Video & Transcript Research : 'student policy'

Page 1 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Edpol Committee Meeting - 2025-04-01

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • that allow students to earn academic credit, are available to all students, and are supervised, coordinated
  • providing a range of educational opportunities to students.
  • , and students enrolled in tribal contract schools.
  • system for all of our students and charter schools.
  • I like learning more about each individual policy.
Bills: HF1306
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Education Policy Committee 4/1/25

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:03:03.280> native students native students native language.<00:03:05.200> Section<00
  • <00:04:13.599> learning evaluate and accelerate student learning evaluate and accelerate student
  • students experiences that allow students students experiences that allow students to<00:04:57.600
  • > in<00:15:48.720> tribal students and students enrolled in tribal students and students enrolled
  • Uh that idea students with IEPs.
Bills: HF1306
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I have the great privilege of being the federal policy director and board vice chair of Students Engaged
  • that harm students, students like me, and students like us.
  • From unique backgrounds and stories to tell... ...that harm students, students like me, and students
  • We built a movement led by students, for students, demanding a seat at the table.
  • Students deserve the freedom of expression and a truthful curriculum, not policies that silence our voices
Summary: Students Engaged in Advancing Texas (SEAT) held an advocacy event at the Texas Capitol focused on youth participation in policymaking and opposition to recent education-related legislation. Speakers, including student organizers and SEAT leaders, argued that students should have a direct voice in decisions affecting public schools, curriculum, and school governance. Representative Donna Howard briefly attended to support the group, praised their advocacy, and referenced the idea that if young people are not given a seat at the table, they should “bring your own chair.” Several student speakers criticized the newly passed school vouchers bill as a threat to public education and said it would divert resources from public schools. Others opposed bills such as Senate Bill 12 and Senate Bill 13, describing them as harmful to LGBTQ+ students and inclusive education. One speaker also condemned book bans and library censorship, arguing that students need access to diverse books and truthful, inclusive curricula. The speakers framed these issues as matters of student rights, belonging, and free expression. SEAT executive director Cameron Samuels closed by describing the organization’s history of student-led activism against book bans and exclusion from school policymaking. Samuels said the group had distributed challenged books, pursued legal action over blocked internet resources, and delivered a Student Bill of Rights to superintendents and legislators. The event ended without any formal legislative vote or committee action, serving instead as a press conference and advocacy rally urging lawmakers to listen to students.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Students spend more time stressed, tired, and bored than inspired.
  • The system becomes about scores, not students.
  • We want to be teaching our students what? How to fill out an exam?
  • I'm going to say that the STAAR is simply a bad test for students.
  • That never works out well for our Texas students.
Summary: The committee meeting focused on the impacts of House Bill 8, which proposes increasing the frequency of state testing for students in Texas. During the meeting, various testimonies were provided by students, highlighting their concerns about the negative effects of standardized testing on their educational experience. Students expressed that the pressure of multiple assessments causes significant stress and detracts from the joy of learning. Some lawmakers voiced their opposition to the bill, emphasizing the need for a thorough review and consideration of alternative evaluation methods that prioritize student well-being over testing metrics.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Education Policy Committee 3/24/26

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • This particular student group.
  • from students of St. Francis as well. from students of St. Francis as well.
  • parents and students. parents and students. >> Represent<01:13:27.679> Mueller.
  • We have student testifiers two minutes. We have student testifiers as<01:20:04.960> well.
  • Students health and around them.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • First, student safety.
  • We know students learn when they learn better when they feel better and access to this med during the
  • school day can help a student focus on their learning instead of their discomfort.
  • Texas law already requires students to learn about parenting and paternity awareness.
  • Students can now focus on getting the support that they need and we will save lives.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education May 15th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Each school district must create a policy to excuse the students to attend their release-time courses
  • They won't have to make a policy.
  • This bill does require them to make a policy that reflects the state policy.
  • And so this provides equal access to all students. access to every student.
  • Lastly, the bill requires school districts to adopt a concussion response policy for students who are
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Public Policy K-12 Policy Analyst.
  • Diversity, equity, inclusion policies benefit all students in Texas.
  • the policy.
  • I'm a student from Houston and I'm also the State Policy Director for Students Engaged in Advancing Texas
  • for you, exhibiting the effect DEI policies have on schools and their students.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations Committee on Higher Education Jan 28th, 2026

Appropriations Committee on Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Institutions retain full discretion over how these policies are implemented.
  • The focus of the bill is transparency and accessibility, not policy creation.
  • We've seen our retention rates skyrocket with our students.
  • To this end, at the very essence of everything we do will be student success.
  • Students out without excess hours is important.
Bills: S0176, S0816
Summary: The Appropriations Committee on Higher Education met to hear two bills and several confirmation appointments. Senate Bill 176, as amended, required public universities to maintain and publicize clear campus safety policies and reporting procedures for threats to students, faculty, staff, and visitors. Senator Polsky said the bill was intended to close a gap in postsecondary safety guidance and mirror K-12 requirements. The committee adopted the amendment without objection, heard supportive comments about campus safety, and reported the bill favorably. The committee also heard Senate Bill 116, which would codify the University of Florida Diabetes Institute in statute to support research, prevention, education, collaboration, and outreach on diabetes; the bill drew supportive testimony from AARP and others and was also reported favorably. The committee then took up confirmations for multiple university and college boards of trustees. Nominees and appointees testified about their backgrounds and priorities, including FIU trustee Nestor Plana, UNF trustee Clarence Stephen Moore, UCF trustees Mark Philburn and Alan Flores, USF trustees Rick Piccolo and Nancy Watkins Hemingway, and Miami Dade College trustee Ismarie Monreal, among others. Their remarks emphasized student success, research growth, workforce development, financial stewardship, and institutional goals such as engineering, cybersecurity, health care, and preeminence. Several members asked about NCLEX nursing pass rates and university performance metrics, and one public commenter raised concerns about campus climate and student safety at UCF. After hearing the appointees and public comment, the committee voted to confirm the group of nominees in a block and reported the confirmations favorably. The meeting concluded without further business after a motion to adjourn.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education May 13th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • system for students seeking post-secondary education, providing students with statewide and national
  • I'm here as a State Policy Associate for Students Engaged in Advancing Texas, also known as SEAT.
  • Policies that silence conversations about race, gender identity, or inequality do not protect students
  • , as well as for all students.
  • Our students will suffer.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • So putting a student out in the hall, is that consistent with that student out of class? Yeah.
  • Our educators want to ensure all students learn, all students.
  • Sometimes a student may threaten the safety of that teacher or other students.
  • A student uses profanity loudly at a teacher and other students.
  • Educators want all students to learn, all students. And they also want safe classrooms.
Summary: The committee heard a series of school safety and discipline bills, beginning with SB 870, which would codify an attorney general opinion allowing local school boards to decide whether school marshals may openly carry, conceal carry, or store a firearm in a secure safe on campus. The bill was laid out with no public testimony and left pending. The chair then moved to a combined discussion of SB 1871, 1872, 1873, 1874, and 1924, all focused on school discipline, teacher authority, and student safety. Senators Perry and Creighton described the package as a response to rising classroom disruptions, assaults on teachers, and concerns that districts lack effective tools to maintain order. SB 1871 would expand teacher removal authority, require return-to-class plans before a student removed for certain conduct can return, make some serious offenses mandatory for placement in juvenile justice settings, and provide telehealth mental health services through a consortium. SB 1872 would require expulsion to a JJAEP for assaults on teachers or school volunteers and extend certain expulsion-eligible conduct to off-campus offenses. SB 1873 would restore the prior understanding that in-school suspension is not subject to a three-day limit. SB 1874 would grant teachers immunity from disciplinary action for reporting discipline violations or acting in compliance with Chapter 37. SB 1924 would restore authority for local police and school district police to issue Class C citations for school offenses and require criminal referrals for students posing an imminent threat or assaulting a teacher, with a substitute clarifying referral rules when a citation has already been issued. The committee adopted the substitutes for the bills and moved them forward. Invited witnesses from teacher and administrator groups largely supported the overall goal of stronger discipline and safer classrooms, while asking for refinements. The Texas Classroom Teachers Association testified that teachers need more autonomy to remove disruptive or violent students and that classroom removals should not mean removal from learning. Superintendents from San Angelo, Grandview, and Wiley ISDs supported the bills’ emphasis on safety, expanded ISS flexibility, mandatory placement for serious offenses, and telehealth mental health services, but asked for more local control, flexibility for Districts of Innovation, more than one campus behavior coordinator in large districts, clearer timelines for return-to-class plans, and more precise definitions for disruptive conduct. Several witnesses stressed that teacher retention and student learning are being harmed by current discipline problems, while some members raised concerns about vague standards and the risk of overuse or public humiliation through citations and removals.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Education Policy Committee 3/4/26

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • require student screen use. require student screen use.
  • class of students at once. class of students at once.
  • The policy is designed to minimize barriers so that rural, urban, and under-resourced students all have
  • Transportation policy is attendance policy. Housing policy is attendance policy.
  • Economic policy is attendance policy.
Bills: HF3776, HF3557, HF3585
Summary: The committee first approved the previous day’s minutes, then took up House File 3776, as amended by the A2 amendment, which clarified how the bill would apply to students with IEPs and 504 plans. The bill’s author argued that Minnesota should address screen time for preschool and kindergarten students, saying current law is too broad, that young children are especially vulnerable to developmental and attention harms from screens, and that parents and teachers should have more control over device use. The bill was laid over after discussion. Testimony on HF 3776 was split. Amanda Faye of Minnetonka Public Schools opposed the bill as drafted, saying it would conflict with existing academic standards, READ Act screening requirements, accessibility tools, and local control, and would force districts back to paper-based screening. Katherine Myers of Live More Screen Less supported the bill, citing concerns about early childhood screen exposure and arguing that screen-free time supports child development. Members raised concerns about local control, parental rights, and how to protect students who need devices for accommodations; the author and nonpartisan staff noted that schools can already adopt cell phone policies, but exceptions may be needed for certain students and uses. After laying over HF 3776, the committee began House File 3557. Representative Craft introduced the bill as a voluntary program to promote practical science education and workforce development tied to climate literacy, including a proposed Minnesota Seal of Climate Literacy for high school students. The bill was only introduced before the transcript ended, with no vote or final action recorded on HF 3557.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Our educators want to end all students learn. All students.
  • Sometimes a student may threaten the safety of that teacher or other students.
  • A student uses profanity loudly at a teacher and other students.
  • Educators want all students to learn, all students. also want safe classrooms.
  • plan for that student.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Education Feb 13th, 2026 at 09:07 am

Senate Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • For our students, for a future educator workforce that reflects the students and provides the highest
  • Student or others.
  • But students do not have that freedom.
  • We have over 400 student athletes.
  • We have over 400 student athletes, roughly 14% of our student population.
Bills: HB30, HB120, HJR1, SB210, SB306
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Education Feb 13th, 2026 at 08:35 am

House Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • , development, and implementation of systems and policies that will positively affect students with disabilities
  • Our particular interest is in aligning capstone projects with students' IEPs to ensure that students
  • Our particular interest is in aligning capstone projects with students' IEPs to ensure that students
  • every policy in the ...vulnerable students and ensure that it's fully integrated into every policy and
  • When we looked at student Lexile performance and growth using comparable metrics, New Mexico students
Bills: HB30, HB120, HJR1, SB210, SB306
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • That's why I'm a law student. So my name's Alice Min. I'm, as I just said, a student.
  • This bill aims to ensure transparency online for both current students and prospective transfer students
  • than four years per student per program.
  • This bill targets only faculty discrimination while ignoring the more common student-on-student religious
  • A law student at UT Austin.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Institutional education adopt a policy prohibiting a student enrolled who holds a non-immigrant visa
  • would be incumbent upon those institutions to let their students know and understand those policies clearly
  • body, the student body and everybody to to know and understand the policy that's in place.
  • need to make certain. and that students are aware of the ramifications of the policy.
  • It's not just a bad policy, it's a bad law. and surveil their students, but not all students.