Video & Transcript Research : 'polling place'

Page 1 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 30th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • enter the polling place.
  • who are physically unable to enter a polling place or who would wish to do so.
  • To risk injuring themselves if they attempted to enter the polling place.
  • If by entering a polling place they would be at risk.
  • The bill would bring the polling places to a screeching halt.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 30th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • So how is this not a participatory poll tax imposed on convention parties? candidates.
  • The United States cannot abridge my right to vote by failure to pay a poll tax or any other tax.
  • We had several candidates get knocked off the ballot for not paying this poll tax or other tax.
  • She wanted me to spend that money on a campaign for Congress, not on a poll. I'll stop there.
  • places.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Rules Feb 11th, 2026 at 09:27 am

Senate Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • Burn Leo County polling places on Election Day to take over them, as he has suggested.
  • , that is, they are intentionally obstructing ingress to a polling place.
  • That is not intentionally obstructing a polling place.
  • Or you weren’t able to vote because of obstruction or disturbance at the polling place.
  • You know, this is a polling place, right?
Bills: SB264, SB261
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/2/26

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • HF 3587 requires election judges assisting voters who can't enter the polling place to handle only one
  • <00:58:53.240> location uh you come into the polling location uh you come into the polling
  • place?
  • Um, I'm concerned about the implementation of something like this in a busier polling place and how you
  • <01:04:34.000> make a busier polling place and how you make a busier polling place and how
Summary: The committee took up House File 2614, a bill aimed at preventing local governments from requiring or effectively mandating homeowners associations (HOAs) as a condition of residential development approval. The committee first approved the February 25 minutes, then adopted the DE1 amendment to HF 2614 before hearing the bill. The authors said the measure is a bipartisan piece of a larger HOA reform effort and that the language was negotiated with the League of Minnesota Cities and other stakeholders; they emphasized that developers could still choose to create HOAs, but cities and counties could not require them. Testimony in support came from Housing First Minnesota and the Minnesota Homeownership Center. Supporters argued that unnecessary HOAs raise housing costs, reduce affordability, and are often used to shift public infrastructure costs onto homeowners. They said HOAs remain appropriate for shared-wall housing, shared amenities, and other situations where common property is truly needed, but should not be imposed for single-family developments or minor features. Several members shared examples of HOA overreach and asked for clarification on how the bill would work, including whether developers could still request neighborhood signs or other features; staff and the authors said that would still be possible if the developer requested it rather than the local government requiring it. A significant portion of the discussion focused on stormwater ponds and other infrastructure. One member said the bill should not prevent cities from requiring stormwater facilities because maintenance costs and water-quality responsibilities can be substantial and should not be shifted to all taxpayers. The authors responded that the amendment language was intended to balance concerns about unnecessary HOA mandates with the need to address maintenance, noting that some maintenance responsibilities could remain with cities or be handled through developer agreements. A member requested a roll call on the bill, but the transcript does not include a final vote or disposition beyond the discussion and amendment adoption.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 14th, 2026 at 04:37 pm

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair, and this money will allow schools to have a place to store them, and it can be in a magnetized
  • On page 14, even more problematic because not all of these places are going to get inspected and get
  • I'd like to indicate to the board, if we could, that places like Elephant Butte, in a way, it's sort
  • And these pop-up places would be something that would be permitted.
  • Yeah, so three places over. I'll move that. I'll accept that, sir. As a minute. Thank you.
Bills: SB23, SB221, SB261, SB264
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 13th, 2026 at 04:06 pm

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • It eliminates most exemptions from firearms in polling places.
  • The why would be to prevent an affray at a polling place. Cool.
  • A mobile voting site or any location used as a polling place while early voting is taking place or on
  • And I think polling places is a place that you just shouldn't have guns.
  • I do think that polling places are sacred spaces.
Bills: SB23, SB221, SB261, SB264
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 11th, 2026 at 05:25 pm

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • That's been in place since the 1970s. Okay. So that's the origin. So if you fast forward through...
  • This took place across the country.
  • But this is a place where I think we should be considering an exception, particularly as attorneys.
  • And we need to question why our youth are turning to crime in the first place.
  • I do think that's something that we need to have in place.
Bills: SB41, SB153, SB165, SB261, SB264
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 16th, 2026 at 11:18 pm

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • So this legislation does not relate to the restriction of firearms at polling places.
  • So whether they're standing around the polling place or whether they're walking the only road in and
  • To any location used as a polling place, including parking areas for the polling location within 50 feet
  • Being directed to be at a polling place for that purpose.
  • So, I get no ordering to bring or keep a troop of armed persons at polling places, but what about ballot
Bills: SB38, SB17, SB41, SB264
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Public Health Mar 17th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • And just being able to be an occupational therapist all over the place.
  • Everyone deserves access to their identity, and everyone deserves a place to call home.
  • We were, our new place was not gonna be ready for about 3.5 weeks.
  • We got a place here in Austin, Texas called Texas One Center.
  • We got Trinity, we got, it's so many places you go.
Bills: HB163, HB 296
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections May 8th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • That means there's going to be at least four people in the polling place.
  • Number two, I realize that the bill's trying to achieve parity in the polling place staff, but there
  • The presiding judge has to make an effort to have bilingual clerks at the polling place and needs at
  • Well, you really don't want that at a polling place.
  • It could allow a gubernatorial appointee to close beloved polling places or slice voting... or office
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • So it's pretty bipartisan and relates to the use of a wireless communication device at a polling place
  • So the screen that you showed us, that was the poll book? Poll book.
  • I'm an election judge also up in Temple, Bell County, and my polling place is an extension of the church
  • I don't even know why the Bluetooth is there, because when I set up my polling place, it was with cables
  • That's a new thing, and it's careless to introduce Bluetooth into the polling places.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The polling and data substantiate these points time and time again.
  • There's no card on which to place a sticker.
  • This law will place an undue burden on public libraries.
  • To be a trans-Texan is to be human in the place that we call home.
  • It's also happening in places you wouldn't think of, like sororities.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) May 15th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the polling and data substantiate these points time and time again.
  • There's no card on which to place a sticker.
  • They will simply try to find it in other places. They will go online.
  • This law will place an undue burden on public libraries.
  • To be a trans Texan is to be human in the place that we call home.
Summary: The committee took up House Bill 186, which would require social media platforms to verify users are 18 or older before allowing account creation. Invited witnesses in support, including Mary Elizabeth Castle and David Dunmoyer, argued the bill would protect children from harmful algorithms, addictive design, bullying, sexual exploitation, and mental health harms, and emphasized parental rights and the idea that minors should not enter binding contracts with platforms. Committee members questioned them about how algorithms work, whether parents could realistically monitor content, and whether the bill would still allow educational use; the witnesses said the bill was narrowly aimed at harmful social media use and not educational content. Public testimony on HB 186 was largely in opposition, though several student witnesses said they supported the bill’s goals but wanted the age lowered to 16 or the bill amended to allow parental consent or joint accounts. Opponents argued the bill would be ineffective because teens could bypass age checks, would cut off access to educational tools, school communications, recruiting and NIL opportunities, and would burden free speech and privacy. Some witnesses also said social media helps teens with mental health, community, and creative or professional opportunities, while others warned the bill could disproportionately harm disabled and marginalized users. After public testimony closed, HB 186 was left pending. The committee then heard House Bill 5138, which Chairman Hughes said would respond to a court ruling limiting the Attorney General’s authority to prosecute election crimes unless invited by local prosecutors by changing the statute to require AG prosecution. Public testimony on HB 5138 was brief and opposed by at least one witness who argued it would further erode local control and expand state preemption. The bill was left pending after testimony. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 3225, a library bill aimed at keeping sexually explicit books and materials out of children’s sections in municipal libraries and requiring age verification for checkout, including digital access, with parental consent and other revisions added in the House. Supporters said the bill would protect children from explicit material and keep such content in adult sections, while opponents argued it would amount to censorship, be costly and difficult to implement, and could be used to target LGBTQ+ or other marginalized content. Library workers, parents, students, and advocates testified that existing library sections already separate age-appropriate materials and that the bill could reduce access to books, burden libraries, and infringe on parental choice and free expression.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 17th, 2025 at 10:04 am

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • mark their ballots or otherwise indicate their votes at a polling place.
  • You're just saying the room within where the poll is actually taking place.
  • You're just saying the room within where the poll is actually taking place.
  • Among these was a prohibition against cameras and other recording devices inside the polling place.
  • But it is still the case, for example, that if you're a poll watcher and you leave the polling place
Summary: The committee first voted out two previously heard Senate bills without amendment: SB 688, relating to the date of the meeting of presidential electors, and SB 914, relating to authorizing certain cities to change the date of their general election for officers. Both motions passed on 8-0 votes with one member absent. The committee then heard HB 3909, which would change the current prohibition on wireless device use from a 100-foot boundary around a voting station to only inside the room where voting is taking place, with a committee substitute also adding state-prescribed signage. The author and supporters said the change would reduce confusion and make enforcement easier for election workers, while opponents argued the existing 100-foot rule helps prevent electioneering, recording, and possible technical interference with election equipment. The bill was left pending. Members also heard HB 1968, which would repeal a provision that requires counties to provide election services to certain political subdivisions in odd-numbered years but not even-numbered years, making county-provided election services consistent across years. Supporters said it would improve consistency for smaller cities and school districts, while opponents warned it could strain county equipment and staffing during heavy election cycles. The bill was left pending. HB 2279 would require voter registrars to remove a person from the rolls if the person swears under oath during jury service that they are not a U.S. citizen; supporters said this would streamline removal of ineligible voters, while opponents raised concerns about mistaken identity and loss of due process. The bill was left pending. Finally, the committee heard HB 2803, which would require a presiding judge to give a poll watcher a signed statement explaining any removal from service. Supporters said this would improve documentation and accountability, and one witness asked for clarification that improper removal would remain a criminal offense; the author said he would consider a floor amendment and further discussion. The committee also heard HB 4253, which would create a more uniform voter-roll maintenance process based on inactivity, sending confirmation notices to voters who have not voted in the prior 25 months and eventually removing those who do not respond after multiple election cycles. Supporters said it would clean up outdated records and help keep voters registered where they actually live, while opponents argued it could wrongly remove eligible voters who simply do not vote regularly. HB 4253 was left pending as well.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/23/26

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • And that's been a place already doing.
  • that are closer to places that people work, go to school, and play.
  • At Groundbreak, we know a home is more than a place to live.
  • Um when I council in the first place.
  • We talked, we a place to call home.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/11/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • It will not be placed on the TV.
  • So you only get to claim one place as your abode or domicile that you pay taxes at.
  • places and tabulating centers.
  • The Strike Everything Amendment switches references of polling places to voting locations and references
  • The Strike Everything Amendment expands lawful acts by voters to include voting centers and polling places
Summary: The Committee on Federal and Military Affairs and Elections heard a lengthy presentation on an investigative referral concerning alleged voter registration anomalies in Arizona from March 2023 onward. The chair described examples involving out-of-state residents, deceased registrants, military voters, duplicate or mismatched registrations, and registrations tied to Service Arizona, ACCESS, third-party vendors, and NGOs. Members also discussed alleged mismatches between county recorder data and Secretary of State reports, possible issues with automatic voter registration, and concerns about public records compliance. At the end of the presentation, members were asked whether they wanted to sign onto a criminal referral to the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice; several declined, while others agreed, and the committee proceeded after correcting a signature-block issue. The committee then considered Senate Bill 1259, which would allow certain protected individuals to use an alternate mailing address and attest to their residential address on candidate and financial disclosure filings. After questions about residency verification and confidentiality, the bill received a do pass recommendation by a 6-1 vote. Senate Bill 1281, dealing with state land department procedures for covered federal designations and notification of land takings, was heard next; after opposition testimony from the Sierra Club Grand Canyon Chapter, it passed 4-3. Senate Bill 1037, concerning election equipment security and internet connectivity, drew substantial debate. A Marquez strike-everything amendment that would have shifted the bill toward voting centers, ERIC participation, early voting changes, and election funding failed on a 4-3 vote. The underlying bill then failed to receive a do pass recommendation on a 3-3-1 vote. Finally, Senate Bill 1040, which would make voter registration rolls publicly accessible online and downloadable, passed 4-3 after questions about what information would remain redacted and concerns about public access to voter data.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 17th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • where voters mark their ballots or otherwise indicate their votes at a polling place.
  • There was a prohibition against cameras and other recording devices inside the polling place.
  • place.
  • polling place and go out, that the judge Can at that point say you can't come back in?
  • Remember when they walk into the polling place, the magic question: "Do you still live at 123 Main Street
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Most reported they saw voters give up and leave the polling place.
  • May have gone to another polling place, we don't really know. Those who did get through the county.
  • So you get that many polling places scattered over that broad a distance.
  • One of my election clerks that I routinely used was in one of the polling places.
  • We're not opposed to rules surrounding schools and polling places.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Mar 13th, 2025

State Affairs

Summary: The committee heard testimony on Senate Bill 1596, which would remove short-barreled rifles from the list of prohibited weapons in the Texas Penal Code. The author, Sen. Hagenbuch, said the bill would align state law with federal realities and argued that the current prohibition is arbitrary and unnecessary. Supporters, including representatives from Gun Owners of America and Texas Gun Rights, said the bill would reduce confusion, protect lawful gun owners, and preserve the ability to use shorter firearms for self-defense, hunting, and for smaller shooters. One supporter also described a recent case in which an AR pistol was mistaken for a short-barreled rifle and led to a state charge that was later dismissed. Public testimony was split. Supporters said stabilizing braces and shorter firearms can improve accuracy, safety, and accessibility for women, children, and smaller-statured shooters. Opponents, including Texas Gun Sense and two Santa Fe shooting survivors, argued that short-barreled firearms are more concealable and dangerous, and pointed to the 2018 Santa Fe High School shooting as evidence of the risks of easier access. They urged the committee to keep the existing restrictions in place to protect public safety. After public testimony closed, the committee took up pending business. Senate Bill 1505, relating to the Compassionate Use Program, was reported favorably to the full Senate on an 8-0 vote. Senate Bill 17, relating to the acquisition of real property by certain aliens or foreign entities, was first amended by adopting a committee substitute and then reported favorably to the full Senate by a 7-1 vote. The committee then recessed until after the Senate’s adjournment or final recess.