Video & Transcript Research : 'grade levels'

Page 4 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 3/26/26

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, this is the next level. I appreciate you coming to do this. Thank you.
  • So, I I this is the next level.
  • that we have in the the same high level that we have in the past. past. past.
  • Mitigation of these forest threats requires site-level forest improvement and tree planting."
  • was never designed to handle the level was never designed to handle the level of<00:56:51.480>
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Education 3RD REVISED Feb 24th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • So this says for students in grades 6 through 12.
  • As I recall my grade school days, that was my favorite subject.
  • , kindergarten through fifth grade.
  • Level because this would be state-coordinated training.
  • level, at the state department level.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Transportation May 1st, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • And I was here two years ago for recognizing the Korean town from the state level.
  • Now, 55 years later, I'm standing here asking for state level to help us, having the sign, we'll be very
  • And so you, you're asking us to add hydrogen to that at the state level, is that correct, because we
  • loads we would have normally hauled that day, we were required to haul 400 loads to provide the same level
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

House in Session Apr 16th, 2025

Florida House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • They… lack sufficient support in grades four through twelve.
  • HAPPENING ON THE FEDERAL LEVEL RIGHT NOW.
  • Members, if we could keep the noise level down a little bit.
  • A DISASTER AND CREATING COMPLETE CHAOS AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL.
  • And retain the power at the local level. Representative, you are recognized.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 16th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • High quality instructional materials. materials are the key component in delivering grade-level TEKS.
  • What what percentage of your kids in your district are reading at below grade level?
  • What percentage of your kids are below grade level in math?
  • Texas children cannot read on grade level.
  • If our children can't read at grade level, then it's It's us that have been failing them, the government
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Transportation May 1st, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • At the state level, it was recognized in the city before that, and then finally, we got the confirmation
  • At the state level, helping us achieve the installation of the sign will be very significant.
  • And so you're asking us to add hydrogen to that at the state level?
  • We were required to haul 400 loads to provide the same level of service to our customer.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Transportation May 1st, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is a bill that relates to the operation of vehicles at railroad grade crossings, increasing the
  • This bill relates to the operation of vehicles at railroad grade crossings and increases the criminal
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

October 8, 2025 - 08:30 AM

Transcript Highlights:
  • LEVEL AT THE END OF KINDERGARTEN, HOW OFTEN DOES THAT CHILD STAY AT GRADE LEVEL IN THE ENSUING YEARS
  • ALGEBRA LAST YEAR 57% SCORED ON GRADE LEVEL AND ABOVE.
  • LEVEL 15 YEARS BUT THOSE ARE REDESIGNED ALONG THE GRADE LEVEL ASSESSMENTS.
  • FOR EXAMPLE 50% OF THE STUDENTS ARE IN GRADE LEVEL IN MATH AND ELA BY 10TH GRADE.
  • LEVEL BY THE CONCLUSION OF THIRD GRADE IT IS A STRUGGLE FOR THEM TO MOVE BEYOND, GET ON GRADE LEVEL.
AR
Transcript Highlights:
  • They are, however, provided as content areas by grade level, which are kindergarten through grade 4,
  • grades 5 through 8, and then grades 9 through 12, which are often referred to as the high school level
  • So results from the ELPA for 2024 and 2025 by grade level.
  • , because I know it varies from grade level to grade level in the year.
  • , because I know it varies from grade levels in the year.
Keywords: 1204, all
Summary: The committee received a Bureau of Legislative Research presentation on Arkansas academic standards, accountability, and achievement as part of the adequacy study. Staff reviewed how state curriculum and standards have evolved from the 1997 Public Education Act, the 2003 Quality Education Act, and the 2017 Educational Support and Accountability Act, including required course offerings, graduation requirements, career and technical education pathways, and recent additions such as success-ready pathways, Arkansas history, firearm safety, and fetal growth and development instruction. Members asked for a comparative chart showing how the laws and requirements changed over time, and staff agreed to provide one. The presentation then turned to the federal ESSA plan and Arkansas’s state accountability system. Staff explained the state’s long-term goals for 2030, including 80% proficiency in ELA and math, 52% of English learners on track to English proficiency, and 94%/97% four- and five-year graduation rates. They reviewed 2025 assessment results showing proficiency rates generally in the 30s, with English learners and students with disabilities performing lowest and white students highest. They also discussed school support and improvement categories, equitable access to educators, and report card/public reporting requirements, noting that some ESSA-related measures such as the school index, equity labs, and certain 2024 report card data were not currently available or not being calculated. Members questioned whether those ESSA commitments were being met and asked staff to follow up with DESE, including whether the legislature can revise the ESSA plan. The committee also reviewed the Arkansas Accountability Act and related assessment data. Staff described the Atlas assessment system, alternate assessments for students with significant cognitive disabilities, ELPA 21 for English learners, ACT results, and NAEP comparisons. They reported that no student group met the 80% proficiency goal in 2025, Arkansas’s ACT composite score declined slightly over time, and Arkansas generally trailed national and SREB averages on NAEP. Members asked for additional data, including historical highs and lows, the number of assessments students take by grade, dropout data, and comparisons with other states. The meeting ended with agreement to invite the Department of Education to a future meeting to answer questions about missing data, equity labs, report cards, and ESSA compliance.
AR
Transcript Highlights:
  • They are, however, provided as content areas by grade level, which are kindergarten through grade four
  • So broken out by grade level, starting with English language arts, you'll see here in 2025 all grade
  • Next, we have that grade level by math.
  • We'll look at grade-level results for third and fourth grade for reading and for writing as well, and
  • , because I know it varies from grade level to grade and year to year.
Summary: The committee received a lengthy Bureau of Legislative Research presentation on Arkansas academic standards, accountability systems, and adequacy requirements. Staff reviewed how state curriculum and standards have evolved from the 1997 Public Education Act through the 2003 Quality Education Act and the 2017 Educational Support and Accountability Act, including required coursework, standards for accreditation, career and technical education, graduation requirements, and recent additions such as computer science, personal finance, firearm safety, and fetal growth and development instruction. Members asked for a chart comparing the major laws and repeals over time, and staff agreed to provide one. The presentation then turned to federal ESSA requirements and Arkansas’s state accountability system. Staff explained Arkansas’s long-term goals for proficiency, English learner progress, and graduation rates, and reported 2025 ATLAS proficiency results, which remained below the 80% goal across student groups. They also reviewed English learner progress, graduation rates, school support and improvement, and equitable access to educators. Data showed gaps by subgroup and by school poverty/minority concentration, with Title I and high-poverty schools more likely to have emergency/provisional teachers and less experienced staff. Members questioned the lack of recent data for some ESSA measures, including equity labs and school index calculations, and asked staff to follow up with the Department of Education. The committee also discussed NAEP results, ACT scores, and teacher quality measures under the state accountability act. Arkansas’s NAEP performance remained below national averages in fourth- and eighth-grade reading and math, and ACT composite scores and benchmark attainment were also reviewed. Members asked for additional information on historical highs and lows, the number of assessments students take by grade, dropout data, and comparisons with other states. No formal votes were taken; the main action was agreement to request additional information from DESE and to schedule department follow-up at a future meeting.