US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US Federal House Bill HB1727

Introduced
 
Introduced
2/27/25  

Caption

Rocky Mountain Judgeship Act

Summary

HB1727, titled the Rocky Mountain Judgeship Act, would authorize three new federal district judgeships in the Mountain West: two for the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado and one for the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho. The bill directs the President to appoint these judges with the advice and consent of the Senate, increasing the authorized number of district judges in Colorado and Idaho. In addition to creating the new judgeships, the bill makes conforming amendments to the federal judicial code to update the statutory judge counts for both districts. It also amends the Colorado district court venue statute to add Fort Collins to the list of places where court may be held, alongside existing locations such as Sterling. The measure is a targeted federal judiciary staffing bill rather than a broader policy change.

Impact

The bill would amend title 28 of the U.S. Code, specifically the table in section 133(a) listing authorized district judgeships and section 85 governing the District of Colorado. If enacted, it would expand the federal trial bench in Colorado and Idaho, potentially affecting case assignment, docket management, and judicial workload in those districts. It would also formally recognize Fort Collins as an additional place for holding court in Colorado.

Sentiment

Based on the bill text and sponsorship, the measure appears generally pragmatic and noncontroversial, aimed at addressing judicial workload and court administration in two growing states. The bipartisan introduction by members from both parties suggests support for the underlying need to add judgeships. No committee transcript or vote record is available here to indicate organized opposition or debate.

Contention

The main issue likely to draw scrutiny is whether the additional judgeships are justified by caseload and population growth, and whether Congress should expand the federal bench in these districts at this time. Any contention would center on resource allocation, the pace of judicial confirmations, and whether the specific number of judgeships for Colorado and Idaho is appropriate. No specific objections or competing viewpoints are provided in the available materials.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

US HB634

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judgeship and Reorganization Act of 2025

US SB54

This bill increases from two to three the total number of U.S. district court judgeships for the District of Idaho. The President must appoint, with the advice and consent of the Senate, one additional judge for that judicial district.

US HB319

This bill increases from two to three the total number of U.S. district court judgeships for the District of Idaho. The President must appoint, with the advice and consent of the Senate, one additional judge for that judicial district.

US SB0180

JUDGESHIPS-6TH JUD CIRCUIT

US HB864

St. Mary's County - Judgeships - Circuit Courts

US HB493

Washington County - Judgeships - District Court

US HB269

This bill increases from two to three the total number of U.S. district court judgeships for the District of Idaho. The President must appoint, with the advice and consent of the Senate, one additional judge for that judicial district.

US SB543

Judgeships - Circuit Court and District Court

US SB620

St. Mary's County - Judgeships - Circuit Courts

US HB0493

Washington County - Judgeships - District Court

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.