Video & Transcript Research : 'Estates Code'

Page 45 of 472
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Mar 19th, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • It doesn't change the code in that respect.
  • Look, there's real estate on the driver's license.
  • So there are already laws in the books in Texas penal code. that forbids that action.
  • And so to protect it, that's why there's Texas Penal Code. that prohibits racial profiling under the
  • 287g program there's also a code in violation if they do also do racial profiling, which is overseen
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

S/C on Academic & Career-Oriented Education Mar 5th, 2025

S/C on Academic & Career-Oriented Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Are you familiar with the, um, CTE funding and the Codes used in teams and all that.
  • Uh, and that comes, I guess, from the, the code that they use for reporting that expenditure, um.
  • So that may be there may be some other codes that we need to take a look at, um, but we can get more
Bills: HB20, HB120
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/25/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is a revision to some changes to the Minnesota Trust Code and, about 10 years ago, the trust code
  • > major years ago the trust code underwent major years ago the trust code underwent major overhaul
  • We hope that we can have a real estate fix this year.
  • We hope that we can have a real estate fix this year.
  • that's what the uniform commercial code that's what the uniform commercial code is<01:24:48.920>
Bills: HF747, HF360
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Child Committee Meeting - 2026-04-14

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Bills: HF4407, HF4382
Summary: The Children and Families Committee adopted the April 8 minutes and then took up House File 4407, as amended by the A1 amendment. The amendment, explained by nonpartisan staff, incorporated much of the Senate version of related legislation and made a series of changes: it revised the definition of “disproportionately represented child,” shifted that determination to the Commissioner of Children, Youth, and Families, made technical cross-reference and terminology updates, adjusted training requirements, set the working group to expire December 31, 2027, and added an appropriation for statewide implementation. The committee adopted the A1 amendment and then referred the bill to Ways and Means. Representative Gilman said the bill is intended to preserve the goals of the Minnesota African American Family Preservation Act while addressing operational, legal, and fiscal problems before statewide implementation. He argued for delaying the effective date by one year, shifting case review responsibilities to the state, and providing funding so counties are not left with an unfunded mandate. He also said the bill adds safety measures related to synthetic opioids and other imminent-harm concerns, and that the delay would allow the working group to finish its recommendations and give counties time to prepare. County officials Steve Schmidt of Meeker County/Minnesota Rural Counties and Jenny Mojo of Clay County testified in support of the bill as amended, emphasizing that counties need clearer responsibilities, staffing, training, technology, and dependable funding to implement the law successfully. Rebecca St. George of DCYF said “active efforts” is not absolutely defined and is determined case by case, often with court involvement. Members raised questions about the meaning of active efforts, the bill’s synthetic opioid language, and whether the proposal should apply more broadly rather than within this specific act. A citizen also cautioned that the opioid language should not unintentionally affect families in treatment programs. Representative Hicks warned that the fentanyl provisions could lead to broad removals and create placement problems for teens with substance use disorder, while Representative Gilman responded that the bill includes a rebuttable presumption and is meant to protect children from imminent harm.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services May 13th, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, SB 500 amends the Family Code to establish clear deadlines to provide required to the entities placing
  • SB 1266 will amend the Government Code so that the providers are regularly evaluated with clear objectives
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 28th, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • , or currently is in the code, serious bodily injury.
  • The criteria keep one of the three that's now in the code and leaves two, cutting two away.
  • The code presently includes three criteria: one, felony offense involving family violence against an
  • in Article 26.05 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which is drafted for attorneys...
  • The Texas Family Code.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 24th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • addresses vagueness and closes loopholes that exist in Chapters 232 and 233 of the Texas Local Government Code
  • These codes were enacted to regulate the number of residential units that could be built per acre of
  • through setback requirements, which is in direct contradiction to Chapter 232 of the Local Government Code
  • express authority to do so under Chapters 232 and 233 of the Constitution and the Local Government Code
  • I'm also a real estate investor.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 24th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Because currently, as the local government code states for tree ordinances, you are allowed to cut trees
  • So the way this code is, the local government code, this section, this 212.905, in it, it talks about
  • example, city of Austin, if you decide to cut down a tree and according to their local government code
  • Because of the way the current code is written, you would then, and most municipalities would require
  • But currently, if the law is such that in the codes, individuals need to submit a statement of the tree
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • our part of the area, the part of Bexar County and surrounding counties, there's a provision in the code
  • In the code that prevents a zone from even being designated in an area with certain Chapter 27 injection
Summary: The Committee on Natural Resources heard House Bill 2109, which would remove certain long-proposed reservoir projects from the state water plan after 50 years without progress. Chairman Van Deaver and many landowners, local officials, timber interests, and conservation advocates testified in support, arguing that the Marvin Nichols Reservoir has burdened Northeast Texas landowners for decades with the threat of eminent domain, depressed property values, and uncertainty over homes, farms, ranches, schools, churches, and cemeteries. Supporters also said the project would flood tens of thousands of acres, require extensive mitigation, harm timber and agriculture, and that Texas now has better alternatives such as conservation, reuse, aquifer storage and recovery, and desalination. Several members expressed sympathy for the affected families and questioned whether a project could remain in the plan indefinitely without progress. Opposition came from North Texas water interests, including the North Texas Commission, Tarrant Regional Water District, and the Texas Water Association, who argued that the bill would interfere with the state’s long-term water planning process and remove needed future supply options for a fast-growing region. They said Region C faces major projected shortages by 2070, that conservation and reuse have already delayed the need for new supplies, and that reservoirs remain one tool in the state’s water-planning toolbox. TWDB staff explained the existing inter-regional conflict process and noted that the substitute would affect several unique reservoir sites, not just Marvin Nichols. After testimony, Chairman Van Deaver closed by urging passage of the bill, but the committee withdrew the substitute and left HB 2109 pending. The committee then took up House Bill 5188, a brackish groundwater bill. The author said the bill would reduce permitting burdens for wells in designated brackish groundwater production zones, and the committee substitute added requirements on monitoring, groundwater-rights ownership, and allocation of pumpage limits while removing some exclusions and export-fee provisions. Texas Wildlife Association testified against the bill, warning that the exemptions could weaken groundwater conservation districts’ ability to protect freshwater resources and surface-owner rights. San Antonio Water System testified in favor, saying brackish groundwater is a key future supply and that the substitute would help speed development of desalination and brackish projects. The Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts testified neutrally but raised concerns about reduced district oversight, especially around injection-well exclusions and the loss of export fees, and said discussions on the bill were ongoing.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 22nd, 2025 at 02:04 pm

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • For context, I am board certified in estate planning and probate.
  • Since 1999, I have led a boutique trust and estates firm out of Houston.
  • My entire career has been spent doing trust and estate work.
  • It's a huge financial savings to the clients in these estates.
  • Of the family code, there are several grounds, A through...
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Transportation Funding Apr 14th, 2025

S/C on Transportation Funding

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chapter 91 of the Transportation Code addresses the acquisition, financing, construction, operation,
  • Members, under Section 21.105 of the Transportation Code, the Texas...
  • Currently, there's a conflict with the Transportation Code and the Government Code.
  • The Transportation Code states that the interest earned...
  • House Bill 4905 amends the Transportation Code to move the SCRF into a separate account from the State
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • ties the tax credit more closely to the federal R&D credit under Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code
  • We talked about the A&M Real Estate Center having a statistic that for every $1,000 you increase the
  • Senate Bill 1030 removes a significant obstacle in the tax code to allow further expansion of the Texas
  • is installed in an individual's residence or homestead by a person licensed under the Occupational Code
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 3rd, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Code provisions and punitive provisions across different codes, so I really want to zero in on that we're
  • Under Section 1022 of the Health and Safety Code.
  • Provisions like disappear in the Penal Code.
  • As set forth in Bill 1902, we would establish a specific code for jugging.
  • That would be covered already by the penal code?
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Mar 31st, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • books for fraudulent possession or use of identifying information, which is currently in the penal code
  • written to address a high-tech crime that is relatively new and not adequately addressed in the penal code
  • The scratch-off material covering the Activation code is then removed.
  • As a new law, this will land in Chapter 32 of the Penal Code, automatically making this crime a predicate
  • Most people don't realize that the Texas Penal Code, compared to most states and the federal law, is
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) Mar 17th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Alcoholic Beverage Code sets timelines and procedures for when a retailer must pay a wholesaler,
Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs resumed consideration of several pending bills, first taking up Senate Bills 667, 1349, 1585, and 2312. After inviting testimony had already been heard, no members of the public came forward to testify on any of those measures, and the committee closed public testimony and left all four bills pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1355, which Senator Parker explained as a committee substitute aimed at helping Texas distillers recover unpaid invoices from wholesalers. The substitute would require distillers to invoice at the time of purchase, send a demand letter if payment terms are violated, and allow complaints to be filed with the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, which could determine an appropriate penalty based on the facts. Natasha Dehart of Bent Distilling Company testified in support, describing serious cash-flow problems and unpaid invoices from a Texas wholesaler that had forced layoffs, late vendor payments, and operational strain. No one testified against the bill, and it was left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1378, a narrowly tailored local bill for a Carrollton facility recently acquired by Sazerac that employs more than 1,000 Texans. Senator Parker said the bill would create a limited exemption to avoid forcing the company to shut down or move because of current permit restrictions, while preserving the three-tier system and preventing the company from selling wine to itself. A Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission resource witness said the bill was drafted so it would not open the door to broader industry changes. Mason Moreland testified against the bill as filed, arguing it gave special treatment to one company and failed to address broader problems in the wine industry, including direct-to-consumer sales and permit issues. After questions from senators, public testimony closed and SB 1378 was left pending. The committee then recessed subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Mar 17th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • Let me find the words here. under the health and safety code that just says this case information is
  • It's in the code that's under HHSC. OK. And then, would HHSC?