Video & Transcript : 'economic development agreement' :

Page 49 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development Apr 23rd, 2025

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Committee on Trade, Workforce, and Economic Development will now come to order.
  • HB4850 gives a thoughtful reflection. fresh to the Economic Development and Tourism Office, aiming to
  • This bill also no longer requires. the Economic Development and Tourism Office to maintain a toll-free
  • And we have a resource witness here from the Economic Development and Tourism office to answer any questions
  • Adriana Cruz, testifying on behalf of the Texas Economic Development and Tourism Office, the Office of
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Corrections Apr 16th, 2025

Corrections

Transcript Highlights:
  • And that's what the bill sets out to do, is come to a, you know, some sort of immediate agreement that
  • recommendations. ...and the General Appropriations Act to allow TDCJ to use appropriate funds to enter into an agreement
Bills: HB1826 , HB2854 , HB3006 , HB4614 , HB5261 , HB5639
Committee: House Corrections
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs Apr 7th, 2025

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • have bond covenants or contracts that they are part of, and that this might conflict with those agreements
  • In exchange, the corporation will work with developers in the community to bring properties back into
  • To make developing affordable homes feasible.
  • My name is David Dannenfelser, and I am the Senior Director of Development Finance for the Texas State
  • Members, House Bill 3248, if you recall, relates to the authority of a defense-based development authority
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 19th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • On the economic development front, it promotes confidence in our ability to tackle. low water challenges
  • Without this investment, we risk. shortages that could stall economic development, drive up costs for
  • Our survey also. talked about how economic development projects have been hindered or halted because
  • Economic development team at the Greater Houston Partnership Economic Development Organization for the
  • Our economic development team hears. directly from communities in our region about their concerns about
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 19th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • That's where the development was going to go. So it happens.
  • Or they can actually have an agreement with a franchise utility to actually provide the service.
  • Texas coastal system work and develop coastal barriers all across the state. Two things that the.
  • area program of the Texas Water Development Board.
  • Board for the development of certain projects in economically distressed areas.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/04/2026 - Senate Government

Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Richards with the Arizona Department of Economic Security. Good morning, Mr.
  • Melanie Richards with the Arizona Department of Economic Security.
  • I honestly don't understand why you're employed by the Department of Economic Security.
  • I honestly, I don't understand why you're employed by the Department of Economic Security.
  • So let's just talk from a cold, solely economic point of view.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • and the volume of business that they would like to and that they feel would be successful for the economic
  • development of the state.
  • They would bring in developers.
  • I have not been involved in the tool development process.
  • But they're already in the process of developing the tool.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Postsecondary Education & Workforce Jan 27th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Postsecondary Education & Workforce

Transcript Highlights:
  • and career pathways, most often at no cost to students, because access to professional development is
  • House Bill 2438 supports the development of an educated workforce serving children in ECEAP, Working
  • I'd love to learn more about the history that you've learned through your bill development.
  • The apple industry has been involved in variety development and research at WSU for some time to develop
  • With data-sharing agreements already in place to help us identify passport-eligible youth, we are really
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so that's why I make that comparison, because it's really about economic development more than it
  • , to me, I see that it's more about economic development than it is about the needs.
  • But I think that there's, I think there's an economic development aspect of this that we've got to be
  • I hope not, because that could deter certainly economic development in the future, right?
  • development boom, that could jeopardize the entire state's economic vitality in the future, right?
Summary: The Committee on Natural Resources heard House Bill 2109, which would remove certain long-proposed reservoir projects from the state water plan after 50 years without progress. Chairman Van Deaver and many landowners, local officials, timber interests, and conservation advocates testified in support, arguing that the Marvin Nichols Reservoir has burdened Northeast Texas landowners for decades with the threat of eminent domain, depressed property values, and uncertainty over homes, farms, ranches, schools, churches, and cemeteries. Supporters also said the project would flood tens of thousands of acres, require extensive mitigation, harm timber and agriculture, and that Texas now has better alternatives such as conservation, reuse, aquifer storage and recovery, and desalination. Several members expressed sympathy for the affected families and questioned whether a project could remain in the plan indefinitely without progress. Opposition came from North Texas water interests, including the North Texas Commission, Tarrant Regional Water District, and the Texas Water Association, who argued that the bill would interfere with the state’s long-term water planning process and remove needed future supply options for a fast-growing region. They said Region C faces major projected shortages by 2070, that conservation and reuse have already delayed the need for new supplies, and that reservoirs remain one tool in the state’s water-planning toolbox. TWDB staff explained the existing inter-regional conflict process and noted that the substitute would affect several unique reservoir sites, not just Marvin Nichols. After testimony, Chairman Van Deaver closed by urging passage of the bill, but the committee withdrew the substitute and left HB 2109 pending. The committee then took up House Bill 5188, a brackish groundwater bill. The author said the bill would reduce permitting burdens for wells in designated brackish groundwater production zones, and the committee substitute added requirements on monitoring, groundwater-rights ownership, and allocation of pumpage limits while removing some exclusions and export-fee provisions. Texas Wildlife Association testified against the bill, warning that the exemptions could weaken groundwater conservation districts’ ability to protect freshwater resources and surface-owner rights. San Antonio Water System testified in favor, saying brackish groundwater is a key future supply and that the substitute would help speed development of desalination and brackish projects. The Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts testified neutrally but raised concerns about reduced district oversight, especially around injection-well exclusions and the loss of export fees, and said discussions on the bill were ongoing.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Modeling is a key driver to our evaluation and development of the DFCs.
  • Our county is already under pressure from Musk and all of the developing counties.
  • This is Natalie Ballew on behalf of the Texas Water Development Board, water development board testifying
  • And so, I want to emphasize. that the district does not seek to hinder development.
  • development and it's a limited amount of gas.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education Apr 15th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • More than 76. 76% of our students are considered economically disadvantaged compared to the state average
  • Because of this extra work, he basically lost the opportunity to develop a love of reading because it
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education Apr 15th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • So TA's developed this great tool, it's a website that's very good, it helps.
  • They also provide young people with essential support such as mentorship, skill development. safe and
  • It focuses on planning, differentiation, and professional development.
  • It talks about child adolescent development and psychology.
  • There's new development.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Property Tax Appraisals Mar 20th, 2025

S/C on Property Tax Appraisals

Transcript Highlights:
  • landlord is charging fair market rent and so the landlord would need to submit a copy of the lease agreement
  • Uh, in the case where, uh, the property owner and the appraisal district come to an informal agreement
  • disposition, which was added to law, and what in effect that allows is a, uh, property. to come to an agreement
  • Uh, Chairman Capriglione, some other examples where values may change outside of informal agreements
  • Uh, again, those, and that covers the cost of the design, uh, the curriculum development and all of those
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government Apr 14th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • And substandard development across our county.
  • But we're talking about developments of 600 homes.
  • That developer did come to the Arlington HFC.
  • The same thing applies to new developments.
  • And so when I've seen these other developers come from outside.
Summary: The committee heard several local government and property tax bills, with most testimony focused on appraisal disputes, tax administration, and development rules. Senate Bill 1052 by Senator Hinojosa would address coastal county appraisal litigation by requiring property owners in certain large-value disputes to report an uncontested taxable value while appeals are pending, so taxing units can base truth-in-taxation calculations on more realistic revenue. Nueces County, Del Mar College, and Corpus Christi ISD testified in support, describing major budget shortfalls caused by refinery valuation disputes; the committee substitute narrowed and clarified the bill’s scope. No opposition was heard, public testimony closed, and SB 1052 was left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1531, which would require local tax collectors to accept common electronic property tax payments such as credit cards, debit cards, and e-checks. Witnesses supported modernizing payment options and the committee substitute removed ACH/electronic funds transfer language to avoid bank-account disclosure concerns. Public testimony closed and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 325, by Senator Perry, would restore platting and groundwater-certification requirements that were unintentionally weakened by prior legislation; supporters from county government, water groups, and builders’ representatives debated whether the real issue was groundwater protection or road standards for private roads. The bill was left pending after extensive testimony and no vote. The committee then took up Senate Bill 994 and SJR 46, which would exempt certain livestock feed inventory from property tax and provide the constitutional amendment needed for that change. Feed store and Farm Bureau witnesses supported the measure as relief for seasonal inventory taxes, and the bills were left pending. Senator Paxton presented SB 467 and SJR 84 to create a temporary property tax exemption for homes completely destroyed by fire, with refunds or corrected bills based on the date of loss; both were left pending. SB 1237 would clarify charitable property tax exemptions for senior housing and retirement communities, with testimony from Catholic and Baptist retirement organizations and a resident describing rising costs and exemption revocations; it was also left pending. The committee later voted 6-0 to report SB 2073, a pending bill on appraisal district authority to purchase or finance real property, and recommended it for the local and uncontested calendar. Finally, the committee heard SB 2172, SB 2173, and SB 2063, all related to property tax administration. SB 2172 would limit when appraisal districts can require homeowners to reapply for homestead exemptions, requiring a specific reason and written notice; SB 2173 would protect new homeowners from surprise tax liabilities caused by prior owners’ erroneous homestead exemptions, with testimony describing large back-assessment bills; both were left pending. SB 2063 would bar appraisal districts from using market-value evidence in unequal appraisal protests, and testimony sharply divided between taxpayer advocates, who said market data improperly overwhelms equity claims, and appraisal district representatives, who argued market value is inherently tied to equal-and-uniform taxation and cited a recent Texas Supreme Court decision; the bill was left pending after testimony.