Video & Transcript Research : 'property development'

Page 3 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 22nd, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Ultimately, a developer will require a group of properties to redevelop after the developer has submitted
  • So with the intention to develop this property, we purchased it.
  • Despite us not being ready to develop the property, we obliged in order to be good neighbors and help
  • This has stripped us of our ability to develop the property that we bought and paid for, condemned us
  • But the property—and I don't know who the developer is—but the property that we're discussing, it had
Bills: SB2215, SB2639
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations and Budget Natural Resources Subcommittee Apr 6th, 2026 at 10:30 am

A&B Natural Resources Subcommittee

Transcript Highlights:
  • So who's going to oversee the decision on who would what property would be sold? Thank you.
  • by CLO law we have to or by law we have to buy other property so how does this how does this coincide
  • with that do we have to go once we sell state property do we have to go and buy other state property
  • To be clear, at one point we had talked about developing some property around Lake Murray and we were
  • Chairman, SB1530 is a research and development ecosystem piece.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 29th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The district property is in an area that would benefit from mixed-use and residential development.
  • But does not have sufficient water sewer roads or storm damage to support development and there are no
  • For the developer to provide to provide these improvements with that their There is witnesses that can
  • Adjacent existing restaurants and commercial developments. This is a template.
  • property to be included in the district is proposed to be developed as a high quality family friendly
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Yeah, this is for personal property. Right, for business personal property.
  • What's your total property tax budget?
  • It exempts animal feed from being subject to property tax on personal property if that feed is also eligible
  • properties due to restrictions on what an owner can do to develop the land.
  • property that they use or sell.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Currently, the Texas State Property Code considers manufactured homes as personal property rather than
  • real property.
  • About 85% of what we sell right now is personal property, and about 15% is real property.
  • So if you treat your property as real property and there's no land under it that's owned by you, how
  • us purchasing his property for development.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 4th, 2026 at 10:04 am

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • , it would not get developed.
  • Chair, I would just add that out of all the economic development tools the state has that give away property
  • to develop.
  • So I ask the question: can these properties be condemned? Mr.
  • We frequently get inquiries from hotel properties; multifamily housing properties tend to be the customers
Bills: SB101, SB58, SB55
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part II) May 26th, 2025

Local Government

Summary: The Senate Local Government Committee briefly convened and then immediately moved to recess. Senator Paxton made a motion to recess subject to the call of the chair, which was accepted. No bills, testimony, or substantive policy issues were discussed during the meeting. With no other business before the committee, it stood in recess subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part I) May 26th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • property owners.
  • property owners.
  • Are you looking at industrial property? Is it going to be mixed-use property?
  • that property, as well as some of the larger property owners that have property that would be amenable
  • that property as well as some of the larger property owners that have property that would be amenable
Summary: The committee heard and discussed several local-government-related bills, mostly with committee substitutes. House Bill 2731 would let certain border counties regulate roadside vendors selling live animals in unincorporated areas and along public rights-of-way; the substitute narrowed the bill to live animal sales only and excluded livestock and other roadside commerce. House Bill 3483 would streamline TCEQ review of special utility district revenue bonds by removing tax-bond requirements that do not apply to SUDs. House Bill 4308 would create a county industrial development district framework, limited in the substitute to certain counties including Fort Bend County, to help finance industrial sites and related infrastructure. House Bill 5663 would create a Wood County Hospital District memory-care-focused district with no taxing power, intended to help pursue grants and other funding for a new facility. House Bill 4582 addressed attainable housing in Dallas and Tarrant counties, allowing local reimbursement tools for developers under a uniform, optional framework. House Bill 5509 would let municipalities suspend or revoke a hotel’s certificate of occupancy if law enforcement and a criminal court both find probable cause of human trafficking, with the substitute adding due-process protections. House Bill 1532 created a Lake Houston dredging and maintenance district funded by revenue from dredged material sales and revenue bonds, with no taxing authority or eminent domain. House Bill 23, heard as pending business, would revise the process for local governments to rescind development documents and adjust third-party reviewer liability and eligibility rules. House Bill 4580, concerning property tax exemptions for charitable organizations such as the Houston Rodeo, was amended to remove language about exempting revenue from property use and instead focus on land used for agricultural, youth, and educational support. Public testimony was generally supportive on the bills heard, with witnesses including county officials, utility and water association representatives, hotel industry representatives, and housing developers. Several speakers emphasized the need for faster financing or permitting tools, flood mitigation, housing affordability, anti-trafficking enforcement, or local economic development. Some members raised concerns about scope, precedent, consultation with affected senators, and due process, particularly on House Bill 4582 and House Bill 5509, but the committee largely accepted the committee substitutes as improvements. No public testimony was offered on several bills, and most measures were left pending before later being voted out. The committee took recorded votes on multiple pending bills and reported them favorably, often with committee substitutes adopted in lieu of the filed versions. House Bills 1532, 2731, 3483, 5509, 5663, and 4580 were reported out, with 1532 and 5663 passing unanimously and 3483, 2731, and 5509 also receiving favorable votes despite one present-not-voting on 3483. House Bill 23 and House Bill 4582 were left pending subject to call of the chair. The committee then recessed until adjournment or later.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 1st, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • they lost through eminent domain if the entity that acquired the property is required to pay property
  • tax but fails to pay property tax on the acquired property for two years.
  • Property rights are a cornerstone of Texas values, ensuring landowners and developers can make investments
  • Vested property rights are essential for responsible land development, and Texas has long been a leader
  • A consistent approach would prevent confusion, reduce unnecessary expenses for property owners and developers
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 1st, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • close to the property line.
  • lot as long as what they're developing doesn't pose a danger or a nuisance.
  • For fully developed, landlocked cities such as ours, this would have deeply negative impacts.
  • Additionally, there would be a loss of property rights and values.
  • This is due to a controversial development just to our north, known as Epic City.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Tax, Business and Transportation Jan 27th, 2026 at 01:42 pm

Senate Tax, Business & Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • developer chooses to develop that property and allows them to really reap the benefit of front-end money
  • It's been a new development throughout the country to extend these property tax exemptions a little further
  • property tax go up pretty radically, this will encourage that developer to get that vacant lot under
  • And on Fourth Street, we had a woman come in who developed a property there that had been vacant on Fourth
  • And on 4th Street, on 4th Street, we had a woman come in who developed a property there that had been
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs May 6th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • where they're located, and so the property just sits there.
  • taken it back because of property taxes.
  • They have actually broken ground during the development.
  • It's a developer. The developer in the nine percent program currently has to notify us.
  • Admits to the department a letter opposing the development.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 3rd, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Today, you will hear witnesses with varying points of view. about the balance between property development
  • Horton development that was just done inside the city. It's a 676 home development.
  • We want developments, we need developments, but we need to be prepared for it.
  • otherwise be developed.
  • It just gives developers and property owners the right to do it. That's what I'm saying.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Apr 3rd, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • This could allow a single property owner to disannex their property, leading to a Swiss cheese. effect
  • taxing our properties.
  • I purchased Lakefront property 10 years ago and actually built a house on that property.
  • development.
  • , specifically for commercial development.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WLA-HWN Public Hearing 02-19-2026

Water, Land, Culture and the Arts

Bills: SB2596, SB3002, SB3067
Summary: The joint committees on Water and Culture and the Arts and on Hawaiian Affairs heard SB 3173, which would create a cultural training pilot program in the Department of Land and Natural Resources, administered by DOBOR, for commercial permit holders operating in Lahaina Harbor. Testimony was largely supportive from Lahaina Strong, which said the bill responds to community concerns and would help commercial operators return with greater cultural understanding and respect. Supporters framed the measure as a way to rebuild Lahaina intentionally and strengthen relationships between industry and community. Opposition came from Trilogy Excursions and the Activities and Attractions Association of Hawaii. They said they already provide or encourage cultural education, but argued the bill as written is too broad, potentially mandatory, and could create hiring and operational problems for businesses trying to restart after the fire. They asked that any program be voluntary, collaborative, and practical, with clearer details on who must take the training, how often it would be offered, and how it would be coordinated. In response to questions, a witness said most operators would likely participate if the training were accessible and well-marketed, but that the harbor’s limited current operations and staggered rebuilding make timing important. After testimony and questions, the chairs said they appreciated the comments but wanted to move the bill forward without amendments because of a filing deadline, noting that timing and other issues could be worked out in later committees with DLNR, OHA, and stakeholders. Both committees then voted to pass SB 3173 unamended, with one member excused in each committee.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation General Fund Committee Feb 19th, 2025

Finance and Taxation General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill adds additional duties for the state auditor in terms of property that's missing or damaged
  • to investigate any of that missing or stolen property. ...of that missing or stolen property.
  • This does not expand any duties to the auditor beyond the realm of property audits.
  • Property Investigations.
  • I really think we need to be doing everything we can to incentivize workforce development.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

AEN-EDT, AEN Public Hearings 02-06-2026

Agriculture and Environment

Transcript Highlights:
  • We agricultural development.
  • transfer the agricultural development transfer the agricultural development division<00:02:09.520
  • business development corporation. business development corporation.
  • the Agricultural Development ADD, the Agricultural Development Division,<00:02:41.760> manages
  • properties.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on SP 2350, which would transfer oversight of the Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Development Division and the aquaculture and livestock support services branch to the Agribusiness Development Corporation. The Department of Agriculture and ADC both testified, with ADC opposing the bill as written while supporting the goal of strengthening agriculture. ADC said the transfer could create federal operational and coordination risks, jeopardize federal funding and program continuity, and was unnecessary because ADC is a business development entity, not a regulatory agency. The Hawaii Farmers Union also expressed concern that moving the programs could weaken the department’s ability to access federal resources, while the Hawaii Farm Bureau submitted written testimony and the Hawaii Aquaculture and Aquaponics Association and H-Plan were noted as supporting the measure; the Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council was noted as opposing it. Much of the discussion focused on aquaculture’s economic potential and the role of regulation, permitting, and funding. Committee members questioned why aquaculture had not grown faster, citing current gross revenues of about $66 million last year, a prior high of $82 million, and a possible long-term target of $500 million. Testimony identified permitting and feed costs as major barriers, along with market conditions and water quality issues affecting producers. ADC described ongoing efforts on feed development, permitting streamlining, coastal-state collaboration on seaweed and restorative aquaculture, and national advocacy for more parity in seafood import standards. Members also pressed the Department of Agriculture on its leadership and priorities, criticizing the lack of bills and resources dedicated to aquaculture and asking whether the department should have more authority to pursue land purchases and development opportunities. The department said it relies on divisions and industry feedback for bill ideas, noted it funds an annual aquaculture survey, and said it was pursuing congressional earmarks and other funding for aquaculture parks, research, and export/import issues. ADC said it would work with the department if the bill passed, but that its current statute does not give it regulatory authority and any such change would require a statutory amendment.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • But it's not property taxes.
  • property owners.
  • All property owners... within the district only.
  • that property, as well as some of the larger property owners that have property that would be amenable
  • to industrial development.