Video & Transcript : 'tax refund' :

Page 76 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/26/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:03:26.519><c> on</c><00:03:26.840><c> any</c> be refunded the 1.8% tax revenue on any be refunded
  • a</c><00:08:11.440><c> annual</c> Legend tax drug refund from a annual Legend tax drug refund from a
  • </c><00:30:24.240><c> refunds</c><00:30:24.679><c> for</c> parity and property tax refunds for parity
  • </c> larger uh property tax larger uh property tax refund<00:37:02.280><c> um</c><00:37:02.839><c> yeah
  • </c> to the differences in property tax to the differences in property tax refunds<00:37:07.599><c> between
Committee: House Taxes
Keywords: 1183, house
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Taxes - 04/08/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • for</c> refundable sales tax exemption for refundable sales tax exemption for construction<00:21:45.360
  • He said tax refunds and tax credits help stabilize family incomes.
  • in tax refunds back into hundred million in tax refunds back into the<01:35:45.199><c> hardworking</
  • ><c> help</c><01:35:59.760><c> sta</c> refunds and tax credits help sta refunds and tax credits help
  • By providing outreach state tax refunds.
Committee: Senate Taxes
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 2/18/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • An idea of the scope of the work that occurs, and the total is about 7.2 million tax returns and refunds
  • ;D tax credit partially refundable R&amp;D tax credit partially refundable 25%<01:17:04.639><c> uh</c
  • I think that, you know, there are a couple of corporate tax credits that are refundable, but that is
  • that are corporate tax credits that are refundable<01:22:11.120><c> but</c><01:22:11.320><c> that</c
  • Now, with the new law and with the renter's refund becoming a renter's credit on the income tax form,
Committee: House Taxes
Keywords: 1183, house
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Mar 13th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Bills: SJR18 , SCR9 , SCR13 , SB10 , SB14 , SB19 , SB263 , SB412 , SB441 , SB523 , SB569 , SB687 , SB688 , SB707 , SB766 , SB914 , SB971 , SB1006 , SB1066 , SJR36 , SJR18 , SCR9 , SCR13 , SCR25 , SB565 , SB372 , SB495 , SB842 , SB971 , SB1066 , SB765 , SB523 , SB62 , SB19 , SB18 , SB666 , SB688 , SB707 , SB888 , SB687 , SB706 , SB847 , SB290 , SB766 , SB11 , SB10 , SB13 , SB263 , SB412 , SB441 , SB569 , SB914 , SB1248 , SB740 , SB14 , SB1006 , SB504 , SB917 , SB925 , SB388 , SB1902 , SB1121 , SB995 , SB857 , SB305 , SB296 , SB284 , SB35 , SB6 , SB815 , SB3 , SB1281 , SB1379 , SB1300 , SB1497 , SB1499 , SB1498 , SB1451 , SB263 , SB523 , SB569 , SB688 , SB766 , SB914 , SB971 , SB1066 , SR215 , SR245 , SR247 , SR258 , SCR9 , SJR56 , SJR63 , SJR64 , SJR69 , SJR70 , SJR71 , SCR30 , SCR31 , SCR32 , SCR33 , SB1701 , SB1702 , SB1703 , SB1704 , SB1705 , SB1706 , SB1707 , SB1708 , SB1709 , SB1710 , SB1711 , SB1712 , SB1713 , SB1714 , SB1715 , SB1716 , SB1717 , SB1718 , SB1719 , SB1720 , SB1721 , SB1722 , SB1723 , SB1724 , SB1725 , SB1726 , SB1727 , SB1728 , SB1729 , SB1730 , SB1731 , SB1732 , SB1733 , SB1734 , SB1735 , SB1736 , SB1737 , SB1738 , SB1739 , SB1740 , SB1741 , SB1742 , SB1743 , SB1744 , SB1745 , SB1746 , SB1747 , SB1748 , SB1749 , SB1750 , SB1751 , SB1752 , SB1753 , SB1754 , SB1755 , SB1756 , SB1757 , SB1758 , SB1759 , SB1760 , SB1761 , SB1762 , SB1763 , SB1764 , SB1765 , SB1766 , SB1767 , SB1768 , SB1769 , SB1770 , SB1771 , SB1772 , SB1773 , SB1774 , SB1775 , SB1776 , SB1777 , SB1778 , SB1779 , SB1781 , SB1782 , SB1783 , SB1784 , SB1785 , SB1786 , SB1787 , SB1788 , SB1789 , SB1790 , SB1791 , SB1792 , SB1793 , SB1794 , SB1795 , SB1796 , SB1797 , SB1798 , SB1799 , SB1800 , SB1801 , SB1802 , SB1803 , SB1804 , SB1805 , SB1806 , SB1807 , SB1808 , SB1809 , SB1810 , SB1811 , SB1812 , SB1813 , SB1814 , SB1815 , SB1816 , SB1817 , SB1818 , SB1819 , SB1820 , SB1821 , SB1822 , SB1823 , SB1824 , SB1825 , SB1826 , SB1827 , SB1828 , SB1829 , SB1830 , SB1831 , SB1832 , SB1833 , SB1834 , SB1835 , SB1836 , SB1837 , SB1838 , SB1839 , SB1840 , SB1841 , SB1842 , SB1843 , SB1844 , SB1845 , SB1846 , SB1847 , SB1848 , SB1849 , SB1850 , SB2188 , SB2230 , SB2312 , SB2345 , SJR56 , SJR63 , SJR64 , SJR69 , SJR70 , SJR71 , SCR30 , SCR31 , SCR32 , SCR33 , SB1701 , SB1702 , SB1703 , SB1704 , SB1705 , SB1706 , SB1707 , SB1708 , SB1709 , SB1710 , SB1711 , SB1712 , SB1713 , SB1714 , SB1715 , SB1716 , SB1717 , SB1718 , SB1719 , SB1720 , SB1721 , SB1722 , SB1723 , SB1724 , SB1725 , SB1726 , SB1727 , SB1728 , SB1729 , SB1730 , SB1731 , SB1732 , SB1733 , SB1734 , SB1735 , SB1736 , SB1737 , SB1738 , SB1739 , SB1740 , SB1741 , SB1742 , SB1743 , SB1744 , SB1745 , SB1746 , SB1747 , SB1748 , SB1749 , SB1750 , SB1751 , SB1752 , SB1753 , SB1754 , SB1755 , SB1756 , SB1757 , SB1758 , SB1759 , SB1760 , SB1761 , SB1762 , SB1763 , SB1764 , SB1765 , SB1766 , SB1767 , SB1768 , SB1769 , SB1770 , SB1771 , SB1772 , SB1773 , SB1774 , SB1775 , SB1776 , SB1777 , SB1778 , SB1779 , SB1781 , SB1782 , SB1783 , SB1784 , SB1785 , SB1786 , SB1787 , SB1788 , SB1789 , SB1790 , SB1791 , SB1792 , SB1793 , SB1794 , SB1795 , SB1796 , SB1797 , SB1798 , SB1799 , SB1800 , SB1801 , SB1802 , SB1803 , SB1804 , SB1805 , SB1806 , SB1807 , SB1808 , SB1809 , SB1810 , SB1811 , SB1812 , SB1813 , SB1814 , SB1815 , SB1816 , SB1817 , SB1818 , SB1819 , SB1820 , SB1821 , SB1822 , SB1823 , SB1824 , SB1825 , SB1826 , SB1827 , SB1828 , SB1829 , SB1830 , SB1831 , SB1832 , SB1833 , SB1834 , SB1835 , SB1836 , SB1837 , SB1838 , SB1839 , SB1840 , SB1841 , SB1842 , SB1843 , SB1844 , SB1845 , SB1846 , SB1847 , SB1848 , SB1849 , SB1850 , SB2188 , SB2230 , SB2312 , SB2345
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Appropriations Jan 21st, 2026 at 04:00 pm

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • business and occupation taxes that would otherwise be owed, and the refund value charges are also exempt
  • from the state litter tax.
  • that would otherwise be owed, and the refund value charges are also exempt from the state litter tax
  • The deposit refund system changes that.
  • All right, we have students who don't pay taxes over here advocating for these tax bills and coming in
Bills: HB1607 , HB2159 , HB2441 , HB2521 , HB2531 , HB2543
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Revenue Jun 21st, 2026 at 10:00 am

Joint Committee on Revenue

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 4082 would change the existing Title V septic tax credit to a refundable tax credit, thereby
  • the tax credit from a non-refundable to a refundable tax credit, thereby enabling all eligible homeowners
  • tax credit that allows primary homeowners in non-refundable Title V septic tax credit that allows primary
  • tax credit from a non-refundable to a refundable tax credit. thereby who seeks to change the tax credit
  • from a non-refundable to a refundable tax credit, thereby enabling all eligible homeowners to realize
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The Joint Committee on Revenue held a public hearing on bills related to transportation, telecommunications, and utilities, with Senators Eldridge, Rausch, and Jehlen and House members including Co-Chair Madaro, Leader Donato, Representatives Paulino, Wells, Gómez, and Plouffe present. The chairs reviewed hearing procedures, deadlines for written testimony, and the new joint rules governing action on bills. No votes were taken; the hearing was for testimony only and was adjourned after public comment. Testimony began with strong support for Senate Bill 1998 and House Bill 3230, An Act Enhancing Renewable Heating Solutions for the Commonwealth. A representative of the Coalition for Renewable Natural Gas said the bill would help decarbonize heating by allowing utilities to use renewable natural gas and other qualified renewable fuels, while also supporting jobs and local economic development. The committee then heard support for House Bill 4082, which would make the Title V septic tax credit refundable; the Falmouth Water Quality Management Committee said this would better help lower- and middle-income homeowners facing costly septic upgrades or sewer connections in nitrogen-sensitive coastal areas. The committee also heard opposition to House Bill 4080 and Senate Bill 1924 from the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, which argued that higher aviation fuel taxes would not be justified without a clear aeronautical use for the revenue and noted federal restrictions on aviation fuel tax proceeds. In contrast, a coalition opposing private jet expansion supported Senate Bill 1924, saying a higher jet fuel tax would better align tax policy with climate and public health goals and help address aviation emissions. Finally, the Metropolitan Area Planning Council supported House Bill 3050 on regional ballot initiatives, arguing that local revenue tools could help cities and towns fund transportation projects and reduce pressure on state transportation dollars.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Taxes - 02/13/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • 00:26:20.919><c> on</c><00:26:21.279><c> materials</c><00:26:22.279><c> for</c> refund of uh sales tax
  • on materials for refund of uh sales tax on materials for a<00:26:22.640><c> project</c><00:26:23.080
  • With that, Madam Chair, this particular project, of course, requests a refund of sales tax for... um
  • </c><00:38:15.560><c> uh</c> requesting a refund of sales tax for uh requesting a refund of sales tax
  • /c> see here is refund of sales tax on see here is refund of sales tax on supplies<00:41:57.359><c> for
Committee: Senate Taxes
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 4/2/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • Those taxes and wholesalers will then submit a request to have that money refunded to them, and very
  • the tax liability that isn't being used on that credit, up to 25% of that, is refundable, and all other
  • the tax liability that isn't being used on that credit, up to 25% of that, is refundable, and all other
  • the tax liability that isn't being used on that credit, up to 25% of that, is refundable, and all other
  • refundable R&amp;D making the R&amp;D tax credit refundable up<00:45:33.960><c> to</c><00:45:34.119>
Committee: House Taxes
Keywords: 1183, house
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Taxes - 05/07/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:15:21.600><c> have</c><00:15:21.680><c> a</c> tax refund um expected to have a tax refund um
  • tax refunds.
  • ><c> by</c> property tax refunds by property tax refunds by $130,000.<00:17:01.279><c> On</c><00:17:01.519
  • to the property tax refund.
  • <c> for</c> the property tax refund is effective for the property tax refund is effective for taxable
Committee: Senate Taxes
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • So, just very quickly, House File 2499 would expand the renters credit to ensure property tax refunds
  • The homestead credit is a state-paid refund to homeowners whose property taxes are also high relative
  • </c><00:04:32.240><c> and</c> tax refunds for both homeowners and tax refunds for both homeowners and
  • </c><00:05:07.759><c> refunds</c> renters's uh property tax refunds renters's uh property tax refunds
  • Some more renters will qualify, and some renters will get a larger property tax refund.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee heard House File 2499, authored by Representative Lee, which would expand Minnesota’s renters’ credit to more closely match the homestead credit for homeowners. Lee explained that the bill would raise the income cutoff from about $75,389 to $143,140 and increase the maximum credit to $3,500, with the goal of addressing what she described as an inequity between renters and homeowners who both pay property taxes. She cited revenue estimates showing the change could make about 80,000 additional renters eligible, while acknowledging the bill would be costly to enact this year. Nan Madden of the Minnesota Budget Project testified in support, describing how the renters’ credit works, including the assumption that 17% of rent goes toward property taxes. She highlighted 2022 data showing most recipients had low incomes, many were seniors or people with disabilities, and participation was higher in greater Minnesota in some respects. Michael Dah of Homeline also supported the bill, saying renters face rising housing costs and use the credit for basic needs such as groceries, school supplies, medical care, and car repairs. Members discussed whether expanding the credit would simply benefit landlords or encourage rent increases. Representative Anderson opposed the bill on the grounds that policy should incentivize homeownership, while Representative Huitt argued the credit could help renters build savings and move toward homeownership if they choose. Representative Lee responded that the housing market is broken and that the credit is one tool to help renters in a broader housing continuum. The discussion also covered outreach and administration of the credit, including the recent move to file it with income taxes, electronic certificates of rent paid, and funding for tax-preparation assistance and outreach through VITA sites and community organizations. The bill was laid over for possible inclusion in the omnibus tax bill.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Mar 11th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • employees that are allowed to exempt their names from public disclosure on state records and in property tax
Bills: SJR36 , SJR34 , SJR18 , SCR9 , SB616 , SB565 , SB384 , SB140 , SB262 , SB370 , SB372 , SB495 , SB627 , SB764 , SB842 , SB971 , SB767 , SB480 , SB1066 , SB929 , SB765 , SB523 , SB62 , SB19 , SB18 , SB666 , SB688 , SB707 , SB888 , SB687 , SB706 , SB847 , SB869 , SB890 , SB992 , SB1145 , SB494 , SB290 , SB766 , SB11 , SB10 , SB13 , SB263 , SB412 , SB20 , SB441 , SB442 , SB1621 , SCR13 , SB569 , SB314 , SB25 , SB293 , SB914 , SB260 , SB1248 , SB740 , SB14 , SJR34 , SCR9 , SB10 , SB11 , SB19 , SB20 , SB25 , SB62 , SB140 , SB260 , SB262 , SB290 , SB293 , SB314 , SB370 , SB384 , SB412 , SB441 , SB442 , SB480 , SB494 , SB495 , SB616 , SB627 , SB706 , SB707 , SB764 , SB767 , SB869 , SB890 , SB929 , SB992 , SB1145 , SB1621 , SJR34 , SB140 , SB262 , SB370 , SB480 , SB627 , SB764 , SB767 , SR224 , SB1626 , SB1627 , SB1628 , SB1629 , SB1630 , SB1631 , SB1632 , SB1633 , SB1634 , SB1635 , SB1636 , SB1637 , SB1638 , SB1639 , SB1640 , SB1641 , SB1642 , SB1643 , SB1644 , SB1645 , SB1646 , SB1647 , SB1648 , SB1649 , SB1650 , SB1651 , SB1652 , SB1653 , SB1654 , SB1656 , SB1657 , SB1658 , SB1659 , SB1660 , SB1661 , SB1662 , SB1663 , SB1664 , SB1665 , SB1666 , SB1667 , SB1668 , SB1669 , SB1670 , SB1671 , SB1672 , SB1673 , SB1674 , SB1675 , SB1676 , SB1677 , SB1678 , SB1679 , SB1680 , SB1681 , SB1682 , SB1683 , SB1684 , SB1685 , SB1686 , SB1687 , SB1688 , SB1689 , SB1690 , SB1691 , SB1692 , SB1693 , SB1694 , SB1695 , SB1696 , SB1697 , SB1698 , SB1699 , SB1700 , SB1626 , SB1627 , SB1628 , SB1629 , SB1630 , SB1631 , SB1632 , SB1633 , SB1634 , SB1635 , SB1636 , SB1637 , SB1638 , SB1639 , SB1640 , SB1641 , SB1642 , SB1643 , SB1644 , SB1645 , SB1646 , SB1647 , SB1648 , SB1649 , SB1650 , SB1651 , SB1652 , SB1653 , SB1654 , SB1656 , SB1657 , SB1658 , SB1659 , SB1660 , SB1661 , SB1662 , SB1663 , SB1664 , SB1665 , SB1666 , SB1667 , SB1668 , SB1669 , SB1670 , SB1671 , SB1672 , SB1673 , SB1674 , SB1675 , SB1676 , SB1677 , SB1678 , SB1679 , SB1680 , SB1681 , SB1682 , SB1683 , SB1684 , SB1685 , SB1686 , SB1687 , SB1688 , SB1689 , SB1690 , SB1691 , SB1692 , SB1693 , SB1694 , SB1695 , SB1696 , SB1697 , SB1698 , SB1699 , SB1700
CO

Colorado 2026 Regular Session

Colorado Senate 2026 Legislative Day 115 May 8th, 2026

Colorado Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • . refunded. refunded.
  • . refund. refund.
  • tax</c> taxes reduced.
  • State tax State tax taxes reduced.
  • out</c><01:40:03.960><c> the</c> TABOR refund uh TABOR refunds out the TABOR refund uh TABOR refunds
Keywords: 981, all
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/29/2026 - House Rural Economic Development

House Rural Economic Development Committee of Reference

Transcript Highlights:
  • paid the tax, not the consumers to whom the tax was passed down.
  • So we paid into this tax.
  • paid the tax, not the consumers to whom the tax was passed down.
  • So we paid into this tax.
  • So we paid into this tax.
Summary: The Committee on Rural Economic Development convened, adopted its committee rules, and briefly introduced members and staff. The chair noted a hard stop time and moved quickly through the agenda. The committee also heard a general discussion that future meetings would likely include a mix of rural housing, broadband, transportation, and economic development measures. The committee passed HB 2258, which adds La Paz County to Area 4 for representation on the Tourism Advisory Council, on a 7-0 vote. It then considered several Apache Junction and Pinal County-related appropriation bills. HB 2065 would appropriate $9.5 million for housing infrastructure, rehabilitation, and blight abatement in Apache Junction; HB 2066 would appropriate $8 million for broadband and fiber expansion there; and HB 2071 would appropriate $15.5 million for a rural business and workforce hub, infrastructure revitalization, and a rural health/community services facility. Members and the sponsor emphasized rural housing shortages, broadband gaps, and the need to bring Apache Junction and other rural areas up to parity with larger cities. The committee also passed HB 2106 on a 7-0 vote. That bill would direct undistributed or non-refunded revenues from a county transportation excise tax, collected before April 10, 2026, to ADOT for county transportation projects, with the sponsor explaining it as a way to use remaining Pinal County tax proceeds for roads after litigation and refunds. Several members discussed the need for broader rural investment, including possible amendments to include the Navajo Nation and other rural communities, and one bill was held over for the next agenda due to time.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Taxes - 02/26/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • ><c> tax</c><00:08:08.960><c> increment</c><00:08:09.520><c> financing</c> generated from tax increment
  • </c> understand this is an existing tax understand this is an existing tax increment<00:14:14.240><c>
  • And so that mortgage and dean tax.
  • or applications for refunds.
  • And what can be covered in that refund cannot be greater than the tax that's due, penalties, and the
Committee: Senate Taxes
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Appropriations Jan 21st, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • business and occupation taxes that would otherwise be owed, and the refund value charges are also exempt
  • from the state litter tax.
  • The refund value charges are also exempt from the state litter tax.
  • The deposit refund system changes that.
  • All right, we have students who don't pay taxes over here advocating for these tax bills and coming in
Summary: The committee held a public hearing and briefing on several bills, with House Bill 2441, House Bill 2159, House Bill 2521, House Bill 2531, House Bill 2543, and House Bill 1607 discussed in that order after agenda changes. HB 2441 would expand reimbursement from the LEO retirement fund for survivors of law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty, covering Medicare Parts A and B premiums and retroactive health insurance premiums during the period before a death is officially determined to be work-related. Staff described a relatively small number of affected survivors and modest actuarial impacts, and the prime sponsor spoke emotionally in support. A representative from the L&I Board also testified that the board had studied the issue and endorsed the bill. HB 2159 would create the Pre-K Promise Account to receive philanthropic funds for ECEAP expansion. Staff explained ECEAP eligibility and the proposed non-appropriated account structure, noting Governor Ferguson’s budget included $34.5 million in non-appropriated authority for about 2,000 new school-day slots. Testimony was strongly supportive from Ballmer Group, DCYF, Head Start/ECEAP advocates, a Yakima provider, and the governor’s office, all emphasizing the public-private partnership, expanded access, and support for children furthest from opportunity. HB 2521 would remove the $18 cap on the State Patrol’s firearm background check fee and allow the fee to be set to cover total program costs. Staff said the fee could rise to about $33 per check based on current costs, and the State Patrol testified that the cap no longer matches actual expenses and threatens staffing and service levels. One member of the public opposed the bill, arguing the state system should be scrapped or capped and that consumers would face higher costs. HB 2531 would freeze the ambulance quality assurance fee at its July 4, 2025 level to comply with federal law and adjust Medicaid add-on payments accordingly; the Washington Ambulance Association strongly supported it as essential to preserving federal matching funds and improving wages and benefits. HB 2543 would update county clerk fees and modernize outdated references, with county officials supporting the changes as necessary to reflect current electronic-record practices. HB 1607, the Recycling Refund Act, drew the most extensive testimony. Staff described a 10-cent refund system for covered beverage containers, a producer responsibility organization, Ecology oversight, and fiscal impacts tied to program administration and lost tax revenue. Supporters, including environmental groups, youth advocates, Seattle Public Utilities, and some industry voices, argued the bill would reduce litter, increase recycling rates, support reuse systems, and complement the existing recycling reform law. Opponents from recycling haulers, grocers, beverage interests, counties, and solid waste providers argued it would function like a tax, raise consumer and retailer costs, duplicate or undermine curbside recycling and EPR, and create siting and implementation problems. No votes were taken on the bills in this transcript; the hearing concluded with public testimony and adjournment.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • Our state has a strong foundation for R&D, making the R&D tax credit refundable up to 25% ensures that
  • refund uh refundable R&amp;D regarding the refund uh refundable R&amp;D tax<00:36:25.920><c> credit<
  • </c><00:37:09.560><c> credit</c><00:37:09.800><c> refundable</c> R&amp;D making the R&amp;D tax credit
  • refundable R&amp;D making the R&amp;D tax credit refundable up<00:37:10.480><c> to</c><00:37:10.599>
  • the threshold for filing an income tax return. ...accounting services to perhaps claim a refund they
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee took up House File 2437, the governor’s proposed tax bill, and first adopted the A25-Z42 amendment to put the bill in the desired shape. Commissioner Paul Marquardt of the Department of Revenue then presented the bill as part of Governor Walz and Lieutenant Governor Flanagan’s budget, describing it as a response to budget pressures that would make the tax system more fair and stable while supporting economic development and jobs. Marquardt walked through the bill’s major provisions. These included sustainable aviation fuel policy, repeal of K-12 education credit assignment, elimination of the political contribution refund, expansion of the research and development credit, short-line railroad infrastructure modernization, changes to the state airport fund levy, replacement of attachments and appearances with distribution systems, a narrow personal property tax exception for low-income housing tenants, reduced aquatic invasive species aid, and a 34% reduction in PILT payments. He then focused on the sales tax article, saying it would lower the statewide rate by 0.75% while expanding the base to selected professional services such as accounting, banking, brokerage, and legal services, with business-to-business transactions exempt. He said the proposal would be effective for sales and purchases after September 30, 2025, and estimated a first-year rate-cut impact of about $99 million versus $215 million from the service expansion, while arguing that most households would see a net tax cut. He also noted other changes such as landlord penalty adjustments, a 30% reduction in sustainable aviation fuel incentive payments, repeal of local government cannabis aid, and repeal of the tax filing modernization account. Public testimony began with Kyle Playford of the Financial Planning Association of Minnesota, who strongly opposed the proposed sales tax on professional services, especially financial planning. He argued that financial planning is an essential service for retirement, investment, and long-term financial security, and said the tax would raise costs for consumers, reduce access for middle-class families, small business owners, and retirees, and put Minnesota firms at a competitive disadvantage. The chair then indicated that additional public testimony would continue before member questions.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Taxes - 01/29/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • > uh</c><00:47:09.960><c> know</c> property tax refund she didn't uh know property tax refund she didn't
  • </c><00:47:31.280><c> refund</c><00:47:32.119><c> who</c> aware of the property tax refund who aware
  • </c> file the property tax refund so they are file the property tax refund so they are automatically<
  • tax refund if it legitimate um property tax refund if it had<00:49:11.880><c> been</c><00:49:12.520>
  • </c> of the property tax refund which I think of the property tax refund which I think is<00:55:22.400
Committee: Senate Taxes
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session - part 2 Mar 17th, 2025

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I know we covered that earlier, that through tax... Property tax refunds.
  • You would be eligible if you paid a tax refund if she has zero tax liability, although she pays taxes
  • I pay property taxes on it. Would I be eligible for a refund under your proposal?
  • Somebody who pays sales taxes is not eligible for a refund. under your bill.
  • And we talked about how we have structured past refunds as sales tax rebates.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/18/2026 - House Ways & Means

House Ways & Means Committee of Reference

Transcript Highlights:
  • Taxpayers that collected and remitted this tax had until April 9, 2026, to submit a refund request.
  • The approach in this bill, instead of a sales tax refund, is a refund to income taxpayers, a rebate to
  • So it's a substantial refund, and it makes right the illegal collection of that sales tax over that period
  • HB 4037 creates a new refundable individual tax credit, which this legislation strengthens educational
  • credit, five of which offer a refundable tax credit.
Summary: The committee first took up House Bill 2290, which would clarify transaction privilege tax sourcing rules for tangible personal property by specifying that servers are not used to determine where an order is received and by defining business location. The sponsor and supporters argued the bill simply codifies existing origin-based treatment for Arizona businesses and provides certainty, while the League of Arizona Cities and Towns and ATRA warned it would shift revenue, create compliance problems, and potentially subject businesses to multiple tax rates depending on distribution or pickup locations. The Department of Revenue said it was neutral, noted a 2023 draft ruling had reflected a legal analysis of the issue but was never finalized, and said the bill would address a real need for clarity. After extensive debate over examples involving feed stores, Target, pizza delivery, and online orders, the committee voted 5-3 with one absent to return HB 2290 with a do pass recommendation. The committee then heard House Bill 2373, which would add a space on the individual income tax return for taxpayers to voluntarily contribute part of a refund to the Veterans Donations Fund or Veterans Service Organization Fund. The sponsor and a veterans policy advocate said the measure would give taxpayers a simple way to support veterans organizations, with examples from Colorado and local veterans projects. The bill passed unanimously, 8-0 with one absent, and was returned with a do pass recommendation. Finally, the committee considered House Bill 2143, a technical PSPRS measure that would limit the 5% ownership cap to publicly traded corporations. PSPRS representatives said the change would align the statute with its intended purpose, reduce unnecessary workarounds and legal costs, and preserve broader investment flexibility while maintaining other risk controls. Members discussed how the cap compares with ASRS and other retirement systems, and the bill was still under discussion at the end of the transcript.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Taxes - 01/21/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:01:53.799><c> renter</c> property tax refund for uh the renter property tax refund for uh the
  • </c> in policy now uh the the property tax in policy now uh the the property tax refund<00:02:06.600>
  • > is</c> property tax refund program uh is property tax refund program uh is somewhat<00:03:09.360><c
  • property tax refund would be on the income tax return, that would also require an amended return.
  • property tax refund would be on the property tax refund would be on the income<00:08:11.599><c> tax</
Committee: Senate Taxes
Keywords: 1187, senate, all