Video & Transcript Research : 'property tax levy'
Page 1 of 500
WY
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh no property tax up to 10 acres and it Uh no property tax up to 10 acres and it will<00:02:31.360><
- Do we anticipate how much this may impact our property taxes?
- </c> your property tax or your vehicle your property tax or your vehicle registration.<00:07:34.880><
- </c> that would exempt them the property that would exempt them the property taxes<00:23:44.000><c> on
- Ken Gil with the Department of Revenue Property Tax Division Administrator. Uh, Mr.
Keywords:
veterans, property tax exemption, disabled, service-connected disability, Wyoming, governmental claims, liability limits, inflation adjustment, public safety, local government insurance, HB0127, recreation mill levy, recreational facilities, public recreation, mill levy, property tax, local tax, county commissioners, school district levy, voter approval
WY
Transcript Highlights:
- First bill for consideration is property tax exemptions effect on people's initiatives.
- But hopefully that helped a little bit. >> Thank you. the uh your property tax was your the uh your property
- Ken Gil with the Department of Revenue Property Tax Division Administrator.
- Uh, that could mean that some people are paying very little in terms of property taxes.
- </c><00:19:09.840><c> taxes,</c><00:19:10.400><c> you</c> the the most cuts in property taxes, you the
Keywords:
property tax, homeowner exemption, Wyoming, voter initiative, tax legislation, HB0127, recreation mill levy, recreational facilities, public recreation, mill levy, local tax, county commissioners, school district levy, voter approval, ballot measure, general election, tax referendum, special purpose tax, Wyoming taxation, W.S. 18-9-201
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- tax levy growth to 2.5%.
- They have the same restriction in their property tax levy.
- Tax rates matter. Yes, and property taxes for industrial property taxes.
- Tax rates matter. Yes, and property taxes for industrial property taxes.
- Compared to property taxes? Property taxes are 48% of our general revenue. Sales tax, 27%.
Bills:
SB9
Keywords:
property tax, ad valorem tax, voter-approval tax rate, no-new-revenue tax rate, tax rate calculation, Tax Code, local government finance, municipality, county, special taxing unit, sales and use tax, property tax cap, tax rollback, tax levy, maintenance and operations, debt rate, disaster relief rate, Texas Legislature, local taxing unit
Summary:
The Senate Committee on Local Government met to hear Senate Bill 9, which would lower the voter-approval tax rate for certain local taxing units from 3.5% to 2.5%. Sen. Bettencourt, the bill author, argued the change would continue the state’s property tax reforms begun in 2019, slow local levy growth, and give voters more say over larger tax increases. He and supporters cited data showing property tax levies have grown faster than population plus inflation, and said the bill would help protect taxpayers while preserving the state’s broader investments in school tax relief, water, rural law enforcement, and ambulance funding.
Supporters included the Texas Taxpayers and Research Association, the Texas Association of Business, the Texas Public Policy Foundation, and the Texas Association of Manufacturers. They said the bill would improve transparency, encourage more disciplined budgeting, and create certainty for homeowners and businesses. They argued that lower tax-rate growth would help attract and retain employers and investment, and that voters would still be able to approve higher rates when needed.
Local officials and other opponents said the bill would constrain cities and counties facing rapid growth, inflation, infrastructure needs, and public safety costs. Testimony from county judges, city finance officials, firefighters, and urban county representatives emphasized pressures from jail operations, roads, water, EMS, police and fire staffing, and unfunded mandates. Several witnesses asked for carve-outs or exemptions for public safety and disaster-related costs, warning that a one-size-fits-all cap could force service cuts or shift costs elsewhere. The committee heard extensive questioning but no final vote or disposition on the bill was taken in the portion provided.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- I'm going to move and pass those two through, one to Taxes and one to the General Register.
- It's a technical corrections aid and levy adjustment that will be placed on the General Register.
- House File 922 is another technical correction bill to be re-referred to the Committee on Taxes.
- House File 922 is another technical correction bill to be re-referred to the Committee on Taxes.
- </c> re-referred to the committee on taxes re-referred to the committee on taxes any<00:50:23.079><c>
Keywords:
education funding, nonpublic schools, counseling services, guidance services, transportation for students, HF921, tax increment financing, TIF, excess tax increment, school district aid, levy adjustment, property tax levy, education finance, Minnesota education aid, decertification, local government finance, school funding formula, state aid reduction, referendum equalization aid, debt service equalization
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- of time, I’d just offer that this is not the place to look for money if we are looking for money in taxes
- are looking for look for money if we are looking for money<01:30:53.000><c> in</c><01:30:53.239><c> taxes
- <c> morning</c><01:30:54.560><c> we</c><01:30:54.719><c> heard</c><01:30:54.920><c> a</c> money in taxes
- this morning we heard a money in taxes this morning we heard a bill<01:30:55.320><c> that</c><01:30:
Keywords:
railroad, infrastructure, transportation funding, environmental remediation, capital investment, HF921, tax increment financing, TIF, excess tax increment, school district aid, levy adjustment, property tax levy, education finance, Minnesota education aid, decertification, local government finance, school funding formula, state aid reduction, referendum equalization aid, debt service equalization
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
- they pay in property tax.
- It would be otherwise they would collect the property tax that they're entitled to for that particular
- We'd prefer a phase-in approach so that you don't have these spikes in your property tax valuation, so
- My thoughts on the phase-in is that I anticipate that the impact on the property tax rate is going to
- The taxpayers that pay the property tax would be the taxpayers that would benefit if we eliminated a
Keywords:
public safety, retirement system, investments, trust fund, board of trustees, financial report, income tax rebate, Pinal County, taxpayer eligibility, state revenue, financial assistance, transaction privilege tax, business location, tangible personal property, shared vehicle, sourcing, income tax, veterans, donations, tax refunds
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on Revenue Jan 27th, 2026
Joint Committee on Revenue
Transcript Highlights:
- This law establishes that the residential class has to pay the lowest percentage share of the tax levy
- This law establishes that the residential class has to pay the lowest percentage share of the tax levy
- base, and today it represents 8% of Watertown's total value of the tax levy.
- 50% of the tax levy, but 175 split, commercial, right? But you got three years' extension, right?
- The means-tested senior citizen property tax exemption in the town of Sudbury.
Bills:
H3012, H4008, H4435, H4444, H4526, H4547, H4574, H4575, H4576, H4577, H4585, H4605, H4687, H4703, H4722, H4754, H4755
Keywords:
fines, property valuation, commercial property, real estate, tax penalties, property taxes, local option tax, marijuana sales, Salem, revenue generation, taxation, recreation, local government, commercial activities, Charlemont, property exemption, disabled persons, Swampscott, senior exemption, property tax
Summary:
The Joint Committee on Revenue held a hybrid hearing on 17 miscellaneous and late-file bills, with testimony focused on several local tax measures and one statewide tax policy bill. The first major item was H. 4687 for Watertown, which would permanently continue a special property tax classification arrangement allowing the city to maintain a 50% residential minimum factor and a 175% commercial shift. Watertown officials and local legislators said the temporary 2024 law prevented an estimated 18% residential tax increase that would otherwise hit homeowners, especially seniors, and argued the change would preserve the city’s current tax structure without harming commercial growth. Committee members asked about the regional business impact, whether major taxpayers might leave, and the city’s financial reserves; Watertown officials said businesses had not threatened to depart and that the city’s stabilization and free cash balances were being used for debt reduction, infrastructure, and maintaining its bond rating.
The committee also heard H. 4435, a Charlemont bill authorizing a tax on commercial recreation services. Town officials said the small rural town has a high property tax burden, limited local capacity, and heavy public safety costs from tourism and recreation activity, and they described the proposal as a locally supported way to have visitors help pay for police, fire, EMS, and infrastructure costs. Members raised legal and policy questions about whether the tax fit within existing tax authority and how it differed from meals and rooms taxes, but the town said the tax would apply to recreation services and had support from local businesses.
Finally, the committee heard H. 4722 on fair tax treatment for zero-emission vehicles, especially electric school buses and Class 3-8 trucks. Supporters, including industry representatives and Rep. Gentile, said EV buses and trucks face higher sales and excise taxes because of their higher upfront cost, which discourages adoption even though the vehicles reduce emissions and can lower operating costs over time. They argued the bill would cap tax calculations at the diesel-equivalent value, making the policy revenue-neutral while removing a penalty on electrification. Rep. Gentile also testified for H. 4755, which would amend Sudbury’s means-tested senior property tax exemption so the town would not need new special legislation if the program is renewed again after its current extension expires. No votes were taken, and the hearing concluded after testimony and questions.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- Essentially, if there are any property tax impacts to a bill, the committee must pay those property tax
- c> tax</c> committee must pay those property tax committee must pay those property tax levies<00:10:09.760
- </c> are property tax levy impacts. are property tax levy impacts.
- The city in their 2026 property tax levy included sufficient funds to add six emergency management services
- Without levies as a local tax base.
Keywords:
education finance, lease levy authority, graduation ceremonies, school districts, Minnesota Statutes, local revenue, funding increase, education, state appropriation, local control, HF3371, local optional revenue, school finance, general education aid, school district funding, referendum revenue, referendum market value, equalization aid, state aid, property tax levy
WA
Transcript Highlights:
- be eligible for a property tax exemption.
- The ERFC predicts the state property tax levy will remain below the $3.60 limit throughout the 2027-29
- DoR estimates the expanded exemption will cause a minimal shift of local property taxes.
- For some quick background, the timber tax is an excise tax imposed on timber in lieu of property tax.
- property taxpayers will be paying, because that's a lot. ...lowers the levy rate that the property taxpayers
Bills:
SB5994
WA
Transcript Highlights:
- It consolidates the state property tax levy, as well as expands the property tax exemption program for
- The way that the timber tax revenue is distributed across the property tax formula, if a school district
- Across the property tax formula.
- I do recognize the importance of the property tax exemption.
- tax valuations and needs, the effort to continue to fine-tune our property tax system so that it works
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/11/26
Elections Finance and Government Operations
Transcript Highlights:
- After the a property tax increase.
- But a levy increase, let alone maintaining an existing levy, is not even a guarantee of a property tax
- Of a property tax increase.
- </c><00:55:41.680><c> taxes</c><00:55:42.240><c> move</c> um if property taxes move um if property taxes
- So, if people are not aware that their property tax will increase by voting for a levy, then they will
Keywords:
municipal nondisclosure agreement, NDA, public records, transparency, local government, county, city, town, school district, housing and redevelopment authority, economic development authority, port authority, economic development, land development, public financing, tax increment financing, TIF, abatement, municipal bonds, debt obligations
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- If no request is made, any overpayment is applied toward next year's property taxes.
- The law allows a taxing unit to levy an unrestricted INS, interest and sinking property tax rate, to
- An essential feature of a sustainable... ...property tax system.
- One factor prompting property tax bills to spike is the intentional decision by certain taxing units
- to hold INS tax rates constant while property values rise.
Keywords:
SB 263, Texas franchise tax, cost of goods sold, COGS, broadcasters, television broadcasting, radio broadcasting, media tax, broadcast license, FCC, 47 C.F.R. Part 73, 47 C.F.R. Part 74, film production, television production, tax deduction, margin tax, Texas Tax Code, depreciation, amortization, broadcast rights
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- the rise in property taxes.
- And really, everything in property tax boils down to one thing: what's your levy at home?
- They have the same restriction in their property tax levy.
- no matter how the math works, if you take all that property tax levy and you decide you're going to
- Compared to property taxes? Property taxes are 48% of our general revenue. Revenue sales tax is 27.
Keywords:
property tax, ad valorem tax, voter-approval tax rate, no-new-revenue tax rate, tax rate calculation, Tax Code, local government finance, municipality, county, special taxing unit, sales and use tax, property tax cap, tax rollback, tax levy, maintenance and operations, debt rate, disaster relief rate, Texas Legislature, local taxing unit, school assessment
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- It simply reduces the rollback rate, a.k.a. now the voter-approved tax rate, for taxing jurisdictions
- It simply reduces the rollback rate, a.k.a. now the voter-approved tax rate, for taxing jurisdictions
- the same bill we passed out of the body last week, first makes it mandatory that a person filing a property
- Secondly, the bill creates an offense of real property theft and real property fraud.
- limitations for certain penalties and enhances penalties under various conditions, such as if the property
Keywords:
flooding, public safety, outdoor warning sirens, disaster preparedness, emergency response, flood warning, outdoor sirens, local government, safety measures, flood management, emergency preparedness, municipal safety, disaster response, disaster relief, emergency funding, Meteorological forecasting, local government assistance, training facilities, hemp regulation, consumable products
Summary:
The Senate Committee on Finance met in the second special session and considered a series of bills, mostly related to flood response, water infrastructure, taxation, school accountability, property fraud, and legislative procedure. Senator Zaffirini presented SB 18 on TCEQ permit exemptions for certain erosion, floodwater, and sediment control dams or reservoirs; Senator Perry presented SB 2 on flood relief preparedness, SB 14 on credit impact fees and water supply/conservation incentives, and SB 5 on Hill Country relief funding; Senator Bettencourt presented SB 3 on early warning flood sirens, SB 9 on replacing STAAR with three annual tests and strengthening A-F accountability, and SB 10 on lowering the rollback tax rate from 3.5% to 2.5%; Senator West presented SB 16 on property transaction ID requirements and new real property theft/fraud offenses; and Chair Huffman laid out SB 34, which changes legislative witness immunity rules from transactional immunity to testimonial immunity consistent with federal law. The committee also heard brief explanations that several bills were the same as versions previously passed by the Senate or committee, and there was limited public testimony, with no witnesses on most bills and only position cards on SB 16. Senator West raised a concern on SB 10 about a possible carve-out for police pay raises, but Senator Bettencourt said no change would be made at that time. For SB 34, Chair Huffman explained the bill would still allow compelled testimony before the legislature but would no longer provide blanket immunity, while preserving the right to counsel.
The committee voted favorably on all bills considered. SB 18, SB 2, SB 14, SB 3, SB 16, SB 5, and SB 34 were reported out unanimously or near-unanimously, while SB 9 passed 10-1 and SB 10 passed 8-3. At the end of the meeting, Senator West requested to be shown voting nay on SB 9, and the chair granted unanimous consent. The committee then recessed subject to the call of the chair.
WA
Transcript Highlights:
- disabilities assistance property tax levy.
- the county general property tax levy remaining for county expenses.
- the county general property tax levy remaining for county expenses.
- general property tax levy Counties may either levy a separate mental health services levy in addition
- Part 7 relates to exceeding regular property tax levy limitations.
Keywords:
affordable housing, local government funding, housing programs, community development, financial assistance, adaptive housing, disabled veterans, tax preferences, housing affordability, retail sales tax, property tax, senior citizens, tax exemption, permanent legislation, local government, tax authority, sales tax, use tax, real estate excise tax, REET
Summary:
House Finance heard briefings and testimony on several bills. HB 2559 would let cities and counties impose an additional 4% excise tax on lodging and short-term rentals starting in 2027, with revenues dedicated to affordable housing programs; staff explained the existing lodging-tax structure and caps, and the prime sponsor said the bill is a local option aimed at addressing housing loss from short-term rentals. HB 2133 would make permanent the property tax exemption for multipurpose nonprofit senior citizen centers; staff described the current exemption and fiscal note, and the sponsor and one supporter said it helps keep senior centers open, while a question was raised about whether other nonprofit community centers could qualify. HB 2135 would increase and extend the disabled veterans adaptive housing sales-tax remittance, raising the lifetime cap from $2,500 to $5,000, increasing the statewide cap, extending the expiration to 2038, and adding JLARC review; the sponsor and a veterans coalition testified in support, saying it helps federal grant dollars go further for accessible housing.
The committee then heard HB 2442, an eight-part local government revenue and flexibility bill. Staff said it would expand or authorize several local tax tools and uses, including broader use of real estate excise tax revenues, a new voter-approved affordable-housing REET option for cities, a county public utility tax, a new local sales tax for children and family services, broader uses for housing and related services taxes, changes to county mental health and veterans levies, longer levy lid-lift periods, and expanded uses for rental car tax revenue. The sponsor argued the bill gives local governments needed flexibility without creating a new statewide tax, while supporters from counties, cities, housing groups, and some service providers said local governments need more tools to address housing, behavioral health, children’s services, and infrastructure. Opponents from utilities, realtors, water and sewer districts, wireless carriers, auto dealers, and tax groups argued the new or expanded taxes would be regressive, raise housing and utility costs, or lack a sufficient nexus to the stated uses. No votes were taken in the portion provided.
After that, the committee returned to HB 2559 for public testimony. Supporters, including county and city representatives and housing advocates, said short-term rentals reduce long-term housing supply and that the bill would give local communities a targeted tool to fund affordable housing. Opponents, including short-term rental owners and managers, said the bill would hurt small operators, reduce supplemental retirement income, and could be better addressed through broader lodging taxes rather than singling out short-term rentals. The hearing also included questions about the bill’s tax structure and how revenues would be used, but no action was taken in the excerpt.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
- That part of that tax cut included a path to zero, which is a triggered tax cut.
- And I think, when we look at our income tax revenue, sales tax revenue, the diversity of the funds that
- Chair, I understand that there's currently a senior Property tax freeze.
- If your concern is seniors, would it impact them more to adjust the senior property tax freeze and the
- I think that this is a bad approach to lower property taxes.
Keywords:
income tax, tax rates, revenue certification, Oklahoma Tax Commission, state budget, education, tax credit, school choice, private school, tuition assistance, income limits, parental choice, accreditation, insurance, taxation, premium, home office credit, healthcare, teacher tax credit, income tax credit
OK
Transcript Highlights:
- choice tax credits.
- Chair, I understand that there's currently a senior property tax freeze.
- If your concern is seniors, would it impact them more to adjust the senior property tax freeze and the
- I think that this is a bad approach to lower property taxes.
- I think that this is a bad approach to lower property taxes.
Keywords:
income tax, tax rates, revenue certification, Oklahoma Tax Commission, state budget, education, tax credit, school choice, private school, tuition assistance, income limits, parental choice, accreditation, insurance, taxation, premium, home office credit, healthcare, teacher tax credit, income tax credit
Summary:
The Revenue and Taxation Committee met and considered several bills. Senate Bill 1776, by Senator Pugh, would create a $10,000 refundable tax credit for teachers with seven consecutive years of service, as part of a teacher retention strategy; after questions about the seven-year threshold, it passed 8-3. Senate Bill 1858, by Senator Frix, would create a new TIF district financing option allowing developers, rather than cities or counties, to borrow against projected TIF revenues; the committee adopted an amendment changing a filing provision from “may” to “shall,” and the bill passed 7-4. Senate Bill 1985, by Senator Guthrie, would let state retirement systems consider limited investments in regulated digital assets, capped at 5% and narrowed to large-market-cap assets; the committee added an amendment inserting “in” to clarify the language, and the bill passed 9-2.
The committee then rejected Senate Bill 1302, by Senator Kirt, which would repeal the “path to zero” trigger tied to future income tax cuts; it failed 2-9 after debate over fiscal stability and tax relief. Senate Bill 1809, by Senator Hamilton, would raise the homestead exemption from $1,000 to $5,000; members debated its impact on local governments and school funding, but it passed 9-2. Senate Bill 1401, by Senator Rader, was amended to adjust the insurance premium tax rate from 1.96% to 2.16% and eliminate the home office premium tax credit; the bill was laid over after concerns about its fiscal impact.
Finally, Senate Bill 2053, also by Senator Rader, would allow cities and counties to impose up to a 10% excise tax on medical marijuana dispensaries by local vote, with OTC handling collections and enforcement; supporters framed it as local control and a way to offset public safety costs, while opponents argued it unfairly targeted dispensaries and consumers. The bill passed 7-3. The committee then adjourned and announced it would meet again the following Monday after floor activity.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Current law allows a taxing unit to levy an unrestricted interest and sinking property tax rate to generate
- That is not how the property tax system is designed to work.
- The property taxes aren't even $8,000 anymore.
- When we're charging $17,000 per starter home, that's twice the property tax load on that property.
- And again, that's multiple years of property taxes.
Keywords:
ad valorem taxation, tax exemption, franchise tax credit, income production, personal property, SB 464, school buffer zone, tobacco retailer, vape shop, e-cigarette, vaping, nicotine, tobacco products, retail permit, comptroller, Class A misdemeanor, school proximity, youth access, public school, private school
Summary:
The Senate Local Government Committee heard several bills by Senator Bettencourt focused on property tax and local government accountability. SB 32 would provide about $700 million in business tax relief by raising the business personal property exemption from $2,500 to $25,000 and continuing a 20% franchise tax credit for inventory taxes paid. Witnesses from NFIB, the Texas Retailers Association, and Texas Realtors supported the bill, saying business personal property and inventory taxes are burdensome and especially hard on small businesses. After no opposition testimony, SB 32 was left pending.
The committee also heard SB 1453, which would change how interest and sinking tax rates are calculated by using only the minimum debt service required under bond schedules, while still allowing a higher rate with a 60% governing body vote and a public explanation. A witness from the Texas Taxpayers and Research Association supported the bill as a way to keep debt rates from rising as property values increase and to preserve tax relief. The bill was left pending after testimony.
SB 1883 would tighten rules on local impact fees by requiring 60 days of public availability for capital improvement plans and land use assumptions, raising the approval threshold for adopting impact fees from a simple majority to two-thirds, limiting how often fees can be increased, and expanding notice requirements. Builders and developers testified in support, arguing that impact fees are often poorly reviewed, lack accountability, and are passed on to homebuyers, worsening housing affordability. Committee members discussed adding audit provisions and questioned the lack of city testimony. The bill was left pending with subcommittee action. SB 1452 would require a voter election to decide whether a municipal management district continues to exist, with dissolution if voters reject it; supporters said it would add accountability, while others noted some districts provide essential services and infrastructure. The committee heard testimony from district representatives and builders, then left SB 1452 pending before recessing.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- He got called back to maintain this property and take care of this property.
- In fact, you know, we've had a supermajority on property tax increases of 60% since for 10 years now,
- The street maintenance tax, or SMR is, a special sales tax in the tax code used by some cities to repair
- The city can also avoid shifting the financial burden to property taxes or other funding mechanisms.
- Currently, the tax code provides certain protections to property owners during the hearing process before
Bills:
SB 32, SB 464, SB 996, SB 1163, SB 1173, SB 1277, SB 1452, SB 1453, SB 1548, SB 1882, SB 1883, SB 2016
Keywords:
ad valorem taxation, tax exemption, franchise tax credit, income production, personal property, SB 464, school buffer zone, tobacco retailer, vape shop, e-cigarette, vaping, nicotine, tobacco products, retail permit, comptroller, Class A misdemeanor, school proximity, youth access, public school, private school
WA
Transcript Highlights:
- T-A-Y-T-514 by Representative Orcutt provides an adjustment to all applicable property tax levies when
- It would extend the maximum length of an excess property tax levy, and it would expand the authorized
- It would extend the maximum length of an excess property tax levy and it would expand the authorized
- regular property tax levy in the prior year.
- This levy would be imposed separately from the general property tax levy of the county and outside of
Keywords:
affordable housing, sales tax, housing programs, tax incentives, economic development, property tax, senior citizens, tax exemption, local government funding, permanent legislation, adaptive housing, disabled veterans, tax preferences, housing affordability, retail sales tax, governmental transfer, agriculture, land use, local government, tax authority
Summary:
House Finance heard briefings on several tax and housing-related bills, including HB 1717 on a local sales and use tax remittance program for affordable housing, HB 1859 on expanding affordable housing opportunities on religious organization property, HB 1960 on a renewable energy excise tax, HB 2133 on making a senior center property tax exemption permanent, HB 2135 on extending a disabled veterans housing tax preference, HB 2140 on tax treatment for land transferred to government entities, HB 2442 on a broad package of local tax and levy authorities, and HB 2559 on a local option excise tax on short-term rentals for affordable housing. Staff also described proposed substitutes and amendments for each measure, including changes to administration, eligibility, effective dates, tax credits, voter-approval requirements, and JLARC review provisions.
During executive action, the committee adopted amendments to HB 1960 clarifying tax administration and JLARC independence, while rejecting an Orcutt amendment that would have adjusted property tax levies for renewable energy projects. The committee also adopted a technical correction to HB 2133 and an effective-date amendment to HB 2135. Amendments to HB 2442 and HB 2559 that would have required voter approval or provided state tax credits were rejected. Members debated the policy impacts of local taxing authority, housing affordability, and tax burdens on property owners, veterans, seniors, and short-term rental operators.
The committee voted to report HB 1717, HB 1859, HB 1960, HB 2133, HB 2135, HB 2140, HB 2442, and HB 2559 out of committee with do pass recommendations. HB 1960 passed on a recorded vote of 11 ayes and 4 nays; HB 2442 and HB 2559 each passed 9-6; the other measures were approved by voice vote, generally 15-0. The meeting then adjourned.