AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 9 and Title 47, relative to consumer protection.
Summary
SB0739 amends Tennessee’s consumer protection law by extending a statutory deadline from 30 days to 45 days. The bill makes a narrow change to Tennessee Code Annotated Section 47-18-123(a), which appears to govern a consumer-protection notice, response, or correction period, though the text provided does not include the underlying section’s full subject matter. The act takes effect immediately upon becoming law.
In practical terms, the bill gives affected parties an additional 15 days to comply with the deadline in the referenced consumer protection statute. Because the measure only changes a single time period and does not create a new regulatory scheme, its legal impact is limited but meaningful for consumers, businesses, and any administrative or enforcement process tied to that deadline.
Impact
The bill amends Tennessee Code Annotated Section 47-18-123(a) by changing a 30-day period to 45 days, thereby lengthening the time allowed under that consumer protection provision. This affects the operation of the referenced statute by giving a longer compliance or response window to the parties governed by it, and it may delay when certain consumer remedies or enforcement steps can proceed. No other statutes are changed by the text provided, and the act becomes effective immediately.
Sentiment
No committee discussion or recorded votes were provided, so there is no documented debate to indicate strong support or opposition. Based on the text alone, the bill appears to be a modest, technical consumer-protection adjustment rather than a controversial policy change. The absence of amendments, committee notes, or vote history suggests the measure was likely treated as a straightforward deadline extension.
Contention
Because no transcripts or vote records are available, no specific points of contention can be identified from the provided materials. The only potentially debatable issue is whether extending the deadline from 30 to 45 days better balances consumer rights with compliance burdens on regulated parties. Any disagreement would likely center on that tradeoff, with consumer advocates favoring more time for compliance and businesses or enforcement interests potentially preferring a shorter deadline.