Transcript Highlights:

• Madam Chair, there's an amendment.
• These amendments are consensus-driven.
• So they are friendly amendments.
• There's a Griffin strike-all amendment. Would you move to Griffin's strike-all amendment, please?
• Griffin strike-all amendment. Would you move to Griffin strike-all amendment, please?

Bills: SB1137, SB1176, SB1287, SB1335, SB1336, SB1445, SB1677

Keywords: underground utilities, utility locating, dig safe, call before you dig, 811, excavation safety, damage prevention, one-call center, locate request, white lining, large project coordination, buried infrastructure, subsurface utilities, utility marking, locator wire, locator strip, interactive positive response system, landlord duties, apartment community, mobile home park

Transcript Highlights:

• be amended as follows.
• And so amended be be amended as follows.
• /c> be amended as follows.
• N so amended be be amended as follows.
• This is L004. >> Will the clerk please read amendment L004? >> Amendment L004.

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Are there amendments? On the desk, Mr. President. Please read the first amendment.
• Amendment barcode 212818 by Senator Rouson: delete lines 31 through 45 and insert amendment.
• The amendment withdrawn. Please read the next amendment.
• Amendment barcode 350766 by Senator Bracy Davis. Amendment barcode 350766 by Senator Bracy Davis.
• President, I respectfully withdraw this amendment. Amendment withdrawn.

Summary: The Senate opened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and several introductions recognizing guests and visiting groups, including the Challenger Learning Center, the Florida Dental Hygienists Association, Zeta Phi Beta, Pine Forest High School students, and others. Senators also noted President Albritton’s recovery and upcoming caucus and appointment announcements. The chamber then moved to the special order calendar. The main floor debate centered on Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 156, which increases penalties for crimes against law enforcement officers and other personnel, including making manslaughter of an officer punishable by mandatory life imprisonment without release and clarifying resistance to officers. Senator Leek described the bill as a compromise intended to honor Officer Jason Rainer, while Senators Rouson and Bracy Davis offered and then withdrew amendments. Senators Pizzo, Berman, Smith, Polsky, and others questioned the bill’s impact on self-defense, officer conduct, jury instructions, prosecutorial discretion, and the removal of language regarding unlawful force by officers. Supporters argued the bill corrects confusion and strengthens protections for officers; opponents said it removes civilian protections and imposes disproportionate mandatory sentencing. The bill passed 31-4. The Senate then passed SB 168 on public nuisances, expanding nuisance law to include gambling establishments and increasing penalties; SB 288 on rural electric cooperatives; SB 292 and SB 298 creating public records protections for appellate clerks and dating-violence victims; SB 296 establishing the HAVEN alert platform study and expanding address confidentiality protections for domestic violence victims; SB 364 modernizing CPA licensure; SB 386 creating protections for farm equipment purchasers; and several Open Government Sunset Review bills preserving or extending public records and meeting exemptions, including SB 7000, SB 7202, SB 706, SB 708, SB 7012, SB 7014, and SB 7016. Most passed with little or no opposition, though some of the public-records measures drew a few nays. At the end, the Senate waived rules to immediately certify passed bills to the House and adjourned until the next scheduled meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair the substitute amendment to the amendment.
• The amendment is adopted.
• Senators wishing to debate on the bill as amended any debate on the bill as amended.
• Not the amendment to come back to that. We have no appearance forms on the amendment.
• The amendment is adopted. We're back on the bill as amended any questions on the bill as amended.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I would move the DE3 amendment and, if you would, describe the amendment.
• I would move the DE3 amendment and, if you would, describe the amendment. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
• discussion to the amendment discussion to the amendment barely<00:01:32.240> worth<00:01:
• of the de amendment say I. I I opposed. of the de amendment say I. I I opposed.
• Amendment is adopted. Motion prevails. Amendment is adopted. Closing<00:02:20.080> comments.

Bills: SF1959, HF2444, SF2298, HF2445, SF2216, HF2443, HF2130, HF1943, HF2436, HF2442

Keywords: veterans, military affairs, Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Military Affairs, omnibus veterans bill, appropriations, National Guard, state active service, armory, State Armory Building Commission, veterans homes, veterans cemeteries, county veterans service office, Minnesota GI Bill, Gold Star families, Blue Star families, Secret War in Laos, Hmong veterans, Laos veterans, special guerrilla units

Transcript Highlights:

• The amendment is adopted. the amendment. Okay. So, the chair will the amendment. Okay.
• discussion to the DE 4 amendment? discussion to the DE 4 amendment?
• Okay, in the packet, I have an A17 amendment. I don't have another amendment.
• amendment is adopted. Any final word? amendment is adopted. Any final word?
• The amendment<01:14:52.320> the<01:14:52.760> uh amendment the uh amendment the uh uh<01

Bills: HF4077, HF3809, HF3639, HF4478, HF3363, HF3874

Keywords: municipal nondisclosure agreement, NDA, public records, transparency, local government, county, city, town, school district, housing and redevelopment authority, economic development authority, port authority, economic development, land development, public financing, tax increment financing, TIF, abatement, municipal bonds, debt obligations

Summary: The Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee approved the minutes from March 25 and March 26, then took up House File 4077, a bipartisan bill authored by Representatives Greenman and Roach. The bill would prohibit municipalities from entering into non-disclosure agreements with private entities that restrict disclosure about land development, economic development, or publicly funded projects, while preserving existing Chapter 13 data practices rules and trade secret protections. The authors argued the bill is needed to prevent secret agreements and backroom decision-making that undermine public transparency, and they moved that the bill be re-referred to the general register. Several local officials and residents testified in support, including a St. Louis County commissioner, the mayor of Lonsdale, and residents from Farmington and Hermantown. Supporters said NDAs had been used in connection with data center and other development projects to keep elected officials and the public in the dark, eroding trust and limiting community input. They described the bill as a common-sense transparency measure and said existing law already protects legitimate trade secrets. Opposition came from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and the Minnesota Business Partnership, which argued that NDAs are often necessary in early-stage economic development discussions to protect sensitive business information and remain competitive with other states. They warned the bill could discourage investment, jobs, and tax growth, and said it would impose a one-size-fits-all state mandate that limits local discretion. Committee members then debated whether the bill was too broad and whether it should be narrowed to data centers; supporters responded that the issue extends beyond data centers to other forms of economic development. A roll call vote was requested on the motion to re-refer the bill to the general register, but the final vote result was not stated in the transcript excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• Amended or not, to be amended will be the lawyers who undoubtedly will litigate it for years.
• So these amendments do not include that, and that wasn't offered up in the amendment negotiations between
• There isn't even an analysis, let alone draft amendments, that says it is to be amended.
• And, yes, the amendments came very, very recently.
• However, the proposed amendments also insert.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• on the author's amendment?
• this as a friendly amendment? this as a friendly amendment?
• I think it the amendment on this.
• amendment at this time. amendment at this time.
• amendments in the bill here. amendments in the bill here.

Bills: HF1667, HF2526, HF68

Keywords: correctional fees, supervision fees, probation, Department of Corrections, criminal justice funding, electronic home monitoring, drug testing, restitution collection, community service work, postprison supervision, court-ordered services, fee sunset, fee phaseout, offender fees, community corrections, supervised individuals, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Duties and Disclosure Amendments. Duties and Disclosure Amendments.
• >> This is a roll call vote on Senate File 105 as amended. amendment? amendment?
• 105 as amended. Senator KGO. 105 as amended. Senator KGO.
• <00:59:59.200> Page Any amendments to this bill? Yes. Page Any amendments to this bill?
• That amendment has been adopted. Are there any other amendments to this bill?

Bills: HB0108, HB0039, HB0091, HB0070

Keywords: audit, transparency, government reporting, accountability, public access, firearm rights, restoration of rights, criminal justice, felony convictions, Wyoming law, artificial intelligence, social scoring, biometric data, privacy rights, government regulation, foreign censorship, digital innovation, constitutional rights, Wyoming GRANITE Act, extraterritorial laws

Transcript Highlights:

• <01:26:24.320> that<01:26:24.560> we amendment to amend the amendment that we amendment
• amend the amendment, what now when you amend the amendment, what page<01:28:07.199> are<01:28:
• . amendment. amendment.
• Is that a friendly amendment? amendment? amendment?
• Floor amendment. Aaliyah. Floor amendment.

Keywords: 1136, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So we're going to go first to House Bill 184 as amended. We'll go...
• Now you're striking an amendment.
• Um, okay, on the amendment, any other questions on H.A.F.C. Amendment Number One?
• Amendment Number One to House Bill 200. Okay. We’ve adopted that.
• We’re excited to go next to House Bill 47 as amended.

Bills: HB63, HB64, HB184, HB200, HB47, HB48, HB2, HB9

Keywords: water project fund, New Mexico Finance Authority, NMFA, Water Trust Board, water infrastructure, wastewater, drinking water, flood prevention, watershed restoration, water storage, conveyance, delivery, water treatment, recycling, reuse, municipal infrastructure, local government finance, capital outlay, grants, loans

Transcript Highlights:

• They don't propose amendments. So let's have an amendment in front of everybody. It is 233732 2.
• So this amendment is friendly. It was a proposed language and thank you for moving the amendment.
• on the amendment or comments on the amendment.
• You have an amended bill, Senator.
• So we've amended it again. So it's twice amended. Now in this committee, getting sloppy over there.

Bills: SB3, HB70, HB49, HB60, HB151, HB164, SB17, SB35, SB164

Keywords: Public Regulation Commission, PRC, utility oversight fund, public utilities, utility regulation, commissioners, commission staff, chief of staff, ethics, Gift Act, revolving door, post-employment restrictions, consumer complaints, telecommunications, pipeline safety, natural gas pipelines, oil pipelines, license fees, regulatory oversight, administrative cleanup

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair Botana: Members, any questions on the amendment? Questions on the amendment?
• Any public testimony on the amendment? Members, any debate on the amendment?
• That is the amendment. Chair Botana: Questions on the amendment?
• Chair Botana: Public testimony on the amendment? Debate on the amendment? Rep.
• Chair Botana: Your amendment is adopted. Back on the bill as amended.

Transcript Highlights:

• The A6 is amended to the DE. Um, then we will go to the DE2 next.
• <00:04:41.960> as please say I the de2 as amended as please say I the de2 as amended as amended
• c><00:04:44.280> apologies<00:04:45.280> as amended the de2 as amended apologies as amended
• the de2 as amended apologies as amended<00:04:45.919> please<00:04:46.120> say<00:04:46.400
• We will be moving House File 1837, as amended, to the General Register.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee considered House File 1837 and first adopted the A6 amendment to the DE2. Staff explained that the A6 made several technical and policy changes, including fixes to compensation council language, grants management changes drawn from prior legislation and the governor’s fraud package, clarifying revisions to state contracting language, revival of the 2025 compensation council so it could address judicial salaries in 2026, changes requested by Minnesota Management and Budget to personnel management statutes, and a conforming change renaming the commissioner’s plan to the Non-Represented Employees Compensation Plan. After discussion, the committee adopted the DE2 as amended to House File 1837. Members and the chair described the bill as a bipartisan policy package reflecting work from both sides of the aisle. No opposition was recorded on the final motion. The committee then voted to re-refer House File 1837, as amended, to the General Register. The motion carried by voice vote, and the bill was reported out of committee.

Transcript Highlights:

• We did have a floor amendment on the House or, excuse the Senate side, that amended it and which brought
• Chairman, there is also one amendment. Mr.
• And now this is going to add, before the amendment, three more subsections of people, and the amendment
• No, we're going to move the amendment down here. Mr.
• Vice Chair, please move the bill as amended. Mr.

Bills: SB1039, SB1061, SB1068, SB1069, SB1099, SB1127, SB1148, SB1271, SB1426, SB1448

Keywords: attorney discipline, legal costs, reputation damage, state bar, court costs, fentanyl, drug offenses, narcotic drugs, criminal penalties, Arizona Revised Statutes, educational institutions, public order, disruption, concealed weapons, safety regulations, firearms, muffling devices, weapon regulations, Arizona law, public safety

Transcript Highlights:

• amendments for clarity, consistency, and style.
• Obviously, that would be preferable. amendments U noting these are not to be amendments U noting these
• <01:29:48.199> on um we have a number of amendments on um we have a number of amendments on
• <01:29:56.480> that a general summary of the Amendments that a general summary of the Amendments
• <01:31:15.159> to credit we're going to make amendments to credit we're going to make amendments

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Energy and Environmental Protection Committee met on February 13, 2025, after a brief recess for a concurrent hearing. The committee heard testimony on several measures, including HB 332 on recycling and lithium-ion batteries, HB 256 on environmental protection and federal air standards, HB 348 on single-use plastics in lodging establishments, HB 810 on noise pollution and helicopter-related civil actions, HB 505 on Red Hill coordination, HB 975 on carbon sequestration incentives, and HB 974 on utility financing and step-in agreements. Testimony was generally supportive on HB 256, HB 348, HB 505, HB 975, and HB 974, while HB 332 drew both support and opposition, including concerns from the Consumer Technology Association about battery recycling policy. On HB 975, OPSD supported the program but urged language to prevent use for carbon offsets, and the committee discussed how the program would be monitored and reimbursed. On HB 974, the chair summarized extensive amendments addressing reserve fees, revenue definitions, trust funds, default procedures, and customer credits, while noting the Consumer Advocate’s changed view that a reserve fee may not be constitutionally required. In decision making, the committee adopted amendments and recommended passage for HB 332, converting it into a working group to study recycling of small- and medium-format lithium-ion batteries, with members from state agencies and industry and a note that an appropriation may be needed. HB 256 was passed with amendments to clarify compliance with federal law unless standards become more stringent. HB 348, HB 810, and HB 505 were each passed as is. HB 975 was passed with amendments, including language to prevent use of the program for carbon offsets and a note that dollar amounts would be blanked out and addressed in the committee report. HB 974 was also passed with amendments after the committee reviewed the proposed changes and discussed the reserve fee issue. The committee additionally noted that HB 1476 had previously been deferred and would remain deferred, and the meeting concluded with adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh first of all, it's been amended.
• can uh vote yes on this amendment today. can uh vote yes on this amendment today. Thanks.
• The amendment does not prevail. Well, the motion does not prevail. The amendment is not adopted.
• in favor of the H2 amendment, say I. I. in favor of the H2 amendment, say I. I.
• amendment is not adopted. amendment is not adopted.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee took up House File 3603, and Representative Olson first offered and had adopted an A1 author’s amendment. Olson then explained that the bill would direct the Commissioner of Children, Youth and Families to seek a USDA waiver allowing Minnesota to bar SNAP purchases of items subject to state sales tax, such as prepared foods, chips, soft drinks, and candy. He argued the goal was to promote healthier nutrition, noted that other states have similar waivers, and said the change could help Minnesota qualify for significant federal rural health care funding. Public testimony was divided. Patrick Garofalo of the Minnesota Grocers Association opposed the bill, saying SNAP is a supplemental program and that the proposal would be difficult to administer at retail stores, create confusion, and expose retailers to serious penalties for mistakes. He argued the state tax code is not a nutrition standard and pointed out inconsistencies, such as some candy-like products still being taxable or some healthy items being treated as prepared food. Will Hagen of Minnesota Retailers also opposed the bill, warning it would require costly point-of-sale changes, retraining, and would turn store employees into enforcers while creating cross-border shopping problems. Matt Schmidt of the American First Policy Institute supported the concept, saying SNAP should emphasize nutrition and that restricting unhealthy purchases would reduce taxpayer subsidies for junk food and soda. Members then debated the bill’s logic and practicality, including questions about which snacks would or would not be allowed under the tax-based standard. Representative Sencer-Mura offered an H2 amendment, framed as applying the same restrictions to legislators’ own per diem spending; Representative Hansen responded that the comparison was not equivalent and raised concerns about household circumstances and accessibility. The H2 amendment was put to a vote and did not prevail. The committee then continued member discussion on the bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 120 as amended. Mr.
• President, Senate Finance, we fixed that in the amendment, and the amended bill reflects that.
• We do have a floor amendment. The reader to read. We do have a floor amendment. The reader to read.
• Discussion on the amendment.
• Section 3, we just amended out on a unanimous vote. We just amended Section 3 out.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:21:57.720> section<00:21:58.039> two Amendment section two Amendment section two the
• Senate draft one and then further amend Senate draft one and then further amend the<00:53:34.559
• <01:12:01.719> to we do ask for a proposed amendment to we do ask for a proposed amendment
• 891 I have a laundry list of amendments 891 I have a laundry list of amendments so<01:16:57.280>
• I have a recommended amendment.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee on Economic Development and Technology heard testimony on several measures, with most witnesses either supporting the bills or offering technical concerns and suggested amendments. On SB 338, testimony came from the Department of Taxation, Tax Foundation of Hawaii, and Surpac, and the bill later moved forward with amendments. On SB 558, testimony was largely in support from the Department of Agriculture, Ulupono Initiative, Local Food Coalition, Hawaii Food Industry Association, Hawaii Farm Bureau, and the Agribusiness Development Corporation, which described the measure as supporting rural jobs, food-system development, and use of off-grade agricultural products. ADC requested flexibility for neighbor-island siting and funding allocations, while the committee also discussed whether the bill’s language should be made more general and whether it could raise constitutional concerns about overly specific site designations. The bill was advanced with amendments and a noted appropriation allocation of $350,000. The committee also heard SB 186, which drew support from the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development, Department of Agriculture, Ulupono Initiative, Hawaii Food Industry Association, Hawaii Farm Bureau, Hawaii Public Health Institute, DED, ADC, AAHU RC&D, and the Hawaii Youth Food Council. Supporters said the measure would improve coordination among agencies on food systems, help address food security and the state’s 30% by 2030 farm-to-school goal, and create a more organized statewide food systems effort. SB 328 received support from the Department of Taxation and Hawaii Farm Bureau, with Farm Bureau describing it as a way to repurpose existing dairy infrastructure to revive hog production and support livestock and farm-to-school goals; the Tax Foundation of Hawaii opposed the measure as a potentially narrow industry incentive that could unfairly benefit a specific taxpayer and said a direct appropriation would be more transparent. SB 89 was described by Hawaii Farm Bureau as a labeling measure intended to protect the integrity of a culturally relevant local product, though the group raised concerns about wording and implementation timing. Later, SB 742 received support from the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, the Office of Wellness and Resilience, the Executive Office on Early Learning, the University of Hawaii System, Hawaii KidsCAN, the Hawaii Workforce Funders Collaborative, and the State Commission on the Status of Women. Testifiers said the bill would improve cross-agency data sharing, support workforce and education planning, and create public-facing dashboards; the Commission on the Status of Women asked to be included in the working group or as an advisory member. In decision-making, the committee adopted amendments and advanced SB 338, SB 558, and SB 1186. For SB 1186, the chair’s recommendation added three positions, specified committee-note funding amounts for those positions and operating funds, and revised working-group membership to have co-chairs appoint five members with relevant experience and expertise.

Transcript Highlights:

• Amendment, Fifth Amendment, you know, search and seizure and due process.
• > Fifth right same with fourth amendment Fifth right same with fourth amendment Fifth Amendment
• amendments.
• We'll just be taking the AG amendments, the Tax amendments, and technical amendments.
• amendments and Technical amendments amendments and Technical amendments questions<03:00:36.640><

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee hearing covered House Bill 279 and House Bill 392, both relating to firearms. HB 279 would restrict carrying or possessing firearm parts except at or between certain locations and in an enclosed container, define firearm parts and prohibited persons, and increase penalties for violations. The Department of Law Enforcement strongly supported the bill, saying it would close a loophole involving disassembled or “ghost gun” parts and help law enforcement charge people who carry weapons in pieces. Most public testimony opposed the measure, with speakers arguing it was unconstitutional, vague, hard to enforce, and would burden lawful gun owners, gunsmiths, and firearm dealers; several also said existing laws already cover the conduct. One supporter, Dennis Dunn, said additional firearm security could reduce theft and suicides. The chair noted the committee had received 270 testimonies on HB 279, with 39 in support, 234 in opposition, and one comment. The committee then heard HB 392, which would prohibit the possession, transfer, and sale of ghost guns and establish mandatory minimum sentencing for using a ghost gun in a felony. The Department of Law Enforcement and the Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney’s office supported the bill, saying unserialized firearms are difficult to trace and that prosecutors need clear laws to address them. Supporters argued the measure would help prevent untraceable weapons from circulating and align penalties with other firearm offenses. Opponents, including several gun owners and association representatives, said the bill was unnecessary because existing state and federal laws already prohibit unserialized firearms, and warned it could create confusion, criminalize lawful owners of antique or self-built firearms, and be difficult to administer. No votes or final committee action were taken in the portion provided.