Video & Transcript Research : 'emissions limits'

Page 36 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/25/26

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • E15 has lower life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, lower tailpipe emissions, and lower evaporative emissions
  • The carbon emission reduction profile of today's corn ethanol has been verified by the U.S.
  • The carbon emission reduction profile of today's corn ethanol has been verified by the U.S.
  • The carbon emission reduction profile of today's corn ethanol has been verified by the U.S.
  • > profile The carbon emission reduction profile The carbon emission reduction profile today's<
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Mar 19th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I mean, the, the housing this at the governor's office with, Um, with its limited staff and just having
  • Our main focus is on, uh, low emissions energy and promoting those. Uh, nuclear is in that basket.
  • And if it's going to be low emissions, nuclear really qualifies for that.
  • And if we can make it low emissions, that's great, uh, but we're going to need it all.
  • And second, as the chairman just said, there is no limit set.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on State and Local Government - 05/01/25

State and Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill allows for local control, but what it does is it limits local out-of-control.
  • Uh we would suggest limiting<00:26:08.320> the<00:26:08.480> scope<00:26:08.720> of<
  • It spurred 21,000 metric tons of CO2 emissions each year.
  • metric tons of CO2 emissions each year. metric tons of CO2 emissions each year.
  • <00:31:06.880> by capita by 2050 and net zero emissions by capita by 2050 and net zero emissions
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Science, Technology and Energy (01/20/2026)

Science, Technology and Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Exactly by emissions. How do we do that?
  • So let's just say it goes down limit.
  • So we all know that solar lowers emissions.
  • Do you think the uh lowers uh emissions.
  • increased emissions? increased emissions?
Keywords: 1189, house, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • For members of the public who wish to provide public comment, please limit your comments to the items
  • which promotes improvement on farms and ranches with the goal of conserving water and minimizing emissions
  • This program supports practices that sequester carbon and reduce emissions by improving soil health on
  • We find that this is a significant distinction in a year in which the Legislature has limited general
  • Be prioritized for actual emission reductions, particularly methane.
Keywords: 988, house, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Just one last question: so the limit would be the 5 million nanometers, and what microplastics absorb
  • Let me start by accepting the committee amendments, which limit and clarify the scope of the bill.
  • SB 1383 created a program sought to reduce methane emissions, including the reduction of landfill disposal
  • As the Assembly Member said, SB 1383 was designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from landfills.
  • We understand that sending food waste to a landfill does create methane emissions or greenhouse gas emissions
Summary: The committee heard a long agenda of natural resources and related bills, with several measures taken up as the committee reached quorum and many others moving on consent or with due-pass recommendations. Early items included AB 80 on carpet recycling, AB 452 creating a local process for state surf reserves, and AB 823 restricting microplastics in personal care and cleaning products. AB 80 drew broad support from recycling, labor, and environmental groups and was described as a follow-up to earlier carpet recycling reforms. AB 452 was backed by surf, tourism, environmental, and local government interests as a voluntary, community-driven way to recognize and protect surf breaks. AB 823 generated the most extensive debate, with supporters citing public health and environmental harms from microplastics and opponents warning the bill’s language could sweep in products such as sunscreens, cosmetics, and fragrance-encapsulation materials; the committee discussed possible ambiguity and EU comparisons before voting the bill out on a due-pass-as-amended basis to Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials. The committee also advanced AB 1046, which would create a narrow exemption from SB 1383 organic-waste requirements for certain crop preparers and tree nut processors that do not send organic waste to landfills. Agricultural witnesses said the bill would clarify that their operations already reuse byproducts and should not face duplicative reporting, and the measure passed with support from agricultural and rural county representatives. AB 252, the “Stop Laying Off Firefighters Act,” proposed year-round Cal Fire staffing; the author and Cal Fire supporters argued that wildfire conditions are now year-round and that maintaining trained crews would improve response and prevention, and the bill was sent to Appropriations. AB 571, a targeted CEQA exemption for the Southern California Veterans Cemetery in Anaheim, drew strong bipartisan and veterans’ support and also passed out. Later, the committee approved AB 1455, which would authorize emergency rulemaking and streamline future updates for ember-resistant building regulations after recent wildfire emergencies, and AB 687, which would let public agencies use forest-practice rules and timber-harvest plans for certain publicly funded fuel-reduction projects; AB 687 drew some opposition over scope and enforceability concerns but was still advanced. The committee also moved AB 652, allowing alternate members on the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District board to prevent quorum problems, and AB 317, a first-time homebuyer housing bill that would exempt certain small, lower-cost homes from CEQA and defer some property taxes; AB 317 prompted discussion about guardrails to avoid unintended use on larger subdivisions. Finally, AB 900, requiring the Natural Resources Agency to develop a stewardship plan for 30-by-30 lands, was heard with broad support from land trusts and conservation groups and advanced on a due-pass recommendation, and AB 738, a wildfire-rebuild bill easing solar requirements for certain disaster survivors, was introduced and discussed with questions about its narrow scope and the number of homes affected.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

House Chamber - Wed May 6, 2026, 9:00AM HST - Day 57

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • This concern is not limited to a single provision.
  • It is limited to a single provision.
  • And that limited space doesn't swell.
  • We do have a responsibility to limited.
  • ,<04:50:17.840> encouraging reducing carbon emissions, encouraging reducing carbon emissions
Keywords: 910, house, all
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • We do have a 2-minute time limit for testifiers, and so when you hear a little alarm, that means your
  • <00:41:58.520> of<00:41:58.720> how<00:41:58.880> close future setback limits
  • of how close future setback limits of how close housing<00:41:59.440> can<00:41:59.599> be
  • <00:42:09.920> to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to
  • > by limit further climate change by limit further climate change by accomplishing<00:42:13.440
Keywords: 912, senate, all
Summary: The committee heard testimony on Senate Bill 1232, which would create a three-year wastewater technology testing pilot program at the University of Hawaiʻi Water Resources Research Center and coordinate testing with state and county agencies. The Department of Health, the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, and University of Hawaiʻi representatives supported the bill, saying it would help certify new wastewater technologies, lower costs for cesspool conversions, and provide data to the Department of Health. Testifiers said the prior testing effort ended after the departure of Dr. Roger Babcock, and that the new program would use National Sanitation Foundation standards, graduate students, and local wastewater facilities such as Wahiawa. Committee members asked about the $750,000 total cost, the scope of existing research, prior test sites, and whether the program would be tied to individuals or a permanent program. One member raised concerns about the fairness and data basis for sewer conversion decisions in local communities, and the University said it would follow national standards and share results openly. The committee then took up Senate Bill 686, relating to a short-term management initiative for coconut rhinoceros beetle response and related appropriations. The Department of Agriculture and the University of Hawaiʻi testified in support, while a county representative and other advocates urged broader statewide coverage, including Kauaʻi, and asked that appropriated funds be usable on any island. Testimony emphasized the need for immediate action, outreach, tree-trimmer training, canopy treatments, K-9 inspections, container fumigation, and biocontrol research. A member summarized the bill’s funding components, including amounts for training, residential palm treatments, response teams, inspections, fumigation, and research, and noted the importance of directing money toward on-the-ground response. Committee questions focused on how much funding remained available, how the agencies would coordinate with DOA, whether the department was prepared to manage all the bill’s functions, and how infestations were being communicated to the public. Finally, the committee began hearing Senate Bill 657, which would appropriate funds for the University of Hawaiʻi School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology’s Center for Climate Resilient Development. The Department of Land and Natural Resources testified in strong support, and the Department of Health also supported the measure, noting that it relies on the center’s data to inform decisions and recommendations on projects. The discussion on this item was brief in the portion provided, with no vote or final action shown.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Senate May 26th, 2026

Louisiana Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 864 by Representative Knox is an act in Title 33 relative to the establishment of fire limits
  • to authorize municipalities to prevent fires by establishing fire limits and prohibiting the storage
  • Representative Knox's House Bill 864 is an act in Title 33 relative to the establishment of fire limits
  • , authorizing municipalities to prevent fires by establishing fire limits and prohibiting the storage
  • This bill establishes a fire limit to prohibit the storage of flammable materials above ground beneath
Bills: SR146, SCR12, HB221, HCR115, HCR116, HCR58, HB1, HB312, HB313, HB314, HB383, HB983, HB1126, HCR3, HB2, HB3, SCR3, SB56, SCR9, SCR58, SB35, SB65, SB215, SB246, SB249, SB269, SB282, SB296, SB323, SB363, SB369, SB474, SB490, SB492, SB500, SB514, HCR27, HCR28, HCR66, HCR67, HCR72, HCR5, HCR32, HCR49, HCR50, HCR53, HCR60, HCR62, HCR64, HCR68, HCR78, HCR81, HCR86, HCR97, HCR102, HCR31, HCR47, HB476, HB481, HB487, HB492, HB549, HB579, HB608, HB621, HB624, HB626, HB632, HB637, HB656, HB722, HB745, HB804, HB818, HB821, HB833, HB864, HB867, HB874, HB893, HB909, HB951, HB968, HB969, HB978, HB979, HB988, HB989, HB1001, HB1005, HB1007, HB1024, HB1032, HB1050, HB1051, HB1056, HB1059, HB1077, HB1080, HB1081, HB1086, HB1108, HB1112, HB1153, HB1172, HB1173, HB1175, HB1192, HB1193, HB1204, HB1218, HB1242, HB1244, HB1249, HB1252, HB1254, HB42, HB45, HB71, HB79, HB158, HB160, HB169, HB227, HB251, HB289, HB330, HB394, HB410, HB429, HB769, HB971, HB1017, HB1234, HB1235, HB9, HB177, HB181, HB202, HB223, HB225, HB387, HB398, HB457, HB459, HB540, HB591, HB616, HB766, HB775, HB783, HB895, HB906, HB950, HB975, HB1052, HB1057, HB1076, HB1100, HB1139, HB1155, HB1160, HB1182, HB1186, HB1220, HB1223, HB1224, HB1228, HB1231, HB1245, HB1256, HB17, HB27, HB36, HB41, HB47, HB73, HB126, HB133, HB140, HB159, HB166, HB205, HB211, HB226, HB259, HB271, HB308, HB310, HB324, HB337, HB351, HB399, HB403, HB571, HB712, HB723, HB726, HB740, HB750, HB759, HB812, HB844, HB966, HB1006, HB1009, HB1018, HB1036, HB1038, HB1107, SB29, SB42, SB78, SB208, SB217, SB274, SB300, SB341, SB379, SB382, SB387, SB401, SB441, SB449, SB487, HB74, HB134, HB258, HB359, HB468, HB956, HB1117, SB43, SB149
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Public comment will be taken at the end of the hearing and will be limited to one minute.
  • Public comment will be taken at the end of the hearing and will be limited to one minute.
  • So my time is limited. Let me just say this.
  • The second reappropriation is for the zero-emission vehicle operations.
  • This program is limited in duration, with only one more year proposed.
Summary: The subcommittee first heard an informational presentation on the May Revision’s proposed reorganization of the Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency into separate housing-focused and consumer/business-focused entities. Administration officials said the split would improve oversight, streamline decision-making, and create a dedicated California Housing and Homelessness Agency with a new housing development and finance committee. The Department of Finance said funding was needed in 2025-26 to begin implementation, while the LAO recommended rejecting the proposal without prejudice because the Little Hoover Commission review was still pending and the plan would require ongoing General Fund costs. Members raised concerns about the timing, the lack of alignment with the budget process, and whether the reorganization would improve accountability for homelessness spending; several public witnesses supported the concept but stressed it could not substitute for new housing and homelessness dollars. The committee then took up the Department of Veterans Affairs. CalVet requested funding for phase three of its electronic health care record project and a trailer bill to preserve authority for federal background checks, but the May Revision withdrew requests for deferred maintenance and additional administrative support. The LAO noted deferred maintenance can prevent larger future costs, and the chair criticized the withdrawal of less than $1 million for veterans’ homes as short-sighted given existing repair needs. No vote was taken. Next, the Department of Housing and Community Development presented its budget. HCD said the May Revision provides no new affordable housing or homelessness funding, but does retain existing rounds of funding and proposes a $31.7 million reversion from undersubscribed housing programs. Members from both parties expressed concern about zeroing out ongoing housing and homelessness investments, especially for LIHTC, the Multifamily Housing Program, and HAP. HCD also defended its homelessness accountability and compliance work, saying the unit includes about 30 program staff and six attorneys, with three additional attorneys requested mainly to handle public records and litigation workload. Public commenters largely opposed the lack of new funding and urged continued support for housing and homelessness programs, while some supported the reorganization and accountability efforts. Finally, the committee heard Go-Biz proposals. The administration requested authority to increase funding for a federal trade program match if needed, plus reappropriations for administrative funds tied to the Containerized Ports Interoperability Grant Program, zero-emission vehicle operations, and the Women’s Business Center Enhancement Program. It also proposed withdrawing the Cal Competes grant request and reverting remaining funds from the Performing Arts Equitable Payroll Fund. The LAO said Cal Competes is generally effective but could be cut as a budget solution, while warning that the performing arts fund was close to awards and should be considered carefully. Members objected to pulling back committed funds for performing arts organizations and questioned why the state would withdraw support after applications had already been submitted.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Item 3 is the Texas emissions reduction plan or TURP.
  • So the emissions inventory that's required there was due was required in 2025, so hence the large number
  • Marginally conventional wells, falls under the Federal Methane Emissions Reduction Act. folks can apply
  • We have aimed to address key strategic funding priorities. within base limits.
  • They might be less financially attractive. but they don't have the same capacity limitations.
Bills: SB1, SB 1
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 1/21/25

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:15:32.800> in<00:15:33.279> operations reducing carbon emissions in operations
  • reducing carbon emissions in operations making<00:15:34.639> more<00:15:34.920> sustainable
  • <00:30:35.200> house<00:30:35.440> file<00:30:35.720> 9<00:30:36.039> limits
  • <00:30:36.399> the section four of house file 9 limits the section four of house file 9 limits
  • bill's support for baseload power sources like nuclear energy and hydroelectric power, while not limiting
Keywords: 1183, house
Summary: The House Energy Finance and Policy Committee met to approve the January 16 minutes and then heard House File 9, which was referred to the Committee on Taxes after the committee’s action. The bill was presented as an energy policy measure aimed at reliability and affordability. It would expand hydroelectric power’s eligibility under the state’s energy standard, delay certain carbon-free compliance requirements for utilities that do not meet a retail rate benchmark, prohibit local permits to demolish fossil fuel plants under certain conditions, state support for carbon capture and sequestration without creating a state funding obligation, end the nuclear moratorium, and expand the sales tax exemption for residential natural gas and electricity used as primary heat year-round starting after June 30, 2026. The committee also took up and adopted the A1 author’s amendment, which clarified that the carbon capture language does not obligate state spending. The bill’s sponsor argued that Minnesota’s current energy policy is driving up costs and threatening reliability, especially during extreme cold, and said the bill would create “off-ramps” from existing mandates to protect ratepayers and businesses. He cited reliability concerns, MISO/NERC risk assessments, rising utility rates, and the need for an all-of-the-above energy approach, including hydro and nuclear. He also said the bill would reduce taxes by broadening the sales tax exemption for residential heating. Testimony was mixed but generally focused on reliability, affordability, and the role of nuclear power. The Minnesota Rural Electric Association and the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce supported the bill’s emphasis on keeping power reliable and affordable, with both saying Minnesota needs dispatchable, carbon-free resources and noting concerns about high electricity costs and future demand from data centers and AI. The Prairie Island Indian Community opposed lifting the nuclear moratorium without a viable waste solution, describing the long-term burden of spent nuclear fuel on its community and asking for more consultation. Xcel Energy said its nuclear plants have operated safely and reliably for decades, support low-cost and low-carbon power, and could be part of the state’s energy transition, but it emphasized the need for tribal participation and said decisions about retiring fossil plants should remain within the existing Public Utilities Commission resource planning process.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House State Government Committee Feb 4th, 2026

State Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill also addresses fraud prevention and transaction limits.
  • In that first 30 days, it limits you to only depositing $1,000 at a time.
  • Existing customers, anyone that's beyond the 30-day, they're limited 10,500 per day.
  • This bill also addresses fraud prevention and transaction limits.
  • In that first 30 days, it limits you to only depositing $1,000 at a time.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 1st, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • We limit public testimony to two minutes per witness.
  • So, witnesses, if we can limit the testimony as much as possible...
  • Communities, slowing economic growth, and limiting infrastructure development.
  • Currently, it operates under statutory limits that prevent it from designating non-contiguous areas for
  • House Bill 5676 is a cleanup bill that merely adds typical limited authority that all MUDs already have
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 1st, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Public testimony will be limited to two minutes.
  • Additionally, political subdivisions may limit the square footage of ADUs.
  • We suggest limiting applicability to cities with a population of less than 150,000. would ensure growing
  • We can guarantee transportation access by geographic... limiting applicability to properties within one
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Public Safety Committee Meeting - 2025-04-01

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Additionally, all of the testifiers who have signed up in advance have been provided with a time limit
  • Please adhere to these time limits. We are short on time and we have a lot of bills.
  • Siegel, I'll just note too that we're 30 seconds over the time limit, so if there are a couple of points
  • Just to let you know, we are on a very tight schedule, so we're limiting time.
  • Many counties, especially in rural areas with limited tax bases, are facing the difficult reality of
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 4/1/25

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Additionally, all of the testifiers who have signed up in advance have been provided with a time limit
  • Please adhere to these time limits. We are short on time and we have a lot of bills.
  • 325 more than four times the legal limit 325 more than four times the legal limit he<00:02:28.080
  • especially in rural areas with limited especially in rural areas with limited tax<00:46:31.119><
  • limit limiting the time responsibilities limit limiting the time and<00:52:51.040> resources<
ND
Transcript Highlights:
  • So think of the rules that the EPA passes from emissions controls, whether that's regional haze, MATS
  • rule, that has been in place. rule as a mercury emissions control rule.
  • It's a little bit cleaner than coal from an emissions standpoint.
  • And anytime you would hit a high limit that's outside your permit limit, then you get an alarm that comes
  • And then that helped lower CO2 emissions by doing that. But you could do that.
Summary: The committee met at the Coteau Freedom Mine in Mercer County, approved the June 2 minutes, and heard an overview of the mine from Coteau Properties president Andrew Hawbaker. He described the Freedom Mine as the largest lignite mine in the United States, supplying coal to Dakota Gasification, Antelope Valley Station, and Leland Olds Station. He emphasized the mine’s scale, safety record, reclamation work, workforce needs, community involvement, and economic impact, including payroll, taxes, royalties, scholarships, and local hiring. Members asked about how long land stays in production, how quickly it returns to agriculture after reclamation, labor shortages, and how mining affects groundwater and water wells. Hawbaker said most tracts are mined for about three to five years, reclamation is coordinated with landowners, and the company continues to struggle to find electricians, welders, mechanics, operators, and engineers. The committee then heard from Public Service Commission Chairman Randy Christman on coal mining reclamation and permitting. He reviewed North Dakota’s coal mining history, the state’s reclamation laws, federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act primacy, bonding, permit renewals and revisions, prohibited mining areas, inspection and enforcement, and contemporaneous reclamation requirements. Christman stressed that North Dakota’s program is professional and thorough, with frequent inspections, financial assurance, and a 10-year revegetation monitoring period before bond release. He also discussed federal coal ownership issues that can delay mine plans, the treatment of prime farmland, and how reclamation differs for wind and pipelines. In response to questions, he said one challenge is sometimes releasing land too soon before long-term compaction issues are fully understood, and he noted that data centers do not currently have a comparable reclamation model because they typically own the land. In the afternoon, the committee received an update from Lignite Energy Council president Jonathan Fortner on the lignite industry. He said North Dakota’s lignite sector supports five commercial power plants, four mines, about 12,000 direct and indirect jobs, and more than $5.5 billion in economic activity, while helping keep the state’s electricity rates among the lowest in the nation. Fortner reviewed coal severance and conversion tax revenues, the lignite research fund, federal regulatory rollbacks, carbon capture policy, and the industry’s legal costs fighting federal rules. He also highlighted a study on large-load development, saying new data centers and critical mineral processing facilities could create major local tax revenue and help justify new baseload generation. Members asked whether new gas pipelines would crowd out coal plant development and whether the economic study included jobs and broader local impacts; Fortner said the industry sees room for both and that the study did include construction, operations, jobs, and tax effects.