Video & Transcript Research : 'governmental immunity'

Page 2 of 196
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs May 13th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • members, and everyone joining us today as we continue the very important business of the House Governmental
  • And I know you're urban counties, but to your knowledge, is there any part of this state that is immune
  • But we don't have any language that relates to, or that I remember reading, about immunity waiver or
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee Mar 19th, 2025

Public Safety and Homeland Security

Transcript Highlights:
  • the current code because it clearly states that an individual cannot come within 20 feet of any governmental
  • appropriately to get at the conduct that you believe is more towards impeding or interfering with the governmental
Bills: HB403, HB224
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Committee, February 16, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • from claiming immunity.
  • wrestled with questions of immunity. wrestled with questions of immunity.
  • Um because immunity is a of immunity?
  • that entitles them to be um imu immune. that entitles them to be um imu immune.
  • gives them the status of being immune. gives them the status of being immune.
Bills: HB0103, HB0070, HB0091
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • challenge the validity of an ordinance by providing a clear and unambiguous explanation. waiver of immunity
  • They can’t get past Auburn Immunity. Yes, right. Now, this is an important point.
  • Then, there’s an express waiver of immunity for enforcement of the code by an action through mandamus
  • Because it exists, there is a waiver of immunity built into that, but cities will argue that there is
  • Chairman Priglioni, this House bill has to do with fiscal transparency for bonds issued by local governmental
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Environment and Natural Resources Jan 27th, 2026

Environment and Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Next, we're going to jump to tab number six, SB 1698 on net zero policies by governmental entities by
  • Next, we're going to jump to tab number six, SB 1698 on net zero policies by governmental entities by
  • Governmental entities are also prohibited from implementing, administering, or enforcing cap-and-trade
  • So the bill speaks to governmental entities.
  • So the bill speaks to governmental entities.
Summary: The committee took up several environmental bills, beginning with SB 1682 on local administration of vessel restrictions. Senator Trumbull said the bill would give cities and counties tools to address abandoned, derelict, and long-term anchored vessels while following state standards and FWC guidance. Members from affected areas spoke in support, citing recurring derelict vessel problems and the difficulty and cost of removal once vessels sink. The bill was reported favorably. The committee then heard SB 1468 on advanced wastewater treatment, which would require DEP to compile a detailed statewide report on wastewater treatment plants, including construction age, treatment levels, contaminant data, spill history, flood risk, and receiving waterbody impairment information. Florida Rural Water Association testified that any move to require advanced treatment for all plants over one MGD could create major financial burdens without dedicated funding. The bill was reported favorably. The committee also considered CS/SB 1294 on biosolids management, with a strike-all amendment adopted. Senator Bradley said the revised bill would require bulk Class AA biosolids fertilizer and compost products to be land applied only at agronomic rates and, absent a bona fide sale, only at permitted DEP-approved sites, with a transition date moved to July 1, 2028. Supporters said it would protect water quality and legitimate fertilizer and compost markets, while rural utilities asked for funding and flexibility. The committee reported the bill favorably. Next, the committee took up CS/SB 1628 on net zero policies by governmental entities. Senator Avila said the bill would prohibit local governments and other governmental entities from adopting or funding net zero policies, imposing related fees or taxes, or operating cap-and-trade or carbon trading programs. The committee adopted an amendment clarifying the definition of carbon dioxide. The bill drew extensive debate: supporters argued it would protect residents and businesses from higher costs and preserve predictability, while opponents said it would block local climate and clean-energy policies, including electric buses, energy-efficiency measures, and climate resilience planning. After public testimony on both sides, the bill was reported favorably. The committee also approved CS/SB 1474 on biosolids management, which Senator Gates said would require biosolids and septage to be treated at the highest practical level when wastewater treatment facilities are reasonably accessible and would bar Class B land application within 50 miles of a permitted wastewater facility. An amendment applying the statutory definition of septage was adopted, and the bill was reported favorably. Finally, the committee heard SB 558 on stormwater system standards. Senator Burgess said it would create statewide standards for municipal and county stormwater systems using FDOT guidelines and third-party inspections, with an amendment making technical changes and broadening who may perform inspections. Supporters said uniform standards could improve safety and reduce failures, while contractors, engineers, and industry groups warned it could raise costs, delay projects, and preempt stronger local standards. The bill remained under discussion as the transcript ended.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 14th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 755, as substituted, does the following. restricts a governmental entity from contracting
  • It provides transparency by requiring governmental entities to make the following information available
  • And those governmental entities that currently bring people in-house and have them as their government
  • This bill would ensure that all individuals within a governmental entity, including elected officials
  • governmental entity, then they are not the governmental entity.