Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial power'

Page 6 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Aug 26th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Various matters of judicial administration are always in this bill.
  • On the floor, a couple more local changes were made to the 501st Judicial District in Fort Minn County
  • It contains my Senate Bill 1575, which implements vital recommendations of the Texas Judicial Council
  • Or are other candidates for judicial office subject to the same restrictions?
  • I hear that they are through judicial canon.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House State Government Committee Mar 18th, 2026

State Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • ADEM to decommission and restore abandoned solar farms which have not operated or produced and sold power
  • operated or produced any or produced and operated or produced any or produced and sold<00:29:41.200> power
  • sold power to the grid in three years. sold power to the grid in three years. authorizes<00:29:44.799
Bills: SB88, SB337
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - House Ways & Means

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • As it was described, House Bill 2780 makes targeted technical updates to Arizona's judicial tax lien
  • What it does is it clarifies when a judicial tax lien foreclosure should proceed as a public... ...counties
  • What it does is it clarifies when a judicial tax lien foreclosure should proceed as a public sale rather
  • In addition to voting on the regular election cycle, they have the power of initiative, referendum, and
  • But what I want you to know is counties are very judicious in raising those.
Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 2780, a technical cleanup measure related to Arizona’s judicial tax lien foreclosure and excess proceeds process. The sponsor and a witness said the bill clarifies when a court should order a public sale, standardizes distribution of sale proceeds, and corrects inconsistencies left from prior reforms. No opposition was raised, and the committee approved HB 2780 unanimously on a 9-0 do pass vote. The committee then took up House Bill 4029, which would require the Governor’s Office of Strategic Planning and Budgeting and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee to evaluate the revenue impact of federal tax conformity changes earlier in the process, and would require the Department of Revenue to issue tax forms consistent with statute. An amendment was adopted to have OSPB and JLBC each make the evaluation and to require a governor’s report if the impact is $100 million or more, along with new reporting deadlines for DOR. Supporters argued the bill would force earlier action on conformity and prevent tax forms from diverging from statute; opponents said it added bureaucracy and could delay filing. The committee approved HB 4029 as amended by a 5-4 vote. The committee also heard House Bill 4030 and the related HCR 2052, both aimed at limiting local tax and fee increases. HB 4030 would bar municipalities and counties from adopting, imposing, or collecting increased fees, transaction privilege taxes, and utility rates from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2030. The sponsor said the measure was intended to protect taxpayers from inflation and rising local costs. Cities, counties, and utility representatives opposed the bills, warning they would hinder infrastructure financing, water and wastewater projects, road improvements, and public safety services, and could force general fund subsidies or delayed maintenance. Supporters argued local governments have seen substantial revenue growth and should be restrained from further increases. The committee did not reach a final vote on HB 4030 or HCR 2052 in the portion provided.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • So there is no judicial discretion at that point.
  • As we're considering these sorts of circumstances, I just ask that we maintain judicial discretion in
Bills: SB3073, SJR87
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 7th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The result is denying a powerful therapeutic option for those here—moms, kids, veterans—which will be
  • That's 75,000 Texans from all walks of life who found real therapeutic relief through the power of the
  • the federal government control of interstate commerce, and it does give the states certain limited powers
  • Now, at what point do those things give way to the state's police power, the state's ability to call
  • Police power to say, "Hey, that stuff, that other stuff, that's really, really bad, should be off the
Bills: HB28, SB3, SB 3
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 7th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • You’re going to hear some powerful testimony later in this hearing.
  • I experienced the power of one of my products myself.
  • It's about protecting profits for powerful corporations.
  • Tyranny is the oppressive and unjust exercise of power.
  • Because it threatened powerful industries. Today, we know better.
Bills: SB 3, HB28, SB3
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 23rd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, I'm ruling that these powers previously were unconstitutional.
  • that power is exclusively theirs, except in very limited circumstances?
  • of Texans without power for weeks due to high wind damages to power lines.
  • This bill. allows non-profit water supply corporations to sell excess power generation back to the power
  • This one bill talked about using power for our own use, but also selling that excess power to, among
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 23rd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is the second piece of the reforms to the Emergency Powers Act.
  • There are two types of powers that are implicated under the two different types of declarations.
  • The bill doesn't expand investigative powers under Article 18B.
  • I mean, they have a lot of power in this regard.
  • Is this a lot of power to get through to the AG? They should be here.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Apr 1st, 2025

Alabama House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Legislative, welcome all Southern Legislative, welcome all Southern Legislative, Executive, and Judicial
  • Officials to our Executive, and Judicial Officials to our Executive, and Judicial Officials to our great
  • Power Partners legislative reception is Power Partners legislative reception is Power Partners legislative
  • We don't have the power. We don't have the don't have the power.
  • We don't have the don't have the power.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 1st, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • , you've watched us give away more of the state to those who already have so much and have so much power
  • Public Utility Commission. of Texas to address the failure by an operator to maintain an electric power
  • of understanding that would allow them to work together to limit the risk of fires by shutting off power
  • HB 4368 by Power, relating to the requirements for identification numbers, inspections, and evidence
  • HB 4388 by Hull, relating to judicial authority and duties, for the Committee on Judiciary and Civil
Bills: HJR4, HJR6, HB195, HB 13, HB143, HB135
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 16th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • harder than I have to make sure judges are adequately paid, that we preserve the prerogative of the judicial
  • This bill addresses the lack of actionable prosecution data by requiring the Texas Judicial Council to
  • sort of data process in most... prosecuting attorney offices, so this would just ask that the Texas Judicial
  • It asks for a collaborative process for the Texas Judicial Council to work.
  • A mandate in the bill, it is rather the bill sets up a process by which the Texas Judicial Council will
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Justice Apr 1st, 2025

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • I am the district attorney for the hundred and six judicial district in West Texas.
  • We support this bill because it offers a practical, powerful step. towards improving re-entry outcomes
  • Members, a magistrate in Texas is a judicial officer who presides over certain criminal cases and some
  • Under their own qualification standards, hiring and firing processes, jurisdictional powers and other
  • To have not been defeated for re-election to a judicial office, and to have not been removed from office
Summary: The Senate Committee on Criminal Justice convened to address pressing issues surrounding oil field crime and safety on Texas highways. The meeting was initiated by Chair Flores, who emphasized the need for improved tools to combat repeat offenders having committed intoxicated driving, alongside tackling oil field theft that has escalated due to organized criminal activities. The committee heard public testimonies and engaged with various stakeholders, including law enforcement and industry representatives, who highlighted the complexities and dangers associated with these crimes. Notably, a significant focus was placed on Senate Bill 1320, which aims to establish a dedicated unit within the Department of Public Safety to investigate and address thefts specific to the oil and gas industry. This initiative seeks to strengthen coordination among various law enforcement agencies and improve training for local officers to combat these sophisticated theft operations more effectively.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I am the district attorney for the 106th Judicial District in West Texas.
  • We support this bill because it offers a practical, powerful step towards improving reentry outcomes.
  • and in good standing with the State Bar of Texas, not having been defeated for re-election to a judicial
  • Chapter 54 magistrate eligibility for certain removal provisions through the State Commission on Judicial
  • and in good standing with the state bar of Texas, to have not been defeated for re-election to a judicial
Summary: The committee heard and advanced several criminal justice bills, with most of the discussion focused on oilfield theft, DWI enforcement, juvenile justice, reentry licensing, jail transparency, and court/judicial standards. SB 1320 would create a DPS oilfield theft unit headquartered in the Permian Basin; supporters from industry, law enforcement, and a district attorney described increasingly sophisticated, organized theft tied to cartels and multi-jurisdictional criminal networks, while DPS said it currently has only two officers working the issue. The committee voted SB 1320 out unanimously and placed it on the local and uncontested calendar. SB 826, which would enhance DWI committed in a school zone to a state jail felony, also passed unanimously after brief explanation and no testimony. SB 1171, adding juvenile justice OIG peace officers to Schedule C salary, was reported favorably on a committee substitute, and SB 1080, which would allow incarcerated people to obtain occupational licenses effective upon release, also passed on a committee substitute after testimony from formerly incarcerated advocates and reentry supporters. The committee also considered several bills aimed at tougher DWI penalties. SB 476 would increase intoxication manslaughter penalties when the offender violates an ignition interlock restriction; the bill was supported by the author, victims’ family members, Galveston officials, and law enforcement, but opposed by the Texas Civil Rights Project, which argued treatment and prevention would be more effective. After discussion about possible amendments, the bill was left pending. SB 745 would create a new first-degree felony option for intoxication manslaughter involving multiple deaths, and it was reported favorably after testimony from a prosecutor supporting the need for a stronger sentencing option. SB 2320 would broadly increase penalties for DWI offenses, including first-time DWI, DWI with an open container, high-BAC DWI, and repeat offenses; it was supported by a grieving family member and a sheriff, and the committee voted it out favorably. On juvenile justice, SB 1727 would expand tools to address assaults on staff at Texas Juvenile Justice Department facilities by lowering the age for transfer to adult prison in some cases, allowing earlier transfer of determinate-sentence youth, and restricting release when a criminal case is pending. Juvenile probation officials supported the bill as a public safety and victim-rights measure, while the Texas Civil Rights Project opposed it, arguing it would send children to inappropriate adult facilities and conflict with juvenile justice principles; the bill was left pending. SB 1437 would expand the juvenile justice do-not-hire registry to include non-certified positions, and it passed unanimously after supporters said it would help close loopholes that allow predators to move between child-serving jobs. SB 2289, requiring counties that house inmates out of state to report that information and any deaths to the Texas Commission on Jail Standards, also passed unanimously. Finally, SB 989, requiring criminal background checks for court personnel who determine bail, and SB 664, establishing statewide qualifications and oversight for magistrates and associate judges, were explained and discussed as transparency and public-safety measures, with SB 989 reported favorably and SB 664 under committee consideration at the end of the transcript.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/3/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • It gives governments the power to spy on us wherever they go, tracking our faces at protests, political
  • I'll also say that, you know, when we are talking about bills like this, it's not about who's in power
  • who's in power at the time.<00:29:29.039> And<00:29:29.600> this<00:29:29.919> is
  • <00:29:56.320> shift<00:29:56.640> at<00:29:56.799> the when there's a power
  • Um similar to uh the of who's in power.
Summary: The committee approved the minutes from February 24 and February 26. It then took up House File 3661, a bill originally authored by Representative Gomez and presented by Representative Feist, which would ban government use of facial recognition technology and be re-referred to the Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee. The committee adopted the A1 amendment, described as a technical amendment based on House Research recommendations, before hearing testimony on the bill. Representative Feist said the bill is aimed at preventing serious privacy and civil-liberties harms, including secretive surveillance, racial and gender bias, and the lack of statewide rules governing government use of facial recognition. Supportive testimony came from Chad Marlo of the ACLU, who argued the issue is bipartisan, the technology has accuracy problems, and government use is expanding against vulnerable groups. Chris Wayland of Restore the Fourth Minnesota also supported a ban, emphasizing the inability to opt out of facial recognition and the lack of standards, disclosure, and community input. Rich Newmeister urged stronger transparency measures, including agency policies and public notice in buildings using the technology. Major Spencer Baky of the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office opposed an outright ban, saying facial recognition is used only as an investigative lead, not for positive identification or real-time surveillance, and that results are corroborated before use. He said the office has used the tool in hundreds of investigations and supports a statutory framework with safeguards instead of a ban. In member discussion, Representative Hudson argued a blanket ban was too broad and suggested a more targeted evidentiary approach, while Representative Moller and Representative Kurr expressed concern about misuse and the federal government's use of the technology. Representative Durant asked whether there was a current Minnesota problem and whether stakeholders and law enforcement had been involved in drafting the bill. No final vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided, beyond adoption of the amendment and the committee’s continued consideration of HF 3661.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 26th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Now if I recall correctly, and I may be wrong, but if I recall correctly, judicial candidates are subject
  • I believe that's true that judicial candidates are subject to the same canons, the same rules that, that
  • , that judges are when they run for election, for reelection, and the judicial, my understanding is,
  • uh, Dean, that the judicial campaign finance rules are much more stringent than the ones we are under
  • The judicial branch really is a is a is not involved in our actions here to make legislation.
Bills: SB 53, SB 54, HB16, SB 19