Video & Transcript Research : 'change making'

Page 29 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • HB 18 by Shaheen, relating to the making to...
  • The organizational structure has also changed.
  • You can't go back and make that up.
  • HB18 by Shaheen relating to the making or acceptance of political contributions by and the making of
  • Up all the air and not make a difference.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Aug 26th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • We'll be changing those through conference.
  • It wasn’t really a change.
  • Does that make sense?
  • I hope you know, tell them that we’re changing gears.
  • It currently has not changed.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part I) Aug 26th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 19 relating to a prohibition on the making and acceptance of political contributions during
  • residence address that is not current and the immediate action after the registrar's receipt of certain change
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part I) Apr 28th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, to make a long, we'll get you some numbers.
  • Uh, is there any Jack, do you want to make a comment? We'll call you up.
  • I just wanted to make sure of that.
  • This is an issue we talked about with the change in the appraisal board.
  • So to make a long story short, this is happening at Tarrant County.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Chamber Meeting Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:17 am

New Mexico House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • You can go in a really dark corner, or you can choose to fight and advocate and try to make change so
  • The change was described as cleanup language to make clear that children are not being punished for anything
  • And how many times do we let one child get triggered before we make a change?
  • And how many times do we let one child get triggered before we make a change?
  • a change.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • And, you know, the DTPA reminds me of another change that I would intend to make to this bill is, you
  • Although I don't have a committee substitute yet, I will be making the following changes to this bill
  • And so, you know, anything you do with this act, if you make changes, absolutely preserve the integrity
  • This bill makes several changes to the statute regarding local administrative district judges, increases
  • This bill makes several changes to the statute regarding local administrative district judges, increases
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 4961, which would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision. The author said the bill is intended to create incentives to maintain insurance and to address what he described as an unfair system for insured drivers. Texans for Lawsuit Reform and Texas Eagle Forum testified in support, while the Texas Trial Lawyers Association opposed it, warning the bill could also affect pedestrians, passengers, children, and others who did not choose whether a vehicle was insured. The bill author clarified that passengers would be included in the bill’s coverage. No vote was taken and the bill was left pending. House Bill 5570 would extend a legislative attorney CLE exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate to boards or commissions. The author said the measure is meant to ease time burdens and encourage service, and a witness supported it as a modest incentive for public service. A committee member noted a discrepancy in the number of affected attorneys, and the author agreed to verify the correct figure. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 2969, which would restrict the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech based on sincerely held beliefs. The author and several witnesses from Texas Values, Alliance Defending Freedom, and Cecilia Wood argued the bill protects lawyers of faith from an ABA model rule they described as a speech code. No one testified against the bill, and it was left pending. House Bill 4260, which would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction, drew opposition from the County Judges and Commissioners Association, which argued existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would burden rural officials. The author said the bill was prompted by concerns about judges using their office to pressure others. The bill was left pending. House Bill 5134 would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect actual damages and would allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill is aimed at preventing harassment and fishing expeditions, especially in family-law disputes. Questions focused on how the standard would work and how it differs from current law; the author said the main change is fee-shifting and a clearer legislative directive. The bill was left pending. House Bill 3095, a committee substitute version of a similar uninsured-motorist bill, would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages and limit economic recovery, with several exceptions. Trial lawyers argued it was unconstitutional because it capped economic damages and could unfairly affect innocent drivers, pedestrians, and older people who no longer drive. The author acknowledged constitutional concerns and said the bill would need further work; the committee withdrew the substitute and left the bill pending. Finally, House Bill 4388 would require all judges, including county judges who perform administrative duties, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct. Supporters said some elected judges avoid accountability by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents argued the bill is too rigid and unnecessary because existing remedies already exist. House Bill 3964 would limit public nuisance claims to their historical role and bar such claims against lawful conduct, conduct already covered by other remedies, and products. The author and supporters said the bill is meant to prevent courts from using public nuisance to make policy, while opponents argued it would eliminate useful remedies and could affect local actions against environmental or product-related harms. The author said the bill would not affect statutory nuisance claims, private nuisance claims, or other causes of action, and would be amended to clarify some provisions. The bill was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • And, you know, the DTPA reminds me of another change that I would intend to make to this bill is, you
  • Although I don't have a committee substitute yet, I will be making the following changes to this bill
  • And so anything you do with this act, if you make changes, absolutely preserve the integrity of it, the
  • This bill makes several changes to the statute regarding local administrative district judges, increases
  • This bill makes several changes to the statute regarding local administrative district judges, increases
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills affecting civil practice, judicial conduct, and attorney regulation. HB 4961 and the similar HB 3095 would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision, with HB 3095 also addressing certain exceptions and limiting economic damages in some cases. Supporters said the measures would encourage insurance coverage and fairness for insured drivers, while opponents argued they would unfairly punish injured people who were not responsible for the lack of insurance, including pedestrians, passengers, children, and others. HB 3095 drew constitutional concerns from witnesses, and the committee later withdrew the committee substitute and left the bill pending; HB 4961 was also left pending after questions about its scope, including passengers. HB 5570 would expand a continuing legal education exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate who serve on boards or commissions. The author and witness said the bill would free up time for public service while still requiring ethics training. A committee member raised a discrepancy in the number of attorneys covered, and the bill was left pending. HB 2969 would prohibit the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech, especially in relation to sincerely held religious beliefs. Supporters framed it as a protection for lawyers of faith against an ABA-style speech code, while no one testified in opposition; the bill was left pending. HB 4260 would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction. The author described it as an ethics measure to avoid conflicts of interest, but county officials and the County Judges and Commissioners Association opposed it, saying existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would impose hardships, especially in rural counties. The bill was left pending. HB 4388 would require all judges, including those who serve only in administrative roles, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct; supporters said some judges avoid discipline by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents said the bill was unnecessary and could burden county judges who serve as administrators. It was also left pending. The committee also heard HB 5134, which would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect to suffer actual damages and allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill would curb harassment and fishing expeditions, but members questioned how the standard would work in practice; the bill was left pending. Finally, HB 3964 would narrow common-law public nuisance claims by barring suits over lawful conduct, conduct already addressed by other remedies, and products, while preserving other causes of action. Supporters said the bill would prevent regulation through litigation and protect legislative authority; opponents said it would eliminate important remedies and that no Texas abuse had been shown. The author indicated he would revise the bill, and it was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The committee's substitute makes the following changes: the definition of motorized off-road vehicle
  • It makes various conforming changes to municipal courts and municipal courts of record regarding their
  • Yes, and making sure that judges' decisions are. ...You know, that they can feel free and safe to make
  • The substitute makes conforming changes to correct oversights in the introduced version.
  • Under subsection three of the bill, which makes the changes effective retroactively, subsection F was
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • The only question I have about this particular bill is the change that this bill makes in terms of the
  • We had a lot of people make investments in that.
  • Can you speak to what controls are in place to make sure that the state of Oklahoma is making the right
  • So we wanted to clarify and to make sure that they...
  • And so further to that question, making sure that we've done...
OK
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • I think, together, we can make peace and prosperity and safety.
  • Clerk will act to make the machine sergeant sn roll call. Roll call is now in progress.
  • So, do you think the bill actually makes the incentives more objective or less objective?
  • But let me just say this to make sure that I think I'm hearing you correctly.
  • That is one change.
TX
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • To make a long... We'll get you some numbers.
  • Jack, do you want to make a comment?
  • It really changes the conversation.
  • To make a long story short, you collected 170,000 signatures.
  • I just wanted to make sure of that.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

House Chamber - Tue Feb 17, 2026, 12:00PM HST - Day 16

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

JHA Info Briefing - Tue Feb 17, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Hawaii House Floor Meeting