Transcript Highlights:

• And we noticed that it focuses pretty primarily on tuition assistance, and non-tuition costs of attendance
• And at CSUs alone, housing is double the cost of tuition.
• And at CSU's alone, housing is double the cost of tuition.
• And I'm asking that because we know that housing is not a part of the tuition itself.
• The student's eligibility for in-state tuition...

Summary: The committee heard several higher education bills. It first approved the consent calendar, which included SB 67 and SB 619. The main discussion centered on SB 437, which would direct the CSU system to develop a fair, evidence-based process for verifying whether someone is a descendant of a person enslaved in the United States, as part of the state’s reparations work. Supporters said the bill fills a gap left by the Reparations Task Force and would create a transparent, credible lineage-verification process; opponents argued genealogy methods already exist, the bill would waste money and delay action, and some raised constitutional concerns. The committee took a vote on SB 437, but the roll was left open after the initial tally showed three ayes and three noes. The committee then heard SB 790, which would allow California to join the interstate reciprocity agreement for online postsecondary education. The author and supporters said the bill would improve consumer protections for California students taking out-of-state online courses and help California institutions compete more effectively by reducing the burden of seeking separate state approvals. Opponents, including University of Phoenix and other groups, argued the bill conflicted with the existing reciprocity framework, could exclude some institutions, and might not actually secure California’s entry into the agreement. The committee voted 3-1 to pass SB 790 as amended to the Business and Professions Committee, with the roll left open. The committee also heard SB 391, which would authorize the Community College Chancellor’s Office to charge fees for research partners seeking access to data. Supporters said the office is absorbing significant unfunded workload from data requests and that fees would help recover costs; opponents, including the California Teachers Association community college association, warned the fees could create barriers for faculty and smaller researchers. Members discussed possible exemptions and implementation details. The committee voted 5-1 to pass SB 391 as amended to the Appropriations Committee, with the roll left open. Finally, the committee heard SB 685, a pilot program to provide cost-of-attendance assistance at four CSU campuses for students who experienced homelessness in high school. Supporters said it would help students cover housing, food, and transportation costs and reduce dropout risk; members asked about eligibility and implementation, and the author explained the bill would use McKinney-Vento homelessness designations and target students at risk of “summer melt” and college homelessness.

Transcript Highlights:

• fees and books after accounting tuition fees and books after accounting for<00:24:01.280> other
• And what the Minnesota National Guard's approach to scholarship or tuition help was this: You go to a
• And what the Minnesota National Guard's approach to scholarship or tuition help was this: You go to a
• And what the Minnesota National Guard's approach to scholarship or tuition help was this: You go to a
• to scholarship or tuition help was this. to scholarship or tuition help was this.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• On to Senate Bill 1567, Senate Draft 1, House Draft 1, relating to classification and compensation systems
• Up next, we have Senate Bill 1567, Senate Draft 1, House Draft 1, relating to classification and compensation
• On to Senate Bill 1567, Senate Draft 1, House Draft 1, relating to classification and compensation systems
• draft 1, 1567, Senate draft, House draft 1, relating<00:10:20.880> to<00:10:21.120> classification
• <00:10:21.760> and relating to classification and relating to classification and compensation

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• tutoring um therapies School tuition tutoring um therapies instructural<00:22:28.159> material
• or in some cases there school tuition or in some cases there are<00:23:07.640> selective<00:23
• The transfer—the average cost of a given district—is the tuition amount allowed to be transferred.
• cost of a given district is the tuition cost of a given district is the tuition amount<01:40:12.960
• tuition and go to that public school, and they'll pay the difference. costs<01:42:02.639> we<

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:33:15.960> of um the commercial classification of um the commercial classification of
• of properties in their classifications of properties in their jurisdictions<00:43:50.920> Market<
• <01:01:01.599> quite that particular classification quite that particular classification quite
• classification.
• The 1C classification and the commercial resort classification, and within those, they received a particular

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So these state funds and tuition, which have not kept pace with inflation, they're not sufficient to
• fill that capital funding gap without decimating the very programs that bring in the tuition and then
• and then provide the the tuition and then provide the graduates<00:48:02.559> to<00:48:02.680
• you're stuck in a catch 22 um tuition you're stuck in a catch 22 um when<00:48:10.559> expenses
• <00:59:30.640> investment amount in terms of tuition investment amount in terms of tuition

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We were asked to talk specifically about tuition reimbursement, so this is a summary.
• We were asked to talk specifically about tuition reimbursement.
• Some agencies do support tuition reimbursement, others do not.
• We do provide tuition reimbursement, but it varies significantly among the agencies.
• It does not cover—it's not specifically tuition reimbursement—but it does include tuition reimbursement

Summary: The Employee Benefits Committee met to hear presentations on state employee health insurance, compensation, leave policies, labor market conditions, and prevailing wage issues, then later took up committee rules and bill-draft jurisdiction. PERS reviewed the history and structure of the state health plan, noting the state has paid the full family premium since 1979, described cost-control and benefit-enhancement changes over time, and explained current plan options, wellness incentives, employer wellness discounts, and the upcoming bid process for the 2027-29 contract. HRMS then presented compensation comparisons showing state classified pay generally trails private and regional markets, with larger gaps at higher-level jobs, and reviewed benefits and leave policies, including the new enhanced annual leave and new-hire leave, the state’s unpaid family leave structure, and varying tuition reimbursement practices. Job Service reported on labor force trends, low unemployment, high labor force participation, job openings, and wage growth, and OMB said there are no state prevailing-wage requirements beyond federal Davis-Bacon rules for federally funded projects. The committee then considered a proposed amendment to Joint Rule 211 to better align the health insurance mandate review process with recent statutory changes. Members discussed how the rule should reference both the committee’s required actuarial reports and the Legislative Council cost-benefit analysis, and the amendment was adopted on a roll call vote. The committee also discussed how its jurisdiction decisions affect whether a bill draft receives actuarial analysis, with staff explaining that a decision not to take jurisdiction means the bill is not treated as impacting the relevant retirement or health plans for purposes of that analysis. After that, the committee began reviewing bill drafts for jurisdiction. The first draft, bill draft 33, would automatically renew pre-tax elections for dental and vision coverage during open enrollment instead of requiring annual re-election. Members debated whether it had any actuarial impact, noting the state does not pay those premiums directly, and the discussion was still underway when the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• Far too many students are constantly choosing between paying for groceries or paying for rent or tuition
• on fewer meals than it is to risk not coming up with the month's rent or not being able to cover a tuition
• /c><00:04:01.040> or<00:04:01.239> paying<00:04:01.439> for<00:04:01.599> tuition
• paying for rent or paying for tuition paying for rent or paying for tuition and<00:04:02.680>
• not being able to cover a tuition not being able to cover a tuition payment<00:04:12.599> I

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• LOOKING OUTSIDE OF FLORIDA AND TALKING TO OTHER STATES OFTEN TIMES YOU HEAR ABOUT THE RISING COST OF TUITION
• WE ALSO JUST LAST WEEK THE COLLEGE BOARD ANNOUNCE THE RANKINGS FOR TUITION AND WE ARE STILL THE LOWEST
• STATE IN THE COUNTRY FOR A RESIDENT UNDERGRADUATE TUITION.
• THIS IS THE FOURTH YEAR WE ARE THE LOWEST STATE IN THE COUNTRY FOR IN STATE TUITION WHICH IS ALSO REMARKABLE
• BECAUSE OF OUR TUITION IT HELPS US TREMENDOUSLY BY CONTINUING TUITION AT THE LEVELS WE ARE HOLDING FOR

Transcript Highlights:

• my office has been slowed in its effort to complete these reviews by a lack of access to job classifications
• And part of the frustration at the local level and the city level is not understanding a classification
• And part of the frustration at the local level and the city level is not understanding a classification
• And part of the frustration at the local level and the city level is not understanding a classification
• And the reason why I ask is because that's, I guess, the watt classification is what is confusing for

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Agricultural classification of property or other types of classified use, pollution control devices,
• Agricultural classification of property or other types of classified use, pollution control devices,
• It is a classification of property, which is assessed in a certain way.
• what is that classification?
• We are talking about classification.

Summary: The Select Committee on Property Taxes met for an educational session focused on how Florida funds public schools and how property taxes are assessed and levied. Dr. Jim Zengali of the Department of Revenue explained the FEFP school funding formula, noting that it is built on weighted student counts, a base student allocation, and programmatic add-ons such as transportation, exceptional student education, school safety, and mental health. He said school funding is roughly split between state general revenue and local property taxes through required local effort, with additional discretionary and capital outlay millages contributing to total school funding. He also described the Department of Revenue’s role in certifying property rolls at fair market value and reviewing them for substantial compliance, including the so-called “nuclear option” if a roll is not approved. Members asked about trends in millage rates, county-by-county funding differences, the effect of growth and enrollment changes, and how property appraisals are reviewed. Zengali said aggregate millage for school funding has declined over the last decade while revenues have still increased, and he agreed to provide additional data on county trends, parcel strata, student growth, and enrollment impacts. He also clarified that school funding is equalized so students receive similar resources regardless of county wealth, and that federal funding plays only a small role in the FEFP. Amy Baker of the Joint Legislative Office of Economic and Demographic Research then discussed existing homestead benefits. She said about half of Florida’s parcels are homestead properties, most fall in the $250,000 to $500,000 value range, and many seniors without mortgages pay property taxes in lump sums rather than through escrow. Baker explained that Florida’s homestead tax burden is middle-of-the-pack nationally and that the main benefits are Save Our Homes and portability on the differential side, plus the $25,000 homestead exemption and related exemptions on the exemption side. She said these benefits reduce taxable value substantially, with homestead properties receiving a large share of the reductions, and noted that the committee requested follow-up data on exemption usage, portability timing, senior exemptions, and county-level patterns. The final presentation, by Lizette Kelly of the Department of Revenue, covered millage rates and the TRIM process. She reviewed the history of truth-in-millage notices, required taxpayer mailings, public hearing notices, and later changes that tied local millage resets to rollback and majority-vote rates. Kelly explained the difference between proposed and adopted millage, the rollback rate, and the majority-vote rate, and described how taxing authorities include counties, cities, special districts, and MSTUs. She also outlined how county taxable value is calculated from just value through assessment differentials and exemptions, and how certain exemptions, such as the additional senior exemption, apply only to the taxing authority that adopted them. No votes were taken during the meeting, but members requested several follow-up data reports for later discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• But I mean, agricultural homestead land, as you know, is the lowest property tax classification rate,
• But when I speak about the classification rate being one of the lowest, you know, I cited the other two
• But when I speak about the classification rate being one of the lowest, you know, I cited the other two
• But when I speak about the classification rate being one of the lowest, you know, I cited the other two
• But when I speak about the classification rate being one of the lowest, you know, I cited the other two

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Anderson's 100% tax on fraud changes to the homestead resort classification threshold
• um changes to the homestead resort fraud um changes to the homestead resort um um um uh uh uh classification
• classification classification threshold<00:03:24.320> for<00:03:24.640> value<00:03:25.400

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The House considered the conference committee report on House File 2438, the 2026 tax bill. Representative Gomez outlined the main provisions, saying most fiscal changes were tied to federal tax conformity. He also described several other items in the report, including a two-year extension of the pass-through entity tax workaround, a sustainable aviation fuel provision, a one-time $125 million increase in homestead credit property tax refunds, a one-year removal of the cap on the beginning farmer tax credit, a four-year tax exemption for PGA tickets, permanent aid to certain school districts, a direct file program, changes related to homestead resort classification thresholds, local property tax and income tax provisions, local government aid for the new city of Northern, a four-year extension of local homeless prevention aid, and Department of Revenue policy, technical, TIF, local, and public finance items. After the report was presented, the House adopted the conference committee report and ordered the bill repassed as amended by conference. The clerk then gave the bill its third reading as amended. Following third reading, Representative Niska moved to lay House File 2438 on the table. The motion prevailed, and the bill was tabled.

Transcript Highlights:

• They are eager to recruit from New Mexico. where New Mexico students can attend with in-state tuition
• And then the other thing I think that we can consider is a tuition subsidy.
• How does their tuition compare to Texas Tech?
• stacks up against both in-state tuition for New Mexicans and out-of-state tuition for New Mexicans?
• I don't always know what the private school tuition is either, but it's probably about double.

Transcript Highlights:

• before you got paid your own tuition before you got there.<00:04:37.840> So,<00:04:38.880>
• Um, I was told that I'm signing an agreement to pay for tuition. to the front, I'm going to ask folks
• Um, we didn't really talk about tuition.
• Apprenticeship programs and related to the repayment of tuition for transferable credentials.
• <00:26:21.200> for related to the repayment of tuition for related to the repayment of tuition

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Students carry the burden through extended time to degree, which means additional tuition, more debt,
• But to prevent ongoing structural deficits, rebuild core capacity, and keep tuition from rising year
• One of the driving factors was 10 years with no tuition increase and no tuition policy in place, which
• Due to resulting costs and decreased tuition revenue...
• Due to resulting costs and degrees in tuition revenue. Number of years.

Summary: The joint Assembly Higher Education and Budget Subcommittee hearing focused on the future of the California State University system, with opening remarks emphasizing CSU’s major role in California’s economy, workforce, and degree production. Chairs and members said the hearing was intended to inform 2026 budget decisions and to examine three main issues: declining enrollment at some campuses, cost controls and possible consolidation, and oversight of recent state investments at campuses such as Humboldt and Sonoma. The meeting was briefly delayed by microphone and sound problems before reconvening. The first panel featured CSU Academic Senate Chair Dr. Elizabeth Boyd and Cal State Student Association Vice President Katie Karam. Boyd urged the Legislature to protect academic freedom, strengthen faculty governance, provide stable ongoing funding, end unfunded mandates, support student food and housing security, fund flexible course schedules, improve transfer systems such as ASSIST, avoid over-centralizing academic programs, protect immigrant students, and expand intersegmental collaboration. Karam said students are feeling the effects of budget shortfalls through fewer course sections, reduced advising and services, longer time to degree, and tuition pressure, and she called for transparency, meaningful student involvement in budget decisions, and sustained state investment rather than cuts that harm the student experience. The second panel covered enrollment management and included CSU Chancellor’s Office and campus administrators from Chico State, Cal State L.A., and San Diego State. Dr. Delcy Perez said CSU Forward and the new systemwide enrollment plan are aimed at expanding access, aligning programs with workforce needs, and increasing resident enrollment; she reported systemwide enrollment gains and strong application numbers, including a direct-admissions pilot that expanded from Riverside to more campuses. Campus representatives described local recruitment and retention strategies, including early outreach to high school students, community college partnerships, guaranteed admission programs, and expanded advising and student support. San Diego State highlighted record enrollment and high demand, while Cal State L.A. described efforts to recover from impaction and rebuild enrollment. Members pressed CSU officials on the accuracy of enrollment data, the gap between funded targets and actual enrollment, and the system’s reallocation formula. CSU staff explained that campuses below target will see a 5% ongoing reallocation beginning in 2026-27, with one-time reserve funding also being directed to campuses that can grow, and that fiscal health reviews have been completed for 21 of 22 campuses. Legislators also asked about turnaround plans required by the budget act; CSU said those plans are being developed and will be shared in the spring after campus consultation. No formal votes were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, extending with tuition if you have to get into the business of tuition.
• students and have to forego the tuition students and have to forego the tuition we<01:08:19.279>
• tuition rates are going up and down, and we've got more and more tuition agreements across the state
• tuition rates are going up and down, and we've got more and more tuition agreements across the state
• we've got more and more tuition we've got more and more tuition agreements<02:13:44.560> across

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We have the lowest tuition in the country and the third lowest out-of-state tuition in the country, and
• WE ARE GOING TO ALLOW OUR UNIVERSITIES TO SET OUT-OF-STATE TUITION.
• RIGHT NOW, FLORIDA HAS THE THIRD LOWEST OUT-OF-STATE TUITION IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.
• US OUT-OF-STATE TUITION IS $30,140.
• IT ALSO MODIFIES THE TUITION WAIVER FOR PROGRAMS OF STRATEGIC EMPHASIS OR IN-STATE TUITION APPROVED PREPARATION

Bills: SJR4, SJR40, SJR81, SCR37, SCR39, SB22, SB32, SB33, SB36, SB38, SB95, SB209, SB249, SB311, SB326, SB365, SB458, SB609, SB660, SB664, SB693, SB732, SB745, SB760, SB762, SB779, SB783, SB785, SB868, SB871, SB883, SB921, SB955, SB993, SB996, SB1008, SB1057, SB1067, SB1151, SB1171, SB1210, SB1255, SB1265, SB1267, SB1271, SB1307, SB1313, SB1316, SB1318, SB1321, SB1332, SB1365, SB1426, SB1470, SB1484, SB1494, SB1559, SB1592, SB1596, SB1598, SB1637, SB1677, SB1706, SB1758, SB1762, SB1786, SB1809, SB1818, SB1822, SB1841, SB1871, SB1967, SB2064, SB2077, SB2112, SB2148, SB2320, SB2406, SB2407, SJR36, SJR81, SJR50, SJR4, SJR40, SJR27, SCR22, SCR12, SCR39, SCR38, SCR37, SB921, SB609, SB660, SB765, SB62, SB666, SB888, SB687, SB847, SB1248, SB504, SB305, SB296, SB284, SB304, SB1023, SB204, SB670, SB850, SB854, SB413, SB1346, SB1033, SB1220, SB1073, SB810, SB1539, SB447, SB1119, SB1505, SB1215, SB1302, SB583, SB673, SB681, SB1172, SB955, SB957, SB541, SB266, SB1415, SB53, SB1352, SB785, SB1450, SB1502, SB1566, SB1062, SB711, SB746, SB1404, SB1448, SB507, SB1026, SB1349, SB1355, SB1433, SB1434, SB1596, SB1403, SB667, SB1059, SB1567, SB310, SB311, SB505, SB1210, SB1470, SB264, SB1358, SB1364, SB1569, SB1376, SB1228, SB519, SB1350, SB462, SB827, SB1585, SB1484, SB1273, SB927, SB1227, SB1229, SB1353, SB1464, SB1709, SB1729, SB1733, SB1744, SB1772, SB1841, SB1008, SB2016, SB1173, SB1163, SB996, SB1370, SB1321, SB1101, SB860, SB993, SB693, SB1537, SB1332, SB1307, SB963, SB493, SB984, SB619, SB1122, SB455, SB522, SB1057, SB1239, SB1254, SB1255, SB1259, SB1341, SB1877, SB1277, SB32, SB732, SB731, SB268, SB1822, SB1589, SB397, SB1058, SB1267, SB2112, SB1930, SB532, SB508, SB292, SB291, SB901, SB1333, SB1436, SB1494, SB964, SB779, SB1378, SB2312, SB1719, SB287, SB2143, SB1245, SB261, SB1247, SB2406, SB2407, SB1882, SB618, SB38, SB393, SB1371, SB1365, SB2243, SB2226, SB2039, SB1919, SB1895, SB1598, SB1493, SB1810, SB1791, SB1706, SB1644, SB1238, SB783, SB458, SB22, SB651, SB897, SB1809, SB1080, SB745, SB826, SB989, SB1320, SB1437, SB2320, SB2289, SB1171, SB664, SB1637, SB2064, SB868, SB1079, SB1243, SB1504, SB1851, SB1879, SB2237, SB1257, SB2034, SB1522, SB883, SB249, SB1318, SB1151, SB596, SB1191, SB226, SB570, SB870, SB991, SB60, SB365, SB1067, SB1786, SB326, SB1401, SB1592, SB1728, SB1265, SB586, SB529, SB217, SB209, SB1923, SB1559, SB1839, SB387, SB1874, SB1872, SB1873, SB1921, SB1883, SB1677, SB95, SB1620, SB1838, SB2024, SB2429, SB1999, SB511, SB2309, SB2166, SB871, SB510, SB33, SB2420, SB1860, SB1541, SB1316, SB1314, SB1313, SB1426, SB1398, SB1869, SB1750, SB1871, SB36, SB855, SB1233, SB760, SB2425, SB2037, SB1758, SB1759, SB2365, SB1924, SB762, SB1271, SB1818, SB605, SB1405, SB1762, SB1968, SB1977, SB2077, SB2148, SB2321, SB1967, SB1662, SB1663, SB2124, SB2204, SB1855, SB863, SB37, SJR39, SCR1, SCR27, SCR32, SCR42, SCR6, SB2232, SB819, SB2078, SB2252, SB1962, SB2253, SB825, SB1577, SB1184, SB2018, SB2206, SB1901, SB1030, SB2368, SB1963, SB1960, SB1643, SB1625, SB1299, SB841, SB668, SB584, SB231, SB2411, SB1085, SB2431, SB2231, SB1490, SB530, SB34, SB1261, SJR81, SB32, SB458, SB664, SB693, SB868, SB1008, SB1267, SB1307, SB1321, SB1484, SB1637, SB1809, SB1822, SB2064, SB2112, SB2320, SB2406, SB2407, SB609, SB660, SB921, SB779, SB1470, SR388, SB3042, SB440, SB2876, SB3042, SB440, SB2876

Keywords: economic stabilization fund, state finance, constitutional amendment, budget management, financial security, emergency powers, legislative authority, governor powers, disaster management, tax exemption, ad valorem, tangible personal property, income production, SCR 37, Senate Concurrent Resolution, Panama Canal, Texas ports, port infrastructure, maritime trade, shipping lanes

Transcript Highlights:

• They don't have the ability to pay out of pocket for in-state tuition.
• It takes nothing from us to allow them to pay in-state tuition as Floridians.
• Representative Woodson: We can allow them to pay in-state tuition.
• Let me say this: the tuition fee waivers are fundamentally unfair.
• The tuition fee waivers are fundamentally unfair.

Summary: The House convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, approval of the journal, and adoption of the special order calendar for the day. The chamber then took up House Bill 1B on immigration, along with discussion of anticipated Senate changes. The sponsor described the bill as creating a chief immigration officer housed in the Department of Agriculture, establishing an Office of State Immigration Enforcement, expanding cooperation with federal immigration authorities, increasing criminal penalties for certain offenses by unauthorized aliens, ending undocumented-student fee waivers, and providing substantial appropriations for enforcement and related programs. Members also questioned the Senate version’s proposed mandatory death penalty provision for certain capital offenses involving unauthorized aliens, as well as pretrial detention, 287(g) participation, DMV reporting requirements, and the bill’s effects on schools, teachers, social workers, and local agencies. The sponsor and supporting members repeatedly said the bill required broad cooperation with federal immigration enforcement and that existing federal law would control where conflicts arose. A major portion of the debate focused on whether the bill would allow or require immigration enforcement in schools and other sensitive settings, and whether teachers, school resource officers, and social workers could be placed in conflict with federal privacy or professional obligations. Members also raised concerns about detention based on suspected status, the standard of proof for immigration-status determinations, prison and jail impacts, workforce shortages, and the fiscal effects on counties and state agencies. The sponsor said the bill did not provide DMV funding, that the state would need to study some implementation questions, and that the appropriations included $25 million for a local law enforcement participation incentive program and up to $350 million for broader implementation and coordination. Several amendments were offered and failed. Representative Chambliss proposed protecting schools, churches, and places of worship from enforcement activity; Representative Escamani offered amendments to preserve in-state tuition for Dreamers and to grandfather currently eligible students; Representative Woodson offered a similar Dreamer-related amendment; and Representative Bartleman proposed barring local law enforcement from entering schools during school hours to detain children solely for immigration status. Supporters of these amendments argued they would protect children, preserve educational access, and prevent trauma in schools and houses of worship. The House rejected each amendment by voice vote, and the transcript ends during debate on the Bartleman school-safety amendment before final disposition is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• THE FIRST FINDING HAD TO DO WITH UNTIMELY TUITION AND TRANSPORTATION PAYMENTS.
• STEP UP DID NOT TIMELY PROCESS FPS EO EDUCATIONAL TUITION PAYMENTS FOR STEP UP DID NOT TIMELY PROCESS
• FPS EO EDUCATIONAL TUITION PAYMENTS FOR PRIVATE SCHOOLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE RULES AND THEY DID
• NOT PROMPTLY PROCESS FLORIDA TAX CREDIT SCHOLARSHIP PRIVATE SCHOOL TUITION PAYMENTS OR TRANSPORTATION
• WHAT I HEAR FOR MOST FAMILIES IS TUITION EVEN MORE THAN THE SCHOLARSHIP AMOUNT.