HB 1419, titled the Contaminated Wells Relocation Act, would authorize the NASA Administrator to enter into an agreement with the Town of Chincoteague, Virginia, to reimburse the town for certain costs tied to removing and replacing drinking water wells located on NASA-administered property. The bill is narrowly focused on the town’s remaining wells and contemplates a reimbursement arrangement lasting up to five years.
Under the bill, the agreement could cover the development of a plan to remove the existing wells and the establishment of alternative drinking water wells on property controlled by the town through lease, ownership, or easement. The bill also directs that, to the extent practicable, the agreement address relocation of the three remaining wells, identify the new site, and estimate costs for land acquisition or use, engineering, design, permitting, and construction. NASA would be required to submit any agreement to the relevant congressional committees within 18 months after enactment.
Impact
The bill would create a specific statutory authorization for NASA to reimburse a local government for costs associated with relocating drinking water infrastructure from federal property. It does not itself appropriate funds, but it would permit NASA to negotiate and fund an agreement for planning and relocation-related expenses, thereby affecting NASA’s administrative authority and the town’s ability to recover costs. The measure would also require congressional notification of any agreement, increasing oversight of the relocation process and the use of federal property for local water supply needs.
Sentiment
The available context suggests generally supportive, noncontroversial treatment of the bill. It was introduced by members from Virginia and referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, with no recorded votes or committee debate in the provided materials. The bill’s limited scope and local focus indicate it is likely intended as a targeted remedy for an identified infrastructure and contamination-related issue rather than a broader policy change.
Contention
No formal opposition or recorded contention appears in the provided materials. The main practical issue embedded in the bill is the allocation of responsibility and costs for relocating wells that are currently on NASA property, including whether NASA should reimburse the town for planning, land access, engineering, permitting, and construction expenses. Any potential disagreement would likely center on the extent of federal financial responsibility, the selection of replacement sites, and the logistics of removing the remaining wells.
Directs DEP to use funds from perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances contamination settlement with 3M Company for purchase of equipment to remediate perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances contamination.