Video & Transcript : 'Minnesota law' :

Page 30 of 500
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/04/2026 - Senate Public Safety

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is not what this law covers. It's going to include all of those.
  • With 36 years in law enforcement and 32 of those as a law enforcement trainer, I have watched thousands
  • Is that the law? It's Chapter 32-2606. 1991, is that the law?
  • There are already law enforcement auxiliaries that bridge the gap.
  • So this is—so there needs to be a state law for this? Mr.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Mar 19th, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • and federal law enforcement officers.
  • It is not preempted by federal law and it strengthens Texas ability to uphold the rule of law.
  • This law goes into effect.
  • Let's allow our law and our local law enforcement agencies to do the same.
  • law.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Civil Law and Procedure Apr 22nd, 2026

Civil Law and Procedure

Transcript Highlights:
  • It was codified in the law.
  • And that's how that got put into our law, and it's still in our law. ...where our predecessors fought
  • And that's how that got put into our law, and it's still in our law.
  • I'm a professor of family law at LSU and here today on behalf of the Louisiana State Law Institute.
  • What this resolution does is ask the Law Institute to look at the Louisiana trust law compared to other
Bills: HR38 , HR96 , HR160 , HCR31 , HCR61 , HB578 , HB668 , HB1198 , SCR19 , SB66 , SB68 , SB76 , SB139 , SB336 , SB475
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Texas law requires that attorneys who receive court appointments report their caseloads.
  • "By updating Texas's civil asset forfeiture laws.
  • I've been practicing expunction law for a little over 20 years now.
  • Junk science writ law via Senate Bill 344 by Senator Whitmire.
  • There has to be written approval from the highest law enforcement officials.
Summary: The Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence reconvened with a quorum present and announced it would likely not vote that night because of confusion over the bill list; members were told a definitive list would be circulated the next morning and a formal meeting would be scheduled later. The chair then heard a series of bills, generally taking testimony and leaving each pending without action. House Bill 1847 would set maximum caseload standards for private attorneys handling indigent criminal appointments through the Texas Indigent Defense Commission; House Bill 2417 would expand compensation eligibility for some wrongfully imprisoned people; House Bill 2813 would require earlier and more specific victim notice of scheduled court proceedings; and House Bill 2309 would expand state and local authority in certain civil asset forfeiture cases involving human trafficking, health care fraud, and organized crime. Each bill was laid out by its author or a member, with no opposition witnesses registered, and each was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 4733, which would require sealing records for people acquitted of charges when they were not convicted on the related allegation; House Bill 2328, which would modernize expunction service by encouraging electronic notice, setting a standardized fee when electronic service is unavailable, extending clerk retention of expunction orders, and preserving certain mental health commitment orders; and House Bill 115, which would revise Texas’s “junk science” post-conviction writ law by providing counsel, changing the relief standard, requiring written decisions, and easing procedural barriers. Testimony on HB 2328 was mixed: county clerks supported the bill as a cost-saving modernization, while legal advocates warned that permanent retention of expunction orders could undermine true expunction and create privacy risks. HB 115 drew support from innocence and defense organizations, with some concern about a provision affecting subsequent writs. All were left pending after testimony. Later, the committee heard House Bill 2046, which would allow affirmative family-violence findings for any Penal Code offense rather than only Title V offenses; testimony from a Dallas County prosecutor and a committee member emphasized that family violence can involve arson, burglary, fraud, and other non-Title V conduct, and the bill was left pending. House Bill 1765 would tighten restrictions on no-knock warrants by requiring higher-level approval, judicial review, and identifiable officers; members discussed the dangers highlighted by the Harding Street raid and similar incidents, and the bill was also left pending. The meeting ended with the chair noting that some bills had been removed from the agenda at the author’s request and that members should be prepared to finalize the vote list the next day.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Under current Texas law, judges may declare a mistrial in a felony.
  • So in the rare instances, what you're saying occurs, you want a whole law for it. a whole new law.
  • of the Law Center and yourself, and you're against the bill, correct?
  • It's a law that hardly anyone knows exists, and...
  • The current law requires law enforcement agencies to make a good-faith effort to divert people who could
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • That's under the current law.
  • So if the current law... The law is 48 hours, this proposal is 72, you suggest going back to 24.
  • Whether or not the law has a good purpose, whether the law is legal.
  • This is where laws have to work together.
  • That section of law protects landowners from liability for damage caused by things like a law enforcement
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Under the law, a timeline is started when the contractor receives a report.
  • Anyway, I'm, you know, I'm a bit of a law geek, that's why I'm here to... No, thank you.
  • But I think the law, like you said, ought to endure.
  • It seems like under the current law, the provision that you're amending, we have a...
  • You know, just because they understand the slang doesn't mean they understand the law.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Aug 12th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • SB4 complies with all applicable law, and I will say that we have an excellent law firm.
  • So there's no more... ...passing of a bad officer to another law enforcement agency, because that law
  • When it comes to law enforcement, we've made so many advances.
  • From one law enforcement to another, I think that's dangerous.
  • We as law enforcement are public servants, and we work for the people.
Bills: SB8 , SB4 , SB43 , SB1 , SB2 , SB13 , SB6 , SB10 , SB16 , SB14 , SB3 , SB8 , SB4 , SB43 , SB1 , SB2 , SB13 , SB6 , SB10 , SB16 , SB14 , SB3
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions Mar 30th, 2026

Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions

Transcript Highlights:
  • Our goal is simple: to have the law do what it was intended to do.
  • and father-in-law, I don't know.
  • With his wife and two children, my mom, my mother-in-law and father-in-law, and my brother-in-law and
  • And during the right to shelter law, we spent $2,300 per family per week on average.
  • The 62F law was terrible when it passed before I was born, and it remains terrible now.
Bills: H5006 , H5007
Summary: The Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions held a public hearing on two proposed ballot initiatives: one to reduce the state personal income tax rate from 5% to 4% over three years, and another to revise the state tax collection cap law (62F) so the cap would be based on the prior year’s actual collections plus wage-and-salary growth and would include surtax revenue. Committee chairs outlined the hearing process and noted that the measures would need additional signatures to qualify for the 2026 ballot if not enacted by the legislature. The committee’s expert witness, Doug Howgate of the Massachusetts Taxpayer Foundation, said the income tax proposal would lower the base rate in stages beginning in 2027 and would ultimately reduce state income tax collections by about $5.4 billion annually when fully implemented. He estimated savings would vary by income level, from a few hundred dollars for lower- and middle-income households to about $10,700 for taxpayers at the surtax threshold. He argued the proposal would improve tax competitiveness but would also require major budget adjustments, likely including reserve use, spending cuts, and possibly new revenue measures; he cited prior downturns and said the state’s rainy day fund is stronger than in past recessions, though spending growth and health care costs remain concerns. On the 62F proposal, he said rebasing the cap to prior-year collections would make refunds more likely, with modeled refunds totaling about $7.9 billion without the surtax and $10.1 billion with it over the last decade, and warned it could reduce stabilization fund deposits and constrain recovery after recessions. Proponents of both petitions, including representatives from Taxpayers for an Affordable Massachusetts, NFIB, Pioneer Institute, and the Mass Opportunity Alliance, argued that Massachusetts faces an affordability and competitiveness crisis and that lower taxes would help families, small businesses, job creation, and outmigration. They said the income tax cut would put about $1,300 a year back into the hands of average families, help pass-through businesses reinvest, and improve the state’s ability to compete with lower-tax states such as North Carolina. Their economist, Rebecca Paxton, presented a model projecting average annual revenue losses of about $680 million during the phase-in and a total net income tax revenue impact of $2 billion to $2.2 billion, while saying long-term revenue growth would be stronger after implementation. The hearing ended with committee questions and a brief dispute over a planned voter testimonial video, which the chairs said was not appropriate for the hearing at that point.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Minerals, Business & Economic Development Committee, March 2, 2026

Minerals, Business & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • One of the cardinal principles in Wyoming water law is that beneficial use is the basis, the measure,
  • It's against the law, and so any of you that grow that crop, you're going to have to stop.
  • ><c> beneficial</c> Wyoming water law establishes beneficial Wyoming water law establishes beneficial
  • It's it's against the law for that crop.
  • We can use it how water law backing us.
Bills: HB0116 , HB0056
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Minerals, Business & Economic Development Committee, March 2, 2026

Minerals, Business & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • And in that regard, it's important that we follow the normal kind of tort law that begins with the idea
  • We want the case law being built up there so it has primary authority. We'd be adding that.
  • Uh, the laws that are being repealed make that 102%.
  • </c><00:29:03.520><c> Uh</c><00:29:03.840><c> the</c><00:29:04.240><c> laws</c><00:29:04.559><c> that
  • Uh the laws that 100% by liquid assets.
Bills: HB0116 , HB0056
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary Committee, February 24, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Wyoming's laws need to change. I free. Wyoming's laws need to change.
  • </c> before and proving it in a court of law. before and proving it in a court of law.
  • </c><00:31:18.399><c> Um,</c> covered in existing law. Um, covered in existing law.
  • It wasn't defined in the law.
  • </c> the law said it didn't count. Thank you. the law said it didn't count. Thank you.
Bills: HB0008 , HB0009 , HB0028
Committee: Senate Judiciary
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Labor, Health & Social Services, February 13, 2026

Labor, Health & Social Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Just use existing law.
  • But for your edification purposes, law.
  • Go ahead and state your name. squares with the law because this is an squares with the law because this
  • And that law has an eligibility component. This law does not. Any patient has access to this.
  • </c><01:10:34.080><c> any</c> um component. this law does not any um component. this law does not any
Bills: HB0028 , HB0080
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Fraud Committee Meeting - 2025-05-05

Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • General of the State of Minnesota.
  • Meanwhile, the son and daughter-in-law make away with the money.
  • law to do that.
  • We work with our law enforcement partners at the U.S.
  • I'm speaking of Minnesota Statute 609.466.
Bills: HF3043 , HF2891
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Administration of Criminal Justice Mar 18th, 2026

Administration of Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • I was looking at the changes, the proposed law.
  • I'm also a law professor at Loyola, and I teach constitutional law, criminal procedure, trial advocacy
  • , and criminal law.
  • Louisiana, where we had to modify our jury laws.
  • and state law, federal law will remain supreme.
Bills: HB36 , HB52 , HB56 , HB68 , HB92 , HB119 , HB140 , HB147 , HB160 , HB171 , HB289 , HB351 , HB552 , HB784
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Judiciary Committee Mar 19th, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • But we have a hole in the law. And the hole in the law is this.
  • But the hole in the law is this. Okay? But the hole in the law is this.
  • Now we got to have a law. We cannot make a perfect law, and we don't have enough law enforcement.
  • We got to make a law to... We got to make a law to know we won't have that 5%.
  • But we are not changing that part of the law. That part of the law already exists.
Bills: SB210 , SB225 , HB280 , HB287 , HB94 , HB88 , SB157 , HB7 , HB8 , HB42
Committee: Senate Judiciary