Video & Transcript Research : 'private well testing'

Page 7 of 500
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Energy REVISED Mar 5th, 2026 at 09:30 am

Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's private property, and we want to ensure that.
  • I'm willing to hear your side as well as to make this a better bill so that we can preserve water for
  • Well, committee, mark this down. Quickest one ever.
Bills: SB1928, SB259
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • have a deep understanding of private property rights as well as what it means to own land in Texas.
  • Well, you've answered my question.
  • We're trying to test that.
  • Deeper wells, different pumps, a more intensive filtration and treatment process, as well as integration
  • wells.
Summary: The Committee on Natural Resources heard House Bill 2109, which would remove certain long-proposed reservoir projects from the state water plan after 50 years without progress. Chairman Van Deaver and many landowners, local officials, timber interests, and conservation advocates testified in support, arguing that the Marvin Nichols Reservoir has burdened Northeast Texas landowners for decades with the threat of eminent domain, depressed property values, and uncertainty over homes, farms, ranches, schools, churches, and cemeteries. Supporters also said the project would flood tens of thousands of acres, require extensive mitigation, harm timber and agriculture, and that Texas now has better alternatives such as conservation, reuse, aquifer storage and recovery, and desalination. Several members expressed sympathy for the affected families and questioned whether a project could remain in the plan indefinitely without progress. Opposition came from North Texas water interests, including the North Texas Commission, Tarrant Regional Water District, and the Texas Water Association, who argued that the bill would interfere with the state’s long-term water planning process and remove needed future supply options for a fast-growing region. They said Region C faces major projected shortages by 2070, that conservation and reuse have already delayed the need for new supplies, and that reservoirs remain one tool in the state’s water-planning toolbox. TWDB staff explained the existing inter-regional conflict process and noted that the substitute would affect several unique reservoir sites, not just Marvin Nichols. After testimony, Chairman Van Deaver closed by urging passage of the bill, but the committee withdrew the substitute and left HB 2109 pending. The committee then took up House Bill 5188, a brackish groundwater bill. The author said the bill would reduce permitting burdens for wells in designated brackish groundwater production zones, and the committee substitute added requirements on monitoring, groundwater-rights ownership, and allocation of pumpage limits while removing some exclusions and export-fee provisions. Texas Wildlife Association testified against the bill, warning that the exemptions could weaken groundwater conservation districts’ ability to protect freshwater resources and surface-owner rights. San Antonio Water System testified in favor, saying brackish groundwater is a key future supply and that the substitute would help speed development of desalination and brackish projects. The Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts testified neutrally but raised concerns about reduced district oversight, especially around injection-well exclusions and the loss of export fees, and said discussions on the bill were ongoing.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • you understand that I have a deep understanding of private property rights as well as what it means
  • Well, you've kind of proven my point.
  • My name is Hope Wells.
  • As well as integration and disposal.
  • Well, I'm not an expert in IUC wells, but my understanding is that it would include all classes of injection
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • They've been working with the county judge as well as the city.
  • So the water coming out of this aquifer is not going. to affect your homeowner that has a well and is
  • , and also skew our data from collection of our monitoring wells used to assess... ...the lost pines'
  • I'm a resident of Bastrop County, a well owner with a well in the Simsboro Formation of the Carrizo-Wilcox
  • Well, I don't know that it's defined that way here.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Energy Resources Apr 14th, 2025

Energy Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • So why was it added if it was a well-settled law?
  • But it's happening, well, it depends.
  • done as well.
  • water wells or public water supply wells.
  • I think there are some disposal wells there, but the Paxton facility has no disposal well.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Energy Resources Apr 14th, 2025

Energy Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • So that's a new requirement as well.
  • So effectively the sediment that's coming up from an exploration well or from production wells.
  • Well depths and complexity increased, leading to long-reach horizontal wells with multi-stage fracturing
  • Revenues for those wells.
  • The Smith family that was only 10 wells and there's suddenly an issue with the 10 wells derived from
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Energy REVISED Apr 9th, 2026 at 09:30 am

Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I do sense see it that it could very well.
  • There's a lot of private ones out there too.
  • Is it possible that the landfills' private corporation are asking us to impose a burden on another private
  • I believe the cities do, but it can be, they can contract it out to private.
  • Well, this was a little bit confusing here.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Agriculture and Forestry Committee Mar 4th, 2026

Agriculture and Forestry

Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, that has gone away. Federal perspective, and now antibiotic usage requires a prescription.
  • Well,<00:05:25.039> that<00:05:25.360> has<00:05:25.600> gone<00:05:25.840> away
  • <00:05:26.960> federal Well, that has gone away. federal Well, that has gone away. federal
Bills: SB85, SB85
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Would it remove any particular wells off of our abandoned well.
  • Or sorry, I don't need a guide on my private land or nobody needs a license on my private land.
  • Basic 1509 works on well spacings. Now, it's a really short bill.
  • Well, the hearing isn't for the spacing.
  • that's closer than that, then they would be denied a well.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Aug 19th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Work within us to do Your will to serve the people of Texas well.
  • Senator Hinojosa, have a conversation with your county. ...because I think he knows the code all too well
  • , especially given the wide range of potential civil rights violations that could result from its private
  • Well, that's interesting when you take away the AG's power to prosecute.
  • I had the intention of... well, she was going to assist me in how to do those things because I didn't
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Apr 7th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I got to know a lot of them really well. The president, Amanda Davis, is phenomenal.
  • And so all of those things are being addressed in the budget As well.
  • That's the same amount that we spent last year as well. Is that correct?
  • What I see are special editions that are for wealthy and well-connected folks.
  • Well, you can't have both. You can't have. No income tax and then also have tax credits.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 15th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Very well, we'll open public testimony on Senate Bill 6. Very well.
  • Well, unless they're trans men.
  • I firmly believe divorce should be a private decision between private citizens.
  • I firmly believe divorce should be a private decision between private citizens. Ms.
  • Well, female birth control has.
Bills: SB6, SB7, SB8, SB11, SB12, SB13, SB15, SB17
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 8, the Texas Women's Privacy Act, and heard extensive public testimony both for and against the measure. Supporters, including representatives of Texas Values and Texas Values Action, argued the bill was needed to protect women’s privacy and safety in restrooms, locker rooms, showers, prisons, domestic violence shelters, and other government-controlled spaces, and said it would provide clear, sex-based rules. Opponents, including many transgender Texans, civil rights advocates, clergy, business and public safety voices, and others, argued the bill would invite harassment, gender policing, lawsuits, and invasive inspections, while harming trans, intersex, and gender-nonconforming people as well as cisgender women who do not fit stereotypes. Several witnesses said the bill would conflict with federal law or prison standards, worsen safety in shelters and prisons, and hurt Texas’s reputation and economy. The chair repeatedly noted the compressed special-session schedule and said flood relief remained the session’s top priority. Public testimony on SB 8 was eventually closed, and the bill was left pending. The committee then moved to Senate Bill 6, dealing with consumable hemp product restrictions. Testimony on SB 6 focused on whether the bill went too far in restricting hemp-derived THC products. Opponents argued hemp and THC have medical and economic value, that the bill would criminalize conduct and burden courts, and that regulation—not prohibition—was the better approach. Some witnesses supported tighter rules such as testing, child-resistant packaging, and limits on marketing to children, but still opposed the bill’s broad THC ban, higher fees, and age restrictions. Several speakers emphasized benefits for veterans, chronic pain patients, and small businesses, and warned that prohibition would push consumers toward the illicit market. The committee heard the testimony and then continued with additional witnesses, with no final vote or disposition reported in the excerpt.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - House International Trade

International Trade

Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, good morning, members of the Arizona Legislature.
  • Well, yeah, to that point, Chairman Wilmeth. Thank you, sir. That would mean that we could...
  • Well, yeah, to that point, Chairman Wilmeth. Thank you, sir.
  • Well, that's part of the commercial opportunity that I see.
  • We don't think government should be in the business of subsidizing private industry.
Summary: The Committee on International Trade heard a presentation from Alan Renteria of the Puerto Peñasco Chamber of Commerce, who promoted Rocky Point as a major tourism and investment destination for Arizonans. He highlighted tourism growth, cross-border ties, safety coordination, the importance of fishing and shrimp to the local economy, and potential commercial opportunities such as improved border infrastructure and a possible cargo or cruise port. Members responded with personal comments about travel, geology, medical volunteer work, and the city’s appeal, and Renteria said he wanted to serve as a liaison to improve communication between Arizona offices and Puerto Peñasco. The committee then considered three bills related to the Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA). HB 2751 would continue the Arizona Competes fund indefinitely and subject use of the fund to legislative appropriations; HB 2752 would shift oversight of trade offices from the ACA board to legislative appropriation and require annual reporting to JLBC; and HB 2753 would add legislative ex-officio members to the ACA board, including committee chairs and, under an amendment, minority party ranking members. Supporters argued the bills would give the legislature more oversight and a seat at the table, while Greg Blackie of the Arizona Free Enterprise Club opposed HB 2751, calling for repeal or stronger guardrails and citing past audit concerns. All three bills advanced on due pass recommendations. HB 2751 passed 7-1 with one member present and one absent; HB 2752 passed 9-0 with one absent; and HB 2753 passed 9-0 after the Austin amendment was adopted, adding minority party representation. The committee also removed HB 2746 from the agenda before taking up the ACA measures.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Mar 26th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, I think the setting an arbitrary cap in of itself.
  • Private markets, OK, private debt and, and, um, and equity infusions.
  • Well, there's, there's tears of that. There's tears of that.
  • Public Utility Commission is in a tough spot as well.
  • Well, thank you for that, sir.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 26th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, I can...
  • That's the domestic wells, private landowners' wells.
  • . and well owners.
  • They have this well viewer, and I narrowed it to just domestic and livestock wells.
  • wells in the Carrizo.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 26th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Is that what you're testing? Defining baseline.
  • Private markets. Okay, private debt. All right, well, let me give it a shot.
  • Well, it's not really, they report to TCEQ for quality.
  • Ensures the protection of these private utilities.
  • Well, thank you for that, sir.