AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 8-30-318, relative to public employment.
Summary
SB1006 amends Tennessee’s public employment law by changing a deadline in Tennessee Code Annotated Section 8-30-318(d). The bill replaces the existing requirement of "fourteen (14) calendar days" with "ten (10) business days," shortening the time period for whatever action, notice, or response is governed by that subsection. The bill is narrowly drafted and does not create a new program or expand eligibility; it simply revises an existing procedural timeline.
Because the bill only changes a statutory deadline, its practical effect is to give affected public employers, employees, or administrative decision-makers a business-day-based timeframe rather than a calendar-day-based one. This can extend or compress the actual elapsed time depending on weekends and holidays, while also making the deadline easier to calculate in workday terms. The act takes effect immediately upon becoming law.
Impact
SB1006 directly amends Tennessee Code Annotated Section 8-30-318(d), altering a procedural deadline in the state’s public employment statutes from 14 calendar days to 10 business days. The change affects the timing of any rights, duties, notices, or responses governed by that subsection, and it may influence how public employers and employees manage compliance and administrative processing under the statute.
Sentiment
No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no documented debate or formal vote history to indicate support or opposition. Based on the text alone, the bill appears technical and noncontroversial, focused on a narrow timing adjustment rather than a substantive policy change.
Contention
No specific points of contention are available in the provided materials. If any concerns were raised, they would likely center on the practical effect of changing from calendar days to business days—such as whether the new deadline gives parties more or less time in practice, and how it affects administrative efficiency in public employment matters—but no such objections are documented here.