Video & Transcript Research : 'well spacing'

Page 1 of 500
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Energy 2ND REVISED Feb 26th, 2026 at 09:30 am

Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So that's the intent is To try to make it more well known of whatever process is being discussed or program
  • Well, with that need, we've got to push these electrons to.
  • Well, what I'm trying to do here is something that is good for the people.
  • Well, so At an 80-foot setback, if there are houses on four sides, how many feet of a quarter section
  • Well, how about this: Did they own the property before the houses were built in 1983?
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Feb 5th, 2026 at 09:30 am

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Leader, President, I ask that Senator Bullard be allowed to bring an entourage onto the floor as well
  • acts of kindness to just be kind to people, just do it Randomly, what we need to be teaching them as well
  • And we have other heroes as well. Would you all stand if you're in law enforcement?
  • Would you guys stand in recognition as well, and with the Senate, please give them a warm Senate welcome
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Energy 2ND REVISED Feb 5th, 2026 at 09:30 am

Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • First, I wanted to know how modifying the spacing of wells impacts the rights of adjacent landowners
  • So, this bill, currently, in state law, there is a well spacing distance requirement when someone comes
  • The board also has to consider well spacing, so if you're coming in for a permit, you have to be a a
  • house wells.
  • a commercial well, you're obligated to try to find water elsewhere outside of those spacing limits.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Would it remove any particular wells off of our abandoned well.
  • Basic 1509 works on well spacings. Now, it's a really short bill.
  • I mean spacings and different wells. As you guys know, one of my other bills talks about this.
  • Well, the hearing isn't for the spacing.
  • feet from another well.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources (Part I) May 14th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • But in trying to get the abandoned wells and inactive wells, you know, so I see the same parallel in
  • and active wells.
  • Well, there's no reapplication of electrical support structure to turn the well back on, but at the 10
  • A lot of these wells, that field was discovered in the 20s and they continued to drill wells in the 50s
  • well, and if they want to choose gas.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Natural Resources heard several House bills dealing with environmental regulation, oil and gas safety, landfill permits, and utility cost recovery. HB 1237, by Rep. Geren and sponsored by Sen. Zaffirini, would extend TCEQ occupational license renewal deadlines from 30 days to 90 days, allow renewal up to one year with higher fees, and require a new application after longer expiration; the committee substitute clarified that applicants may continue working only until renewal is approved or denied and set a 180-day cutoff for renewal. HB 3071, sponsored by Sen. Hancock, would require TCEQ to cancel certain long-dormant municipal solid waste permits; members discussed concerns about precedent, ownership changes, and whether the bill should be narrowed, and the bill was left pending with a committee substitute expected. The committee also heard HB 2663, sponsored by Sen. Birdwell, which would require operators of inactive oil and gas wells to remove or de-energize electrical equipment after 10 years and authorize Railroad Commission penalties for false compliance. Testimony from landowners, cattle raisers, and the Sierra Club supported the bill as a wildfire-prevention measure, and the bill was left pending. HB 4384, also by Rep. Darby and sponsored by Sen. Birdwell, would let natural gas utilities defer certain infrastructure costs for later recovery through the GRIP process; utility representatives supported it as credit-positive and consistent with existing accounting, while consumer advocates opposed it as increasing rates without enough oversight. The committee discussed possible amendments to add more cost controls, and the bill was left pending. Later, the committee voted HB 2563, the companion to SB 2510, favorably to the full Senate by a 5-0 vote and ordered it certified for the local and uncontested calendar. The committee then took up HB 143, which would codify interagency procedures for addressing electrical power line safety at well sites and related facilities after wildfire concerns; members said a committee substitute had been negotiated with agencies and stakeholders to clarify responsibilities, timelines, and inspection authority while reducing fiscal impact. No final vote was taken on HB 143, and the committee recessed with several bills still pending.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill will be subject to existing OWRB rules related to well spacing.
  • rules in place that if there's nowhere on your land that you can drill a well outside of well spacing
  • These well spacing rules only apply to permitted wells, which generally are for commercial purposes.
  • of that well spacing while we're waiting for those reports to come in.
  • That is not no longer needing to be held before that well spacing takes place. >> OK, thank you.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • going to use that well.
  • In trying to get the abandoned wells and inactive wells, I see the same parallel in what you're trying
  • Well, de-electrified...
  • to drill wells from that time.
  • So, well, in that sense, yes, it allows.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, currently they have $27 million in the account. They get $30 million a year.
  • I'm not tracking real well with the workforce piece and right now. If I may, Mr.
  • Well, what is the... Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
  • Well, I appreciate the question. In all reality, the agency is a state agency.
  • Well, this, I appreciate the question. And in all reality, the agency is a state agency.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, we honor the lineage of the 45th and its great accomplishments.
  • There is a protest period as well.
  • On page 8, it's section, I believe it's, well, page 8. Let me see.
  • Well, what if? Well, what if? I think those are legitimate questions. What if?
  • As well as, you know, federal drawdown.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Shield Desert Storm as well as far more roles and far more places than I can list.
  • Well, thank you, Mr. Speaker. Members, today we have Doctor Kalegreg.
  • For safe and responsible gun ownership, and I believe that they are well on their way to that.
  • Well, that really depends on how many students there are in a given school year.
  • Well, how about the right not to be taxed out of your home in the first place? First place, Mr.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Commerce May 5th, 2026

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, good.
  • Well, let me say this.
  • Well, no one's offered up the amendment. Okay, well, then I'm—let's not... is it offered?
  • Well, y'all famine and me.
  • , well, the successor is FDIC.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Transportation and Energy Committee Jan 22nd, 2026

Transportation and Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • [clears throat] Well, we'll talk privately about it. >> Not necessarily.
  • [clears throat] Well, we'll talk privately about it. >> We'll we'll talk but but I will say this a well
  • Um how many wells is in the Gulf? That's the first question.
  • is in the Um how many how many wells is in the Gulf?
  • We would like to have some information on how many wells in the Gulf and how many of those wells are
Bills: SB174, SB174
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

PBS Public Hearing - Wed Feb 11, 2026 @ 8:30 AM HST

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • > educational<00:24:50.640> furlow furlow as well as educational furlow furlow as well
  • No, we simply don't have the space.
  • So I think the bill means well, but I think we're well on our way already to addressing those issues,
  • So I think the bill means well, but I think we're well on our way already to addressing those issues,
  • neighborhoods as well as vibrant Hawaii. neighborhoods as well as vibrant Hawaii.
Bills: HB1769
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 1769, which would require the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to incrementally reduce the number of people incarcerated in private out-of-state correctional institutions. The DCR director opposed the bill, saying the department does not control overall prison population levels because courts determine admissions, and arguing that Hawaiʻi’s in-state facilities are already over capacity, especially Halawa, which he said is 165% over design capacity. He said only a small portion of the population is under departmental control through furlough programs and argued that bringing people home would require building a new medium-security prison. Supporters, including the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, the Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission, the Public Defender’s office, and several individuals, argued the bill creates a phased, accountable path to reduce reliance on mainland prisons and bring people home. Supporters emphasized the harms of separating incarcerated people from ʻohana and culture, the disproportionate impact on Native Hawaiians, and the need for diversion, treatment, re-entry support, and fair sentencing. Several testifiers also said the department has more control than it claimed, pointing to underused furlough options, reclassification, and empty beds at some in-state facilities, while others urged clearer statutory language and guardrails. Members questioned the director about whether people could be reclassified or moved to available beds at facilities such as Kulani and Waiawa, and about whether the department could do more through staffing and contract changes. The director said some proposals had been sent to the Department of Human Resource Development, but that major facility changes would be costly and that minimum-security facilities would need substantial upgrades to house medium-security inmates. After discussion, the chair said the committee would defer HB 1769 to Wednesday, February 18, 2026, at 11:30 a.m. for decision-making and adjourned the meeting.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, Ms. Gibbons is just with the agency. as a resource. OK. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
  • Well, we'll do the whole panel. Catherine, thank you, Chairman.
  • as well as some of the corporate restructuring initiatives.
  • HPA Capital Management is a well-respected investment firm based in Dallas.
  • Well, that gets confusing. A bump...
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary Committee, February 19, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • If have a house and some stock wells.
  • So, I, well, that's uh a possibility always.
  • I well that's uh a possibility always.
  • My standard online signed up as well.
  • municipalities<01:21:33.840> in Well, it started with municipalities in Well, it started
Bills: SF0099, SF0116, SJ0006
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources May 7th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • I do believe there are resource witnesses available to answer questions as well.
  • We're drilling wells along the Nueces River to bring in another probably 10 to 12 MGD, and then we're
  • I can answer any questions, and we do have somebody here from the agency as well.
  • Representative Troxler, is the groundwater district supportive of this as well? Yes, yes.
  • Okay, um, so are they currently doing any metering on these types of wells?
Summary: The Committee on Natural Resources heard testimony on a series of water, utility, and groundwater-related bills. Early items included HB 5693, which would let Drainage District 7 hold board elections in November of odd-numbered years when a countywide election is occurring, and HB 5671, which would update the Johnson County Special Utility District by clarifying board eligibility, allowing bond issuance, and removing redundant TCEQ approval language to reduce costs and delays. Both bills were left pending after brief testimony from bill sponsors and local witnesses. The committee also heard SB 1504, which would update the Gulf Coast Authority to allow video-conference participation in meetings, and SB 1302, aimed at closing a TCEQ permitting loophole that allowed dischargers with prior denials or suspensions to reapply through an automated process without meaningful review. SB 2692 drew substantial discussion: it would change the signature threshold for outside-city-limits customers appealing municipal utility rates to the PUC by customer class. Valero supported the bill as a way to avoid requiring large-volume users to gather signatures from unrelated residential customers, while the City of Corpus Christi opposed it, arguing that lowering the threshold to one customer could trigger expensive appeals costing $500,000 to $1 million. A PUC witness said such cases are increasing and that the agency would need additional staff under the fiscal note. SB 790, creating a simplified PUC complaint process for small water and wastewater billing disputes, and SB 1663, expanding TCEQ notice requirements for nearby residents when groundwater contamination is discovered, were also heard and left pending. Additional bills included HB 3115, clarifying that the Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District cannot require meters on exempt domestic or livestock wells; SB 1055, raising the Southeast Texas Groundwater Conservation District’s production fee cap from 1 cent to 7 cents per 1,000 gallons; and SB 1625, requiring private water and wastewater utilities to report cybersecurity incidents to TCEQ and DIR. The committee then took up pending business and adopted a substitute for SB 7, which made several changes to water fund use, eminent domain coordination, and EDAP-related provisions, and voted 10-0 to report it favorably. The committee also adopted a substitute for HB 2347, a county water conservation program bill, and reported it favorably 9-1. HB 5675 and SB 2476 were each reported favorably 10-0. The meeting concluded with adjournment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs May 5th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • My wife and I built a new home on the property in 2009, and we dug a well, and in 2021 the well started
  • And they replaced the water well, but we were out of water on our place for about almost a year, well
  • My wife and I built a new home on the property in 2009, and we dug a well, um, and in 2021, uh, the well
  • And they replaced the water well, but we were out of water on our place for about almost a year, well
  • We have over 450 monitor wells now.
Summary: The Senate Water, Agriculture, Rural Affairs Committee heard several bills focused on groundwater management, water infrastructure, and agricultural land conservation. SB 612 would limit certain water districts in Hidalgo, Cameron, and Willacy counties from charging developers pipeline construction fees above actual, documented costs; the committee substitute removed a developer challenge mechanism to preserve district discretion over construction standards. HB 1633 would require groundwater conservation districts to consider registered exempt wells when reviewing or amending permits, and testimony from landowners, district representatives, and advocacy groups largely supported the bill as a way to protect domestic and livestock wells from drawdown caused by large export projects. HB 1689 would clarify that export fee revenues may be used for well operability, alternative water supplies, and aquifer monitoring, including through interlocal cooperation, and HB 3058 would give the Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District authority to use export fees for county road improvements and environmental programs tied to well inspection and groundwater management. HB 2018 would clarify that the Texas Farm and Ranchland Conservation Program is intended to purchase conservation easements only on working agricultural lands, with support from cattle raisers and Farm Bureau representatives. The committee also considered HB 29, which would require large water systems to validate water loss audits and submit mitigation plans; a committee substitute removed the water-loss threshold and adjusted the timeline for more detailed validation. Public testimony on the bills was generally supportive, with several witnesses describing declining well levels, road damage from export projects, and the need to preserve agricultural land and local water supplies. The committee adopted committee substitutes and voted favorably on HB 29, HB 1689, HB 2018, SB 612, and SB 3058, recommending several of them for the local and uncontested calendar; HB 1633 was left pending awaiting a committee substitute.