Video & Transcript Research : 'binding determination'

Page 2 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Ways & Means Mar 31st, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • cemetery exemption if an owner cannot be identified, no one applies for an exemption, or the appraisal determines
  • information from various entities, such as local and state agencies and the historical commission, in determining
  • Texas law provides property owners the ability to challenge appraisal review board decisions through binding
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 2/20/25

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • We identify, investigate, and determine appropriate cleanup plans for sites where hazardous substances
  • We identify, investigate, and determine appropriate cleanup plans for sites where hazardous substances
  • environment uh we identify investigate environment uh we identify investigate and<00:25:21.559> determine
  • /c><00:25:22.000> appropriate<00:25:22.520> cleanup<00:25:23.000> plans and determine
  • appropriate cleanup plans and determine appropriate cleanup plans for<00:25:23.600> sites<00:
Bills: HF276, HF413, HF411
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Ways and Means General Fund Committee Feb 12th, 2025

Ways and Means General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • Who determined the amount? How was the amount determined before you know that?
  • The amount they determined was set by the Department of Revenue.
  • The Department of Revenue determined the amount that added the fee, whatever you call it.
Bills: HB30, HB35, HB72, HB89, HB30, HB35
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Feb 4th, 2026

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • . >> [laughter] >> I don't determine that. >> I can show videos offline to members of the committee.
  • Um, we'll just use the previous roll with that objection. >> [laughter] >> I don't determine that. >>
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Child Committee Meeting - 2026-04-15

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • And who gets to determine that? Because I was going to offer this amendment yesterday to my bill.
  • So I would like to make sure that whoever determines what amendments are okay and what amendments are
  • And who gets<01:24:55.840> to<01:24:55.920> determine<01:24:56.400> that?
  • <01:24:56.720> Because gets to determine that? Because gets to determine that?
  • what amendments are whoever determines what amendments are okay<01:25:40.640> and<01:25:40.840
Bills: HF4382, HF2929
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Human Services Apr 1st, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • The problem arises when the child is determined by CPS to be in a safe environment and does not have
  • Well, yes, the situation is many times, if that is a frivolous accusation and the child is determined
  • to be in a safe environment, determined nothing has happened.
  • Whether or not an investigation moves forward past a determination, I guess.
  • So the fiscal note on the committee substitute will not be able to be determined.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Health and Human Services May 14th, 2025

Health & Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Yet the parliamentarian for the House has determined that my suggested language, which clearly would
Summary: The committee heard testimony on a series of health and human services bills and left each one pending after public testimony. HB 4655 would expand financial literacy instruction for youth aging out of foster care to include credit scores, predatory lending, scams, banking, budgeting, and related consumer topics; the sponsor and Buckner International described the need to protect foster youth from financial pitfalls. HB 923 would add three public members and one physician to the Texas Medical Disclosure Panel; supporters said it would improve informed consent and patient voice, while a witness raised concerns about a House amendment requiring a physician majority for decisions and senators questioned scope-of-practice limits. HHSC said the panel is an independent body and the bill expressly bars it from changing scope of practice.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services Apr 1st, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill also eliminates the requirement that the Executive Commissioner sets a determines the financial
  • Reason to believe, ruled out, unable to determine. unable to complete, and administrative closure.
  • If the parent receives a determination of RTB, or reason to believe, their name remains on the registry
  • Because we have to be able to determine, is somebody truly a threat?
  • child care mall and we have interesting studies indicating that the lifetime amount being determined
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services Apr 1st, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • The problem arises when the child is determined by CPS to be in a safe environment and does not have
  • to be in a safe. environment, determined nothing has happened, that information may never reach or may
  • So, um, since, I guess, all, like, other people 47 other states have determined, so RxPASS should not
  • Determining the cash price of these drugs is effectively impossible. including these zero-cost drugs
  • Be able to be determined.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 4/2/25

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • closely with advocates, providers, and the Department of Children, Youth, and Families in order to determine
  • families<00:54:19.119> in<00:54:19.240> order<00:54:19.480> to<00:54:19.680> determine
  • <00:54:20.280> the families in order to determine the families in order to determine the system
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/27/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • for these individuals, from home health care to hospitalization, and dealing with all the social determinants
  • for these individuals, from home health care to hospitalization, and dealing with all the social determinants
  • for these individuals, from home health care to hospitalization, and dealing with all the social determinants
  • for these individuals, from home health care to hospitalization, and dealing with all the social determinants
  • He added that he wanted clarity because there is often confusion in guidance, especially when determining
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The committee substitute also clarifies that the comptroller will determine the state employee's median
  • And the median salary would be determined by the comptroller.
  • The substitute includes downcoding in the definition of adverse determination.
  • In this bill regarding an adverse determination, which of course has the same ramifications.
  • And prohibiting all use of AI in any adverse determination.
Bills: SB 6, SB6, SB504, SB765, SB815, SB929
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/17/2026 - House Commerce

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • It allows the applicant to request an individualized determination that demonstrates the basis for the
  • The bill provides a process for appealing the individualized determination and judicial review for challenging
  • the validity of the individualized determination or the exaction.
  • this phrase, the adverse impact that's used, that's part of the report in section, subsection B, determine
  • that they must already prepare a takings impact report that seems to mimic the individualized determination
Summary: The committee heard Senate Bill 1566, which would prohibit municipalities and counties from maliciously delaying licensing, permits, or approvals, authorize the Attorney General to enforce the prohibition, and provide expedited judicial review. The sponsor said the bill is intended to address affordability by preventing intentional government delays in housing and business approvals. County representatives supported the goal but opposed the bill as drafted, arguing the county language differed from the city/town language and could sweep in ordinary processing delays or incomplete applications; the sponsor said a floor amendment would fix the county language. Testimony from supporters described long permit and parcel-number delays and argued the bill would give applicants a remedy against intentional obstruction. The committee recommended the bill do pass by a 7-3 vote, with one present and one absent. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1787, which would require written notice for exactions imposed on development projects, allow individualized determinations, and create an appeal path including judicial review. The sponsor framed it as a takings and affordability measure to stop unrelated or excessive exactions from being imposed on housing projects. Cities and counties opposed the bill, saying existing law already requires nexus and proportionality, already provides an appeal process, and that the bill would create a duplicative Attorney General review and confusion, especially for mixed-use projects. Supporters, including Pacific Legal Foundation, the Home Builders Association, and a homeowner who described a costly infrastructure demand on her property, argued the bill would curb extortionate demands and make the process fairer. The committee passed the bill 7-2 with one present and one absent. Senate Bill 1478, a liquor-regulation cleanup bill, was also heard and received broad support. The measure makes technical changes to liquor statutes, including clarifying interim permits, repealing a federal food-safety preemption provision, and updating definitions such as cider and production terminology. Industry stakeholders said the bill was the product of months of consensus work and mostly technical corrections. It passed unanimously, 10-0. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 1431, which would limit municipal control over home design features and prohibit certain required shared amenities that would necessitate HOA maintenance. The sponsor and supporters argued the bill would reduce housing costs by preventing subjective aesthetic mandates and unnecessary HOA-driven requirements, while opponents from cities and neighborhood groups warned it would undermine local control, crime-prevention design standards, neighborhood character, and quality. Home builders and property-rights advocates said the bill would expand consumer choice and reduce costs, while critics argued it could lead to lower-quality housing and remove local recourse. The bill was not reported out in the portion provided, and testimony continued with no final vote shown.