Video & Transcript Research : 'statutory amendment'

Page 4 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Under current law, when a person files a constitutional amendment election contest, no official result
  • In the interest of public protection, I proceeded with the statutory case.
  • I'm here actually just to register my opposition to the amendments to subsection F.
  • And subsection F was passed in 1989 as an amendment to the turnover statute.
  • An amendment basically says you can't use disbursements either.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate of the 89th Legislature Feb 19th, 2025 at 11:00 am

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, the following amendment. Secretary will read the amendment.
  • Floor amendment number one by Huffman. Senator Huffman, you're recognized on your amendment.
  • Hearing none, amendment is adopted. Following amendment, Secretary read the amendment.
  • Floor amendment number two by Huffman. Senator Huffman, you're recognized on your amendment.
  • Hearing none, amendment is adopted. The following amendment, sorry, that's the last one.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Revenue Committee, February 12, 2026

Revenue

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any amendments?
  • Any<00:17:21.959> amendments? Any amendments? Any amendments?
  • Amendment one.
  • they're all This is amendment they're all This is amendment Amendment<00:40:05.800> two.
  • <00:40:07.200> Amendment Amendment two. Yeah. Okay. Amendment Amendment two. Yeah. Okay.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Justice May 14th, 2025

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is another constitutional amendment that addresses the critical bail issue that we have throughout
  • So what this joint resolution does, if approved by Texas voters, it amends the Constitution to require
  • the denial of bail If approved by Texas voters, it amends the Constitution to require the denial of
  • This constitutional amendment adds insult to injury, and with that, we oppose this SJR. Thank you.
  • I forgot we had a floor amendment, but it actually makes it clearer to your concern.
Bills: SB3073, SJR87
Summary: The Senate Committee on Criminal Justice met with a quorum present and took up three bills tied to bail reform and law enforcement records. Senator Huffman presented SJR 87, a proposed constitutional amendment that would require denial of bail for people accused of certain serious felony offenses if they have a prior conviction for, or are already on bond for, one of those offenses and there is probable cause to believe they committed another listed offense. Supporters said it would give judges a needed tool to detain repeat violent offenders; opponents from the ACLU of Texas and Texas Civil Rights Project argued it would mandate detention without individualized due process and weaken the presumption of innocence. The committee voted 7-1 to report SJR 87 favorably, with Senator Miles voting no. The committee then heard SB 3073, which would require magistrates who find no probable cause after an arrest to enter written findings supporting that determination. Senator Huffman said the bill was a narrow cleanup measure to improve transparency and provide guidance to law enforcement and prosecutors without limiting judicial discretion. With no invited or public testimony, the committee voted 6-1 to report SB 3073 favorably, again with Senator Miles dissenting. Finally, the committee considered SB 781, a committee substitute dealing with law enforcement file management and personnel records. Senator King explained that the bill would standardize policies already used in many Texas cities and under civil service rules, separating public and sealed personnel information while preserving access for criminal defense discovery. Senator Miles raised concerns that sealing exonerated allegations could hide patterns of misconduct and allow problematic officers to move between agencies. The committee adopted the committee substitute and voted 6-1 to report SB 781 favorably, with Senator Miles voting no. The committee then recessed subject to the chair’s call.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Committee, February 16, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Discussion on the bill or amendments. Start with amendments.
  • discussion on the bill or amendments. discussion on the bill or amendments.
  • Further amendments.
  • Further amendments.
  • to<01:43:01.920> the further amendment or an amendment to the further amendment or an amendment
Bills: HB0103, HB0070, HB0091
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary Committee, February 16, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Landon Amendment. >> The Landon amendment. >> Is there a second?
  • >> Any other amendments?
  • Is there a second to that amendment? amendment? amendment? >> Second. >> Second.
  • propose that amendment. propose that amendment.
  • That amendment has been adopted. >> Any additional amendments to this bill?
Bills: HB0103, HB0070, HB0091
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 14th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • probate courts match those of statutory county and district courts.
  • However, it did not clearly... ...statutory probate courts matched those of statutory county and district
  • probate court counties then create new statutory probate... ...and it helps the statutory probate court
  • The first amendment that you have at the top says...
  • The first amendment deals with what's called the summary disposition procedure.
Bills: SB1015, SB2933
Summary: The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence heard testimony on Senate Bill 1015, which would clarify that the comptroller is responsible for distributing excess judicial fund payments back to statutory probate courts. Judge Guy Herman testified in support, saying the bill would help ensure probate courts receive funding they are entitled to, while Ed Heimlich testified against the bill with broad criticism of probate courts and judicial practices. The committee then heard Senate Bill 2933, which would add elder abuse training to required judicial education for several categories of judges and judicial officers; Dr. Bruce Hargrave supported the bill, citing the prevalence and underreporting of elder abuse and the need for judges to recognize warning signs. No votes were taken on either of those bills, and SB 2933 was left pending. The committee then reconsidered Senate Bill 38, an eviction-related bill, and Vice Chair Hayes described two agreed floor amendments: one limiting the summary disposition procedure to forcible entry and detainer cases involving squatters, and another requiring a notice to pay rent or vacate for tenants who had been timely payers but missed a payment. After discussion, the committee voted 6-4 to report SB 38 without amendments. The committee also adopted or advanced a series of other bills and resolutions, including SB 293, SB 1141, SB 1448, SB 1536, SB 1558, SB 1838, SB 1940, SB 2127, SB 53, SB 251, SB 311, SB 387, SB 441 (with a substitute), SB 1164, SB 1335, SB 1574 (with a substitute), SB 1719, SB 1760, SB 1839, SB 1923 (with a substitute), SB 2807, and SJR 27 (with a substitute). Most measures were reported favorably on largely party-line or near-unanimous votes, with a few close votes on SB 942, SB 311, SB 2807, and SJR 27. SB 942, relating to retroactive child support beginning at conception, initially failed 5-5 but was reconsidered and then passed 6-5. The committee adjourned after completing its agenda.