Video & Transcript Research : 'strict liability'

Page 45 of 309
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Commerce and Economic Development Oversight Apr 14th, 2026 at 03:00 pm

Commerce & Economic Development Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • Bill 1684 requires any company engaged in highway remediation to first obtain $3 million worth of liability
  • Members, with SB 1641, we're simply asking that the articles of organization for a limited liability
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • It's been very hard. down unfunded liabilities. The formula just doesn't work.
  • contribution which covers the normal cost of benefits accrued in a given year and pays down the unfunded liabilities
  • require the state to pay a layered, actuarially determined contribution to address. the unfunded liability
  • It would also require the unfunded actuarial accrued liability to be depreciated.
  • like benefitted. grants, but ensuring that the state's commitment is just to address the unfunded liability
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • But our public schools very Rightly again are bound by a rather rigorous and strict set of regulations
  • In this case, 3985 places liability on a municipality or a local government entity that appears to be
  • and practice rather than liability to a breach of the law or a breach of an ordinance.
  • So, are we not creating a liability out of those ordinary decisions?
  • I wouldn't say that we're creating a liability out of normal decisions.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26 - Part 1

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • bill forces current owners to serialize, surrender, destroy, or move lawfully owned property within strict
  • Expanding criminal liability for law-abiding citizens engaged in historically lawful conduct does not
  • Expanding<00:21:06.560> criminal<00:21:06.880> liability<00:21:07.440> for Expanding
  • criminal liability for Expanding criminal liability for law-abiding<00:21:08.240> citizens<00
  • that for centuries we've allowed people to make their own firearms and not have to adhere to the strict
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Business, Professions and Economic Development Committee Jun 29th, 2026

Business, Professions and Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • And a lot of that is because, understandably, we have some of the most strict regulations in the nation
  • Actually, we by far have the most strict regulations in the nation.
  • Meanwhile, the work we do every day has only become more complex. liability.
  • This bill adopts the existing strict guidelines around interstate licensee-to-licensee transactions for
Keywords: 987, senate, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • This is the only industry I can think of that can cause foreseeable harm and have no liability for it
  • And the response those parents received was, 'We have no liability here because of Section 230.'
  • And the response to those parents received was, we have no liability here because of Section 230.
  • Manufacturers may face liability for inadvertent or technical violations.
  • Strict deletion requirements could be seen as conflicting with such obligations.
Summary: The committee began as a subcommittee due to the lack of a quorum and heard several privacy- and technology-related measures. The first item was H.R. 117, a resolution urging Congress to reform Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The author and supporters argued the law is outdated and shields platforms from accountability for harms such as harassment, exploitation, scams, and other online abuse. Witnesses, including a survivor parent and a gender justice advocate, described harms to children, women, and LGBTQ people and urged a two-year sunset to force federal reform. Some members supported the resolution as a call for federal action, while one member said he could not support it because the resolution was too general and lacked specificity about the reforms being sought. No vote was taken because the committee lacked a quorum. The committee then heard SB 898, which would require manufacturers of connected consumer products to disclose how long they will support the software and to notify consumers when products approach end of life. The author said consumers deserve transparency about security updates and continued functionality, and supporters from Consumer Reports and PIRG emphasized cybersecurity risks, consumer confusion, and electronic waste from unsupported devices. Opponents, including business and industry groups, raised concerns about enforcement through the unfair competition law, notice burdens, labeling issues, and compliance challenges, especially for products with long support windows or third-party dependencies. One member expressed support, noting the cybersecurity risks of end-of-life devices, but again no vote was taken because there was no quorum. The committee also heard SB 435, which would narrow the CCPA definition of publicly available information to limit how businesses classify data as public. The author and supporters said the bill would close a loophole that allows data brokers and others to monetize personal information without meaningful consent and could help prevent surveillance and misuse of data, including by government agencies. Opponents argued the bill would upset the balance between privacy and the free flow of information, create compliance uncertainty, and retroactively reclassify information that businesses reasonably believed was public. Some members said they supported the goal of stronger privacy protections, while others said the bill was too broad. The committee again could not vote due to the lack of a quorum. Later, the committee heard SB 923, which would expand Californians’ right to delete personal information to cover data obtained from third parties and require online businesses to offer a web form or similar method for deletion requests. Supporters, including the California Privacy Protection Agency and consumer advocates, said the bill would make deletion rights meaningful and better address data broker practices. Opponents sought an opt-out-of-processing alternative and raised operational and legal concerns, but supporters said deletion is not the same as retention or processing limits. Members largely spoke in favor of the bill’s privacy goals, but no action was taken. The committee also heard SB 947, the “No Robo Bosses Act,” which would require human review for certain automated employment decisions and limit predictive analysis in workplace discipline and termination. Labor groups supported the bill as a safeguard against biased or erroneous AI-driven decisions, while business, public employer, and local government groups opposed it as overbroad and burdensome. Members voiced support for human oversight in employment decisions, but the item was not voted on because the committee still lacked a quorum. Finally, the committee began hearing SB 1114, the SOGI Data Privacy Act, which would restrict disclosure of sexual orientation, gender identity, and intersex data to federal agencies absent a court order or legal requirement; the author and witness framed it as a response to federal efforts to obtain sensitive LGBTQ-related data.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Legislative Health and Human Services Nov 6th, 2025

Legislative Health & Human Services Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • One of the concerns is always about liability.
  • Regarding liability, malpractice insurance would be required, and rates for dental hygienists are very
  • And again, they would be required to carry malpractice insurance to cover any liability issues.
  • So we have addressed that in our model, along with the liability issue.
  • We do not do foster care for liability issues. I understand. Thank you, Madam Chair.