Video & Transcript : 'judicial procedures' :

Page 1 of 500
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/28/2026 - Senate Judiciary and Elections

Judiciary and Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Some of it is going to be done with rules and their policies and procedures on some things that they're
  • So that’s kind of the procedure.
  • Madam Chair and members, for the record, Leanna Garcia, on behalf of the Arizona Judicial Council, in
  • Madam Chair and members, for the record, Leanna Garcia, on behalf of the Arizona Judicial Council, in
  • The Secretary of State currently creates the election procedural manual, or the EPM, every other year
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 12th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Yes, the Texas Judicial Commission on mental health, chaired by Justice Jane Bland, of which Speaker
  • Christy, I have you here on behalf of the Texas Judicial Commission on Mental Health, registered on the
  • Members, this SJR deals with the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, which is created to protect. .
  • Thomas, I have you here on behalf of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, registered on the bill
  • I'm the General Counsel for the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.
Bills: SJR27 , SB53 , SB311 , SB1164 , SB2807 , SB1574 , SB 53
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's mostly a procedural fix. It helps parties.
  • to competent, licensed interpreters for those who need them and reduce public confidence in our judicial
  • While this matters procedurally for appeals, it has There's little relevance when it comes to the day-to-day
  • However, this procedural difference should not impact the court's ability to hear and rule on basic local
  • This bill provides cities with flexibility and promotes judicial. consistency and eliminates the need
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Last session, this body passed SB 14 to ban those types of procedures on a minor.
  • Trying to get these procedures because I research this area.
  • That to other treatment or procedures that minors get.
  • This aims to enhance psychiatric care while ensuring judicial oversight.
  • Ott, you mentioned judicial oversight on several occasions.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 202 has been abused, weaponizing the legal system through deposition procedure
  • Judicial Conduct.
  • I’m the General Counsel for the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.
  • So the threshold for needing a new court is judicial time.
  • And so the threshold for needing a new court is judicial time.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills affecting civil practice, judicial conduct, and attorney regulation. HB 4961 and the similar HB 3095 would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision, with HB 3095 also addressing certain exceptions and limiting economic damages in some cases. Supporters said the measures would encourage insurance coverage and fairness for insured drivers, while opponents argued they would unfairly punish injured people who were not responsible for the lack of insurance, including pedestrians, passengers, children, and others. HB 3095 drew constitutional concerns from witnesses, and the committee later withdrew the committee substitute and left the bill pending; HB 4961 was also left pending after questions about its scope, including passengers. HB 5570 would expand a continuing legal education exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate who serve on boards or commissions. The author and witness said the bill would free up time for public service while still requiring ethics training. A committee member raised a discrepancy in the number of attorneys covered, and the bill was left pending. HB 2969 would prohibit the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech, especially in relation to sincerely held religious beliefs. Supporters framed it as a protection for lawyers of faith against an ABA-style speech code, while no one testified in opposition; the bill was left pending. HB 4260 would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction. The author described it as an ethics measure to avoid conflicts of interest, but county officials and the County Judges and Commissioners Association opposed it, saying existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would impose hardships, especially in rural counties. The bill was left pending. HB 4388 would require all judges, including those who serve only in administrative roles, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct; supporters said some judges avoid discipline by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents said the bill was unnecessary and could burden county judges who serve as administrators. It was also left pending. The committee also heard HB 5134, which would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect to suffer actual damages and allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill would curb harassment and fishing expeditions, but members questioned how the standard would work in practice; the bill was left pending. Finally, HB 3964 would narrow common-law public nuisance claims by barring suits over lawful conduct, conduct already addressed by other remedies, and products, while preserving other causes of action. Supporters said the bill would prevent regulation through litigation and protect legislative authority; opponents said it would eliminate important remedies and that no Texas abuse had been shown. The author indicated he would revise the bill, and it was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • It came out of, you know, Judicial Council and consultations with a number of these courts.
  • That's what the Judicial Council's recommendations have been focused on. ...And your recommendation is
  • This bill addresses the inefficiencies. ...by authorizing district judges in four judicial districts
  • We have new procedures with respect to exemptions, and this bill is really designed to fill in the gaps
  • Different courts have different procedures, but we have about half the time.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • It represents real threats and dangers that are judicially... system and the public face daily.
  • take decisive action and make a meaningful difference in the security. our Texas courts and the judicial
  • Furlow, here for yourself and the 106th Judicial District, and you are against the bill.
  • Jennifer Lundy I show you as with Texans for judicial accountability and you are against the bill.
  • It's going to change judicial rules or judicial financial interest or special interest in many . . .
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Did you just say that the Texas Judicial Council recommends that the implicit bias...
  • Well, we want our judicial system to be fair and impartial.
  • Studies consistently demonstrate that implicit biases affect judicial decisions.
  • Chapter 49 of the Code of Criminal Procedure relates to death inquests.
  • Chapter 50 of the Code of Criminal Procedure relates to fire inquests.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Apr 28th, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • We need to make sure our procedural process worked correctly.
  • We need to make sure our procedural process worked correctly.
  • Rules of Civil Procedure are very clear in 4.9.
  • We are required by law... ...of evidence and procedure are no longer relaxed.
  • And it's a new trial, except now the rules of evidence and procedure are strict.
Bills: HR2 , HR37 , HR61 , HCR11 , HCR64 , HB89 , HB183 , HB341 , HB371 , HB451 , HB480 , HB520 , HB541 , HB579 , HB597 , HB816 , HB1004 , HB1064 , HB1165 , SB44
Committee: House Judiciary
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Apr 14th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Because mine has something to do with civil procedure 4342. Thank you for the question.
  • It's just the title is incorrect as it came over from the house, where it says civil procedure.
  • So, it is in civil procedure as was pointed out by our sharp-eyed staff.
  • They pay it as Part of their general procedure.
  • It is not something that's just a part of procedure.
Committee: Senate Judiciary
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • But my concern with this bill is judicial accountability.
  • I sent this to the State Judicial Commission and they rejected it.
  • Increase judicial compensation.
  • You don't have the judicial? The judicial should be under 839.
  • procedural steps.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • compensation as well as judicial transparency, accountability, judicial compensation as well as judicial
  • First off, you all have judicial conduct that you can't fight back.
  • As an organization, 100% fully behind increase in judicial pay.
  • On the bill, just so I can be consistent as a judicial officer.
  • I can be consistent as a judicial officer.
Summary: The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence met to hear House Bill 1761, a broad judicial package focused on increasing judicial compensation and adding accountability and efficiency measures. The chair explained that HB 1707 and HB 2100 were withdrawn from the agenda, and that HB 1761 would be taken up first because many judges and stakeholders were present. The committee substitute for HB 1761 proposed a 30% increase in base judicial pay to $182,000, changes to judicial retirement linkage, stronger judicial conduct provisions, and efficiency measures such as targeted reporting for judges not meeting benchmarks, appellate in-person meeting encouragement, and time limits on certain motions. The chair and several supporters said judicial pay had reached “emergency status,” citing Texas’s low national ranking and difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified judges. Witnesses in support included presiding and district judges, the State Bar’s judicial section, business and trial lawyer groups, and prosecutors. They emphasized that many judges work long hours off the bench, handle warrants at night and on weekends, manage heavy dockets, and face recruitment problems in both urban and rural counties. Supporters also said higher pay would help attract experienced lawyers, retain judges, and improve court efficiency. Several witnesses and members discussed judicial accountability, including public reporting of court performance and the role of the Texas Supreme Court and presiding judges in setting benchmarks. Some members raised concerns that raw statistics can be misleading because judges also do substantial off-the-bench work and often help cover other courts’ dockets. There was also testimony and discussion about the bill’s conduct and discipline provisions. A representative of the Texas Civil Rights Project opposed parts of the bill that would tie pay raises to changes affecting judicial independence, warning about subjective bail-related discipline standards and possible chilling effects. The executive director of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct cautioned against civil penalties for complainants, saying it could discourage good-faith complaints and create litigation risks. Other witnesses supported accountability reforms but urged caution about unintended consequences, especially for family and emergency cases and for judges handling warrants and other time-sensitive matters. After testimony, the committee withdrew the committee substitute and left HB 1761 pending, then recessed the committee.