Transcript Highlights:

• love to frame a couple of quick case love to frame a couple of quick case studies<00:09:23.120><
• from doing the safe design in many cases from doing the safe design in many cases including<00:20
• Of course, this varies from case to case, but so many survivors find it hard to accept that this magnitude
• <00:31:38.159> to<00:31:38.399> case, course, this varies from case to case, course
• , this varies from case to case, but<00:31:39.360> so<00:31:39.600> many<00:31:39.919><

Bills: HF3429, HF3418, HF3431, HF1597

Keywords: intelligent speed assistance, transportation, speeding offenses, public safety, license restrictions, speed control, pedestrian safety, traffic safety, roadway improvements, nonmotorized transportation, crosswalks, sidewalks, bike lanes, complete streets, Vision Zero, Toward Zero Deaths, MnDOT, Department of Transportation, Department of Public Safety, local road authority

Transcript Highlights:

• It's not the case.
• It's not the case.
• It's not the case.
• It's not the case.
• It's not the case.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• um they've opened over a thousand cases um they've opened over a thousand cases in<00:17:17.839>
• We do have some, in both cases, we are slightly different than most other states.
• , in a lot of cases, not in all cases—but there’s value in that.
• They often will do standards that can be adopted by states in some cases.
• They often will do standards that can be adopted by states in some cases.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Um I rest my case. and it's worth protecting. and it's worth protecting.
• > Um<00:52:20.760> I<00:52:20.880> rest<00:52:21.240> my<00:52:21.360> case

Bills: SB3136, SB2521, SB2851, SB3154, SB3262, SB2387, SB3001, SB2818, SB2972, SB2372, SB2108, SB888, SB3320, SB2798, SB2110, SB3007, SB2615, SB2095, SB2101, SB3138, SB2756, SB3229, SB2969, SB3286, SB3238, SB2557, SB3140, SB2014, SB3097, SB3096, SB3069, SB99, SB2930, SB2268, SB2543, SB3022, SB3109, SB3215, SB3152, SB3156, SB3234, SB3053, SB3067, SB2673, SB411, SB2041, SB2919, SB2532, SB2152, SB2721, SB2446, SB2601, SB2239, SB2804, SB3324, SB2802, SB2577, SB2320, SB2706, SB2595, SB2781, SB2961, SB2433, SB2657, SB2340, SB3045, SB3203, SB2861, SB3245, SB2803, SB3204, SB3025, SB2138, SB2645, SB3082, SB2109, SB2261, SB3332, SB2811, SB2567, SB2125, SB2866, SB83, SB874, SB2386, SB3137, SB3132, SB2175, SB2272, SB2271, SB847, SB3302, SB2089, SB2102, SB2050, SB2694, SB2487, SB2061, SB709, SB3083, SB2151, SB2852, SB2471, SB2568, SB2253, SB2697, SB2429, SB2929, SB3032, SB2057, SB148, SB2353, SB2075, SB2907, SB2074, SB3219, SB3218, SB2367, SB3048, SB17, SB3253, SB2376, SB3103, SB2999, SB3255, SB1166, SB3157, SB2698, SB3029, SB2146, SB2470, SB3040, SB3076, SB2575, SB3294, SB2438, SB2530, SB2688

Keywords: lead-free, lead in drinking water, drinking water, water infrastructure, public water system, plumbing, pipe fittings, solder, flux, fixtures, cast iron pipe repair, nonpotable water, Safe Drinking Water Act, Department of Health, water quality, lead exposure, lead contamination, water utilities, backflow preventer, fire hydrant

Bills: SB3136, SB2521, SB2851, SB3154, SB3262, SB2387, SB3001, SB2818, SB2972, SB2372, SB2108, SB888, SB3320, SB2798, SB2110, SB3007, SB2615, SB2095, SB2101, SB3138, SB2756, SB3229, SB2969, SB3286, SB3238, SB2557, SB3140, SB2014, SB3097, SB3096, SB3069, SB99, SB2930, SB2268, SB2543, SB3022, SB3109, SB3215, SB3152, SB3156, SB3234, SB3053, SB3067, SB2673, SB411, SB2041, SB2919, SB2532, SB2152, SB2721, SB2446, SB2601, SB2239, SB2804, SB3324, SB2802, SB2577, SB2320, SB2706, SB2595, SB2781, SB2961, SB2433, SB2657, SB2340, SB3045, SB3203, SB2861, SB3245, SB2803, SB3204, SB3025, SB2138, SB2645, SB3082, SB2109, SB2261, SB3332, SB2811, SB2567, SB2125, SB2866, SB83, SB874, SB2386, SB3137, SB3132, SB2175, SB2272, SB2271, SB847, SB3302, SB2089, SB2102, SB2050, SB2694, SB2487, SB2061, SB709, SB3083, SB2151, SB2852, SB2471, SB2568, SB2253, SB2697, SB2429, SB2929, SB3032, SB2057, SB148, SB2353, SB2075, SB2907, SB2074, SB3219, SB3218, SB2367, SB3048, SB17, SB3253, SB2376, SB3103, SB2999, SB3255, SB1166, SB3157, SB2698, SB3029, SB2146, SB2470, SB3040, SB3076, SB2575, SB3294, SB2438, SB2530, SB2688

Keywords: lead-free, lead in drinking water, drinking water, water infrastructure, public water system, plumbing, pipe fittings, solder, flux, fixtures, cast iron pipe repair, nonpotable water, Safe Drinking Water Act, Department of Health, water quality, lead exposure, lead contamination, water utilities, backflow preventer, fire hydrant

Transcript Highlights:

• , investigations conducted, and the disposition of those cases.
• . cases. cases.
• In this case, Lydia wasn't given the services that she signed up for. Not okay.
• :21.880> the<01:25:21.960> services case, Lydia wasn't given the services case, Lydia wasn't
• Because in this case, if it wasn't for Lydia's mom, Lydia wouldn't be protected.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Why do we throw away all boundaries in Why do we throw away all boundaries in this<00:07:53.800> case
• this case this case uh<00:07:54.960> since uh since uh since um<00:07:56.280> they've<
• where it's more flexibility in cases where it's more appropriate<00:14:09.360> to<00:14:09.760
• where your neighbors may not the case where your neighbors may not reside<00:24:30.640> on<00
• So, there are other criminal some cases.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• But that has not been the case.
• But that has not been the<00:09:31.760> case.
• In fact, the Brennan Center's the case.
• <00:19:27.360> whether longer be relevant in that case whether longer be relevant in that
• case whether corporations<00:19:28.200> have<00:19:28.400> a<00:19:28.480> right

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• But we know that's not always the case.
• or number four with regards to new cases of human trafficking.
• So we've seen an uptick in terms of human trafficking cases throughout our state.
• In this particular case, in our community... ...to serve who they want to serve.
• In this particular case, in our community, pediatricians are not in abundance.

Summary: The committee first took up CS/SB 1606 on patient access to records. Sponsor Senator Grall explained an amendment that aligned the bill more closely with HIPAA by defining “designated record set,” allowing a 14-day extension, and requiring records to be produced in the requested form if readily producible. Several senators asked about patient portals, legal representatives, and whether the bill applied post-mortem; Grall said the bill was limited to authorized access during the patient’s life. Testimony was largely opposed, with health information and provider groups warning that the bill could create cybersecurity risks, conflict with HIPAA and meaningful-use rules, burden facilities, and improperly broaden access to portals and sensitive records. Supporters argued it would improve patient access and speed. The amendment was adopted, and the bill was reported favorably by roll call vote after debate on the bill as amended. The committee then considered CS/SB 712 on construction regulations. Grall described provisions on synthetic turf, change orders, public works bidding, elevator rails, alarm contractor scope, tall mass timber, pool and spa contractor scope, spaceport exemptions, permit document limits, and solar/energy storage inspections. Two amendments were adopted: one removed pool and spa contractor language and delayed the change-order provision until July 1, 2025; the other removed the tall mass timber section. Pool contractors testified against the scope expansion in the original bill, while others supported the remaining provisions. Senators raised concerns about the Florida Building Commission process and how the public-works language might affect small-business participation, but the bill as amended was ultimately reported favorably. Finally, the committee heard CS/SB 1288 on parental rights. Grall said the bill would require parental consent for most minor health care decisions, allow parental access to records, restrict surveys/questionnaires, and limit use of biofeedback devices, while preserving certain exceptions such as emergency care and STD testing. An amendment clarified questionnaire opt-outs for K-12 students, added court-order exceptions, addressed DNA sampling for criminal investigations, refined biofeedback language, and added emergency behavioral health exceptions; it was adopted. The bill drew extensive testimony both for and against: supporters said it restored parental authority and protected children from decisions they are not equipped to make, while opponents argued it would endanger minors seeking confidential STI, mental health, or abuse-related care, especially in unsafe homes. Senators also debated whether the bill would conflict with existing laws and whether it could leave some minors untreated. The transcript ends during continued public testimony on the bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:15:33.800> where decision to decline charging cases where decision to decline charging
• cases where a<00:15:34.160> reported<00:15:34.680> violation<00:15:35.319> of<00
• in the state of Minnesota person cases in the state of Minnesota it's<00:20:48.720> not<00:20
• is closed what we after that uh case is closed what we have<00:23:17.520> come<00:23:17.760><
• Today I'm here to inform you about the positive case for what our services could do if we receive an

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The president, at least in my case, I would say probably in Ken's, at St.
• That's the purpose of boards in some cases, if I'm not mistaken. Is that right? Yeah, yes, sir.
• <01:22:22.440> from up and the testimony in this case from up and the testimony in this case
• case still before the courts.
• attorney Gran mentioned the um the case attorney Gran mentioned the um the case of<01:37:51.560> the

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:09:37.600> and act that is advisable in all cases and act that is advisable in all cases
• That was a court case, U.S.
• In this case, obviously, it would be the case that an applicant would have to go before the zoning board
• Um, that's not the case.
• paragraph that talks about in the case paragraph that talks about in the case of<02:34:13.600>

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Duran then asked whether the dispatcher who generated the case would still have access
• to the case, or whether the receiving dispatch center would need to create the case itself.
• Representative Witty responded that the case is generated by one dispatcher.
• create the case itself um as well? create the case itself um as well?
• is generated by one or by so the case is generated by one or by one<00:24:51.000> dispatcher.

Bills: HF4810, HF4597, HF1082, HF3230

Keywords: public safety, radio communications, infrastructure funding, county funding, interoperability, ARMER network, local jurisdictions, HF4597, Minnesota public safety, 911, emergency dispatch, emergency communications, public safety appropriation, Metropolitan Emergency Services Board, PSAP, dispatch interoperability, real-time coordination, emergency response coordination, cross-jurisdictional response, 911 center awareness platform

Transcript Highlights:

• And I just want to say, um, it's been uh, a success in some cases that we've talked about.
• And I just want to say, um, it's been a success in some cases that we've talked about.
• And I just want to say, um, it's been a success in some cases that we've talked about.
• And in this case, I think that's the path forward. I completely understand and respect the concern.
• And in this case, case, case, I<00:33:04.040> think<00:33:04.320> that's<00:33:04.640><

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So, I've, um, the handout in here talks about a case in Massachusetts, a case in Rhode Island, and a
• case in Rhode Island.
• So, I've, um, the handout in here talks about a case in Massachusetts, a case in Rhode Island, and a
• So, I've, um, the handout in here talks about a case in Massachusetts, a case in Rhode Island, and a
• case in Rhode Island.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We heard case after case. instance after instance, where BuyBoard costs, the purchases they make from
• And if it is a case of bullying, we already have that provision.
• If there is no video, the trial of the case will rely...
• Unfortunately, that's not always the case.
• This is simply not the case.

Bills: SB 13, SB 27, SB 57, HB1325, HB1655, HB3312, HB5526, SB13, SB57, SB207, HB441, HB591, HB5019, SB27, SB843

Keywords: lobbying, public funds, political subdivision, local government, county association, municipal lobbying, registered lobbyist, Texas Legislature, taxpayer lawsuit, injunctive relief, attorney's fees, government finance, county dues, state association of counties, sheriffs association, law enforcement officers, legislative advocacy, bill tracking, legislative alerts, Government Code Chapter 556

Transcript Highlights:

• In this case, CalFresh, and monitoring the federal developments and keeping note. Mr.
• Lastly, a memo that just recently came out stated that every individual who files an affirmative case
• These funds could have been used instead to enhance our employment services case management capacity
• This led to missing mail correspondence, which flagged my case.
• Case load.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• not the case at the time.
• not the case at the time.
• And so um we do find ourselves in case.
• And so was not the case at the time.
• And so all of not necessarily the case.

Keywords: Call to Order and Roll Call - 0:25 Approval of Minutes – 3-50 2025 RS SB 253 – 4:25 Computer Science and AI Literacy – 27:36 Fayette County School District Budget Update – 51:46 Adjournment – 2:09:46, 958, all

Summary: The committee first handled routine business, including roll call, introductions, and approval of the previous meeting minutes by voice vote. It then heard a presentation on SB 253, focused on expanding support for teacher apprenticeship and teaching-and-learning pathways. Senator Hickman and staff from the Kentucky Department of Education and Nelson County Schools described how the program uses dual credit, work-based learning, and registered apprenticeship to help students earn an associate degree in high school and continue toward a teaching degree. They said the goal is to address the teacher shortage by creating a sustainable pipeline into the profession. Witnesses emphasized that the main barrier is cost. Mary Taylor said Kentucky’s youth apprenticeship model has been successful in other fields and that education should be added as an in-demand sector, but an associate degree alone will not solve the teacher shortage because teachers still need a bachelor’s degree and certification. Laura Arnold of Nelson County Schools described the district’s Lead Nelson program, saying the district has invested more than $800,000 since 2021, currently has 37 students in the pathway and seven committed apprentices, and spends about $85,000 per apprentice from freshman year through certification. She said district staffing, planning, and university partnerships are also significant hurdles. Members asked about job guarantees, tenure, and retirement; Arnold said employment is performance-based and retirement issues are being considered. Senator Hickman said the bill would use lottery funds to help cover tuition and dual credit costs so more districts can participate, noting that a prior version died because of a high fiscal note. Representative Payne and Representative Tipton praised the program but stressed the need for funding and noted inconsistencies between statute and budget language on Work Ready Kentucky and dual credit support. Representative Tipton also cautioned that lottery revenue may not keep pace with demand and said the General Assembly may need to make broader funding decisions. After the apprenticeship discussion, the chair moved the committee to the next agenda item on computer science and AI literacy, where Code.org began a presentation on the importance of computer science for all students.

Transcript Highlights:

• But if it's just speed, that is not the case.
• The exact advocates versus Ellison case.
• In this case, what the plain language.
• That's our test case for suspending civil rights.
• That's our test case for suspending civil rights.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• In some cases, because of the demographics and the population shifts, we need to... Rep.
• Case and then you have less Court of Appeals judges, it's going to take longer to resolve a case.
• They looked at information provided by the cases filed on limited jurisdictional courts.
• Appellate cases are not uniform, and they are not simple.
• Appellate cases are not uniform and they are not simple.

Bills: SCR59, SCR70, HR275, HR279, HR282, HR289, HR307, HCR112, SCR61, SCR62, SCR64, SB121, HR310, HR314, HR316, HR317, HR321, HCR117, SCR5, SCR29, SCR33, SCR37, SCR63, SCR30, SCR40, SCR65, HCR3, HCR49, HCR66, HCR67, HB54, HB137, HB321, HB368, HB386, HB414, HB431, HB552, HB555, HB578, HB590, HB593, HB618, HB638, HB670, HB692, HB707, HB708, HB715, HB718, HB732, HB741, HB748, HB776, HB796, HB807, HB822, HB848, HB856, HB887, HB888, HB917, HB921, HB1082, HB1243, HB1246, HB1, HB2, HB42, HB45, HB71, HB79, HB126, HB133, HB159, HB213, HB218, HB222, HB289, HB291, HB312, HB313, HB324, HB352, HB383, HB398, HB403, HB429, HB457, HB459, HB549, HB571, HB579, HB591, HB608, HB616, HB624, HB766, HB769, HB783, HB804, HB864, HB874, HB909, HB951, HB971, HB983, HB1005, HB1017, HB1051, HB1056, HB1126, HB1186, HB1193, HB1223, HB1224, HB1235, HB1249, SB259, SB295, SB312, SB348, SB444, SB485, SB441, SB149, HB359, SB29, SB43, SB78, HB463, HB998, SB197, SB268, SB123, SB276, SB326, SB80, HB901, HR20, HR74, HCR65, HCR71, HCR98, HB284, HB306, HB341, HB366, HB393, HB458, HB577, HB603, HB605, HB614, HB625, HB646, HB733, HB752, HB773, HB798, HB911, HB955, HB996, HB1035, HB1069, HB1113, HB1140, HB1180, HB1191, HB1240, HB1255, SB82, SB89, SB97, SB479, HB74, HB119, HB134, HB210, HB258, HB468, HB784, HB870, HB953, HB956, HB1117, HB1236, SB42, SB208, SB217, SB274, SB300, SB341, SB379, SB382, SB387, SB401, SB449, SB487

Keywords: Major Richard Star Act, veterans, military retirement, disability compensation, VA benefits, combat-wounded, medically retired, military retirees, service members, veterans benefits, Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense, concurrent receipt, retirement offset, combat-related disability, bipartisan support, memorial resolution, Congressional memorial, Louisiana delegation, Richard Star