Relating to the punishment for the offense of aggravated assault.
Summary
HB 795 would expand the circumstances under which aggravated assault is punished as a first-degree felony under Texas Penal Code Section 22.02(b). Under current law, aggravated assault is generally a second-degree felony unless certain aggravating factors apply. This bill adds or clarifies several first-degree felony triggers, including assaults involving serious bodily injury to certain family or household members when a deadly weapon is used, traumatic brain or spine injuries causing permanent paralysis or a persistent vegetative state, and assaults against public servants, witnesses, informants, process servers, and security officers in specified circumstances.
The bill also elevates punishment for assaults committed from a motor vehicle when the actor knowingly discharges a firearm at or toward a habitation, building, or vehicle while reckless as to occupancy, and the discharge causes bodily injury, property damage, or fear of imminent serious bodily injury. In addition, it creates first-degree felony treatment for aggravated assault committed as part of a mass shooting. The changes apply only to offenses committed on or after September 1, 2025.
Impact
HB 795 would amend Section 22.02(b) of the Texas Penal Code, increasing the punishment range for a broader set of aggravated assault cases from second-degree felony to first-degree felony. This would affect sentencing exposure for defendants and could increase penalties in cases involving domestic violence, attacks on public officials and justice-system participants, drive-by shootings, and mass shootings. The bill would apply prospectively only, leaving earlier offenses subject to existing law.
Sentiment
The available record shows no recorded votes or committee testimony, and the bill was left pending in subcommittee. Based on the text alone, the measure appears to reflect a punitive public-safety approach aimed at deterring especially dangerous assaults and protecting vulnerable or official victims. The lack of recorded opposition or support in the provided materials means the overall sentiment cannot be measured from debate, but the proposal is framed as a crime-enhancement bill rather than a controversial policy redesign.
Contention
The main points of potential contention are the expansion of first-degree felony treatment to a wider set of assault scenarios and the inclusion of a new mass-shooting aggravator. Supporters would likely emphasize stronger penalties for attacks on public servants, witnesses, process servers, security officers, and victims of drive-by shootings or severe injury. Critics could question whether the bill broadens felony punishment too far, whether the new categories are sufficiently precise, and whether enhanced sentencing is the most effective response to violent crime. No specific objections or amendments are reflected in the provided committee materials.
Upgrades assault against servicemember to aggravated assault; expands crime of bias intimidation to encompass crimes and offenses committed against servicemembers.
Amends felony murder, aggravated manslaughter, and aggravated assault statutes to include death or bodily injury occurring during commission of auto theft.