Video & Transcript Research : 'engineering fees'

Page 7 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Higher Education Apr 8th, 2025

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • The machinist was crafting tools based on the engineer's designs and the engineer was both surprised
  • He remarked here at College Station, man I wish I had taken machine sh- I was studying engineering in
  • Members, this bill relates to student access to certain academic records, authorizing a fee.
  • Use to determine which major they're getting into so not everybody can get engineering.
  • College application fees alone can be a deterrent. current for prospective students.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Higher Education Apr 8th, 2025

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • The fee has not changed since 1980, number one.
  • where the fee is.
  • But fee-wise, it would be in line with university fees. Thank you. Yes, sir. Okay.
  • Do they see in their tuition and fees as compared to a resident of Texas?
  • They would see the same increase because it would be a mandatory fee.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's at those campsites where there's just a flat fee. That's it. That's where you see that happen.
  • Uh, if you are at a campsite where there is a fee for electricity, which the 400% sounds really bad,
  • It's at those campsites where there's just a flat fee. That's it. That's where you see that happen.
  • It's at those campsites where there's just a flat fee. That's it. That's where you see that happen.
  • just a flat fee. That's it. just a flat fee. That's it.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 22nd, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • actions against unlawful zoning ordinances, and it allows prevailing parties to recover attorney's fees
  • It adds hundreds of thousands of dollars. in legal fees.
  • City Council believed the Historic Commission's recommendation and, despite multiple structural engineers
  • and civil engineers warning of the building's immediate dangers, the City Council ultimately changed
Bills: SB2215, SB2639
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation General Fund Committee Mar 5th, 2025

Finance and Taxation General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is a focus for us on this, and so it would add a $5 tag fee.
  • They're in the engineering phase and they're going to... engineering phase and they're going to need
  • But I don't want us to levy a fee and have everyone… want us to levy a fee and have everyone opt out
  • We're not talking about different fees, are we?
  • Are we talking about everybody having the same fee or different fees for different counties?
Bills: HB52, HB89, HB141, HB52, HB89, HB141
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The district had a fee schedule that's locked into statute.
  • They requested a change in that statute so they can raise their fees.
  • They threaten you with the fees that they're going to impose on the community whether they win or lose
  • We could be saddled with thousands of dollars in legal fees. bills that we can't afford.
  • Marta Fee, separate legislation, separate law.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Ways and Means General Fund Committee Mar 31st, 2026

Ways and Means General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • . >> Same assessment fee. Any questions from the committee?
  • willing to do this willing to do this >> same<00:08:43.120> assessment<00:08:43.519> fee
  • 43.839> Any<00:08:44.080> questions<00:08:44.399> from >> same assessment fee
  • Any questions from >> same assessment fee. Any questions from the<00:08:44.800> committee?
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank God Superman doesn't exist, because if he did, GOP lawmakers would find a way to reverse-engineer
  • There are also countless engineers who will consider leaving.
  • As an engineer, there's a saying that I learned early: all models are wrong, but some are useful.
Bills: SB7, SB14, SB 7, SB 14
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Commerce May 5th, 2026

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • our state, and taxes and... ...the complexities of just doing business in our state, and taxes and fees
  • and land surveying, to provide for the incidental practice of engineering by architects, to provide
  • “If you would hire the proper mechanical engineer, this wouldn’t be happening.
  • They have construction education funding, and they do have an administrative fee, which was 4%.
  • Everybody liked it, from the engineers to the architects, so I think we had a consensus.
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Day 56 (3-31-26)

Kentucky Senate Floor Meeting

MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/11/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The first restriction the bill addresses is the 5% limit on finance lender fees.
  • Under current Minnesota law, lenders are not allowed to include a lender fee in the principal amount
  • , closing costs, including lender fees, closing costs, including lender fees, can<01:19:06.360>
  • ,<01:20:05.920> where a lower rate or origination fees, where a lower rate or origination
  • fees, where loans<01:20:06.480> without<01:20:07.120> a<01:20:07.200> prepayment
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Health and Public Affairs Feb 9th, 2026 at 02:06 pm

Senate Health & Public Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I do think we need a separate, whole entire bill looking at impact fees, which have to do with the cost
  • point about working with the developments to get rid of the costs, if we could redo how we do impact fees
  • The other piece of this is that this saves the county millions of dollars in fees, where they can focus
  • He's currently a third-year student at NMSU, studying civil engineering technology, and expected to graduate
  • She is also a student at NMSU, and she's majoring in mechanical and aerospace engineering with a minor
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 2328 would establish a standardized $25 fee per entity for cases where electronic service
  • By streamlining the expunction notification process, standardizing service fees, and extending record
  • Currently, an expunction is filed by the petitioner and it's a $350 filing fee, and if they retain an
  • It's a $350 filing fee, and if they retain an attorney, they have to pay that attorney's fees, and then
  • The first is that the fee, there is a fee under this bill that is mandatory.
Bills: HB115
Summary: The Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence reconvened with a quorum present and announced it would likely not vote that night because of confusion over the bill list; members were told a definitive list would be circulated the next morning and a formal meeting would be scheduled later. The chair then heard a series of bills, generally taking testimony and leaving each pending without action. House Bill 1847 would set maximum caseload standards for private attorneys handling indigent criminal appointments through the Texas Indigent Defense Commission; House Bill 2417 would expand compensation eligibility for some wrongfully imprisoned people; House Bill 2813 would require earlier and more specific victim notice of scheduled court proceedings; and House Bill 2309 would expand state and local authority in certain civil asset forfeiture cases involving human trafficking, health care fraud, and organized crime. Each bill was laid out by its author or a member, with no opposition witnesses registered, and each was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 4733, which would require sealing records for people acquitted of charges when they were not convicted on the related allegation; House Bill 2328, which would modernize expunction service by encouraging electronic notice, setting a standardized fee when electronic service is unavailable, extending clerk retention of expunction orders, and preserving certain mental health commitment orders; and House Bill 115, which would revise Texas’s “junk science” post-conviction writ law by providing counsel, changing the relief standard, requiring written decisions, and easing procedural barriers. Testimony on HB 2328 was mixed: county clerks supported the bill as a cost-saving modernization, while legal advocates warned that permanent retention of expunction orders could undermine true expunction and create privacy risks. HB 115 drew support from innocence and defense organizations, with some concern about a provision affecting subsequent writs. All were left pending after testimony. Later, the committee heard House Bill 2046, which would allow affirmative family-violence findings for any Penal Code offense rather than only Title V offenses; testimony from a Dallas County prosecutor and a committee member emphasized that family violence can involve arson, burglary, fraud, and other non-Title V conduct, and the bill was left pending. House Bill 1765 would tighten restrictions on no-knock warrants by requiring higher-level approval, judicial review, and identifiable officers; members discussed the dangers highlighted by the Harding Street raid and similar incidents, and the bill was also left pending. The meeting ended with the chair noting that some bills had been removed from the agenda at the author’s request and that members should be prepared to finalize the vote list the next day.