Video & Transcript Research : 'disabled'

Page 7 of 315
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • It clarifies that in Enhancements for trafficking a child or disabled individual apply whether or not
  • Additionally, it extends these protections to disabled individuals and clarifies court procedures to
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • For various conditions such as if the property owner was over 65 or disabled. Mr.
  • It is people with disabilities, and it is nonprofits.
  • If you take advantage of ...of somebody who's disabled through deed fraud, you're going to get a penalty
  • We clarify that severely disabled students at campuses which are primarily comprised of that student
  • This came from some of our disability rights groups. Groups.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • So are House bills that enhance penalties for endangering a child, elderly person, or disabled?
  • as it sounds, current statute provides Is it someone who places a child, elderly individual, or a disabled
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Mar 18th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • to you about House Bill 166, which strengthens protections for children, elderly individuals, and disabled
  • Under current law endangering a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual with the presence or
  • House Bill 166 is explicitly criminalizing the act of exposing children, elderly individuals, or disabled
  • In the presence of a child, elderly individual, disabled individual in a way that creates a risk of harm
  • It's a problem. for our disabled community and also a problem for our elderly community who may get a
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/24/2026 - Senate Appropriations, Transportation and Technology

Appropriations, Transportation and Technology

Transcript Highlights:
  • disabled, and piece work.
  • The subminimum wages for workers with disabilities.
  • less than those without disabilities.
  • You don't look disabled, or you don't look autistic.
  • I'm here today because disability is not a discount.
Summary: The committee first considered Senate Bill 1630, which would direct AHCCCS to seek federal approval for a home- and community-based services program for adults determined to be seriously mentally ill, with quarterly implementation updates, stakeholder input, and a cap on enrollment. The sponsor and advocates from Arizona Mad Moms argued the bill would create an assisted-living-style Medicaid option for the most disabled SMI individuals, improve continuity of care, and reduce state general fund costs by shifting some expenses to federal Medicaid funding. Access testified neutral, estimating a total fiscal impact of $27.7 million, including $5.83 million general fund, and explained the need for CMS approval. The committee adopted an amendment reducing the initial cap to 250 members, changing reporting frequency, and adjusting eligibility and expansion conditions, then passed SB 1630 as amended on a 10-0 vote. The committee next heard Senate Bill 1131, which originally required school districts and charter schools to adopt cardiac emergency response plans and appropriated $1 million for implementation. An amendment replaced the mandate with a reporting requirement on AED counts, CPR/AED-trained staff, and whether schools have a plan, while keeping a grant component for AEDs and prioritizing rural schools. The American Heart Association supported the amended approach as a way to gather baseline data and target resources, and members discussed AED training, school preparedness, and whether the funding should favor rural or high-population schools. The committee adopted the amendment and passed SB 1131 as amended on a 9-1 vote, with Senator Kuby voting no and several members explaining concerns about funding and priorities. The committee then took up Senate Bill 1582, which concerned the school safety interoperability fund. An amendment shifted the appropriation from the Department of Education to the Department of Administration and allocated funds to specific county sheriff offices for continuing operation and maintenance of existing interoperability systems, while narrowing the program to public safety agencies and school districts and requiring twice-yearly testing. Sheriffs, a county school superintendent, and the Arizona Sheriffs Association described the systems as useful for drills and real emergencies, improving communication between schools and first responders; one speaker noted the program had been used in drills and at least one live deployment. Some members questioned the audit findings, the focus on rural counties, and whether the program was a good use of funds, while supporters emphasized its value for school safety. The committee adopted the amendment and passed SB 1582 as amended on a 6-4 vote. Finally, the committee began hearing Senate Bill 1504, which would change retirement rules for Tier 2 and Tier 3 public safety personnel by allowing earlier normal retirement and shortening the COLA waiting period, with an amendment exempting the changes from the statutory pre-funding requirement. Supporters from firefighter and police groups said the bill would improve recruitment and retention and let employees receive earned benefits sooner, while city, county, and taxpayer representatives warned it would add substantial unfunded liabilities and undermine the 2016 pension reforms. Actuarial testimony estimated significant costs, including tens of millions in annual or upfront impacts depending on how the change is funded, and members debated whether the amendment would shift costs onto future taxpayers or simply spread them over time. The transcript ends during continued testimony and discussion on SB 1504, before a final vote is reached.