Concurrent Resolution; supporting the elimination of the United States Department of Education; urging the United States Congress to fully cooperate with such efforts.
Summary
HCR1025 is a concurrent resolution expressing support for eliminating the United States Department of Education and urging Congress to cooperate with that effort. The resolution argues that education is not an enumerated federal power, cites the Tenth Amendment, and contends that federal involvement has produced burdensome regulations and one-size-fits-all mandates. It also points to Oklahoma’s education performance and funding trends as evidence that greater state and local control is needed.
The resolution frames the issue as both constitutional and practical: it says education policy should be returned to states and local communities, which are described as better positioned to set curriculum and priorities for their students. It further asserts that eliminating the federal department could improve efficiency and student outcomes by reducing federal overreach and allowing more local innovation.
Impact
As a concurrent resolution, HCR1025 does not change Oklahoma statutes or create new legal requirements. Its effect is political and expressive: it places the Oklahoma Legislature on record supporting federal elimination of the U.S. Department of Education and urging Congress to act. The measure is aimed at federal education policy, but it does not directly alter state education law, funding formulas, or agency authority in Oklahoma.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment in the available record is strongly supportive of the resolution. The House adopted it by a wide margin, 71 yeas to 15 nays, indicating substantial backing among members. The text itself is highly critical of federal education policy and presents the elimination of the department as desirable, constitutional, and beneficial to Oklahoma students and taxpayers.
Contention
The main point of contention is the role of the federal government in education. Supporters argue that the Department of Education represents federal overreach and that states should control education policy under the Tenth Amendment. Opponents, reflected in the 15 no votes, likely objected to eliminating a federal agency that administers education programs and supports national standards, though no committee transcript is available to identify specific arguments. The resolution also relies on claims about Oklahoma student performance and funding, which may be disputed in terms of causation and policy effectiveness.
Concurrent resolution; recognizing that marriage is between one man and one woman; calling on the Supreme Court of the United States to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges.
Concurrent Resolution; expressing support for partnership with Taiwan; supporting tax agreement; celebrating the 46th anniversary of Taiwan Relations Act of 1979.
United States; granting the State of Oklahoma concurrent jurisdiction on military installations upon completion of certain act; authorizing certain reciprocal agreement. Effective date.