Video & Transcript : 'internet advertising' :

Page 9 of 314
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee Jan 12th, 2026

Revenue and Taxation

Transcript Highlights:
  • taxes on electronic commerce, as the tax is on digital advertising, not all advertising.
  • So the Maryland advertising tax imposes a tax on annual gross revenue derived from digital advertising
  • It includes banner ads, search engine advertising, and other advertising formats delivered to users in
  • What's programmatic advertising? That's advertising that's algorithmically driven.
  • You don't print money to be able to advertise more. You don't raise your prices to advertise more.
Keywords: 988, house, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • taxes on electronic commerce, as the tax is on digital advertising, not all advertising.
  • So the Maryland advertising tax imposes a tax on annual gross revenue derived from digital advertising
  • What's programmatic advertising? That's advertising that's algorithmically driven.
  • What's programmatic advertising? That's advertising that's algorithmically driven.
  • You don't print money to be able to advertise more. You don't raise your prices to advertise more.
Summary: The Assembly Committee on Revenue and Taxation heard two bills. AB 796 by Assembly Member Lowenthal proposed a California Social Media Accountability Act that would impose a recovery fee on social media platforms’ advertising revenue and direct the proceeds to a Social Media Safety Trust Fund for education, mental health care, research, and social services related to youth harms from social media. The author and supporters, including a Long Beach Unified School District administrator and a pediatric emergency physician, argued that social media is contributing to youth mental health crises, cyberbullying, self-harm, and related school and health system costs, and that platforms should help pay for mitigation. Opponents, including taxpayer, business, and industry groups, argued the fee would raise costs for businesses and consumers, especially small businesses that rely on targeted digital ads, and warned of likely legal challenges under federal law, including the Internet Tax Freedom Act. Committee members discussed the bill’s legal distinctions from Maryland’s digital advertising tax, the potential pass-through of costs to advertisers, and whether the proposal would meaningfully address youth harms. Several members expressed support for the bill’s goal and concern about social media’s effects on children, while others raised questions about how the revenue would be allocated and whether the tax burden would fall on small businesses. After testimony and debate, AB 796 was held in committee and referred to the suspense file. The committee also took up AB 1265 by Assembly Member Haney, which was already on the suspense file. The chair recommended an aye vote on the bill as amended, with a clarification to reporting requirements, and the committee approved it 5-0, sending it to Appropriations.
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

April 10, 2025 - 08:30 AM

Transcript Highlights:
  • , obviously they can choose whichever ones to advertise in or not advertising, but I'm not comfortable
  • And in my counties, you've got people without internet. You've got people without internet.
  • My 26-year-old didn't have internet.
  • You've got people without internet. My 26-year-old didn't have internet.
  • There really is people without the internet to look.
Summary: The Civil Justice and Claims Subcommittee heard and voted on four bills. HB 587 on self-storage spaces would let rental agreements include an alternate contact person and allow default notices to be published online instead of only in newspapers, while keeping existing notice timelines and servicemember protections. Newspaper and press witnesses opposed the online-notice change, arguing it could reduce public reach and transparency, especially in rural areas; the sponsor said newspapers could still be used and the bill was only adding another option. The committee adopted an amendment changing the effective date to October 1, 2025, and then reported the bill favorably 12-2. HB 6033 would repeal the Florida Labor Pool Act. The sponsor argued the act duplicates other state and federal protections, while opponents said it contains unique safeguards for day laborers, including limits on fees, transportation charges, and deductions, and a private right of action. Testimony from labor advocates and workers warned repeal would reduce protections for vulnerable workers; the sponsor and supporters said other laws already cover the issues. The committee reported the bill favorably 11-3. HB 897, dealing with timeshare plan management, was presented as a clarification of conflicts created by recent condominium legislation and would require faster records responses, more disclosure of contracts, and clearer remedies for mismanagement. Support came from industry groups, and the bill passed unanimously, 14-0. The final measure, PCS for HB 1385, created a civil remedy for parental abduction or unlawful withholding of a child in violation of a timesharing order. Family law attorneys opposed it over concerns about added litigation, child involvement, and overlap with existing remedies, while the sponsors and supporters said it would provide needed deterrence and compensation in serious cases. The committee adopted the PCS and reported it favorably 13-0.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • And you when they're on the internet.
  • </c> newsletter signups, and advertising newsletter signups, and advertising tools.<00:10:57.760><c>
  • Advertising is one of the most data.
  • </c> particularly by targeting internet-based particularly by targeting internet-based activity<00:17
  • It had a couple of pigs out on the internet. It was on the internet.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee took up House File 3117, which would impose an excise tax on social media companies based on Minnesota monthly users and data-mining activity, and adopted an A1 amendment that added clarifying language identifying social media platforms. Chair Gomez described the bill as a way to tax companies profiting from data mining and social media use, citing concerns about child bullying, misinformation, and wealth concentration. The bill was laid over for possible inclusion in the 2025 taxes bill. Supporters testified that the measure would help raise revenue from a highly profitable industry and better align the tax code with the social costs of data collection and social media use. Pastor Julie Thompson, MAPE representative Tanner Fritzinger, Council Member Sue Bud, and Eric Bernstein of We Make Minnesota all backed the bill, arguing that social media companies extract value from users’ data, contribute to mental health and social harms, and should pay more toward public needs. Bernstein also framed the tax as a way to broaden the tax base and fund schools and other services. Opponents warned that the bill could sweep in local broadcasters, newspapers, and other businesses that use digital platforms and collect some user data, and that costs would likely be passed on to consumers. Wendy Pollson of the Minnesota Broadcasters Association said the definitions were too broad and could unintentionally include local media. Deb Peters, speaking for Americans for Digital Opportunity, argued the tax would raise costs for small businesses and consumers, create legal risks, and amount to double taxation. Several members echoed concerns about regressivity, administration, and whether the bill actually addresses online bullying or data privacy, while supporters said it is a first step toward taxing a new, lightly taxed industry.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Ways & Means Jan 22nd, 2026 at 04:00 pm

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • services, including technical support, security and investigative services, temporary staffing, advertising
  • such as sales between members of an affiliated group, temporary staffing used by hospitals, and advertising
  • is held invalid, then all of the advertising exclusions are invalid.
  • For the information of the committee, there is pending litigation with the state relating to advertising
  • services, asserting the exclusions unfairly target digital advertising in violation of federal law.
Committee: Senate Ways & Means
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Feb 11th, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • They are engaging a publisher to advertise as per the current statute, and the publisher, for whatever
  • Clear and became known that, uh-oh, we didn't do the advertising correctly.
  • Has cost taxpayers millions of dollars, to say nothing of the fees to do the advertising.
  • However, the original law had two real purposes: one, to entice businesses to advertise and say, "Hey
  • There's a provision in Rebuild Alabama that specifically allows these projects to be advertised on the
Bills: SB36 , SB39 , SB40 , SB12 , SB29 , SB121 , SB131 , SB12
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Taxing digital ads 3/25/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> attention on social media, internet attention on social media, internet search<00:03:40.319><c>
  • ofome advertisements and out ofome advertisements.<00:04:30.320><c> The</c><00:04:30.479><c> two</c><
  • The two areas of advertisements.
  • </c> primarily digital advertising services. primarily digital advertising services.
  • Taxing advertising and advertising-related services raises costs for everyone.
Keywords: 1183, house
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development May 14th, 2025

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development

MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/27/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • My family suffered a little bit when we got our information put on the internet, and not only did I have
  • I spent nearly 30 years there, the last 12 as the police chief prior to taking this position. internet
  • and not only did I have to internet and not only did I have to worry<01:08:18.799><c> about</c><01:08
Bills: HF1027 , HF2226 , HF1916 , HF1915 , HF1567 , HF1986
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:00 am

Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies

Transcript Highlights:
  • Please reject this bill and any other internet gaming bills.
  • Many today will come before you and call it internet gambling.
  • And by every measure, internet... ...public policy failure, and by every measure, internet casino gambling
  • But in terms of internet casino gambling, it's a whole nother thing.
  • So eliminating the advertising, I really believe in a whistle-to-whistle ban on advertising as it relates
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies, chaired by Rep. Carole Fiola and Sen. Barry Finegold, held a lengthy hearing on a range of gambling-related bills. Testimony first focused on H. 496 to allow the Massachusetts Gaming Commission to authorize Plain Ridge Park Casino to add table games and more slot machines. Supporters, including Rep. Jeffrey Roy, Sen. Finegold, Rep. Barry R. Finegold, Rep. Brian Vaughn, and Plainville officials, argued the change was needed to keep Massachusetts gaming dollars from flowing to Rhode Island, protect jobs, and preserve local tax revenue. They described Plain Ridge as a strong community partner and cited host-community benefits such as municipal infrastructure projects and local aid. Opponents or skeptical witnesses later argued that expanded gambling, especially online, would increase harm and cannibalize existing casinos and local economies. The committee also heard testimony on bills related to sports betting restrictions and online gambling. Sen. John Keenan presented a “Better Health Act” proposal to ban prop bets and in-play bets, require affordability checks, prohibit hosts, raise the sports betting excise tax, expand funding for problem-gambling services, and increase research and data sharing. He and supporters framed the bill as a public-health response to addiction, suicide, bankruptcy, and other harms. Rep. David Nangle, speaking from personal experience with gambling addiction, strongly opposed internet gaming, warning that it would intensify addiction and expose children and families to 24/7 gambling on phones. In contrast, Rep. David Moradian and industry witnesses supported H. 4431 to legalize and regulate internet gaming, arguing it would bring illegal activity into a regulated market, generate new revenue, and include consumer protections such as age verification, deposit limits, self-exclusion, and responsible-gaming tools. The committee also took testimony on H. 4238, which would expand fundraising options for fraternal organizations, especially the Elks. Rep. Bruce Ayers and Elks representatives said the bill would help lodges raise money for scholarships, veterans’ services, and community programs after COVID-related losses and declining membership. On H. 480, Rep. Kathleen LaNatra, Rep. Badger, and representatives of veterans organizations and gaming-machine operators urged allowing qualified veterans groups to participate in certain video gaming activity, saying it would provide a sustainable revenue source to keep posts open and support veterans’ services. Dr. Rachel Volberg testified that expanding gambling, especially online gambling and slot machines at veterans organizations, would likely increase gambling harm, and she urged stronger harm-prevention measures, data reporting, and research funding. Other witnesses, including anti-gambling advocates and industry representatives, sharply disagreed over whether legalization would reduce illegal gambling or worsen addiction and social costs. No votes or final actions were taken during the hearing.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Taxes Committee Meeting - 2025-04-09

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • They may collect user data through site visits, newsletter sign-ups, and advertising tools.
  • Taxing advertising operations, especially online, raises costs for everyone.
  • That they send their kids to schools that don't allow phones or internet or screens.
  • I'm not a big fan of the internet. I'm not a big fan of social media.
  • It was on the internet. We get all the food we want to eat, free housing.
Committee: House Taxes
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:03:33.840><c> for</c> enforcement placed advertisements for enforcement placed advertisements
  • Why else would they prohibit putting advertisements for scales?
  • ><c> for</c> prohibit putting advertisements for prohibit putting advertisements for scales?
  • But to limit advertisements for scales.
  • They've been doing it for over 30 years, since the inception of the internet in 1993.
Keywords: 1183, house
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Advanced Information Technology, the Internet and Cybersecurity Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Joint Committee on Advanced Information Technology, the Internet and Cybersecurity

Transcript Highlights:
  • The second piece is surveillance advertising.
  • Now surveillance advertising, I would define as predatory.
  • This goes beyond just advertising, of course.
  • However, they are explicitly using it for what they call personalized advertising—surveillance advertising
  • You know, we say on the internet everyone's a child.
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The committee hearing focused on a package of Massachusetts privacy and technology bills, especially measures to ban the sale of location data, establish a comprehensive consumer data privacy law, and regulate biometric recognition and surveillance pricing. Chairs and sponsors argued that self-regulation has failed, that data brokers and large tech companies routinely collect and monetize sensitive information, and that state action is needed because federal protections are weak or absent. Several speakers tied the bills to reproductive health, gender-affirming care, domestic violence, children’s data, and other sensitive uses of location and biometric information. Supporters included legislators and advocates who backed H. 86/S. 197 (Location Shield), H. 78/S. 45/H. 104/S. 29 (comprehensive privacy bills), H. 99/S. 47 (surveillance pricing in grocery stores), and H. 36/S. 36 (biometric recognition accountability). They emphasized data minimization, bans on selling sensitive data, consumer rights to access, delete, and opt out, and in some cases a private right of action. Several witnesses said Massachusetts should lead or align with other states, while others argued that stronger protections are needed because data can be weaponized by stalkers, anti-abortion actors, abusive partners, insurers, or law enforcement. Industry and coalition witnesses urged the committee to favor a more standardized, interoperable framework modeled on laws already adopted in other states, warning that novel definitions, data-minimization rules, and private rights of action could create compliance burdens, confusion, and costs for businesses, including small businesses. They argued that entity-level exemptions for sectors already covered by federal laws like HIPAA or GLBA promote consistency, and that Attorney General enforcement is preferable to private lawsuits. Committee members questioned witnesses on patchwork concerns, the scope of exemptions, and whether the proposed bills would harm or help consumers and small businesses. No votes or final actions were taken during the hearing; written testimony was noted as due later, and the committee continued taking testimony from multiple panels and virtual witnesses.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Finance Oct 14th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • Advertising services are digital and non-digital services related to— Advertising services are digital
  • services, which are the advertising services that are actually putting the advertisement out for the
  • buckets of advertising services. 509 Media in this case is providing pre-disseminated advertising services
  • of advertising services. 509 media in this case is providing pre-disseminated advertising services,
  • that it's going to be plausible to get that information from the various providers of Internet advertising
Summary: The committee first received a presentation from Dr. Reich on the Economic and Revenue Forecast Council (ERFC), including how the council’s joint executive-legislative forecasting process works, the main state revenue sources, and recent economic conditions. He said Washington’s economy is slowing, with weak employment growth, softer taxable sales, and uncertainty from tariffs, federal spending, and the federal shutdown. He also noted that the September forecast was reduced, mainly because of lower sales tax and real estate excise tax collections, and that the state still expects modest growth rather than a recession. Members asked about whether Washington tends to lag national downturns and how forecast information should affect budgeting; Dr. Reich said the forecast is a revenue tool, not a budgeting decision, and that spending choices remain with elected officials. The Department of Revenue then presented on Washington’s sales and use tax structure and the implementation of Senate Bill 5814, which expands retail sales tax to several services effective October 1, 2025. Steve Ewing explained how sales and use tax are sourced, how reseller permits and the multiple points of use exemption work, and how the new law applies to live presentations, temporary staffing, investigations and security services, IT services, custom website development, advertising services, and custom software. He said DOR held listening sessions, issued interim guidance, and set up a centralized landing page and outreach efforts to help taxpayers understand the changes. He also described a six-month grace period for certain pre-existing contracts through March 31, 2026, but said penalties and interest still apply under the statute. Committee members raised concerns about how businesses and individuals will know when a service is taxable, who is responsible for collecting and remitting tax, and how sourcing will work for services delivered across multiple locations or online. DOR staff walked through examples involving accounting services, live lectures, virtual events, advertising campaigns, and search engine marketing, including the use of reasonable allocation and pool codes when exact sourcing data is unavailable. Members also questioned the administrative burden on small businesses and professionals newly subject to tax, and whether additional legislative fixes or relief from penalties and interest may be needed. No votes or formal actions were taken in the work session.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Taxes - 04/09/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> uh in terms of uh internet uh in terms of uh internet commerce<00:07:40.000><c> and</c><00:07:41.039
  • </c><00:43:20.800><c> on</c> and selling the data to advertisers on and selling the data to advertisers
  • </c> this tax does only apply to internet this tax does only apply to internet best<00:49:34.000><c>
  • . advertising. advertising.
  • And there are local advertising.
Committee: Senate Taxes
Keywords: 1187, senate, all