Video & Transcript Research : 'lease termination'

Page 5 of 342
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Currently, an SSCC that decides to prematurely terminate a contract with DFPS may do so with only 60
  • Similarly, DFPS may opt to terminate a contract with an SSCC with a third... a 30-day notice.
  • The premature termination of an SSCC contract impacts children with active cases. placements and may
  • This increases the required notice period for contract termination between DFPS and SSCCs to 180 days
  • For example, a pharmacist was terminated from her position at H-E-B after she refused to administer the
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 8th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I mean, let's face it, there could be damage with anyone you lease to.
  • Attracting tenants while also helping landlords lease units.
  • that in these jurisdictions, anywhere from one-third to over half of voucher recipients are unable to lease
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 8th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • independent contractors beyond 12 weeks of compensation and prohibits any severance if the individual is terminated
  • House Bill 4317 allows for up to 20 weeks of severance pay for executive employees who are not terminated
  • Those who are terminated but not because of something of their own device and still permit successive
  • About a third of those no longer operate the hospital, but lease the hospital.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Housing Finance and Policy Committee 3/18/25

Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:02:58.200><c> if</c> who are allowed to break their lease if who are allowed to break their lease
  • There's no clear termination date.
  • There's no clear termination date.
  • We do have 10,000 leases, and autistic kids are not easy.
  • </c><00:54:01.640><c> give</c> they signing up the uh the lease give they signing up the uh the lease
HI
Summary: The committee first took up HB 2611, which would prohibit algorithmic price-setting in Hawaii’s rental market, require public education by the Attorney General, and establish fines and penalties. The Department of the Attorney General opposed the bill, saying its language was too unclear and could expose landlords and agents to criminal and civil liability for ordinary rent-setting practices based on public information or assistance from property professionals. Members asked about antitrust standards, tacit agreement, and whether using county-published affordable-rent schedules would be unlawful; the AG said that would not be unlawful if based on public information and without collusion. Testimony was mixed, with the chair noting support from the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission, Hawaii Realtors with comments, 50501 Hawaii and General Strike Hawaii, Haloha Project, 13 individuals, and one opponent. The committee then heard HB 2102, which clarifies that residential projects involving ground disturbance in high-risk areas remain subject to state historic preservation review and removes an exemption for lands presumed nominally sensitive. The Office of Planning and Sustainable Development and the Department of Planning and Permitting supported the measure, saying it would improve clarity and ensure review focuses on projects most likely to affect historic properties or iwi kupuna, while also urging language refinements to better define sensitive sandy-soil areas and balance preservation with housing timelines. NAP Hawaii opposed the bill, arguing it would undo progress made last session and that the current process already includes protections for inadvertent discoveries and efficiency for lower-risk areas. The Office of Hawaiian Affairs strongly supported HB 2102, explaining it was responding to beneficiary complaints about late-added language in last year’s law and saying the nominally sensitive-area language should be removed because it was adopted without sufficient stakeholder input and could be harmful to iwi kupuna protections. Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation and several individuals also supported the bill. Committee discussion focused on how “nominally sensitive” areas are determined, whether project proponents could self-certify areas as exempt, and how high-density residential projects should be treated; SHPD said it uses survey and monitoring data to map sensitivity, that highly sensitive areas like Kīauea are not nominally sensitive, and that some high-density projects should remain exempt if they do not involve new ground disturbance. The hearing included no final vote in the portion provided, but the chair noted 48 individuals in support and continued questioning on the bill’s definitions and implementation.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WAL Public Hearing - Thu Feb 5, 2026 @ 9:00 AM HST

Water & Land

Transcript Highlights:
  • DLNR issues a lease to, um, uh, who then issues leases to the observatories.
  • DLNR issues a lease to, um, uh, who then issues leases to the observatories.
  • DLNR issues a lease to, um, uh, who then issues leases to the observatories.
  • </c> gets the property is through a lease. gets the property is through a lease.
  • Yeah, they're talking about leases while you guys are talking about leases, too.
Summary: The committee first heard HB 1527 relating to gambling. The chair outlined hearing rules, including a two-minute limit and a warning that bills not heard would die. Testimony was overwhelmingly in support from a prosecutor, Honolulu Police Department, and Stop Predatory Gambling, all arguing that casinos and sports betting increase crime, sex trafficking, harassment of athletes, and broader social harm. No opposition testimony was presented, and the committee moved on without questions or action taken on the bill. The committee then heard HB 1823 relating to coastal zone management and HB 2490 relating to coastal resilience. For HB 1823, DLNR, the Office of Planning, and Maui County testified, with Maui County supporting the measure and its proposed amendments. For HB 2490, DLNR expressed concern about exempting a proposed Mokuji Bay pilot project from permits and regulation before a long-term plan is finalized, while the County of Maui, the Mokuji Soto Zen Mission, and the Office of Planning supported the bill as a coastal resilience pilot. The mission described severe erosion, sea-level rise impacts, and years of unsuccessful efforts to stabilize the shoreline; its consultant said the study is leaning toward nature-based and hybrid solutions. In questioning, members and DLNR discussed whether the bill should say the project “shall” or “may” be exempt, and the chair indicated the language would be adjusted to preserve DLNR discretion and to change the lead agency reference to OPSD. No vote was taken in the transcript. Finally, the committee took up HB 2223 relating to historic preservation reviews. SHPD said it stood on its written comments, while OPSD and DHHL supported the bill. DHHL argued the measure would streamline reviews, improve transparency, and help address long wait times for its projects, saying it could alleviate burden on SHPD and better serve beneficiaries. Representative Shimizu questioned whether the bill would create redundancy and expand government rather than strengthen SHPD, noting a separate staffing bill already exists. SHPD responded that DHHL is uniquely subject to 6E review and that the bill would not waive federal or state historic review requirements; the discussion also touched on possible federal-style grant support and the existing memorandum of agreement between SHPD and DHHL. The transcript ends during questioning, with no final committee action shown.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/04/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair and members, Senate Bill 1029 designates a candidate committee as having the intent to terminate
  • , which spells out all those eligible uses, essentially for the disposal of campaign funds upon termination
  • 933 which spells out all those eligible uses essentially for the disposal of campaign funds upon termination
  • is that assumed An indication that if a candidate is deceased, there is that assumed intention to terminate