Video & Transcript Research : 'adoptive parent'

Page 2 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 22nd, 2025 at 02:04 pm

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • to state that one parent or the other isn't a parent.
  • , says they're the parents, but the biological parents come along and say, "No, I'm the parent."
  • between a parent... ...and a non-parent.
  • non-parent.
  • I am losing my parent to a terrible situation, and I want to be adopted."
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • And if a hospital is an outlier, parents ought to know that.
  • Please tell me why you're not concerned about the parents.
  • Senator Perry moves for the adoption of the committee substitute.
  • Is there Hearing none, the committee substitute is adopted.
  • It's an organization of medical practitioners, parents, policymakers, and patients.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This includes their parent or...
  • Transparency in adoption-related expenses has also raised concerns among prospective adoptive parents
  • The motion is adopted. Senator Perry moves that Senate Bill 547 be adopted.
  • Hearing none, motion is adopted.
  • The motion is adopted.
OK
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Ways and Means General Fund Committee Feb 19th, 2025

Ways and Means General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • That could be a single parent with two kids under $30,000 a year for a family of two.
  • So usually, the parent in that household cannot afford their own health insurance.
  • The non-custodial parent earns, so we want that information out there now.
  • Parents of the amounts paid as a collectible debt up to civil.
  • Any parent of an approved child, including a...
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Senate and Governmental Affairs May 27th, 2026

Senate & Governmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any objection to that adoption? Seeing none, Amendment 4484 is adopted.
  • I am the former foster parent and proud adoptive parent of Kaylee Williams, who is nine years old.
  • Well, thank you for being one of those parents that are willing to adopt. I appreciate that.
  • But parents have to be able to choose to parent their children.
  • , of what the parents want, what the parents want, what the parents need, and that's not the focus.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 21st, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Seeing none, the motion to adopt the substitute is approved. It's adopted.
  • Seeing none, the substitute is adopted.
  • I'm with Parent Guidance, and I've been advocating for parents for 20 years.
  • When I first started the Parent Guidance Center in 2004, parents were not automatically assigned attorneys
  • Parents are already substituting attorneys.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 22nd, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • parental rights mean.
  • But the biological parents come along and say, "No, I'm the parent."
  • If you did, you're the parent; the other person is the parent.
  • The other parent of the child can't complain about that parent being in the home unless that parent has
  • I am losing my parent to a terrible situation, and I want to be adopted."
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 3/26/25

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • And it allows for a child who is not currently adopted to be reunified with a biological parent through
  • reestablishment of parental rights, including a child whose prior adoption dissolved. and all families
  • to be reunified with a currently adopted to be reunified with a biological<00:03:51.760> parent
  • c><00:03:52.400> through And it also allows parents whose consent adoption was, um, accepted by
  • parent did not perspective adoptive parent did not finalize<00:04:09.200> the<00:04:09.439>
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Children, Youth and Family Services REVISED: HB3637 - Added Feb 18th, 2026 at 03:00 pm

Children, Youth and Family Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • It ensures that no parent or prospective adoptive... ...Rights and Child Welfare Bill.
  • It ensures that no parent or prospective adoptive parent can be labeled abusive, neglectful, or disqualified
  • parents, and we wouldn't want to prohibit a set of parents from being able to adopt.
  • And it's important that when we have parents who are willing and able to adopt, who are willing to take
  • This will help more kids get adopted and prevent certain parents from not being able to adopt in the
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Current statute does not expressly articulate this presumption in suits involving a parent and a non-parent
  • Under this bill, a non-parent must first provide clear and convincing evidence that the parent is not
  • and a non-parent.
  • When a case comes before the court between a parent and a non-parent arguing about what is in the best
  • , for their parents to make decisions regarding things as long To be raised by their parents, for their
Summary: The Senate Committee on Jurisprudence heard several family-law and probate bills. Senate Bill 2052 would codify a rebuttable presumption that a parent acts in the best interest of a child and require clear and convincing evidence to overcome that presumption in disputes involving non-parents; the author and several witnesses supported the bill as a clarification of existing case law, while one witness suggested refining the modification language. Public testimony was closed and the bill was left pending. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1923, which would allow child support to follow a child placed temporarily with kin or fictive kin under a parental child safety placement or authorization agreement; the bill’s author and a grandparent caregiver testified in support, while one witness suggested the Attorney General could handle the change administratively. That bill was also left pending. Senate Bill 1838 would standardize fee schedules and compensation rules for attorneys ad litem and related court-appointed counsel in DFPS child-protection cases. The author said the bill would clarify unclear current law, and witnesses from the Texas Indigent Defense Commission and family-defense bar supported it, though one asked that expert-witness expenses be expressly included. Senate Bill 387 would raise the bond requirement for county judges handling guardianship proceedings to at least $500,000; the author described it as a refiling of a prior bill that passed unanimously but was vetoed, and a statutory probate judge testified in support. Senate Bill 1839 would require original or paper wills to be delivered to the transferee court when probate proceedings are transferred; the committee substitute broadened the delivery methods, and the district clerk witness supported the change. All three bills were left pending. The committee also took up Senate Bill 1536, which had previously been voted out with the wrong committee substitute; members reconsidered the vote, adopted the corrected substitute, and then voted 3-0 to report the bill favorably to the full Senate, with local and contested calendar certification. Finally, Senate Bill 1940 would create a transfer-on-death mechanism for manufactured homes classified as personal property, similar to existing tools for real property and vehicles; the author and an estate-planning attorney testified that it would streamline transfers and reduce probate costs. A non-substantive committee substitute was still being prepared, and the bill was left pending.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • and a non-parent. parent, particularly in modification proceedings.
  • Under this bill, a non-parent must first provide clear and convincing evidence that the parent is not
  • rigor of the non-parents. financial capacity.
  • And I'm like, excuse me, parent still has custody, parent determines what's in the best interest, not
  • They do it all. time with parents.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Children and Youth Health Committee Feb 27th, 2025

Children and Youth Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Alabama Bill is far less intrusive, as the parent decides if less intrusive as the parent decides
  • Parents have got to be parents. The state... I've often said the state cannot regulate morality.
  • When a parent gets their teen a smartphone or device, the parent can go into their own Apple or Google
  • The app wouldn't download unless the parent approves, putting parents in control.
  • Parents want a one-stop...
Bills: SB186, SB187
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Children and Senior Advocacy Committee Feb 26th, 2025

Children and Senior Advocacy

Transcript Highlights:
  • When a parent gets their teen a... ...smartphone or device, the parent can go into their own Apple or
  • The app would not download unless the parent approves, putting parents in control. ...approves, putting
  • parents in control.
  • The differences here are first that parent approval... ...here are first that parent approval would be
  • if that's truly a parent?
Bills: HB285, HB317
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Judiciary Committee Jan 21st, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Now >> got a motion to move adoption of the sub by Senator Givhan, second by Senator Figures.
  • Um Miss Ogden, if adoption of the sub.
  • I'll move to adopt the substitute. Do I have a second? You got a second by Senator Elliott.
  • Any opposition using previous roll on the adoption of the substitute? [clears throat] None.
  • The substitute's adopted. Senator Melson on the substitute. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Child Committee Meeting - 2026-04-14

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • , a foster parent, a foster parent, it<00:33:33.480> it<00:33:33.880> it's<00:33:34.080
  • we tell the kids or we tell the parents we tell the kids or we tell the parents through<00:34:21.159
  • what we have before us when we adopt what we have before us when we adopt amendments<01:23:55.600
  • <01:31:12.200> who I don't know the number of parents who I don't know the number of parents
  • We use our policies to discuss with our parents.
Bills: HF4407, HF4382
Summary: The Children and Families Committee adopted the April 8 minutes and then took up House File 4407, as amended by the A1 amendment. The amendment, explained by nonpartisan staff, incorporated much of the Senate version of related legislation and made a series of changes: it revised the definition of “disproportionately represented child,” shifted that determination to the Commissioner of Children, Youth, and Families, made technical cross-reference and terminology updates, adjusted training requirements, set the working group to expire December 31, 2027, and added an appropriation for statewide implementation. The committee adopted the A1 amendment and then referred the bill to Ways and Means. Representative Gilman said the bill is intended to preserve the goals of the Minnesota African American Family Preservation Act while addressing operational, legal, and fiscal problems before statewide implementation. He argued for delaying the effective date by one year, shifting case review responsibilities to the state, and providing funding so counties are not left with an unfunded mandate. He also said the bill adds safety measures related to synthetic opioids and other imminent-harm concerns, and that the delay would allow the working group to finish its recommendations and give counties time to prepare. County officials Steve Schmidt of Meeker County/Minnesota Rural Counties and Jenny Mojo of Clay County testified in support of the bill as amended, emphasizing that counties need clearer responsibilities, staffing, training, technology, and dependable funding to implement the law successfully. Rebecca St. George of DCYF said “active efforts” is not absolutely defined and is determined case by case, often with court involvement. Members raised questions about the meaning of active efforts, the bill’s synthetic opioid language, and whether the proposal should apply more broadly rather than within this specific act. A citizen also cautioned that the opioid language should not unintentionally affect families in treatment programs. Representative Hicks warned that the fentanyl provisions could lead to broad removals and create placement problems for teens with substance use disorder, while Representative Gilman responded that the bill includes a rebuttable presumption and is meant to protect children from imminent harm.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/19/2026 - Senate Government

Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • don't always get spent in a way that benefits the taxpayers who foot the local property tax bill, the parents
  • CAP supports all educational options in Arizona and the ability of parents to choose among them.
  • The amendment is adopted. Let's move it as amended, please. I move SCR 1032 as amended.
  • What we hear from parents is they want smaller class sizes. They want better funded teachers.
  • It is a common-sense measure that is in line with the majority of Arizona parents and Arizona families
Summary: The Senate Committee on Government considered only SCR 1032, along with a strike-everything amendment. The amendment would require school districts, subject to voter approval, to dedicate at least 60% of operational spending to teacher pay, with a phased-in increase starting in FY 2028 for districts below that threshold. It also would penalize noncompliant districts by requiring unexpended Classroom Site Fund monies to revert, making districts ineligible for those funds until back in compliance, and directing JLBC to exclude those districts from per-pupil calculations. The Superintendent of Public Instruction could grant limited waivers of the forfeiture provisions for up to one year, not more than two consecutive years for the same district. Supporters, including representatives of Heritage Action, the Goldwater Institute, and the Center for Arizona Policy, argued that Arizona has increased school funding substantially while teacher pay has remained flat in real terms, and said the measure would improve accountability and ensure more money reaches teachers rather than district administration. They cited Auditor General findings and prior voter-approved efforts such as the Classroom Site Fund and teacher pay initiatives as evidence that districts have not prioritized classroom spending as intended. A rural school coalition testified in opposition, saying the proposal would be difficult for small districts to meet because it could force cuts to other essential costs such as fuel, insurance, facilities, and other operating needs, and that the Auditor General’s classroom-spending categories may not accurately reflect actual teacher pay. One committee member also raised concerns that the measure could harm special education and other legally required student services. During discussion, the sponsor said charter schools were excluded because they are private businesses under the state’s framework, despite receiving public funds. The committee adopted the strike-everything amendment and then voted 4-3 to give SCR 1032, as amended, a do pass recommendation.