Transcript Highlights:

• order<00:18:12.320> for temporary straining order and order for temporary straining order
• Last year, there were over 4,000 temporary restraining order petitions filed statewide.
• Last year, there were over 4,000 temporary restraining order petitions filed statewide.
• for violating a temporary restraining order or order for protection if, after conducting a financial
• restraining restraining order permanent restraining order<00:41:24.000> or<00:41:24.160> injunction

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard testimony on SB 284, which would remove the requirement that wiretapping applications to a designated judge be accompanied by a written memorandum from the Department of the Attorney General. The Department of the Attorney General opposed the bill as drafted and instead proposed a new emergency-wiretap procedure allowing county prosecutors to seek immediate judicial authorization in exigent circumstances, followed by AG review and a follow-up application within 48 hours. The Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney’s office supported creating an emergency exception, citing a kidnapping case involving a missing material witness and the need to obtain live phone location data quickly, but asked that the AG be required to respond clearly within the follow-up period. The AG said the current wiretap process often arrives incomplete and noted a prior Honolulu application that was returned for more information and then abandoned. The committee also heard public testimony, including one speaker in support and another in opposition, and discussed whether the proposed emergency process should include imminent danger findings and what happens if the follow-up application is not approved. No vote or final action was taken in the transcript. The committee then took up SB 295, which increases penalties for violating temporary restraining orders and orders for protection and makes related changes. The Deputy Public Defender opposed the bill’s higher penalties, arguing that not all restraining-order cases involve domestic violence and that the measure could affect family disputes, property conflicts, custody battles, and other non-domestic situations. The Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney supported the bill, saying it would create a more uniform and efficient charging framework and that violations of court orders can be serious even when the conduct appears minor in isolation. Domestic violence advocates also supported the measure, emphasizing the need for meaningful enforcement and deterrence; one witness cited statewide data showing thousands of TRO petitions but relatively few convictions and fines. A representative from the Domestic Violence Action Center supported the bill but requested amendments to reduce unintended consequences for survivors. During discussion, the committee focused on the proposed minimum sentence, with the Domestic Violence Action Center recommending reducing it from 15 days to 5 days. The witness explained that longer minimums can create hardships such as job loss, housing instability, and child care problems, while still allowing time for survivors to access shelter and services. The committee chair indicated support for amending the bill to reflect that recommendation. The Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney also clarified that the bill is intended to address violations of already-issued protective orders after judicial review, not the initial issuance of restraining orders, and said the office supports eliminating the distinction between domestic and non-domestic protective-order violations because charging decisions are often made under time pressure. Multiple individuals and organizations signed up in support, and one witness testified in opposition. No vote or final committee action was announced in the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• So under O, you have to be able to complete everything that the court orders you to do in order to get
• And then they can do another protective order?
• I did not get a protective order. How?
• be a lifetime protective order.
• It says information regarding protective orders.

Bills: HB809, HB 1193, HB1916, HB2558, HB1973, HB2350, HB2399, HB2340, HB 116, HB330, HB2496, HB116

Keywords: digitized signature, waiver of citation, marriage dissolution, electronic notarization, family law, HB 1193, informal marriage, common-law marriage, declaration of informal marriage, confidentiality, privacy, county clerk, vital statistics unit, Family Code, Health and Safety Code, marriage records, public records, personally identifying information, PII, legal representative

Transcript Highlights:

• Hearing none, so ordered.
• per court order.
• Hearing none, so ordered.
• So ordered.
• And so ordered.

Bills: SB330, SB663, SB1020, SB1152, SB1164, SB1896, SB2111, SB2196, SB2383, SB2581, SB2797, SB2798, SB2371

Keywords: county funding, prosecutors' offices, elections, law enforcement, local government, community supervision, budget approval, corrections department, strategic plan, judicial oversight, SB 1020, Texas, personal bond office, pretrial release, electronic monitoring, GPS monitoring, global positioning system, bond conditions, probation, parole

Transcript Highlights:

• Hearing none, so ordered.
• Hearing none, so ordered.
• by court order, and there are violations.
• Hearing none, so ordered.
• Hearing none, so ordered.

Bills: SB330, SB663, SB1020, SB1152, SB1164, SB1896, SB2111, SB2196, SB2383, SB2581, SB2797, SB2798, SB2371

Keywords: county funding, prosecutors' offices, elections, law enforcement, local government, community supervision, budget approval, corrections department, strategic plan, judicial oversight, SB 1020, Texas, personal bond office, pretrial release, electronic monitoring, GPS monitoring, global positioning system, bond conditions, probation, parole

Summary: The committee heard several criminal justice bills, with testimony largely focused on public safety, court procedures, and local criminal justice administration. SB 2371 would expand mandatory skimmer-reporting requirements from gas pumps to ATMs, point-of-sale systems, and virtual currency kiosks, with the Texas Financial Crimes Intelligence Center saying centralized reporting would improve investigations, preserve evidence, and help identify organized criminal groups. SB 2581 would repeal a special law governing commissary funds in certain large counties; the sponsor and the Sheriff’s Association said it would restore parity with other counties while keeping spending subject to audit and inmate-benefit limits. Both bills were laid out and left pending after testimony, with no public witnesses opposing them at the hearing. The committee also heard SB 330, which would require voter approval before counties over a certain size reduce prosecutor funding, similar to an existing law for law enforcement budgets. Supporters argued prosecutors are essential to public safety and need stable funding, while an opponent from the Texas Civil Rights Project said the bill would restrict local budget flexibility and impose costly elections. SB 663 would remove district judges’ approval role for community supervision and corrections department budgets, replacing it with judge review after TDCJ-CJAD approval; probation officials said the change would reduce delays and confusion without reducing judicial oversight. SB 1020 would require more immediate sharing of ankle-monitor violation information and clarify that such records are not judicial work product; the Harris County DA’s office and Crime Stoppers supported it, citing inconsistent local practices and delays that can hinder prosecutions. The committee then took up SB 1164 on emergency detention and court-ordered mental health services. The bill, from the Texas Judicial Commission on Mental Health, would update emergency detention forms, clarify officer duties, allow filings in the county where a person is apprehended or located, and add a factor related to a person’s inability to recognize symptoms or appreciate treatment risks. Supporters included family members, law enforcement, and mental health and judicial witnesses who described cases where earlier intervention might have prevented tragedy; opponents warned the broader language could be misused and emphasized due process and the need for dangerousness to remain the standard. SB 2111 on indigent defense would expand access to counsel at first hearings, strengthen managed assigned counsel programs, create internships and fellowships, and adjust other defense-related procedures; the Texas Indigent Defense Commission and county defense program leaders supported it, while the committee substitute removed some provisions to reduce fiscal impact. Finally, SB 2383 would let recently retired DPS officers return to work in limited roles to help address staffing shortages, and SB 2797 would create reciprocal discovery requirements for criminal cases; prosecutors and some committee members said it would reduce trial surprise and improve truth-seeking, while others questioned whether the bill fully matched the state’s disclosure obligations and whether it could burden defense rights. Several bills were left pending after testimony, and the committee established a quorum later in the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Courts are not acting on these orders, or not issuing orders, and then people's guardianship letters
• Now, granted, there has to be an order of the court. In order to do that.
• I think I'll be asking the court for an order.
• It's not just parents that are in these double binds where they're ordered to attend therapy in order
• Does the court order require you to waive?

Bills: HB557, HB732, HB1892, HB1954, HB2301, HB3180, HB3405, HB3650, HB3758, HB4035, HB4621, HB4795, HB4870, HB5069, HB5137, HB5149

Keywords: child support, arrears, court enforcement, contempt, legal protections, healthcare, insurance, cost reduction, accessibility, regulations, impotency, marriage annulment, Family Code, Texas law, family law, Texas legislation, dissolution of marriage, annulment, marriage, child custody

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNQv-btk0j8, 2026-06-21T07:17:16+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Call to Order and Roll Call- 00:00:01 Approve Minutes from February 09, 2026- 00:01:33 Staff Report on Evaluating Kentucky’s Ability To Monitor Unused And Underutilized Properties- 00:02:05 Kentucky Finance and Administration Cabinet Response to Staff Report-00:20:03 Historical Review of HVAC Installation at Radcliff Veterans’ Centers-00:36:21 Organ Donor Marks on Drivers’ Licenses-00:47:32 Adjornment-01:13:43, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: 00:00 - Call to Order/Roll Call 01:45 - Discussion of 26RS SB 173 15:44 - Roll Call Vote on 26RS SB 173 17:23 - Review of Referred Admin Regs 17:53 - Discussion of 26RS SB 18 19:05 - Roll Call Vote on 26RS SB 18 20:06 - Discussion of 26RS HB 583 42:06 - Roll Call Vote on 26RS HB 583 43:16 - Discussion of 26RS HCR 103 45:56 - Roll Call Vote on 26RS HCR 103 47:14 - Discussion of 26RS HCR 113 54:06 - Roll Call Vote on 26RS HCR 113 55:20 - Adjournment, 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• . >> Does it matter which order? >> We'll do the A4 and the A5. >> Your preference, Mr.
• Do you Does it matter which order?
• order? We'll do the A4 and the A5. order? We'll do the A4 and the A5.
• finding pathways in order to uh in<01:23:16.800> order<01:23:16.960> to<01:23:17.199>
• So everything um in order to do that.

Bills: HF3676, HF3593, HF3785, HF3774, HF4111, HF3513

Keywords: Safe at Home, address confidentiality, domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, harassment, victim privacy, survivor protection, confidential address, protected address, secret address, identity protection, residential confidentiality, program participant, nondiscrimination, court disclosure, protective order, service of process, driver's license, state ID

Transcript Highlights:

• Then, two years later, it passes, and for whatever reason, there's a big change order.
• It's a temporary service until you actually get a whole wastewater treatment plant kind of in place.
• Projects that are in our jails that need to be done in order to stay in compliance with the state requirements
• Then the fifth one is to comply with a federal court order.
• And I would not want to have to go to the extent that the bill requires in order to issue certificates

Bills: SB512, SB1024

Keywords: SB 512, Texas Finance Code, money transmission, money services business, money transmitter, money transmission licensee, terms of service, consumer protection, civil penalty, attorney general enforcement, account closure, refund of balance, financial services regulation, payments industry, fintech, prepaid accounts, remittance, licensee compliance, local government debt, municipal finance

Transcript Highlights:

• 2 The committee, subcommittee on on family and fiduciary relationship, we'll come to order.
• The judge actually doesn't order the child to participate. it unless it is qualified.
• So typically, if there's not an order of charge... support.
• So would it change, modify the order?
• The court would have to issue an order that changed the... initial order to the kinship person?

Bills: SB387, SB1335, HB1671, SB1760, SB1839, SB1923, HB1928, HB4942, HB5628, HB5642, HB1980

Keywords: judicial bond, guardianship, probate law, county judge, statutory county court, estates, inheritance, representative duties, court authority, personal representative, retroactive child support, parentage, genetic testing, family code, child's conception, incapacitated persons, court proceedings, guardianship fees, estate management, probate

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9PR13uXFbk, 2026-06-21T07:17:10+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Call to Order 00:00 Roll Call 00:30 HB 566 Discussion 01:34 566 Vote 07:32 HB 437 Discussion 13:01 437 Vote 19:06 HB 39 Discussion 21:25 39 Vote 31:56 HB 46 Discussion 33:15 46 Vote 34:20 HB 72 Discussion 35:08 Vote 72 Vote 42L58 HB 306 08:47 306 Vote 12:02 HB 79 Discussion 46:20 79 Vote 49:44, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2DIkMoZqX4, 2026-06-21T07:17:06+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 Call to Order/Roll Call 00:50 Discussion of 24RS SB 74 05:03 Roll Call Vote on 24RS SB 74 06:10 Discussion of 24RS SB 145 08:31 Roll Call Vote on 24RS SB 145 09:15 Discussion of 24RS HJR 116 12:25 Roll Call Vote on 24RS HJR 116 13:10 Discussion of 24RS HCR 117 16:00 Roll Call Vote on 24RS HCR 117 16:35 Adjournment, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTKJCijFENM, 2026-06-21T07:17:06+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 - Call to Order/Roll Call 01:22 - Discussion of 24RS SB 151 06:15 - Roll Call Vote on 24RS SB 151 07:12 - Discussion of 24RS HB 271 18:56 - Roll Call Vote on 24RS HB 271 19:40 - Discussion of 24RS HB 476 23:14 - Roll Call Vote on 24RS HB 476 24:13 - Discussion of 24RS HB 491 36:05 - Roll Call Vote on 24RS HB 491 36:50 - Adjournment, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYAR3Jx_ZIo, 2026-06-21T07:17:06+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00:10 Call to Order/Roll Call 00:01:18 Consideration of Referred Administrative Regulations 00:01:35 Discussion of 24RS HB 105 00:14:47 Roll Call Vote on 24RS HB 105 00:15:46 Discussion of 24RS HB 462 00:23:19 Roll Call Vote on 24RS HB 462 00:24:49 Discussion of 24RS HB 367 01:14:06 Roll Call Vote on 24RS HB 367 01:16:00 Adjournment, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGqzXTV0ncA, 2026-06-21T07:17:04+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Call to Order - 00:00:03 Roll Call - 00:00:05 Approval of previous minutes - 00:01:08 Acknowledgment of New Committee Membership and Co-chairs - 00:01:37 Noting that LOIC staff sent 12 finding sheets w/ recs to the cabinet and DJJ for feedback - 00:02:06 Introduction of the new Graduate Fellow - 00:02:42 Update from The Kentucky Department of Juvenile Justice - 00:03:08 Adjournment - 01:54:50, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Transcript Highlights:

• And yet in California law, it still can be the case where temporary restraining orders are denied simply
• They know that their partner has weapons, and yet a judge denied the temporary restraining order even
• I think that for the next party, temporary restraining order, I think this is appropriate.
• restraining orders, also known as WVROs.
• AB 2179 would make workplace violence restraining order procedures match other civil restraining order

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It treats a protective order just like a temporary restraining order.
• temporary restraining order.
• a temporary a protective order just like a temporary restraining<00:36:19.440> order.
• > already temporary restraining order already temporary restraining order already carry<00:36:
• like the temporary restraining order. like the temporary restraining order.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 963, which would make crimes against elders age 60 and over strict liability offenses by removing the requirement that the perpetrator knew or should have known the victim’s age. The Office of the Public Defender opposed the bill, arguing that removing the state-of-mind element would create unfair and subjective results and suggesting sentencing enhancements or broader vulnerability-based language instead. Supporters, including Sandy Wong and another testifier with elder-abuse experience, said the current knowledge requirement creates a loophole that lets offenders avoid the elder enhancement even when they target vulnerable older adults. No vote was taken on the measure in the portion provided. The committee also heard HB 384, which increases penalties for promoting minor-produced sexual images, extends probation terms for felony obscenity offenses, tolls the statute of limitations during a victim’s minority, and requires sex offender registration for certain felony obscenity offenses involving minors. The Public Defender opposed the bill as overly broad and warned of absurd results, while the Department of the Prosecuting Attorney supported it, saying the bill addresses sextortion and other exploitation cases where adults solicit images from minors and that the 3-year age-gap threshold preserves ordinary teen relationships. Committee members questioned whether the bill was aimed at adults only and whether the age-gap carveout was narrow enough; the prosecutor said it was intended to cover adult predators and not consensual peer conduct. No final action was reported. HB 1100, which renames the Neighbor Islands Blind and Visually Impaired Service Pilot Program to use “low vision” instead of “visually impaired,” was supported by the Department of Human Services and disability advocates, who said the current term is derogatory and that the change responds to the blind community. The department said it was beginning work on administrative rules and expected to seek an appropriation, with implementation hoped for in 2026. The committee then heard HB 1283, exempting paternity proceedings from mediation when domestic abuse is alleged; the Hawaii State Coalition Against Domestic Violence and others supported it as consistent with divorce law and important for survivor safety. HB 689, creating safe harbor protections for survivors of sexual exploitation who seek medical or law enforcement help, drew support from HPD, Emua Alliance, the Judiciary, and others, who said it would prevent traffickers from using prostitution charges to silence victims. Finally, HB 383, reinstating mandatory minimum jail terms for successive violations of protective orders and removing the court’s ability to suspend those minimums, drew opposition from the Public Defender, who said some repeat violations stem from mental health or substance use issues, and support from the Prosecuting Attorney, who argued the bill treats protective orders like temporary restraining orders and preserves judicial discretion within a misdemeanor framework.

Transcript Highlights:

• It should apply to temporary restraining orders and to vacatur through the Administrative Procedure Act
• Here's the latest trend in relief, is for district courts to enter temporary restraining orders.
• The legislation I propose does that. bit more on your views here, what are temporary restraining orders
• the judges the district courts from pellet review temporary restraining orders You mentioned this mr
• restraining order.

Keywords: universal injunctions, legislative reforms, judicial authority, executive power, balance of power, judicial overreach

Summary: During this meeting, the committee focused on the implications of universal injunctions, which have become a significant concern in recent years. The discussion centered around various legislative proposals aimed at addressing the perceived overreach of district judges who issue nationwide injunctions that affect policies across the entire country. Several members expressed the belief that such injunctions undermine judicial authority and disrupt the balance of power between the judiciary and executive branches. Expert witnesses testified about the historical context of universal injunctions and the necessity for reforms that would limit the power of courts to grant remedies benefitting non-parties.

Transcript Highlights:

• Without objection, that'll be the order.
• There are plenty of mail-order services available.
• They can't be the PBM and the mail-order pharmacy.
• Yeah, I mean, the mail-order part affects their mail-order businesses, and that's the whole vertical
• Temporary staffing, as they say, does some training.

Bills: HB3552, HB2984, HB4124, HB3934, HB3448, HB3131, HB4200, HB4201, HB3011, HB1912, HB3380, HB3881, HB3538, HB3851, HB3907, HB4430, HB4431, HB4457

Keywords: childcare, differential pricing, Department of Human Services, child care subsidy, licensed providers, emergency legislation, child care, subsidy program, annual report, program integrity, overpayments, ivermectin, over-the-counter medication, pharmacy immunity, healthcare access, FDA approval, prescription, public health, dentistry, licensing

Transcript Highlights:

• Committee on Transportation will come to order the K Calder roll.
• The commissioner court files an order to close, abandon, or vacating the road with the deed of records
• Additionally, this House bill could unintentionally impact even temporary street closures for construction
• And I would note that it does not include temporary road closures, um, as the previous witness was concerned
• It is now 2025, a year when the majority of Texans are very comfortable ordering and shopping online

Bills: HB 341, HB 469, HB 971, HB 1624, HB 2721, HB 2959, HB 3365, HB 3731, HB 3793, HB 3861, HB 3946, HB 3966, HB 4348, HB 4401, HB 4402, HB 4924, HB 4966, HB 5563

Keywords: affordable housing, zoning, development, community support, local regulations, bicycle lanes, traffic collisions, Texas Department of Transportation, study, public safety, bicycles, electric bicycles, scooters, road safety, transportation study, commercial vehicle, safety standards, enforcement, Texas counties, transportation