Transcript Highlights:

• Vote now. If you favor the measure, vote 'aye.' If you oppose the measure, vote 'nay.'
• Vote now. If you favor the measure, vote 'aye.' If you oppose the measure, vote 'nay.'
• Vote now. If you favor the measure, vote 'aye.' If you oppose the measure, vote 'nay.'
• Are there those wishing to vote or change their vote? Vote. Chair is preparing to close.
• Vote now.

Bills: HB2894, HB3418, HB3415, HB3413, HB3414, HB3416, HB3417, HB3419, HB3420, HB1739, HB1752, HB1979, HB2941, HB2992, HB3075, HB3086, HB3177, HB3269, HB3278, HB3279, HB3497, HB3644, HB4432, HB3720, HB3849, HB3882, HB3919, HB3941, HB4118, HB4141, HB4268, HB4342, HB4428, HB4429, HB4434

Keywords: HB2894, Oklahoma Rural Jobs Act, rural jobs, rural investment, tax credit, capital investment tax credit, state tax credits, economic development, rural fund, rural investor, qualified investment, eligible business, Department of Commerce, rural business, investment certification, tax liability, credit cap, workforce development, small business finance, rural development

Transcript Highlights:

• Members who voted or changed their vote. Representative Stuart should care to vote.
• Representative Fugate cares to vote. Representative Heffner cares to vote.
• The chair is praying to close the vote. The vote is 54 to 27, nay.
• Members wishing to vote or change their vote, the chair is preparing to close.
• and I could not vote.

Bills: HB4028, HB4075, HB4077, HB4074, HB4076, SB1221, SB1921, SB2118, SB1932, SB2134, HCR1025, SB1432, HCR1024, HCR1022, SB1122, HB4029, HB4063, HB4073, HB4078, SB1936, SB44, SB237, SB248, SB1360, SB985, SB1204, SB1239, SB1307, SB2143, SB1428, SB1390, SB1400, SB1405, SB1732, SB1832, SB1859, SB1989, SB2018, SB1427

Keywords: tax deduction, venture capital, economic development, Oklahoma, investment, water resources, appropriations, funding, state treasury, infrastructure projects, emergency act, emergency management, disaster relief, pandemic response, state appropriations, HB4074, Health Care Workforce Training Commission, Health Care Workforce Revolving Fund, health workforce, health care workforce

Transcript Highlights:

• I voted no, but then was told to vote yes, that the voters would not come send me back if I voted against
• Those who vote or change vote. Chair's prayer and to close. Declare the vote. 38 nay.
• The vote on the bill will be the vote.
• Members wishing to vote or change a vote, the chair is preparing to close.
• Declare the vote: 87 yes, 7 no, having received a majority vote.

Bills: HB4028, HB4075, HB4077, HB4074, HB4076, SB1221, SB1921, SB2118, SB1932, SB2134, HCR1025, SB1432, HCR1024, HCR1022, SB1122, HB4029, HB4063, HB4073, HB4078, SB1936, SB44, SB237, SB248, SB1360, SB985, SB1204, SB1239, SB1307, SB2143, SB1428, SB1390, SB1400, SB1405, SB1732, SB1832, SB1859, SB1989, SB2018, SB1427

Keywords: tax deduction, venture capital, economic development, Oklahoma, investment, water resources, appropriations, funding, state treasury, infrastructure projects, emergency act, emergency management, disaster relief, pandemic response, state appropriations, HB4074, Health Care Workforce Training Commission, Health Care Workforce Revolving Fund, health workforce, health care workforce

Transcript Highlights:

• Okay, we're not going to vote on the bill itself.
• Okay, we're not going<00:07:41.120> to<00:07:41.199> vote<00:07:41.280> on<00:07
• <00:07:42.000> We<00:07:42.160> may going to vote on the bill itself.
• We may going to vote on the bill itself.
• or uh indispensable or we call material or uh indispensable or we call material witnesses<00:22:

Bills: SB255, SB199, SB47, HB605, HB216, HB621, HB148, HB389, HB509, HB248, SB255, SB199, SB47, HB605, HB216, HB621, HB148, HB389, HB509, HB248, SB336, SB293, SB43, HB420, HB60, HB188, HB106, HB105, HB11

Keywords: SB255, cannabinoid, hemp, hemp-derived THC, THCa, delta-8 THC, HHC, CBD, THC, novel cannabinoid products, hemp products, intoxicating hemp, delta-8, retail license, Department of Revenue, Department of Agriculture and Industries, testing and labeling, third-party laboratory, product safety, public health

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, we're not going to vote on it today.
• Uh, we're not going to vote on it today.
• can uh appeal to remove uh the material can uh appeal to remove uh the material from<00:53:25.359
• <00:53:40.559> I material and and and take it down. I material and and and take it down.
• We will not take a vote on that today.

Bills: HB426, SB24, SB106, SB254, HB505, HB458, HB535, HB509, HB320, HB518, HB261, HB426, SB24, SB106, SB254, HB505, HB458, HB535, HB509, HB320, HB518, HB261, SB316, HB228, SB318, SB260, HB132, HB347, HB405, HB86, HB263, HB302, SB336

Keywords: Alabama Ad Valorem Advisory Committee, ad valorem taxes, property tax, real property, personal property, tax assessment, tax collection, county tax officials, Department of Revenue, Commissioner of Revenue, taxpayer representation, resident taxpayers, local government, property tax administration, Association of Alabama Tax Administrators, tax policy, advisory committee, public input, governance reform, body-worn camera

Transcript Highlights:

• those materials.
• material but alternative material that then someone...
• material.
• Marisucci, not voting. Mercerci, not voting. Hoover, aye. Addis. Thank you. Marisucci, not voting.
• Mercerci, not voting. Addis. Alvarez. Alvarez, not voting. Castile. Garcia, not voting. Lowenthal.

Summary: The Assembly Education Committee held an informational hearing on AB 715, followed by discussion of SB 48. AB 715 was presented by Assembly Members Zbur and Addis as a response to rising anti-Semitism in California schools. They described incidents involving harassment, swastikas, biased classroom materials, and students feeling unsafe, and said the bill would create an Office of Civil Rights with coordinators to address anti-Semitism and other forms of discrimination, provide prevention resources, and support school districts. Witnesses in support, including a rabbi and a student who described personal experiences with anti-Semitic harassment, urged immediate action to protect Jewish students. Opposition testimony came from the California Teachers Association, county superintendents, school board groups, labor organizations, civil liberties advocates, ethnic studies educators, and many community members. Their main concerns were that the bill was rushed, had not been fully vetted in the Assembly Education Committee, and could chill classroom speech or create constitutional problems, especially around language requiring instruction and materials to be “factually accurate” and not based on advocacy, bias, or partisanship. Several opponents argued that anti-Semitism should be addressed through education, training, and restorative practices rather than new statutory restrictions. Some witnesses also raised concerns about the bill’s impact on ethnic studies and free speech. Committee members then debated the bill’s process and substance at length. The authors said the bill had been narrowed through negotiations with education stakeholders and the Senate, that some disputed provisions would be revisited in cleanup language, and that the urgency of anti-Semitic incidents required action now. Several members expressed support for the bill’s goal but criticized the late release of the final language and the lack of consultation with the Assembly committee. Others emphasized the need to protect Jewish students immediately and argued the bill was a necessary response to a real crisis. The transcript does not show a final vote on AB 715 in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• and building materials.
• We urge a no vote. We urge a no vote on AB 1704 unless further amended. Thank you.
• Respectfully, ask for an aye vote. Respectfully ask for an aye vote. Okay, thank you.
• Current vote is 2-2, with the chair voting aye and the vice chair voting no. Senators Allen, aye.
• Current vote is 3-2, with the chair voting aye and the vice chair voting no.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I have been robbed of that vote, and I feel robbed of that vote, and I actually don't even need to use
• accurate materials.
• Where you adopted some material that was not instructional material but alternative material that then
• It doesn't require you to take all the course materials. materials out. Thank you all.
• Not voting. Hoover. Aye. Addis. Aye. Alvarez. Bonta. Not voting. Castillo. Aye. Garcia. Aye.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That's why I had to..." um and materials based on um and materials based on materials<00:35:44.720>
• Oh, we need to vote. I think we had a vote on the amendment. Had a vote on to pass. And how many?
• Oh yeah, we didn't actually all<01:40:33.760> vote. all vote. all vote.
• >> we did vote on it. >> we did vote on it.
• Vote on it.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Members, by vote of four ayes, two nays, and one not voting, Senate Bill 1099 is recommended as constitutional
• Members, by your vote of four ayes, two nays, and two absent, you have recommended Senate Bill 1148 as
• Senate Bill 1435 relates to sexually explicit materials in school and public libraries.
• And that was something that... ...material that was harmful to minors that was basically pornography
• You passed Senate Bill 1099 by a vote of four ayes, two nays, and two absent.

Keywords: 1182, all

Summary: The Rules Committee considered several Senate bills for constitutional and proper-form review. Senate Bill 1099, dealing with defamation claims and a statute of limitations for internet publications, was flagged for possible anti-abrogation and First Amendment issues, but was still recommended by a 4-2 vote. Senate Bill 1148, which would require the Arizona Supreme Court to handle attorney licensing and bar membership requirements, drew separation-of-powers concerns because it would direct how the Court exercises its exclusive authority over the practice of law; it was nevertheless recommended 4-2. The committee then reviewed Senate Bill 1435 and Senate Bill 1567, both addressing sexually explicit materials and minors in schools, libraries, and government settings. Staff raised vagueness and First Amendment concerns, especially around the terms “facilitating” and the breadth of the materials definitions, but said amendments could likely cure the issues. Members questioned the state’s interest in protecting minors and whether narrower definitions could resolve the constitutional problems. Both bills were recommended, each by a 5-2 vote. After correcting the recorded vote on SB 1099, the committee took up a mass motion covering many additional Senate bills. Staff said each measure in the motion had been reviewed and was constitutional and in proper form. The mass motion passed unanimously, 7-0, with one member absent, and the meeting adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Yes by your Vote Cs for SB 1732. Is reported favorably.
• Yes, by your vote SB 94 is reported favorably.
• I voted for this bill. What what's happened?
• By your vote. Sb 1640, is reported favorably.
• By your Vote. Sb 1268 is reported favorably.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The State Materials Office researches and tests all materials used on department projects.
• The State Materials Office sets policies and procedures to ensure all materials used on department projects
• I'd like to close by saying the State Materials Office will continue to research and test all the materials
• and ways to obtain those materials.
• , you know, cost of the material.

Summary: The Transportation Committee heard and acted on a series of transportation, licensing, and memorial bills. The first major item was CS/SB 462, the Department of Transportation agency package, which included provisions on transportation trust fund revenue for electric vehicles, county project reporting, speed limits, workforce grants, procurement and utility relocation procedures, airport participation, metropolitan planning, and related DOT administration. The committee adopted a substitute amendment after extensive discussion, especially over utility relocation reimbursement, penalties, and whether the bill was too rigid while stakeholders continued negotiating. Testimony came from industry and utility representatives both supporting the need to address delays and opposing the bill’s prescriptive approach. The bill passed 8-3. The committee then approved several specialty license plate and memorial measures. CS/SB 1024 added a United States Military Academy plate alongside the Naval Academy plate. CS/SB 824 created a Florida Highway Patrol specialty plate. CS/SB 666 created a Miami Northwestern Senior High School alumni plate, with supporters emphasizing the school’s history and scholarship uses for the revenue. CS/SB 916 authorized indemnification and insurance arrangements for commuter rail operations on the Brightline corridor, modeled on SunRail law, and was reported favorably after technical amendments. CS/SB 1290 updated DHSMV rules to conform to IFTA and federal motor carrier standards, raised the crash-damage reporting threshold, and made other registration and email-notification changes; CS/SB 1292 created a public-records exemption for certain email addresses used in motor vehicle and vessel notifications. CS/SB 1408 designated memorial highways for fallen officers Jesse Madsen and Elio Diaz, and CS/SB 1502 authorized FDOT blanket permits for mobile cranes to travel at night under specified conditions. All of these bills were reported favorably. The committee also received a lengthy informational presentation from FDOT on aggregates and the state’s construction-material supply chain. The witness described aggregate sources, transportation methods, recycling efforts, the importance of the Lake Belt and out-of-state imports, and the department’s supply-chain grant program. Senators asked about long-term reserves, stranded reserves, pricing, and the impact of regulation on future supply, and requested the study and a summary of regulatory impacts for members. The meeting concluded with no further business and adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• is ought to pass by a vote of 3 to2. is ought to pass by a vote of 3 to2.
• The eyes have it by a vote of 15 to 8. The eyes have it by a vote of 15 to 8.
• ought to pass by a vote of 5 to1. ought to pass by a vote of 5 to1.
• is ought to pass by a vote of 3 to2. is ought to pass by a vote of 3 to2.
• vote no on the ought to pass to vote vote no on the ought to pass motion.<03:48:15.760> Thank

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm recommending an aye vote. That's the fundamental framework here. I'm recommending an aye vote.
• Not voting. This is file item number one, SB 811. Chair voting aye. Lee? Aye. Lee, aye. McKinnor?
• Not voting. This is file item number one, 811. Chair voting aye. Lee? Aye. Lee, aye. McKinner.
• Not voting. File item number three, SB 1010, Chair voting aye.
• Chair voting, aye. McKinnor, aye. McKinnor, aye. That vote, that matter has five votes and is out.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair and Vice Chair voting aye.
• or no votes?
• Representative Loen votes aye. Representative Peruso votes aye. Representative Quinland votes aye.
• Representative Loen votes aye. Representative Peruso votes aye. Representative Quinland votes aye.
• Representative Loen votes aye. Representative Peruso votes aye. Representative Quinland votes aye.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Committee on Energy and Environmental Protection heard testimony on a series of energy, transportation, climate, and waste bills. HB 977 would provide additional funding to the Hawaii Green Infrastructure Authority for low-interest financing of rooftop solar and storage for underserved ratepayers; HB 1295 would require state and county agencies to use federal energy tax credits; HB 1051 concerns energy efficiency portfolio standards; HB 1019 addresses long-duration clean energy storage; HB 344 concerns EV charging infrastructure at state facilities; HB 733 would change EV parking requirements; HB 242 creates a working group on EV battery reuse and recycling; HB 1022 expands access to energy industry information reporting; HB 1017 repeals the greenhouse gas sequestration task force; HB 787 asks for a feasibility study on a Buy Clean program; and HB 751 sets composting goals. Testimony was largely supportive across the bills, with some agencies standing on written testimony or offering comments, and a few measures drawing opposition or concerns, including HB 751 from county agencies and HB 242 from Redwood Materials requesting inclusion of a specialized battery recycler on the working group. Members asked several questions, including about EV charging siting, whether bike parking and showers should be considered in EV facility planning, how often EV charging stalls are relocated to other sites, and whether Hawaiʻi has in-state capacity to prepare EV batteries for shipping and recycling. On HB 751, the committee discussed county diversion rates and Maui’s composting capacity, with the Department of Health noting Maui’s diversion decline was tied to closure of the EKO co-composting facility at Central Maui landfill and that reestablishment was planned. On HB 242, Redwood Materials explained it handles lithium-ion batteries, including work related to the Maui wildfire response, and said a full in-state recycling chain is unlikely, though local facilities can safely prepare batteries for shipment. In decision-making, the committee voted to pass all of the measures with amendments. For HB 977, the committee noted a recommended appropriation of $50 million and made technical amendments. HB 1295, HB 1051, HB 1019, HB 344, HB 733, HB 242, HB 1022, HB 1017, and HB 787 were all advanced with technical or substantive amendments, including changes to dates, appropriations, and working group membership. For HB 344, the committee accepted DAGS’s suggestion to make HSEO the expending entity and adjusted the appropriation to one year. For HB 242, the committee added a battery storage industry member, included stationary storage as a consideration, and extended the reporting date to 2027. HB 787 was advanced with a request that the Climate Commission and State Procurement Office work together on more specific amendments if the bill continues moving forward.

Transcript Highlights:

• voted on these definitions. voted on these definitions.
• Um that is new material. That is books. Um that is new material.
• If the board votes that this material is sexually explicit by the definitions that we've already approved
• . material. material.
• is there sexual explicit to vote is there sexual explicit material<01:29:02.719> on<01:29:02.880

Keywords: 924, joint, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I’m recommending an aye vote.
• Not voting. And McKinner? We did, I'm sorry. File item number four, SB 1153, chair voting aye.
• Not voting. And McKinner? We did, I'm sorry. File item three, SB 1010, chair voting aye.
• Not voting. And McKinner? We did, I'm sorry. File item three, SB 10-10, chair voting, aye.
• Chair voting, aye. McKinnor, aye. McKinnor, aye. That vote, that matter has five votes and is out.

Summary: The Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee heard several bills focused on wildfire preparedness, industrial safety, and recycling oversight. SB 1153 by Senator Caballero would require urban retail water suppliers to add wildfire-specific procedures to emergency plans and coordinate with fire agencies; supporters said it would improve planning while recognizing water system limits, and the bill was framed as protecting ratepayers and infrastructure. SB 811, also by Senator Caballero, would create a comprehensive DTSC permitting and regulatory framework for metal shredding facilities; supporters argued it would set clear statewide standards and protect communities, while opponents said it would weaken hazardous waste protections and carve the industry out of existing law. SB 883 by Senator Umberg would impose new safeguards for facilities storing reactive chemicals such as methyl methacrylate after the Garden Grove evacuation, including backup cooling, public review, emergency planning, and state tracking; industry groups opposed the breadth of the bill and sought further clarification, while environmental and community groups supported it. SB 1010 by Senator Ashby would strengthen oversight of appliance recyclers by improving reporting, inspections, certification, and funding for enforcement; supporters said it would reduce emissions and improve compliance, while recyclers raised concerns about fees and certification requirements. Each bill drew extensive testimony from industry, environmental, labor, local government, and community representatives. Supporters generally emphasized public safety, transparency, and the need for clearer statewide standards, while opponents warned about overregulation, reduced flexibility, or unintended impacts on existing hazardous waste and recycling systems. Committee members also raised questions about transparency, liability, size-based treatment of facilities, and whether the bills were narrowly tailored enough to address the problems identified. The committee voted to advance all four measures to the Committee on Appropriations, with votes taken on call and some members voting no or not voting on certain bills. The final add-on votes showed SB 811, SB 883, SB 1010, and SB 1153 all passing out of committee, with the roll left open for absent members before the meeting adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Two obscene material or three material. Two obscene material or three material.
• Why should you vote? Voting questions. Why should you vote? Voting questions. Why should you vote?
• in Blunt County to cast your vote vote in Blunt County to cast your vote vote in Blunt County to cast
• , and you're voting correctly, and vote, and you're voting correctly, and vote, and you're voting correctly
• purposes. for voting purposes. for voting purposes.

Keywords: 920, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Vote<00:21:10.080> green. Vote green. Vote green.
• Vote no.
• Vote no. other off Thanks. Vote no.
• Please vote green. in the future. Please vote green.
• to create the material. to create the material.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: House File 1606, as amended, was debated on the House floor as a bill to prohibit access to nudification technology and related AI-generated sexual deepfakes. Representative Hansen, the bill’s author, described the measure as a response to non-consensual, sexually explicit images and videos, especially harms to children and women, and said the bill would define nudified content, require nudifying features on apps and websites to be turned off in Minnesota, bar promotion of such apps, and create enforcement and remedies. Supporters emphasized testimony from survivors, the rapid growth of AI-generated child sexual abuse material, and the need for state action because federal regulation has lagged. Opponents of the amendment argued the underlying bill should remain a clean, single-issue measure focused on non-consensual content creation and warned that adding age-verification language would complicate the bill and add cost. Representative Bakeberg offered amendment A4, which would add age-verification requirements for commercial adult-content sites, with privacy limits for adults and enforcement mechanisms including audits and attorney general authority. Supporters of the amendment said it would extend existing physical-world protections for minors into the digital space, cited legal support from a Texas case and similar laws in other states, and argued it would help protect children from online pornography. Representative Hansen opposed the amendment, saying she had not been consulted, that it would muddy the bill’s focus on non-consensual nudification, and that it would add fiscal cost. Other members spoke both for and against the amendment, with some saying the issues were related and others saying the amendment was not ready and should be handled separately. The House then took a roll call on amendment A4, and it failed on a 67-67 tie. After the amendment was not adopted, the bill was given its third reading. In closing remarks, supporters of the underlying bill reiterated that it was intended to protect victims and prevent harm before it occurs, while one member said the bill did not go far enough because it targeted software makers rather than the people creating and distributing the material. The transcript ends with further discussion of the bill’s purpose and support for moving it forward.

Transcript Highlights:

• I think we need to actually have a vote for it.
• And I'm not sure if we're going that way or we're going to vote at some point.
• Materials and trainings that are tailored to their profession.
• And that educational material... Make it as effective as possible.
• And that educational material. make it as effective as possible.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The special commission on xylazine met virtually to review and discuss the first draft of its final report. Chair Mindy Domb opened the meeting, confirmed quorum, and the commission approved the minutes from its December 11 public meeting. Staff then walked commissioners through the proposed report structure, including background on xylazine as both an FDA-approved veterinary drug and an illicit drug supply contaminant, as well as appendices for public meeting materials and public resources. The commission discussed findings and recommendations for several working groups. For oversight and enforcement, members focused on licit versus illicit sources of xylazine, noting that the illicit supply is typically obtained through online vendors rather than diverted from veterinary use. Recommendations included better storage and reporting practices in authorized settings, review of manufacturing and distribution information, and focusing enforcement on fentanyl trafficking and large-scale xylazine importation rather than personal possession. Commissioners also discussed whether xylazine should remain in Schedule 6 or be subject to additional penalties, and several members emphasized the need for coordination, information-sharing, and possibly a DPH task force or advisory body to monitor emerging drug threats. For outreach and treatment, staff summarized strong existing programs such as drug checking, wound care education, naloxone distribution, mobile and low-threshold care, and self-directed wound kits, while noting gaps including the lack of an FDA-approved reversal agent for xylazine, difficulty distinguishing xylazine from other exposures, and uneven access by geography, insurance, and audience. Commissioners stressed the need for provider education, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, family support networks, and first responders, and for clear guidance on wound care and when more intensive treatment is needed. The education and training section identified first responders, clinicians, non-clinicians, and people who use drugs and their families as key audiences for tailored, stigma-free materials, with emphasis on real-time, centralized data, naloxone and breathing support, recognition of overdose versus xylazine exposure, and adapting materials as the drug supply changes. The meeting ended with discussion of next steps: staff will circulate a revised draft by March 2, the commission will meet again on March 9 to consider the report and recommendations, and an additional late-March meeting was reserved if needed before the statutory deadline.