Transcript Highlights:

• not a member of the committee, I will make the motion to move House File 28 to be recommended to be re-referred
• </c><00:02:17.360><c> to</c><00:02:17.519><c> the</c> recommended to be re-referred to the recommended
• /c> opportunity to testify on behalf of H opportunity to testify on behalf of H file<00:18:41.840><c>
• The vote being seven yeses and six noes, the bill is re-referred to the General Register.
• NOS the bill is re-referred to the NOS the bill is re-referred to the general<00:51:40.760><c> register

Committee: House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• One other thing I just want to point on line 108: the Senate Judiciary and Public Safety omnibus bill
• </c> thing I just want to point on line 108. thing I just want to point on line 108.
• And with that, Madam Chair, that re um completes my overview of the spreadsheet. Thank you.
• And with that madam chair that re<00:12:39.360><c> um</c><00:12:39.920><c> completes</c><00:12:40.399
• my overview of the re um completes my overview of the spreadsheet.<00:12:42.160><c> Thank</c><00:12:

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:37:15.440><c> uh</c> she may be reabused and re-exloited uh she may be reabused and re-exloited
• Bill 178 does not affect um current law Bill 178 does not affect um current law uh<00:58:53.839><c> h<
• /c><00:58:54.160><c> and</c><00:58:54.400><c> firefighters</c> uh h and firefighters uh h and firefighters
• It would become C ... and then re, right? So, we're striking paragraph on page seven.
• ,</c> &gt;&gt; and then re, &gt;&gt; and then re, &gt;&gt; right?

Bills: HB0083 , HB0102 , HB0178

Committee: Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:

• Pa a followup and and I'm just<00:24:50.159><c> going</c><00:24:50.240><c> to</c><00:24:50.400><c> re
• remind the committee as just going to re remind the committee as well<00:24:51.840><c> as</c><00:24:
• I shouldn't say 108%; that's 8% over standard.
• :03.680><c> receiving</c><00:58:04.400><c> 4</c> clarity, they were re receiving 4 clarity, they were
• re receiving 4 million<00:58:05.680><c> in</c><00:58:05.920><c> the</c><00:58:06.079><c> base</c><00

Committee: Senate Jobs and Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:

• Wishing to read into the record all those signed in not wishing to testify: 52 pro, one con, and zero
• And with that, that concludes... ...pro, one con, and zero other.
• This is H 3021.2.2.
• It's H-3326.1. It makes some modifications with relation to both programs.
• The proposed Substitute House Bill 1735, and this is where I would say H. 3021.1. 1735.

Summary: The House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee met on February 4, with public hearing and executive action on several bills. The main public hearing was on House Bill 2668, as proposed substitute, which would direct the Department of Fish and Wildlife to identify and pursue relocation of the Bob Oak Game Farm and to plan remediation of the current site. Testimony from the bill sponsor, Centralia city officials, Lewis County public health staff, a tribal member, and residents strongly supported relocation, citing nitrate contamination in a sole-source aquifer, risks to drinking water for Centralia and nearby households, and the need for long-term public health protection. The committee also heard that interim mitigation measures such as point-of-use filters and water/sewer extensions were underway, but witnesses said relocation was the only durable solution. The bill was added to the day’s executive session as an unusual late addition, then later passed out of committee on a voice vote with a due pass recommendation. During executive session, the committee also acted on House Bill 2598, creating a Salmon Advisory Commission; House Bill 2619, creating a legislative task force to reduce regulatory stress in agriculture; House Bill 2199, dealing with derelict vessels and disposal timelines; House Bill 2463, which revises agricultural donation and farm-to-food pantry programs; and House Bill 1735, which prohibits force-feeding birds and related foie gras sales. Amendments were considered on several bills, including a DNR amendment to the vessel bill and a narrowing amendment to the force-feeding bill, which failed. The committee approved House Bill 2598 by a 6-5 vote, and House Bill 2619, House Bill 2199, House Bill 2463, House Bill 1735, and House Bill 2668 all received due pass recommendations, with some on voice votes and others by recorded roll call. The chair noted that moving House Bill 2668 in executive session the same day as public hearing was highly unusual and done because of the bill’s urgency and bipartisan support.

Transcript Highlights:

• I signed in con, and it's not that I'm against parole. I'm for parole.
• I signed in con. The 60 percent, right?
• I signed in con, and it's not that I'm against parole. I'm for parole.
• I signed in con. The 60%, right?
• We had 38 people signed in pro, not testifying, and 987 signed in con.

Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 6239, which would require civil arbitration for tort claims against the state and its subdivisions before trial. Staff explained current tort-claim procedures and said the bill would apply arbitration to claims of any dollar amount, with a fiscal note pending. The sponsor said Washington’s liability exposure is unusually high and argued the bill would promote early resolution without limiting jury trials, damage caps, or attorney fees. Members asked who pays for arbitration and whether trial rights are preserved; staff said costs are generally split and the bill preserves a jury trial de novo. Testimony on SB 6239 was sharply divided. Counties, cities, school districts, risk pools, and some public-safety groups supported the bill, saying rising liability and insurance costs are straining budgets and threatening core services. Opponents included trial lawyers, legal aid groups, victim advocates, journalists, and survivors of abuse, who argued the bill would create barriers to justice, delay relief, increase costs for claimants, reduce transparency, and retraumatize survivors by forcing private arbitration before a public trial. Several witnesses said the bill was too broad because it would cover employment, contract, and other claims, not just torts involving abuse or negligence. After public testimony closed, the committee noted the large number of sign-ins, with far more in opposition than in support. The committee then took up Senate Bill 6074, which would reinstate parole for certain felony offenses committed on or after July 1, 2027, allow eligible incarcerated people to petition the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board after serving 60% of their sentence, and create a parole implementation work group. Supporters said it would recognize rehabilitation and improve reentry, while some witnesses raised concerns about the bill’s prospective-only application, the 60% threshold, and the need to address racial disparities and parole criteria more fully. The sponsor said the parole bill was paired with tort-liability reform because criminal justice reform advocates have said liability changes are needed to restore parole in Washington.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'll close the executive session on H 411. HB 414 will be up next.
• The notes in front of me have pros and cons.
• </c> notes in front of me have pros and cons notes in front of me have pros and cons it<01:56:26.360>
• /c><01:58:02.760><c> Bill</c> session on H Bill session on H Bill 533<01:58:05.159><c> um</c><01:58:05.360
• /c><02:02:18.239><c> Bill</c> session on H Bill session on H Bill 594<02:02:20.599><c> getting</c><02

Summary: The Transportation Committee met in executive session on several House bills. HB 212, allowing a 180-day operation waiver when a vehicle fails an emissions test, was retained at the sponsor’s request for possible modifications. HB 249, which would have let bicyclists treat stop signs as yields and stop lights as stop signs, was recommended inexpedient to legislate (ITL) by a 9-7 vote, with a minority report expected. The committee then retained HB 298, creating an exception for removing VIN tags from pre-1981 vehicles when needed for repair or restoration, by a 15-1 vote. HB 411-FN, making handheld device use while driving a secondary offense, was recommended ITL by consent after members argued the current primary-offense law is more effective for enforcement and safety. On HB 414, which would have barred DMV license suspensions based on debts owed to private towing or storage companies, the committee rejected ITL and instead retained the bill 16-0 after members split over whether the current law unfairly ties driving privileges to private debt collection. HB 441, addressing visible diesel emissions and “rolling coal,” was recommended ITL 16-0 because members said the conduct is already illegal under existing state and federal law. The committee then took up HB 461, concerning Department of Safety and DMV training and testing materials, where members debated whether driver testing should be limited to English and whether multilingual materials are a safety necessity or discriminatory; the transcript cuts off before a final vote is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• not say seven have two at large and re not say seven have two at large and re not say seven for last
• I already fought these fights before H I already fought these fights before H I thought these fights
• and then be in Brian den and J Jordan h and then be in Brian den and J Jordan h and then and and and
• horn Jr y'all know Mr district Harris H horn Jr y'all know Mr district Harris H horn Jr y'all know Mr
• second hour con second hour con cry Cavalry rain as they traveled cry Cavalry rain as they traveled

Bills: SB 26 , SB 28 , SJR 36 , SB 616 , SB 565 , SB 384 , SB 28 , SB 28 , SR 131 , SR 168 , SR 174 , SR 175

Transcript Highlights:

• They do have a lot of migrant workers or H-2A workers, and the pay scale for H-2A workers is a lot, is
• who utilize other Specialized labor that would be outside of the H-2A class.
• So minimum wage laws don't apply to the H-2A, so states that have a high percentage of those in their
• And my takeaways, I've got a list of pros and cons over here.
• You know, cons: California's $16.15 hour when they went to $16.50, they've got a net...

Committee: House Business

Summary: The committee held a study on the potential effects of living wage or minimum wage laws in Oklahoma, with the chair emphasizing that the discussion was not intended to advocate for or against State Question 832. The first panel focused on economic and workforce impacts. An Oklahoma Department of Commerce representative argued that living wage calculations vary by region and household type, that Oklahoma’s average wages are already near or above many living-wage estimates, and that higher mandated wages could lead employers to cut hours, reduce hiring, automate, or avoid expansion, especially in rural areas where childcare, healthcare, broadband, and infrastructure constraints also affect labor participation. Committee members asked about wage distributions, rural cost differences, training pathways, and whether higher wages might draw workers or businesses out of state; the witness said many low-wage workers move up over time and that Oklahoma has seen net in-migration. A State Chamber Research Foundation witness then testified that a $15 statewide wage floor would raise payroll costs substantially, especially for small rural employers, and cited examples from California and Seattle to argue that higher wages can reduce hours, jobs, and benefits while increasing consumer prices. She suggested alternatives such as expanding the state earned income tax credit and promoting upskilling through existing education and training programs. A Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry representative described Missouri’s recent voter-approved minimum wage increase to $13.75, rising to $15, along with paid sick leave provisions. She said the chamber opposed the measure because it would raise business costs, hurt rural communities and youth employment, and force some employers to cut hours, reduce hiring, or close. She cited examples from Missouri businesses facing significant added costs and warned that a future ballot initiative could create a patchwork of local minimum wages. In response to questions, she said Missouri’s law did not distinguish by age or industry, that businesses had raised concerns about union contracts and compliance, and that the chamber viewed the measure as harmful to competitiveness. Peter Hansen of NFIB presented the final major testimony, summarizing an NFIB study projecting that a higher Oklahoma minimum wage would produce some short-term GDP gains but longer-term losses, with GDP turning negative by the early 2030s and job losses growing over time. He said businesses respond to higher wage mandates by raising prices, trimming jobs, converting full-time positions to part-time, reducing benefits, and shifting investment toward automation or other capital. He argued that the burden falls most heavily on vulnerable workers such as young or marginal employees, who are less likely to be hired when labor costs rise. In questioning, he acknowledged that higher wages can improve pay for some workers and may have some short-term positive effects, but maintained that the long-term employment and investment effects are negative. No votes or formal actions were taken in the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> by the therein listed titles and re by the therein listed titles and re referred<00:36:54.160><c
• </c><00:50:33.680><c> 0039</c> 0034 says amendment to H bill 69. 0039 0034 says amendment to H bill 69
• HB 292 establishes<01:02:43.520><c> a</c><01:02:43.760><c> res</c> establishes a res establishes a res
• </c> the committee recommendation of re the committee recommendation of re re-refer<03:52:07.040><c>
• </c> introducing legislation, re-referring introducing legislation, re-referring bills<05:01:57.280><

Transcript Highlights:

• And that was where the LAO noted that Merced to Bakersfield is a different scope than SB 108. Okay.
• the L.A.O. noted that the Merced to Bakersfield is different than the, a different scope than the SB 108
• We are sitting together talking about evaluating the pros and cons of moving the station from downtown

Committee: House Transportation

Transcript Highlights:

• 94 HD2 without strong support of hb11 H 94 HD2 without amendments<00:48:18.240><c> my</c><00:48:18.359
• [Applause] H next person on Zoom, please proceed. Identify yourself. Hi, I’m Ricardo Merera.
• Reproductive Rights and freedom of re Reproductive Rights and freedom of choice<01:47:04.040><c> in<
• [Applause] [Applause] up<01:51:27.960><c> hello</c><01:51:28.239><c> H</c><01:51:28.440><c> my</c><01
• </c> so I think um as a legislator as a con so I think um as a legislator as a con and<02:07:27.400><

Committee: Senate Health and Human Services

Summary: The Health and Human Services committee heard extensive testimony on HB 1194 HD2, a bill to regulate midwifery and require accredited education for licensed midwives. Supporters, including the Midwives Alliance of Hawaii, ACOG, a pediatrician, and several licensed midwives, argued the bill would improve maternal and newborn safety, clarify the definition of midwife, strengthen accountability, and align Hawaii with national education standards. They said accredited training is necessary to avoid gaps in knowledge and to support safe transfers and collaboration with hospitals. Opponents, including many midwives, parents, cultural practitioners, and community groups, argued the bill would restrict access to care, criminalize traditional and apprenticeship-based midwifery, and undermine reproductive autonomy and Native Hawaiian and other cultural birthing practices. Several asked for amendments to preserve a birth attendant exemption, the PET/portfolio pathway, and cultural and religious protections. Others said the bill would disproportionately harm rural, Indigenous, and low-income families by making training and licensure less accessible. The committee also heard testimony from state and county entities and professional organizations, with some standing on written testimony and others offering brief comments. The chair repeatedly reminded testifiers of the one-minute limit and the possibility that final decision-making would be deferred if quorum was lost. The transcript does not show a final vote or action taken during this segment.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:10:06.880><c> if</c><00:10:07.120><c> the</c><00:10:07.360><c> student</c><00:10:07.920><c> h<
• /c> because it shows if the student h because it shows if the student h doesn't<00:10:08.560><c> get<
• and I I doing this, but I don't cons and I I don't<01:17:02.880><c> have</c><01:17:03.040><c> a</c><
• This is the building re &gt;&gt; Thank you.
• </c><02:09:43.599><c> consider</c> &gt;&gt; and again all it says is con consider &gt;&gt; and again

Committee: Joint Education

Transcript Highlights:

• That's a testament to not only the hiring, but the training and how we are re-instructing our workforce
• Can you just speak a little bit about the pros and the cons of the approach that we have?
• Yeah, I would have to re-familiarize myself with it because there's a lot of different things going on
• We've been able to retrain them and re-instruct them.
• Both as they appear in H.2 and then also in Mass Ready. Thank you for that. Oh, 100%.

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:

• Also, your Committee on Finance, to which were re-referred Senate Bills 316, 431, and 435, has had the
• honorable body that the Assembly on this day passed Assembly Bills 379 and Senate Bills 12, 36, 39, 108
• President, your Committee on Finance, to which was re-referred Senate Bill No. 318, has had the same
• inform your honorable body that the Assembly on the state passed as amended Assembly Bills 91, 93, 108
• Assembly Bill 108, introduced by Assembly Members Howard Watts, et al., makes an appropriation to the

Transcript Highlights:

• H-QI issue 3, we support the BCP to transfer the Data Exchange Framework over to H-QI and strong implementation
• H-QI issue 5, we support the BCP for AB 1418.
• H-QI Issue 3, we support the BCP to transfer the Data Exchange Framework over to H-QI and strong implementation
• H-QI Issue 5, we support the BCP for AB 1418.
• H-QI Issue 3, we support the BCP to transfer the Data Exchange Framework over to H-QI and strong implementation

Transcript Highlights:

• H. CR. 74 by Representative Baham to establish the Louisiana-United Kingdom Trade Commission. Rep.
• H.
• H.
• H.
• H.

Bills: HR286 , HR287 , HR288 , HR289 , HR290 , HR291 , HR292 , HR293 , HR294 , HCR114 , HR275 , HR276 , HR277 , HR278 , HR279 , HR280 , HR282 , HR283 , HR284 , HR285 , HCR112 , HCR113 , SCR62 , SCR64 , SB132 , SB135 , SB405 , HR179 , HR216 , HR223 , HR225 , HR274 , HCR89 , SB39 , SB99 , SB111 , SB112 , SB124 , SB134 , SB174 , SB189 , SB190 , SB201 , SB233 , SB236 , SB258 , SB270 , SB273 , SB288 , SB307 , SB313 , SB320 , SB321 , SB325 , SB326 , SB331 , SB339 , SB341 , SB345 , SB346 , SB347 , SB353 , SB357 , SB359 , SB387 , SB393 , SB401 , SB415 , SB419 , SB422 , SB426 , SB435 , SB437 , SB440 , SB451 , SB464 , SB470 , SB487 , SB488 , SB495 , SB504 , SB505 , SB518 , SB523 , SB228 , SB408 , HR168 , HR174 , HR194 , HCR54 , HCR74 , HCR79 , HCR87 , HCR94 , HCR95 , HCR97 , HCR98 , HCR102 , HCR104 , SCR23 , SCR38 , HCR26 , HB250 , HB265 , HB339 , HB427 , HB445 , HB463 , HB468 , HB606 , HB639 , HB649 , HB665 , HB746 , HB781 , HB853 , HB861 , HB872 , HB886 , HB916 , HB937 , HB1054 , HB1068 , HB1117 , HB1237 , HB75 , HB705 , SB34 , SB164 , SB172 , SB198 , SB208 , SB232 , SB281 , SB286 , SB317 , SB322 , SB334 , SB380 , SB385 , SB409 , SB417 , SB421 , SB430 , SB439 , SB447 , SB458 , SB510 , SB54 , SB56 , SB72 , SB79 , SB97 , SB105 , SB123 , SB125 , SB129 , SB163 , SB171 , SB252 , SB287 , SB375 , SB386 , SB461 , SB466 , HR84 , SCR3 , HB582 , HB625 , HB646 , HB998 , HB1191 , HB1255 , SB81 , SB100 , SB109 , SB197 , SB374 , SB479 , SB78 , HB901 , HR20 , HR74 , HCR65 , HCR71 , HB284 , HB302 , HB306 , HB341 , HB366 , HB393 , HB458 , HB577 , HB603 , HB605 , HB614 , HB733 , HB752 , HB773 , HB798 , HB911 , HB955 , HB996 , HB1035 , HB1069 , HB1113 , HB1140 , HB1180 , HB1240 , SB82 , SB89 , HB134 , HB258 , HB359 , HB782 , SB149 , SB382 , SB441

Summary: The House met with a quorum, received a guest minister for prayer, approved the journal, and heard several announcements and recognitions, including NEC Awareness Day, a European Union delegation visit, and the Glenmore Wildcats baseball team’s state championship. Members also received Senate messages, including concurrence on some House measures, the filing of Senate bills, and several Senate resolutions and bills laid over for later consideration. The chamber then took up a long series of resolutions and bills. Among the resolutions adopted were measures on a Louisiana-United Kingdom Trade Commission, support for migratory waterfowl studies, hunting education in schools, SNAP delivery-fee studies, fraud prevention for seniors, subsurface data preservation, boating safety reporting, and visual acuity screening data. Some items were temporarily returned to the calendar, including a sales-tax uniform-base rule resolution and several Senate measures. The House also adopted a resolution creating an agricultural national security task force and another supporting a letter to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. On legislation, the House passed bills on missing-person alerts for people with disabilities (“Brian’s Call”), first responder status for public works employees, planning commission procedures, historic preservation district rules, judges’ supplemental compensation, the Baker Economic Development District, New Orleans downtown development district tax authority, a local crime prevention district, clerks of court records, hotel occupancy taxes in Shreveport-Bossier, firefighter cancer screenings, Shreveport police civil service rules, local ethics entity funding, hemp/alcohol age restrictions, OMV digital signatures, LED recreation, TOPS Tech eligibility for veterans, anatomical gift recordkeeping, crypto kiosk fraud protections, firefighting foam definitions, and consumer data privacy. Several bills failed, including HB 705 on legislative contempt penalties and HB 75 on gaming promotional play. One bill on vehicle insurance reinstatement fees was amended and passed, and a bill on judicial compensation fund adjustments was amended and passed after questions about CPI indexing.

Transcript Highlights:

• /c><01:42:14.159><c> Haskins</c><01:42:14.920><c> I</c> representative H Haskins I representative H Haskins
• /c><01:51:25.320><c> Haskins</c><01:51:26.280><c> I</c> representative H Haskins I representative H Haskins
• /c><01:52:54.280><c> Haskins</c><01:52:55.000><c> I</c> representative H Haskins I representative H Haskins
• /c><01:53:55.079><c> for</c> 1073 H for 1073 H for hr18<01:53:57.000><c> and</c><01:53:57.280><c> I</
• /c><01:58:52.280><c> right</c> hr18 with the amendment 1073 h right hr18 with the amendment 1073 h right

Summary: The committee opened a hearing on HR 18, a resolution urging New Hampshire’s congressional delegation to seek federal changes that would let very small slaughter plants use custom-exempt inspection criteria with a third-party inspector present, so beef, pork, lamb, and goat could be sold as individual cuts directly to consumers. Representative Judy Aron said the resolution was drafted in lieu of state legislation because the issue is governed by USDA rules, and she noted she was also working on an amendment to ensure the measure covered federal “very small” plants. Representative Miner asked for clarification about custom slaughter versus retail sales, and Representative Scully supported the resolution while suggesting language to make clear it applied only to local end consumers. Joyce Brady of the New Hampshire Farm Bureau testified in support, saying the state’s four USDA slaughterhouses and the bottleneck in custom cutting made the issue important. After no further testimony, the chair closed the hearing. The committee then moved into a work session on several bills. For HB 616, members discussed an amendment that had been revised after public comments and Commissioner Jasper’s feedback; Representative Guber said it balanced the competing positions, and Representative Penza and Representative Ger said the language now addressed concerns about animal suffering by allowing euthanasia if a treating veterinarian determines the animal is in extreme suffering. The committee then discussed HB 77, with Representative Penza describing changes to landfill-related standards, including replacing aquifer references with drinking water wells, removing a penalty section, changing discretionary language to mandatory language for the department, and adjusting an in situ soils standard. Members praised the compromise, though Representative Scully raised concerns about the 1,500-foot setback and suggested engineering controls such as berms; Penza responded that current rules do not include such controls and that the setback was intended to address surface spills. Several members said the bill reflected a hard-fought balance and should not be rewritten at the last minute. For HB 505, the freeze-dried food bill, Representative Aron explained that the amendment replaced a simple exemption with a requirement that homestead food operations selling freeze-dried foods from a farm stand, farmers market, or retail food store obtain a homestead food license under RSA 143-A:4. She said the amendment defines freeze-dried foods as fruits, vegetables, and commercially prepared dairy products, and delays the effective date 120 days to allow rulemaking. Members generally supported the approach as a light-touch oversight mechanism for potentially hazardous foods, though Representative Ktoa asked for clarification about how the amendment interacts with existing licensing and inspection exemptions, and Aron clarified that these products would not be exempt from licensing under the relevant law. The committee then turned to HB 250, concerning local authority over dog muzzling, where members broadly supported the amendment as a simple solution, while Representative Ktoa asked about the underlying definition of a vicious dog and whether all listed behaviors would warrant muzzling. The discussion noted that the amendment would allow towns to require muzzling for dogs meeting the statutory definition, while excluding hunting, working, herding, and similar dogs.

Transcript Highlights:

• Hello, Representative Con. Thank you for being here.
• that amount from that re-encumbered that amount from that invoice<00:22:38.400><c> out</c><00:22:38.559
• </c><00:55:39.280><c> can't</c><00:55:39.520><c> tell</c><00:55:39.599><c> you</c><00:55:39.920><c> h<
• c><00:55:41.599><c> happy</c><00:55:41.839><c> I</c><00:55:42.079><c> am</c> can't I can't tell you h
• how happy I am can't I can't tell you h how happy I am that<00:55:42.559><c> the</c><00:55:42.800><c>

Transcript Highlights:

• Sanford on being inducted into James H. Sanford on being inducted into James H.
• House joined House joined res y'all you. House joined House joined res y'all you.
• human million to the Department of Re human million to the Department of Re human resources, 1.5 million
• Question for the body's res. Okay. Question for the body's res. Okay.
• I think we need to maybe re-evaluate I think we need to maybe re-evaluate I think we need to maybe re-evaluate

Bills: HB 29 , HB 125 , HB 145 , HB 171 , HB 255 , HB 50 , HB 796 , HB 363 , HB 116 , HB 491 , HB 589 , HB 1495 , HB 368 , HB 1285 , HB 1905 , HB 1360 , HB 2002 , HB 917 , HB 2723 , HB 2067 , HB 1238 , HB 2337 , HB 745 , HB 1188 , HB 1606 , HB 2003 , HB 2147 , HB 2391 , HB 2355 , HB 2546 , HB 2495 , HB 2818 , HB 2249 , HB 1749 , HB 3109 , HB 3228 , HB 3240 , HB 1507 , HB 658 , HB 1748 , HB 1851 , HB 1922 , HB 2001 , HB 2798 , HB 107 , HCR 29 , SB 5 , SB 262 , HB 11 , HJR 72 , HB 106 , HB 18 , HB 48 , HB 27 , HB 37 , HB 1481 , HB 581 , HB 1696 , HB 2216 , HB 1035 , HB 1633 , HB 742 , HB 754 , HB 1689 , HB 1690 , HB 2669 , HB 391 , HB 517 , HB 1024 , HB 1607 , HB 252 , HB 1716 , HB 1562 , HB 4116 , HB 1866 , HB 1741 , HB 2103 , HB 2637 , HB 2884 , HB 503 , HB 1089 , HB 2986 , HB 972 , HB 502 , HB 29 , HB 125 , HB 145 , HB 171 , HB 255 , HB 50 , HB 796 , HB 363 , HB 116 , HB 491 , HB 589 , HB 1495 , HB 368 , HB 1285 , HB 1905 , HB 1360 , HB 2002 , HB 917 , HB 2723 , HB 2067 , HB 1238 , HB 2337 , HB 745 , HB 1188 , HB 1606 , HB 2003 , HB 2147 , HB 2391 , HB 2355 , HB 2546 , HB 2495 , HB 2818 , HB 2249 , HB 1749 , HB 3109 , HB 3228 , HB 3240 , HB 1507 , HB 658 , HB 1748 , HB 1851 , HB 1922 , HB 2001 , HB 2798 , HB 107 , HCR 29