Transcript Highlights:

• It's a committee made up of all stakeholders: we have children's attorneys, parents' attorneys, judges
• appoint an attorney.
• It's a committee made up of all stakeholders: we have children's attorneys, parents' attorneys, judges
• appoint an attorney.
• to have their own attorney, those attorneys have to be paid.

Keywords: 909, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And then to go into the second issue, the human trafficking vertical prosecution grant program.
• Again, to fund vertical prosecution for human trafficking cases.
• using the vertical prosecution model.
• This is Jennifer Euler, the Chief Assistant Attorney General.
• There was, however, $10 million for vertical prosecution.

Summary: Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 6 heard the Governor’s May Revision proposals for the judicial branch, the Board of State and Community Corrections, the Department of Justice, and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The Legislative Analyst’s Office opened with a warning that the state budget remains structurally imbalanced and urged the Legislature to avoid new ongoing spending unless offset by reductions elsewhere. In the judicial branch discussion, the Judicial Council highlighted language access funding, appellate court security, a backfill for the state court facilities construction fund, and an extension of the lactation room mandate; Finance supported most items but suggested reporting language on interpreter costs and reducing the General Fund backfill. Members raised concerns about judicial vacancies, long-term salary freezes, remote hearings, and the lack of progress on court staffing in some counties. For the Board of State and Community Corrections, the administration proposed $10 million one-time each for the Missing and Murdered Indigenous People grant program and a human trafficking vertical prosecution grant program. The LAO said both should be weighed against other priorities and suggested the Legislature consider whether the Tribal Nations Grant Fund could support MMIP work, while Finance said it preferred General Fund support and wanted more review before any fund swap. Members strongly supported MMIP funding and asked whether ongoing support would be considered. On the human trafficking grant, Finance said BSC was a good fit because of its grant administration experience and prior vertical prosecution work, while legislators asked why the program was not placed with the Office of Emergency Services as originally contemplated in prior legislation. The Department of Justice presented antitrust litigation funding, Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse staffing, completion of organized retail criminal enterprise cases, and trailer bill language for a continuous appropriation from the Victims of Consumer Fraud Restitution Fund. The LAO supported the antitrust account use but questioned the Unfair Competition Law Fund’s ability to cover the full request without General Fund repayment, and recommended against a continuous appropriation for the restitution fund in favor of a more limited mechanism with legislative oversight. Finance said the fund would remain solvent and defended the continuous appropriation as necessary to pay victims promptly. In the CDCR portion, the largest discussion centered on the Boston Consulting Group efficiency review and sharply reduced savings estimates; LAO said the department had not fully explained the proposed position eliminations or future $100 million savings target, while Finance said the work reflected deeper analysis and ongoing efforts to find savings. Members repeatedly pressed CDCR and Finance on the gap between earlier promised savings and the revised figures. CDCR also outlined population projections showing continued declines in prison and parole populations, while LAO again urged the state to close an additional prison to save ongoing costs. The department then walked through several May Revision items, including workers’ compensation funding, a Corcoran honor housing dorm, incarcerated firefighter pay implementation, an incarcerated menopause program, mental health receiver staffing, mental health resource teams and crisis intervention teams, medical classification staffing changes, and AI note-taking for the electronic health record. LAO generally recommended limiting-term funding and more reporting for many of these proposals, while Finance defended them as necessary ongoing investments or court-ordered obligations. Members questioned the cost of workers’ compensation, the need for more prison closures, the lack of funding for women’s facility violence prevention, and the timing and transparency of the BCG savings process. No votes were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• Defense attorneys generally never want to stipulate to this, and I understand why.
• Defense attorneys generally never want to stipulate to this, and I understand why.
• Defense attorneys generally never want to stipulate to this, and I understand why.
• So it's going to probably fall in the prosecution.
• And I think each defense attorney, if they are a competent defense attorney, which pretty much everybody

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The agreement and approval of the state attorney is essential. This amendment? Thank you, Mr.
• I'm not an attorney, so I can't answer that for you, but I can get you the answer.
• However, juveniles are still prosecuted under the juvenile system.
• Libby Gozo, Office of the Attorney General, waiving in support.
• Libby Gozo, Office of the Attorney General, waiving in support.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Summary: The committee heard and advanced several criminal justice bills. SB 50 on veterans treatment courts would expand access to veterans courts statewide for eligible veterans with nonviolent charges, while preserving state attorney approval and making the change prospective only; the committee adopted two amendments and reported the bill favorably after testimony from veterans advocates and supporters. SB 52 would create a narrow exemption from private security licensing rules for unpaid volunteer armed security at places of worship; supporters said it would clarify a legal gray area for churches and synagogues, and the bill was reported favorably. SB 436 would add resisting an officer with violence to the list of prior offenses that can trigger felony battery enhancement, with an amendment narrowing the focus to battery on law enforcement involving injury; after debate about mandatory minimums and scope, it was also reported favorably. The committee also approved SB 676, which creates graduated penalties for adults who involve minors in certain animal cruelty offenses and increases penalties for related conduct; it was reported favorably and unanimously. SB 536 would revise criminal gang member definitions and gang-related enhancements, including social media and association criteria; members raised concerns about overbreadth and neighborhood-based misclassification, but the bill passed favorably. SB 432 would add certain xylazine products and 7-OH above a threshold to controlled substance laws, exempt FDA-approved veterinary xylazine, and create trafficking and mandatory minimum penalties for candy-like xylazine products; it was reported favorably. SB 524, an FDLE proposal, would revise duties and appointments related to the Medical Examiners Commission and clarify CJSTC procedures, and SB 590 would toll the statute of limitations for failure-to-report child abuse by mandatory reporters until the offense is discovered; both were reported favorably. Throughout the meeting, the committee heard mostly supportive testimony from law enforcement, advocacy groups, veterans organizations, faith leaders, and other stakeholders. Several bills drew discussion about mandatory minimums, scope, and possible unintended consequences, but no bill was defeated. The meeting concluded with all listed measures reported favorably and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chairman, so we prosecuted distinct crimes.
• Harsh penalties, and my expectation is nobody's going to prosecute him.
• My expectation is the Attorney General is not going to prosecute him, the District Attorney's not going
• to prosecute him.
• For the state prosecutions.

Transcript Highlights:

• prosecuting attorneys, and to make sure that they're included and that it's not going farther than that
• and circuit attorneys and assistant prosecuting attorneys, and to make sure that they're included and
• attorneys.
• And the way it lists that out is it'll say the prosecuting attorney and any assistant prosecuting attorney
• attorney.

Summary: The House Committee on General Laws met with a quorum and went into executive session on House Joint Resolutions 153 and 119, House Bill 2266, and House Bill 2207, then held a public hearing on Senate Bill 1062. On HJR 153/119, the committee adopted a substitute that would remove trial-level judges from the gubernatorial appointment framework and create a joint House-Senate committee to confirm Supreme Court and Appellate Court nominees. Several members objected that the changes were substantial and should have had public hearing, while supporters argued the change would streamline confirmations and add legislative accountability. The committee adopted the substitute and voted the resolutions do pass by 8-6. On HB 2266, the committee adopted an amendment clarifying that the bill’s exception for the Attorney General’s office applies to Assistant Attorneys General rather than broader staff, then rolled it into a committee substitute and voted the substitute do pass by 11-3. On HB 2207, the committee adopted an amendment combining HB 2207 and HB 2233 into one bill string, but after a motion to reconsider was withdrawn, the combined substitute failed on a 6-8 vote. The public hearing on SB 1062 focused on expanding communication access services for deaf, hard of hearing, and deaf-blind Missourians. Senator Carter described the bill as a way to connect Department of Social Services caseworkers with churches, nonprofits, and other community resources to help families avoid foster care placements and better meet local needs, saying the model already exists in some counties and other states. Testimony in support came from the Missouri Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals, family members, and advocates, who described repeated barriers in hospitals, courts, schools, businesses, and emergency settings, including delays in interpreter access, reliance on family members, and problems with video remote interpreting. Witnesses said the bill would improve access, reduce delays, and provide needed coordination and funding support. No opposition testimony was presented, and the hearing was closed without a vote on SB 1062.

Transcript Highlights:

• Say the Attorney General finds somebody and they should take the appropriate action, and they go into
• The Attorney General's office would manage those things today.
• Today the Attorney General's office leaves us some pause because they have broken kind of a 40-plus-year
• General's office would manage Attorney General's office would manage those<00:02:58.760><c> things</
• </c><00:04:33.600><c> General's</c> agen certainly the Attorney General's agen certainly the Attorney

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> redact and then the claimants's attorney redact and then the claimants's attorney says<00:16:09.279
• </c> that that it may not be a prosecutable that that it may not be a prosecutable case<00:49:26.319>
• And the subpoena is issued on behalf of law enforcement by the county attorney or attorney general, depending
• </c><01:12:41.520><c> or</c> enforcement by the county attorney or enforcement by the county attorney
• 12:42.880><c> which</c> attorney general, depending on which attorney general, depending on which statute

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The conference committee took testimony on Senate File 3051, which would allow law enforcement to release unredacted collision crash investigation video and related data to certain requesters, rather than requiring redaction first. Joel Carlson, speaking for the Minnesota Association for Justice, said the bill is intended to save local governments time and money because redacted video is often later released unredacted through court motions anyway. He emphasized that the proposal is limited to people already entitled to crash reports, requires a written request and accident report, does not create an affirmative duty to release data, and preserves law enforcement’s ability to withhold data for active investigations or other protected information. He also cited the Burks decision as support for the view that a subject of data is entitled to the full data even if it includes other subjects. Colonel Christina Bogavich of the Minnesota State Patrol raised concerns that the bill would still require staff to review videos for exceptions, including private data involving bystanders, juveniles, undercover officers, CAD information, and other protected material, so it would not create the claimed time savings. She also said the bill expands the number of potential requesters and lacks a liability provision if released data is improperly disseminated. Committee members and staff discussed the current Data Practices Act, including that private data can still be discoverable in litigation through a court balancing test and that protective orders may apply. A preliminary fiscal note estimated a Department of Public Safety cost of $4,026,334 annually, and members requested copies of the note. Members questioned whether the bill would actually reduce work or simply shift when the work occurs, and whether a litigation-specific exception to redaction should be added. Carlson said he was open to changes, including making release permissive rather than mandatory and strengthening the use restrictions, while members noted the proposal had not yet been heard in the House and would need more vetting. No vote or final action was taken on the provision during this discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, in 1985, I came to New Hampshire to work in the attorney general's office and prosecute homicide
• Typically, capital crimes or murders are prosecuted by the attorney general's office.
• Typically, capital crimes or murders are prosecuted by the attorney general's office.
• So, they're prosecuted by the attorney general's office.
• the</c> attorneys who prosecute these, the attorneys who prosecute these, the attorney<03:41:31.520>

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Our district attorney has, is the only one in the office. Uh, she has fired attorneys in court.
• They had all the evidence, but they would not prosecute the case.
• split district attorney, and that's because of the distance between them.
• to handle the cases, that they can prosecute those cases.
• from the attorney general?

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, at this time we're going to call up our third panel from the Special prosecution unit, Jack Choke
• the Attorney General's office either.
• We started out prosecuting the cases that arise out of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.
• We prosecuted that death penalty case, uh, a few years ago.
• That district attorney then makes the decision if they would like to civilly commit him.

Transcript Highlights:

• Again, I'm glad I'm not an attorney. People say that a lot. Okay.
• Again, I'm glad I'm not an attorney. People say that a lot. Okay.
• So then we talked a little bit about feds prosecuting.
• So what kind of case like this, what does it look like to prosecute this case?
• prosecute that person who it was sold to, who's maybe selling it to another person, how would you prosecute

Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 306, which would prohibit facility fees on certain routine health care services, including preventive care, vaccinations, and telehealth, while preserving fees in inpatient, emergency, and some rural hospital settings. The sponsor and Health Care Authority said the bill is meant to reduce surprise billing, improve transparency, and lower costs for patients and premiums. The Hospital Association opposed the measure as a potential threat to hospital operations, while insurers, consumer advocates, and a private citizen supported it. Members asked about rural exemptions, which hospitals would be affected, uninsured patients, and whether premiums might fall. The committee approved HB 306 on a 5-0 vote. The committee then considered House Bill 166, which would create statewide standards for battery-charged electric fences with alarm systems for commercial properties. Supporters said the bill would reduce permitting delays, provide uniform rules, and help businesses deter property crime. There was little opposition, and members focused mainly on signage requirements and the bill’s limited application to commercial, not residential, fencing. HB 166 was passed on a 4-0 vote. Next, the committee took up a proposed tax credit for gun safes tied to safe storage of firearms. Supporters argued it would encourage compliance with safe-storage laws and help people afford secure storage, but members raised concerns about the size of the credit, possible administrative complications, and whether it should be handled in tax committee instead. The sponsor agreed to roll the bill and work with stakeholders rather than move it forward immediately. The committee also heard Senate Bill 100, a committee substitute clarifying the definition of “dwelling” for burglary and aggravated burglary after a Supreme Court case involving a portal/porch area. Supporters, including law enforcement, business, and property-rights groups, said the bill would provide clarity and better reflect privacy expectations around enclosed spaces. The Public Defender and Criminal Defense Lawyers Association opposed it, arguing the law already distinguishes between trespass, attempted burglary, and burglary, and that the case was correctly handled under existing law. The committee passed SB 100 on a 6-0 vote. Finally, the committee considered House Bill 196 and House Bill 197, both governor’s bills increasing penalties for firearm-related offenses. HB 196 would raise the penalty for receiving a stolen firearm from a fourth-degree to a third-degree felony, and HB 197 would do the same for larceny of a firearm. Opponents argued higher penalties would not deter crime and could increase incarceration, while supporters from state police and the Chamber of Commerce said the bills target stolen guns that fuel violent crime. HB 196 was tabled on a 3-2 vote after debate over deterrence and the narrow scope of the offense. HB 197 was then heard separately, with no opposition testimony, and members discussed how the higher penalty would work in practice; the transcript ends before a final vote on HB 197 is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• or the Attorney General.
• or the Attorney General.
• or the Attorney General.
• by a county attorney.
• a county could be prosecuted by a county attorney.<00:18:02.960><c> So,</c><00:18:03.640><c> there</

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:18:52.080><c> general's</c> as well as the um uh attorney general's as well as the um uh attorney
• </c> to tell us if you're going to prosecute to tell us if you're going to prosecute and<00:31:52.080
• We have the discussion with the attorney general and assistant attorney general.
• </c> Attorney Warner, for taking my question. Attorney Warner, for taking my question.
• </c> there are very few such prosecutions there are very few such prosecutions because<01:42:05.840><

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I think the Attorney General may have someone here today.
• I think the Attorney General may have someone here today.
• District attorneys, the Attorney General, and the sheriffs, the ones who's dealing with these victims
• The district attorneys, the Attorney General, and the sheriffs are the ones who's dealing with these
• victims, having to prosecute once it happens.

Summary: The committee first adopted the minutes from several prior 2025 meetings, then took up HB 574 by Rep. Spell, which updates the names of two organizations on the Mental Health Advocacy Service Board of Trustees. Rep. Spell explained it as a technical cleanup bill to correct the names of the Louisiana Mental Health Association and the Louisiana State Medical Society so the board’s membership records match current organization names. With no objections, HB 574 was reported favorably. The committee then heard HB 486, also by Rep. Spell, to join the Psychology Interjurisdictional Compact (PsyPact) and allow Louisiana psychologists to provide telepsychology and temporary in-person services across state lines. Rep. Spell and PsyPact representatives said the compact would expand access to mental health care, especially in rural areas, while maintaining standards and disciplinary oversight. The committee adopted amendments on fees and the effective date, and HB 486 was reported favorably with amendments. HB 198 by Rep. Eccles proposed a Medicaid reimbursement methodology for ambulatory surgical centers, using a Medicare-based rate to improve access for Medicaid patients needing specialty procedures. Amendments were adopted to add ophthalmology-related services and to cap reimbursement at the lesser of the outpatient hospital rate or 100% of the Medicaid rate, along with a technical amendment to address the fiscal note. Supporters from GI and ASC groups said the bill would improve access and lower long-term costs, and the bill was reported favorably with amendments. The committee spent the most time on HB 182 by Rep. Travis Johnson, which would require hospitals to ensure access to sexual assault forensic exams and related training. Johnson, law enforcement witnesses, and the Attorney General’s office emphasized the need for timely evidence collection, especially in rural areas, and said the current system leaves victims traveling long distances or losing evidence. Hospital and coroner witnesses supported the goal but opposed the bill as written, arguing it could impose duties on hospitals without enough trained personnel, funding, or a workable statewide training and coordination system; they urged a statewide coordinator, mobile SANE units, and clearer implementation. The bill was not finally disposed of in the portion of the meeting provided, and members discussed continuing to work on amendments and timing before floor consideration.

Transcript Highlights:

• attorneys.
• This is a request for deputy prosecuting attorneys for the same reason: bar license fees for attorneys
• I guess somebody's going to determine whether it should be prosecuted beyond, but there will be prosecution
• Yes, ma'am, that's our goal, is to get prosecution.
• So our goal is to prosecute them.

Summary: The committee first filed a report on the executive protection detail and then reviewed a long list of House and Senate bills that were ready for action, with members instructed to hold any items they wanted removed. The committee then took up several agency requests to amend bills: the Auditor of State’s request for a $370 increase for special deputy expense allowance, the Administrative Office of the Courts’ requests for additional funding for court interpreters and substitute court reporters, and requests tied to local sales tax refunds, county property tax redistribution, emergency medical and law enforcement support, and Northwest Arkansas Community College tornado-related repairs. All of those amendments were adopted, and one amendment on House Bill 1034 was held over at Senator Johnson’s request. A major portion of the meeting focused on an amendment for the Department of Corrections to fund a pilot program using mobile technology to identify and disable illegal inmate cell phones at Varner and Cummins prisons. The bill sponsors and Corrections officials described the problem as a serious public safety issue, saying inmates use contraband phones for criminal activity, trafficking, scams, and outside coordination. Members asked about FCC rules, procurement, whether the system would jam or only identify phones, whether it would affect staff or nearby users, how quickly it would work, whether it would be a one-time or ongoing cost, and whether the department had existing budget authority. Officials said the proposal would require an RFP, that current funding was not available in the department’s budget, and that the technology would be a two-year pilot. The committee ultimately adopted the amendment and then gave the underlying bill a do-pass recommendation. The committee also considered an amendment for the University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, which sought a $4 million increase in appropriation authority. Senators discussed the division’s role in county extension offices, 4-H, research, and salary competitiveness, while others questioned why the division needed more appropriation room when it already had about $10 million in headroom and had requested a different funding level through higher education. Division representatives said the increase would help with salaries and provide flexibility for future funding, and Higher Education staff clarified the original request and recommendation amounts. After extensive discussion, the committee adopted the amendment and gave it a do-pass recommendation. Finally, the committee began acting on governor’s letters, adopting amendments for a homestead property tax credit increase, insurance department conference travel, property appraisal analysis support, career and technical education professional development, regulatory and casino gaming appropriations, a new program integrity line for the Department of Inspector General, consolidation of licensing board appropriations, deletion of a completed Fort Chaffee Readiness Center appropriation, and a revised reappropriation package for prison expansion that included special language limiting use of the funds. Members asked several questions about the prison reappropriation, including whether it still related to the earlier Calico Rock project and whether special language should be considered separately; the committee moved the governor’s letters forward for drafting and further action.

Transcript Highlights:

• When a prosecutor or defense attorney, um, ...and thereby creating a false impression.
• That decision wasn't made at the Supreme Court because the defense attorneys jumped up and down.
• That decision wasn't made at the Supreme Court because the defense attorneys jumped up and down.
• I'm not an attorney and my inmate rights bill didn't make it to the floor.
• They were being prosecuted instead of helping prosecute or just doing their job.

Summary: The Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice considered and advanced a series of criminal justice bills, with most measures reported favorably after brief presentations, amendments, and roll-call votes. Among the bills approved were CS/SB 468 on fleeing or attempting to elude law enforcement, which increases offense levels and allows impoundment of involved vehicles; CS/SB 1136 on age as an element of a criminal offense, which strengthens protections for minors and was amended to adjust age thresholds and luring/enticement language; CS/SB 144 on criminal justice, which was narrowed by substitute amendment after discussion with law enforcement and includes provisions on kill switches, body cameras/AI, first responder recognition, and other corrections-related items; and CS/SB 1782, which creates penalties for dangerous excessive speeding. The committee also favorably reported CS/SB 964 on objective parole guidelines, CS/SB 1450 on arrest and detention of individuals with significant medical conditions, CS/SB 612 on murder involving unlawful drug distribution by minors, CS/SB 1838 on tampering with or harassing court officials, CS/SB 716 on enhanced penalties for sexual offenses by repeat offenders, CS/SB 1604 on corrections, and CS/SB 1360 on xylazine, which preserves veterinary use while increasing penalties for illicit trafficking and possession for sale. Several bills drew substantive testimony and debate. CS/SB 1838 prompted concerns from the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers that the tampering language could be applied to prosecutors or defense attorneys; the sponsor said he would work to refine the language. CS/SB 964 received support from criminal defense advocates and a witness who argued Florida’s parole system needs revision due to prison overcrowding and staffing issues. CS/SB 1604 generated questions about inmate access to courts, the statute of limitations for confinement claims, and involuntary mental health treatment; the sponsor said the bill aims to balance inmate rights with timely reporting and to address bad actors in corrections. CS/SB 1360 was supported as a response to the spread of xylazine on the street, while noting its legitimate veterinary use. The most contested measure was CS/SB 1804 on capital sex trafficking. The bill would create a capital offense for adult trafficking of a child under 12 or a mentally incapacitated person under specified circumstances, with a life-felony fallback if capital punishment is later found unconstitutional. Supporters argued it targets especially heinous conduct and closes a gap in existing law; opponents, including the Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops, Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and anti-death-penalty advocates, argued it expands the death penalty beyond homicide, raises constitutional concerns, risks retraumatizing victims, and would be costly to litigate. After extensive debate, the committee adopted an amendment aligning the bill with the House companion and reported the bill favorably. The committee also approved SB 776 adding an aggravating factor for assassination or attempted assassination of a head of state, despite objections from some members who voted no. At the end of the meeting, the chair thanked members for the session, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• be prosecuted?
• And the Attorney General's Office was involved.
• Freeman: Is it true that our Attorney General used to be a prosecutor?
• The other thing as it related to Orleans is that the Attorney General prosecutes all of the cases that
• Tammany-Washington District Attorney is $7.8 million.

Bills: HR310, HR314, HR316, HR317, HR321, HR275, HR276, HR279, HR282, HR286, HR289, HR292, HR295, HR302, HR319, HCR112, HR307, SCR59, SCR61, SCR62, SCR68, SCR69, SCR70, SCR54, SCR55, SCR64, SCR75, HCR79, HCR104, HB75, HB410, HB719, HB750, HB944, HB1098, HB1220, HB1252, HB359, HB210, HB468, HB1117, SB382, HB368, HB552, HB732, HB870, HB1236, SB29, SB42, SB43, SB149, SB208, SB274, SB300, SB312, SB387, SB389, SB401, HR74, HB998, HB901, HR20, HCR65, HCR71, HCR98, HB284, HB306, HB341, HB366, HB393, HB458, HB577, HB603, HB605, HB614, HB625, HB646, HB733, HB752, HB773, HB798, HB911, HB955, HB996, HB1035, HB1069, HB1113, HB1140, HB1180, HB1191, HB1240, HB1255, SB82, SB89, SB97, SB123, SB237, HB36, HB42, HB74, HB119, HB159, HB258, HB259, HB302, HB414, HB459, HB848, HB956, HB1017, HB1028, HB1095, SB217, SB283, SB469

Keywords: oil and gas, orphan wells, inactive wells, shut-in wells, marginal wells, plugging and abandonment, well decommissioning, site remediation, site restoration, Oilfield Site Restoration, OSR program, financial security, bonding, taxpayer liability, public liability, offshore wells, onshore wells, coastal erosion, Department of Conservation and Energy, natural resources

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm the Cole County Prosecuting Attorney.
• Mom and Dad prosecuted. He admitted to it.
• Again, Locke Thompson here for the Missouri Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, Cole County Prosecutor
• Or, as a backup, the AG or prosecuting attorney of the jurisdiction has standing to pursue action.
• friends, initiated by the attorney general.

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Officer Rodriguez will take me to my attorney phone calls and in the parole building.
• The boardroom and the attorney visiting space do not have surveillance cameras.
• The OIG is current the OIG also currently has a team of attorneys.
• I've spent my entire career in prosecution and public protection.
• agency for prosecution.

Keywords: 988, house, all