Video & Transcript Research : 'consumer warning label'

Page 2 of 441
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Health Committee Meeting - 2025-04-07

Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The products are banned; however, as was mentioned, they're not on the labels.
  • labels similar to those required on packs of cigarettes.
  • This bill heeds that call and requires warning labels.
  • If a warning label on a screen can be used to protect a child, can make even one kid pause or put down
  • A clear warning label on platforms like Snapchat would be a vital tool in helping parents make the best
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Health Finance and Policy Committee 4/7/25

Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so when they're not on the labels.
  • This bill heeds that call and requires warning labels. basis.
  • If a warning label on a screen can make even one kid pause or put down the phone and take a break, it's
  • A clear warning label on platforms like Snapchat would be a vital tool in helping parents make the best
  • has a consequence and it's time to label has a consequence and it's time to label the<01:09:09.679
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

CPC Public Hearing - Tue Mar 3, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Consumer Protection & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • That knowledge gap is real, and it's exactly why a warning label is necessary.
  • <00:44:07.920> label<00:44:08.240> is it's exactly why a warning label is it's exactly
  • why a warning label is necessary. necessary. necessary.
  • Um, consumer labeling is proven through the research that it was stated by Kirsten to be effective at
  • proven<00:48:00.240> through Um, consumer labeling is proven through Um, consumer labeling
Summary: The committee heard several administration bills related largely to workers’ compensation and unemployment insurance. On HB 2323 HD1, which would modernize workers’ compensation notice and filing procedures, DLIR and other agencies testified in support of the original bill language but said HD1 removed key components and weakened the bill’s clarity and continuity. HB 2324 HD1, which would repeal state hoisting-machine certification requirements and the separate crane operator certificate, drew support from DLIR; members asked about whether the change would affect safety or local operators, and DLIR said OSHA-compliant certifications already exist and the union supported the change. HB 1509 HD1, which would require faster employer responses to treatment plans and impose penalties for nonresponse, received support from DLIR and others, while DHRD said it wanted an amendment. The committee also took up HB 2164 HD1 on compounded prescription drugs in workers’ compensation. DLIR supported the bill as a way to define compounded drugs and curb inflated pricing, but DHRD and a medical provider opposed it and asked for amendments. Testimony focused heavily on whether the definition should include 503B compounding facilities and whether physician dispensing should be limited to the first 30 days after injury. HB 2165 HD1, dealing with unemployment insurance eligibility and removing the two-year limit on recouping overpayments, was supported by DLIR but opposed by Unite Here Local 5, which argued it would make it harder for striking workers and other claimants. Members questioned the impact of changing reporting deadlines from calendar days to business days and raised concerns about future benefit offsets; DLIR said the bill was needed for federal conformity and that the committee would revisit the offset percentage and effective date. Later, the committee heard HB 2367 on pay transparency, requiring salary ranges in job postings and removing the small-employer exemption. The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission, AAUW, Hawaii Women Lawyers, and an individual testifier supported the bill, saying pay transparency promotes fairness, trust, and pay equity; one testifier described being underpaid compared with a predecessor and said posting ranges would save applicants’ time. HB 2619 HD1, concerning homemade food products and farm kitchens, received generally supportive comments from the Department of Health, which requested an amendment to preserve flexibility in future rulemaking. HB 1765 HD1, on spear-fishing safety warnings, drew support from a safety educator and comments from DLNR; supporters said warning labels would help prevent hypoxic blackout deaths and were low-cost and easy to implement. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the portion of the meeting provided.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Health Committee Feb 11th, 2025

Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • .. that extended protections to doctors. ...that extended protections to doctors who prescribe off-label
  • An off-label medication is an approved drug used for an unapproved situation.
  • However, we do use these off-label all... ...the time for a lot of other things.
  • that was assigned male at birth, from just saying, "Hey, I'm a trans woman," and exploit that same label
Bills: HB45, HB79, SB79
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • They declined to accept that funding and they did not purchase a flash flood warning system.
  • Speaker, members, this amendment strengthens our mass fatality rapid response teams. ...and warning coordination
  • It directs TDEM to document which National Weather Service offices in Texas have a warning coordination
  • state of Texas, we would have more accurate and more timely forecasts. and then be able to better warn
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Mar 2nd, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • state effort to confront illegal offshore internet-based operations that are not regulated, have no consumer
  • This is about consumer protection. This is about protecting revenue.
  • shame that organizations like A.S.A. have been put in the crosshairs of National divisive debate and labeling
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Finance Aug 15th, 2025

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is the flood warning system bill.
  • And this is, of course, for early warning flood sirens at the discretion points by the Water Development
  • This is, of course, for early warning flood sirens at the discretion points by the Water Development
Bills: SB2, SB3, SB5, SB9, SB10, SB14, SB16, SB34, SB18
Summary: The Senate Committee on Finance met in the second special session and considered a series of bills, mostly related to flood response, water infrastructure, taxation, school accountability, property fraud, and legislative procedure. Senator Zaffirini presented SB 18 on TCEQ permit exemptions for certain erosion, floodwater, and sediment control dams or reservoirs; Senator Perry presented SB 2 on flood relief preparedness, SB 14 on credit impact fees and water supply/conservation incentives, and SB 5 on Hill Country relief funding; Senator Bettencourt presented SB 3 on early warning flood sirens, SB 9 on replacing STAAR with three annual tests and strengthening A-F accountability, and SB 10 on lowering the rollback tax rate from 3.5% to 2.5%; Senator West presented SB 16 on property transaction ID requirements and new real property theft/fraud offenses; and Chair Huffman laid out SB 34, which changes legislative witness immunity rules from transactional immunity to testimonial immunity consistent with federal law. The committee also heard brief explanations that several bills were the same as versions previously passed by the Senate or committee, and there was limited public testimony, with no witnesses on most bills and only position cards on SB 16. Senator West raised a concern on SB 10 about a possible carve-out for police pay raises, but Senator Bettencourt said no change would be made at that time. For SB 34, Chair Huffman explained the bill would still allow compelled testimony before the legislature but would no longer provide blanket immunity, while preserving the right to counsel. The committee voted favorably on all bills considered. SB 18, SB 2, SB 14, SB 3, SB 16, SB 5, and SB 34 were reported out unanimously or near-unanimously, while SB 9 passed 10-1 and SB 10 passed 8-3. At the end of the meeting, Senator West requested to be shown voting nay on SB 9, and the chair granted unanimous consent. The committee then recessed subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th 1st C.S.

Senate Session (Part II) Jul 21st, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 25 by Eckhardt, relating to emergency warning systems operated by municipalities and counties
Summary: The meeting centered around the discussion of congressional redistricting, where the committee established the procedures to ensure a fair and transparent process. Led by Senator King, the session focused on adopting a resolution that authorized a special committee dedicated to congressional redistricting and allowed for regional hearings to gather public input via videoconferencing. Concerns were raised about ensuring adequate notice for public participation, especially from marginalized communities potentially affected by proposed changes. Disagreements emerged regarding the timeline for regional hearings and how to address the implications of the redistricting process on minority districts. Overall, participants acknowledged the complex nature of redistricting and the importance of engaging constituents in the legislative process.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Clerk: SB number 3 by Bettencourt relating to outdoor warning sirens in flood-prone areas.
  • Vidal: then is mandating that in flood areas that you have to place warning systems.
  • Waller: San Marcos and Comfort already have a warning system. And we're building upon that.
  • Waller: That don't have a warning system. That's a fair statement, correct? Mr.
  • A former president warned us of this temptation.
Bills: HB8, HB12, SB 3, HJR1, SB 11, SB 16, SB 14
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • targeted to youth consumers.
  • This bill does the opposite, pushing consumers and suppliers back into the black market. where the labels
  • Hemp-derived consumables.
  • And also as a consumer as well.
  • Child enticing labels, as well as clear age restrictions for all consumable products.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/4/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • tell the consumer that. tell the consumer that.
  • shelf labels are one such tool. shelf labels are one such tool.
  • just as they are with paper labels. just as they are with paper labels.
  • businesses and consumers benefit. businesses and consumers benefit.
  • changing labels per day? changing labels per day?
Bills: HF3794, HF3408
Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from March 3, 2026, and then received a presentation from the Minnesota Office of the Attorney General on the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act. Assistant Attorney General Caitlin Miko and Deputy Attorney General Jessica Whitney reviewed the law’s scope, consumer rights, business obligations, and enforcement history. They said the law took effect July 31, 2025, gives Minnesotans rights to access, delete, and opt out of sale, profiling, and targeted advertising, and is enforced by the Attorney General with penalties up to $7,500 per violation. They reported more than 200 complaints in the first six months, many warning letters, and a shift from education to active enforcement now that the initial warning-letter period has expired. Committee members asked about how the universal opt-out works, what happens when companies deny deletion or editing requests, how the office determines willful noncompliance, and whether the law could burden small businesses. The AG’s office said the opt-out can be set through privacy-protective browsers or extensions, companies must respond to consumer requests within 45 days, small businesses are exempt as defined by the SBA, and investigations look for patterns and evidence of willful conduct rather than minor technical violations. The office also said it needs additional funding to fully staff enforcement efforts and noted that it has already issued subpoenas and civil investigative demands. The committee then took up House File 3408, the Stop Grocery Surveillance Price Gouging Act. The author explained that the bill would prohibit retail grocers, physical and online, from setting individualized prices based on consumer information, would limit certain uses of facial recognition and electronic shelf labels, and would preserve narrow exceptions for discounts and loyalty programs. Public testimony followed from the Minnesota Farmers Union in support, arguing that grocery consolidation and surveillance pricing could worsen already high food costs and harm fair competition. The Minnesota Grocers Association opposed the premise that grocery stores use surveillance pricing, said shelf prices are generally uniform and set from a single storewide database, and argued electronic shelf labels are efficient and not nefarious. A technology company representative similarly said ESLs do not use personal data or facial recognition, prices are uniform, and a 2025 study found no meaningful price increases after ESL adoption. The bill was laid over for possible further discussion after the testimony.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Consumers also may want to purchase a damage waiver, which is offered by rental car companies to protect
  • Senate Bill 72 would provide financial security to consumers by providing them the option to purchase
  • We support Senate Bill 72 because consumers and businesses... ...businesses that rent from us have asked
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • At the end of the day, I don't believe consumer protection is here yet.
  • going to get hurt in terms of seeing other investments in this industry, and there's just not enough consumer
  • Ethereum and other technologies, or Bitcoin should change their technology. because the effect for consumers
  • We want to make sure the consumer... ultimately is protected. And with that, I'll be quiet.
  • telephone call to include mobile phone numbers and text messaging, since 302 has no such definition, and consumers