The bill amends the existing laws concerning civil procedure and causes of action, establishing that individuals can seek compensation for various forms of loss, including physical, emotional, and economic damages incurred due to the prohibition of firearms on private property. By explicitly allowing for such lawsuits, S0350 potentially opens property owners up to significant legal liabilities if they choose to impose strict no-firearm policies without legal justification.
Summary
Bill S0350, titled 'Procedure Generally -- Causes Of Action', introduces a new cause of action against property owners who prohibit the possession of firearms. Specifically, it outlines that an individual who is authorized and licensed to carry a firearm may sue if they suffer injuries or damages due to the property owner’s prohibition of firearms on their premises. This legislation aims to provide legal recourse for licensed firearm owners who face restrictions that they believe lead to their injury or distress.
Contention
Debate surrounding S0350 is likely to focus on the balance between property rights and public safety. Critics may argue that the introduction of such a law could lead to increased litigation against businesses that seek to maintain certain security measures, particularly in sensitive environments like schools or public gatherings. On the other hand, supporters of the bill could advocate for the rights of responsible firearm owners, emphasizing that the right to bear arms includes the necessity of being able to do so safely in various settings.
Criminal procedure; criminal convictions sealed under certain circumstances; procedures established; exceptions provided; civil cause of action established
Provides for a cause of action against an individual or entity that prohibits the possession of firearms on real property, except residences, by an individual that is authorized and licensed to carry a firearm.