Transcript Highlights:

• It allows 50 million to be transferred.
• In a new year, and after that cap on transfer, no more credits could be transferred. Okay, Mr.
• We allow both carry forward and transferability.
• Now I have some questions about the transferability. To whom can a company transfer?
• Across the board for transferable tax credits, there May be you can transfer basically to anyone who's

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That's a lot of transfers. Remember, this is for the entire 55 counties, 316 transfers.
• One transfer in four years.
• This student transferred. This student transferred to the other school.
• To transfer.
• It's one transfer, but then you can transfer back.

Keywords: 994, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• as a block and be counted in whole at the four-year university that they transfer to.
• Yes, yes, I think we're seeing success in those blocks of courses transferring.
• , not transferring.
• one class that didn't transfer or six or more.
• Also related to transferability, correct? Yeah, OK, members, any other comments?

Transcript Highlights:

• the Department of Health transferred the Department of Health transferred over<00:17:38.320>
• <00:18:43.280> position work as a knowledge transfer position work as a knowledge transfer
• <00:29:11.760> to that transferred to that transferred to DCF<00:29:13.600> in<00:29
• 2000 to 2 2023 but we're transferring 2000 to 2 2023 but we're transferring some<00:44:37.480>
• with with each of the transferring with with each of the transferring agencies<00:53:52.119>

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• This is an act relating to the transfer This is an act relating to the transfer of<00:07:23.599>
• <00:08:16.240> on All right, Senate Bill 34, transfer on All right, Senate Bill 34, transfer
• will act as a revocation of the transfer will act as a revocation of the transfer on<00:15:02.959
• expressly revokes the transfer expressly revokes the transfer um<00:16:11.279> can<00:16:
• the automobile transfer for one thing. the automobile transfer for one thing.

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• when transferring things.
• <00:05:13.880> So security when transferring things.
• So security when transferring things.
• This is the proof of transfer process.
• This is the proof of transfer process.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• state of Texas, if you have a spouse that deceases or you decease, your spouse could be taxed on the transfer
• So, Senate Bill 2064 prohibits the tax on the transfer of a vehicle between closely related family members
• caption: Committee substitute Senate Bill 2064 relating to exemption from certain taxes imposed on the transfer
• So, Senate Bill 2064 prohibits the tax on the transfer of a vehicle between closely related family members
• So Senate Bill 2064 prohibits the tax on the transfer of a vehicle between closely related family members

Bills: SJR4, SJR40, SJR81, SCR37, SCR39, SB22, SB32, SB33, SB36, SB38, SB95, SB209, SB249, SB311, SB326, SB365, SB458, SB609, SB660, SB664, SB693, SB732, SB745, SB760, SB762, SB779, SB783, SB785, SB868, SB871, SB883, SB921, SB955, SB993, SB996, SB1008, SB1057, SB1067, SB1151, SB1171, SB1210, SB1255, SB1265, SB1267, SB1271, SB1307, SB1313, SB1316, SB1318, SB1321, SB1332, SB1365, SB1426, SB1470, SB1484, SB1494, SB1559, SB1592, SB1596, SB1598, SB1637, SB1677, SB1706, SB1758, SB1762, SB1786, SB1809, SB1818, SB1822, SB1841, SB1871, SB1967, SB2064, SB2077, SB2112, SB2148, SB2320, SB2406, SB2407, SJR36, SJR81, SJR50, SJR4, SJR40, SJR27, SCR22, SCR12, SCR39, SCR38, SCR37, SB921, SB609, SB660, SB765, SB62, SB666, SB888, SB687, SB847, SB1248, SB504, SB305, SB296, SB284, SB304, SB1023, SB204, SB670, SB850, SB854, SB413, SB1346, SB1033, SB1220, SB1073, SB810, SB1539, SB447, SB1119, SB1505, SB1215, SB1302, SB583, SB673, SB681, SB1172, SB955, SB957, SB541, SB266, SB1415, SB53, SB1352, SB785, SB1450, SB1502, SB1566, SB1062, SB711, SB746, SB1404, SB1448, SB507, SB1026, SB1349, SB1355, SB1433, SB1434, SB1596, SB1403, SB667, SB1059, SB1567, SB310, SB311, SB505, SB1210, SB1470, SB264, SB1358, SB1364, SB1569, SB1376, SB1228, SB519, SB1350, SB462, SB827, SB1585, SB1484, SB1273, SB927, SB1227, SB1229, SB1353, SB1464, SB1709, SB1729, SB1733, SB1744, SB1772, SB1841, SB1008, SB2016, SB1173, SB1163, SB996, SB1370, SB1321, SB1101, SB860, SB993, SB693, SB1537, SB1332, SB1307, SB963, SB493, SB984, SB619, SB1122, SB455, SB522, SB1057, SB1239, SB1254, SB1255, SB1259, SB1341, SB1877, SB1277, SB32, SB732, SB731, SB268, SB1822, SB1589, SB397, SB1058, SB1267, SB2112, SB1930, SB532, SB508, SB292, SB291, SB901, SB1333, SB1436, SB1494, SB964, SB779, SB1378, SB2312, SB1719, SB287, SB2143, SB1245, SB261, SB1247, SB2406, SB2407, SB1882, SB618, SB38, SB393, SB1371, SB1365, SB2243, SB2226, SB2039, SB1919, SB1895, SB1598, SB1493, SB1810, SB1791, SB1706, SB1644, SB1238, SB783, SB458, SB22, SB651, SB897, SB1809, SB1080, SB745, SB826, SB989, SB1320, SB1437, SB2320, SB2289, SB1171, SB664, SB1637, SB2064, SB868, SB1079, SB1243, SB1504, SB1851, SB1879, SB2237, SB1257, SB2034, SB1522, SB883, SB249, SB1318, SB1151, SB596, SB1191, SB226, SB570, SB870, SB991, SB60, SB365, SB1067, SB1786, SB326, SB1401, SB1592, SB1728, SB1265, SB586, SB529, SB217, SB209, SB1923, SB1559, SB1839, SB387, SB1874, SB1872, SB1873, SB1921, SB1883, SB1677, SB95, SB1620, SB1838, SB2024, SB2429, SB1999, SB511, SB2309, SB2166, SB871, SB510, SB33, SB2420, SB1860, SB1541, SB1316, SB1314, SB1313, SB1426, SB1398, SB1869, SB1750, SB1871, SB36, SB855, SB1233, SB760, SB2425, SB2037, SB1758, SB1759, SB2365, SB1924, SB762, SB1271, SB1818, SB605, SB1405, SB1762, SB1968, SB1977, SB2077, SB2148, SB2321, SB1967, SB1662, SB1663, SB2124, SB2204, SB1855, SB863, SB37, SJR39, SCR1, SCR27, SCR32, SCR42, SCR6, SB2232, SB819, SB2078, SB2252, SB1962, SB2253, SB825, SB1577, SB1184, SB2018, SB2206, SB1901, SB1030, SB2368, SB1963, SB1960, SB1643, SB1625, SB1299, SB841, SB668, SB584, SB231, SB2411, SB1085, SB2431, SB2231, SB1490, SB530, SB34, SB1261

Keywords: economic stabilization fund, state finance, constitutional amendment, budget management, financial security, emergency powers, legislative authority, governor powers, disaster management, tax exemption, ad valorem, tangible personal property, income production, SCR 37, Senate Concurrent Resolution, Panama Canal, Texas ports, port infrastructure, maritime trade, shipping lanes

Transcript Highlights:

• Right now there is currently a survey holding up an Act 90 transfer for Capala Ranch.
• High-risk lands would require a survey before transfer.
• Secondly, the conditional uh transfer.
• <00:32:05.200> with new uh conditional land transfers with new uh conditional land transfers
• within 5 years of the land transfer within 5 years of the land transfer unless<00:32:25.039>

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Committee on Water and Land heard HB 511, House Draft 1, relating to public lands. The bill would remove the requirement that a land survey be completed before public lands are set aside to a state department or agency. Testimony from the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Land and Natural Resources was generally supportive of the bill’s intent, with requests for clarification. The Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council and Hawaii Farm Bureau supported the measure, arguing that surveys are costly and time-consuming and can delay transfers needed for agricultural use and land stewardship. One member of the public testified in strong opposition, arguing that eliminating surveys would weaken due process, transparency, and the state’s fiduciary duties over public lands. The chair then proposed amendments to narrow the bill’s effect. The amendments would create tiered survey requirements based on land risk: high-risk lands would still require a survey before transfer, while low-risk state agricultural lands with clear historical records could defer surveys if sufficient mapping or GIS data exists. If a survey is deferred, the recipient agency would have to complete one within five years unless exempted by the Board of Land and Natural Resources. The amendments would also allow GIS and related mapping tools for approximate administrative boundaries, require a centralized digital registry of public land transfers, and establish a mediation process for boundary disputes before litigation. Senator McKelvey said he had concerns about the original bill but would support it with the amendments. The committee chair recommended passage with amendments, noting the bill would also go to the Judiciary Committee. The committee adopted the recommendation by vote, with the chair and vice chair voting aye and Senator Dort voting no.

Transcript Highlights:

• office of wine Affairs this transfer office of wine Affairs this transfer will<00:23:06.679>
• First of all, the land transfer is all illegal.
• So I thank you folks, and aloha. transfer allod your title lands which is transfer allod your title lands
• hopefully well or we just transferring hopefully well or we just transferring it<00:43:51.640>
• <00:44:59.599> of hearing Senate bill for transfer of hearing Senate bill for transfer of

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The joint hearing focused on Senate Bill 4, which would transfer stewardship of Mauna ʻAla from the Department of Land and Natural Resources to the Office of Hawaiian Affairs. Committee chairs opened the meeting with housekeeping and noted the hearing was live-streamed, with a two-minute limit for testimony. Director Don Chang of the Board of Land and Natural Resources said DLNR had been working with OHA and had agreed to transfer certain lands subject to due diligence, including Kahana Valley and a parcel in Waimānalo, but urged the committee to finalize those mutually agreed parcels before taking on something new. He also described the current arrangement at Mauna ʻAla as a collaborative one involving the state and the royal trusts, with the state handling routine maintenance and the trusts contributing to larger repairs and improvements on a project-by-project basis rather than through direct annual appropriations. Testimony was mixed. Supporters argued that OHA is better positioned to steward the site because of its cultural mission, Native Hawaiian governance, and ability to protect sacred places with greater cultural competency and accountability. Several speakers emphasized that Mauna ʻAla is not a state park and should be cared for by those with direct cultural ties and experience, and some cited OHA’s recent financial reforms and partnerships as reasons for confidence. Others, including representatives of the Daughters and Sons of the Hawaiian Warriors Makakoa, opposed the bill, citing concerns about OHA’s past financial management, transparency, and the need for more public information and testimony before any transfer. One testifier also argued the land transfer itself was unlawful and rooted in the history of the overthrow and annexation. Members and testifiers also discussed the historical role of the royal trusts and family caretakers at Mauna ʻAla, with one descendant describing a long family stewardship and supporting OHA only if amended language preserved checks and balances and protected iwi and burial grounds. Another speaker said the family recognized James Mayo as kahu of Mauna ʻAla and supported the bill because prior DLNR efforts had not sufficiently protected traditional and customary rights. The hearing ended after public testimony and committee questions, with no vote or final action taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:19:52.960> So, transfer among school districts. So, transfer among school districts.
• have to approve a student transferring have to approve a student transferring to<00:20:12.720>
• Um it is transfer.
• . transfer. transfer.
• district and then uh notify the transfer district and then uh notify the transfer district<00:24

Keywords: Education - Room 216, January 6, 2026; 12:45 PM, 925, all

Transcript Highlights:

• that transfer will no longer take place. that transfer will no longer take place.
• <01:05:23.839> is reduce from the transfer is reduce from the transfer is approximately<01
• because of any of these transfers. because of any of these transfers.
• <03:33:03.600> from this amount shall be transferred from this amount shall be transferred
• transferred from the old age nine. transferred from the old age nine.

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Transfer is such an important issue.
• We could extrapolate a dollar figure from that in terms of how many courses aren't transferring.
• Yes, I think we're seeing success and those blocks of courses are transferring.
• that doesn't transfer or six or more.
• Also related to transferability, correct? Yeah, right. Okay, members, any other comments?

Bills: SB2847, SB3039

Keywords: higher education, bachelor's degree, core curriculum, general education, semester credit hours, credit hours, degree acceleration, time to degree, workforce-aligned credentials, workforce readiness, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, public universities, community colleges, transferability, curriculum reform, academic requirements, degree completion, transfer students, education transparency, academic credit

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, and that's why it's a transferable credential, and I think transferable is the key word.
• Um, and that's why it's a transferable credential, and I think transferable is the key word.
• Um, and that's why it's a transferable credential, and I think transferable is the key word.
• Um, and that's why it's a transferable credential, and I think transferable is the key word.
• Um, and that's why it's a transferable credential, and I think transferable is the key word.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• were<00:02:19.720> approved provisions transfers that were approved provisions transfers that
• transfers themselves. transfers themselves.
• In your handout, there's a map of the transfer that was authorized in 2024.
• . transfers. transfers.
• Uh if you look going to be transferred.

Bills: HF3643, HF3426, HF4222, HF4224

Keywords: Melissa Hortman, Mark Hortman, memorial park, state park, working group, Minnesota Historical Society, Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board, Saint Paul, Department of Natural Resources, Department of Administration, Legislative Coordinating Commission, general fund appropriation, park planning, interpretive services, public engagement, state memorial, land use, natural resources, commemorative legislation, environment

Transcript Highlights:

• Thank you. have to be transferred out. So, the bill have to be transferred out.
• uh possibly misuses the word transfer. uh possibly misuses the word transfer.
• <05:09:28.798> If not transferring. If not transferring.
• transferred for definitive care. transferred for definitive care.
• patient's transfer.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Transfers like Western Union or Moneygram are individuals who send cash transfers where a licensed legitimate
• It takes 4% on that wire transfer and it puts 2.5% back... ...transfer and it puts 2.5% back into the
• As far as legitimate transfers, I know we are trying to separate the illegal transfers.
• So what about legitimate transfers?
• transfers that they have and the amounts that are transferred.

Bills: HB297

Keywords: cash transactions, money transmission, regulatory compliance, criminal penalties, Alabama Securities Commission, 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• that you did look at wire transfers. that you did look at wire transfers.
• It was an automatic bank transfer.
• ,<00:46:30.440> money in overseas wire transfers, money in overseas wire transfers, money
• <00:52:19.360> area, Money Transfer area, Money Transfer area, from from from um maybe<00:
• <01:26:37.640> it, can transfer it, can transfer it, that's<01:26:38.920> where<01:

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:18:58.840> FTEs<00:18:59.679> and transferring out five permanent FTEs and transferring
• > one New sequence transferring out one New sequence transferring out one permanent<00:19:43.120
• New sequence transferring in five permanent FTEs and $511,252 in A funds from Adult Mental Health to
• New sequence transferring in five temporary FTEs and $222,212 in A funds from Adult Mental Health to
• New sequence transferring in $118,000 in A funds and $200,000 in B funds for State Fire Council from

Bills: HB389, HB469, HB1510, HB1573, HB1705, HB1858, HB1875, HB1946, HB1961, HB1962, HB2001, HB2093, HB2096, HB2097

Keywords: HB389, uncrewed aircraft, drone, drones, UAS, unmanned aerial vehicle, misuse of uncrewed aircraft, criminal offense, felony enhancement, drone crime, public safety, police, deputy sheriff, fire department, intoxicated operation, registration number tampering, property damage, bodily injury, Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney Package, Hawaii Revised Statutes

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm going to focus on New College and the transfer of USF's campus. New College.
• We are transferring a $2.5 million from USF to New College.
• So we are transferring that money over.
• from USF to New College; we're just transferring facilities.
• And the bill transfer for the debt service to New College.

Transcript Highlights:

• We’re not saying that they’re not transferring lands. There is data on those lands they transfer.
• those lands they transfer data on those lands they transfer there's<01:04:50.960> there's<01:
• <01:07:13.160> lands 90 also intended to transfer lands 90 also intended to transfer lands
• <01:12:25.360> to transferred to transferred to DOA<01:12:27.080> um<01:12:27.880> am
• <02:00:05.880> of I don't think those the transfer of I don't think those the transfer of

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee on Water and Land met on February 13, 2025, and heard testimony on a series of housing, land, and resource bills. Early bills included HB 743 on fiscal sustainability, HB 1318 on affordable housing, and HB 1409 on the Transit-Oriented Development Infrastructure Improvement District Board. Testimony on the housing measures was largely supportive from agencies and advocacy groups such as the Office of Planning, Hawaii Housing Future, Hawaii Appleseed, Catholic Charities, and the County of Kauai, while the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) raised concerns on HB 1318 about public trust duties for ceded lands. On HB 1409, members questioned whether the bill needed updating in light of a separate bill changing the board structure, and witnesses said the measure did not change funding but only the board’s mission and scope. The committee also heard HB 1410, which would create a supportive housing special fund. Supporters, including Catholic Charities, the Hawaii State Council on Developmental Disabilities, and Hawaii Appleseed, argued that predictable dedicated funding is needed for supportive housing, social services, and long-term homelessness solutions. The Tax Foundation of Hawaii opposed tax earmarks in general, saying they subvert the constitutional budgeting process. Members asked how the fund would be administered and who could access it; witnesses said HHFDC and the counties would coordinate the process, but DLNR noted the bill did not provide additional administrative capacity and suggested language to address that. Later bills included HB 528 on residential leaseholds, HB 1359 on flood mitigation, HB 1087 on historic preservation reviews, HB 868 on disabilities, and HB 1323 on transfer of non-agricultural park lands. HB 528 drew limited testimony, with a Catholic Charities/Hawaii Public Housing Authority representative offering a general example of leasehold development but saying the bill’s exemptions had not been discussed in detail. HB 1359 prompted discussion of homeowner and county responsibilities for drainage and flood damage, with DLNR saying private owners are responsible for drainage on private property and counties for county roads. HB 1087 was supported by DHHL, which said historic preservation reviews currently take about 165 days and the bill could improve timeliness, while Hawaii Historic Hawaii Foundation opposed it. HB 868 drew support from the Disability Rights Center and DCAB, with testimony focusing on beach access and the need for clearer legal authority. On HB 1323, DLNR opposed the bill, saying it did not reflect Act 90 and that some agricultural parcels should remain under DLNR for conservation, watershed, recreation, or fire protection reasons; DOA, Hawaii Farm Bureau, and Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council supported the measure, arguing that productive agricultural lands should be transferred to agriculture to protect local food production and family ranches.