Video & Transcript Research : 'permit issuance'

Page 1 of 376
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Licensing & Administrative Procedures May 6th, 2025

Licensing & Administrative Procedures

Transcript Highlights:
  • People are sitting in buildings, for example, that they're renting, but they can't get all the permits
  • The complaints were that the permitting— was too costly, took too long, and the application requirements
  • This bill would establish a more predictable timeline for the issuance of permits for our small businesses
  • For small businesses, time is money, and every day that a business waits on a permit is a day of lost
  • So, I mean, if you can get your permit from the city in 14 days, you're still going to sit there for
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • , because as you know, the federal permitting process is very lengthy and difficult.
  • immediately, or how long before you actually start working on permits to build the reservoir?
  • We are opposed to allowing brackish groundwater of any TDS level to be exempt from permitting.
  • Right now, just keep it permitted. It's already set up in 101.5 to expedite.
  • We're charged to do the opposite and promote these projects, but while still permitting them.
Summary: The Committee on Natural Resources heard House Bill 2109, which would remove certain long-proposed reservoir projects from the state water plan after 50 years without progress. Chairman Van Deaver and many landowners, local officials, timber interests, and conservation advocates testified in support, arguing that the Marvin Nichols Reservoir has burdened Northeast Texas landowners for decades with the threat of eminent domain, depressed property values, and uncertainty over homes, farms, ranches, schools, churches, and cemeteries. Supporters also said the project would flood tens of thousands of acres, require extensive mitigation, harm timber and agriculture, and that Texas now has better alternatives such as conservation, reuse, aquifer storage and recovery, and desalination. Several members expressed sympathy for the affected families and questioned whether a project could remain in the plan indefinitely without progress. Opposition came from North Texas water interests, including the North Texas Commission, Tarrant Regional Water District, and the Texas Water Association, who argued that the bill would interfere with the state’s long-term water planning process and remove needed future supply options for a fast-growing region. They said Region C faces major projected shortages by 2070, that conservation and reuse have already delayed the need for new supplies, and that reservoirs remain one tool in the state’s water-planning toolbox. TWDB staff explained the existing inter-regional conflict process and noted that the substitute would affect several unique reservoir sites, not just Marvin Nichols. After testimony, Chairman Van Deaver closed by urging passage of the bill, but the committee withdrew the substitute and left HB 2109 pending. The committee then took up House Bill 5188, a brackish groundwater bill. The author said the bill would reduce permitting burdens for wells in designated brackish groundwater production zones, and the committee substitute added requirements on monitoring, groundwater-rights ownership, and allocation of pumpage limits while removing some exclusions and export-fee provisions. Texas Wildlife Association testified against the bill, warning that the exemptions could weaken groundwater conservation districts’ ability to protect freshwater resources and surface-owner rights. San Antonio Water System testified in favor, saying brackish groundwater is a key future supply and that the substitute would help speed development of desalination and brackish projects. The Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts testified neutrally but raised concerns about reduced district oversight, especially around injection-well exclusions and the loss of export fees, and said discussions on the bill were ongoing.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Because as you know, the federal permitting process is very lengthy and difficult.
  • seek permits to build a reservoir?
  • We're charged to do the opposite and promote these projects while still permitting them.
  • We're charged to do the opposite and promote these projects while still permitting them.
  • I think we do not take the permitting out of that process. We do not make it exempt.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Under current law, the North Texas ground water conservation district issues permits for groundwater
  • , doesn't prohibit the use of groundwater. for those purposes, nor does it automatically deny any permits
  • or permit amendments.
  • And so since the district's beginning to issue permits, over half our new permits have been landscape
  • This category now represents the second largest permitted groundwater volume in our region and it shares
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • allows for timely transfer of permits. allows for timely transfer of permits.
  • to that permit.
  • look at all of the permits. look at all of the permits.
  • Refunding permit fees with the permit.
  • they use the permit? they use the permit? >> Mr.<01:39:55.840> M. Mr.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Environmental Regulation Apr 3rd, 2025

Environmental Regulation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Now, these are cumulative impacts, but TCEQ permits—or the permitting process at TCEQ—only applies to
  • the air permits, not to the other cumulative impacts.
  • amended standard air permit.
  • their permit to match the most recent up-to-date amendment.
  • permit for which you applied.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Culture, Recreation & Tourism May 14th, 2025

Culture, Recreation & Tourism

Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you for the opportunity to present Senate Bill 2801, which expands the use of event permits for
  • In all the states we go to, we're covered under a permit. All the...
  • Participants are covered under this permit.
  • Is there a permit needed to do this? Well, that's just what the states require.
  • I looked at all the different states and their permits.
Bills: SB2801, SB2232, SCR18
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Licensing & Administrative Procedures May 6th, 2025

Licensing & Administrative Procedures

Transcript Highlights:
  • in buildings, for example, that they're renting, but they can't get all the permits to get started.
  • I want to be clear that the, the bill does not apply, um, for the permits or licenses.
  • So this bill would establish a more predictable timeline for the issuance of permits for our small businesses
  • Um, for small businesses, time is money, and every day that a business waits on a permit is a day of
  • Package stores, distillers, breweries, brew pubs, holders of mixed beverage permits or bars, holders
Bills: SB 28
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Licensing & Administrative Procedures Apr 22nd, 2025

Licensing & Administrative Procedures

Transcript Highlights:
  • manufacturers at a restaurant. operated by the manufacturer creating a wine, malt beverage, and food permit
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Transportation Funding Apr 14th, 2025

S/C on Transportation Funding

Transcript Highlights:
  • Pursuant to the statute, the fees collected by the two permits were to be split equally: half of the
  • Also in the 83rd, HB 6, the Funds Consolidation Bill, did not exempt the special permit fees from being
  • Therefore, revenue from the funds of the newly created permits in HB 2741 was deposited in its entirety
  • The other 50% will go to the counties listed in the permit application.
  • During the last biennium fiscal year 22-23, $6.08 million was generated from these permit fees.