Video & Transcript Research : 'foreign language'

Page 16 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Health and Human Services Apr 30th, 2025

Health & Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill, however, focuses on speech-language pathologists and audiologists, while Senate Bill 904,
  • Senate Bill 905 would streamline regulations for speech-language pathologists and audiologists, generally
  • I do have some recommendations for some changes for the language under the current bill.
  • If I can for some changes for the language under the current bill, if I can lay those out.
  • The engagement model in this particular bill, the language is limited to legal cases.
Summary: The committee met with a quorum and announced it would vote on pending bills at 10:30, with public testimony limited to two minutes. It first took up Senate Bill 905, a TDLR cleanup bill on licensing regulation of speech-language pathologists and audiologists. Senator Zafferini said the committee substitute would streamline advisory board consultation, remove obsolete provisional licenses, and allow any licensed physician to authorize hearing instruments for minors; the substitute was adopted and the bill left pending. The committee then heard House Bill 451, which would require universal screening for commercial sexual exploitation risk for children in DFPS conservatorship and youth under TJJD jurisdiction. The author and witnesses from Children at Risk, the Fort Bend Anti-Trafficking Collective, and Texas CASA supported the bill as a prevention tool with existing infrastructure and training; the committee adopted the substitute and left the bill pending. The committee next considered Senate Bill 466, which would clarify that families may request a fetal death certificate at any gestational age, while keeping existing filing requirements for physicians. A constituent father testified about losing his 11-week-old daughter and being told he could not obtain a certificate, which he said prevented funeral arrangements; the substitute was adopted and the bill left pending. Senate Bill 2311 followed, requiring residential treatment centers to have a written agreement with the school that will educate resident children before becoming operational. The author cited a local dispute where an RTC and school district lacked communication, and witnesses from Texas CASA and Disability Rights Texas supported clearer educational planning while suggesting the Education Code may need conforming changes; the bill was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 2826, known as Alyssa’s Law, which would create a statewide education program on medical child abuse for medical students, health care professionals, and CPS caseworkers. The author and Sheriff Bill Weyburn described Alyssa’s case as involving repeated unnecessary surgeries and argued the bill would improve awareness and early identification, while several witnesses and members raised concerns about false accusations, impacts on medically fragile children, and the need for scientific, peer-reviewed training and safeguards. After extensive discussion, the chair left the bill pending. The committee also heard House Bill 136, which would add certified lactation consultants as Medicaid providers to expand breastfeeding support; witnesses from lactation and nutrition fields said the bill would improve access, maternal and infant health, and long-term savings, and the bill was left pending. Finally, the committee took up Senate Bill 2805, a surprise-billing/arbitration measure that would clarify provider identifiers and shift arbitration costs to the losing party. The author said the substitute was a legislative counsel draft with no substantive difference, and witnesses from the Texas Medical Association, Texas Society of Anesthesiologists, and U.S. Anesthesia Partners supported the bill as a modest improvement that would reduce administrative confusion and make arbitration fairer without weakening patient protections. Members discussed how arbitration costs affect settlement behavior and how to define the “winner” in close cases. The bill was heard but not voted out during this segment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Mar 10th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 1579 by Blanco relating to the appointment of a receiver. foreign sale or acquisition of
  • Senate Bill 1585 by Hughes relating to a prohibition on governmental contract with companies of foreign
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 13th, 2026 at 09:37 am

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • SB 151 also taxes foreign subsidiary income without providing a foreign tax credit, creating a real risk
  • foreign jurisdiction.
  • If the foreign income was not adequately taxed in the foreign country, the federal government imposes
  • If the foreign income was adequately taxed in the foreign country, the federal government allows a foreign
  • was appropriately taxed in the foreign jurisdiction.
Bills: SB151, HB8, SB177
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Business and Commerce May 8th, 2025

Business & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • The substitute adds clarifying language that the limit for the mid-term review of regulatory agencies
  • While we waited for the House companion to come over, we worked to ensure the language in the bill was
  • confidentiality protections that we apply to terrorism-related data also apply to hostile actions by foreign
  • For foreign adversaries, whether it's information used to prevent, detect, respond to, or investigate
  • Safeguarding Texans and our nation from foreign threats updates the government code, tightening the language
Summary: The meeting was a thorough exploration of multiple bills, most notably focused on innovative energy solutions and public safety enhancements. Key discussions centered around HB14, which aims to bolster the state's nuclear energy capabilities through the establishment of a Texas Advanced Nuclear Energy Office. Senators and expert witnesses discussed the potential of nuclear power as a clean energy source and a strategic necessity for Texas's growth. There was strong support for the bill, with various stakeholders highlighting its importance for the future energy landscape. Additionally, other bills like HB132 addressed the need for enhanced confidentiality protections regarding sensitive information, while HB1584 sought improvements in power restoration procedures during emergencies. Overall, the committee engaged with multiple viewpoints, balancing innovation with safety and ethical considerations.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The substitute adds clarifying language that the limited midterm review of regulatory agencies is added
  • While we waited for the House companion to come over, we worked to ensure the language in the bill was
  • Safeguarding Texans and our nation from foreign threats updates the Government Code, tightening the language
  • And, for agreeing with Senator Menendez, who's not here, we've provided some language about creating
  • And, for agreeing with Senator Menendez, who's not here, we've provided some language about creating
Summary: The committee first took up pending business and quickly reported several measures favorably, including HB 12, SB 1361, SB 1705, SB 1749, SB 1897, SB 2344, SB 2566, HB 3809, and HB 4215, with most sent to the Local and Uncontested Calendar. HB 12’s substitute clarified a limited midterm review of regulatory agencies tied to Sunset Commission recommendations. SB 2696’s substitute changed med spa regulation from a license to a certificate, with training instead of an exam, plus background checks, continuing education, and two-year renewals. HB 3809 dealt with battery energy storage decommissioning and recycling, and HB 4215 was reported without a substitute. SB 1978, concerning interconnection of electric facilities in ERCOT and federal jurisdiction concerns, was reported out on a 5-3 vote after debate, but then the chair later announced the bill was withdrawn and left pending subject to the call of the chair. HB 1899 was also reported favorably, with one nay. A major portion of the meeting focused on HB 14, the advanced nuclear energy bill. Senator Schwertner described it as creating a Texas Advanced Nuclear Energy Office, a nuclear permitting coordinator, a development fund, a completion grant program, and a workforce development program. Testimony was sharply divided. Supporters, including representatives from Fermi America, Dow/X-energy, CPS Energy, Paragon Energy Solutions, Bridge to Nuclear, Aalo Atomics, and the Texas Association of Business, argued that Texas should lead in advanced nuclear, citing future baseload demand, data centers, industrial power needs, supply-chain development, and long-term energy diversification. Opponents, including Public Citizen, Texas Nuclear Watchdogs, Sierra Club, and individual citizens, argued the bill would subsidize unproven, expensive technology, create grants rather than loans, and expose taxpayers to major risk while doing little to meet near-term energy needs. Several members questioned whether the state should fund projects that may not produce grid power for years, and whether the bill’s grant structure and new office were justified. The committee also heard HB 5061, which Senator Schwertner said would prohibit unethical surveillance and misuse of confidential information by state contractors, create a confidential reporting system through the State Auditor’s Office, authorize Texas Rangers investigations, protect whistleblowers, and impose penalties including contract termination, fines, and contracting bans. No public testimony was offered, and the bill was left pending. HB 132, sponsored by Senator Hughes, would extend confidentiality protections for sensitive information to hostile acts by foreign adversaries; it was also left pending after no testimony. HB 1584 was then laid out, with Senator Schwertner explaining it would require utilities to maintain and update priority restoration lists for critical facilities after Hurricane Beryl exposed communication failures, but the transcript cuts off before any action on that bill.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We want to avoid using vague language that would potentially jeopardize academic freedom.
  • My concern about this bill is that the language is vague, and vague language is dangerous.
  • You took language that clearly said non-legally binding language; it said it in the International Holocaust
  • But what I'm concerned about is the vague language of this bill.
  • The vague language has already been discussed. I don't think I need to go over that again.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • And so by striking that language. that makes these private institutions eligible to participate.
  • I'm trying to understand why the language is... You do want an answer though, correct?
  • So, you're saying it's implicit in the language where they're supposed to adopt the policy, that they
  • The language in here that was pointed out, I believe, by...
  • This language is vague. It's not clear what would amount to public opinion. support.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We wanted to ensure that this was retained, and I think we've got language now, at least in the substitute
  • transportation of fuels by imposing a tax on what would otherwise be tax-free to be exported to a foreign
  • Carve out some kind of language that would allow legitimate trade to continue.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Criminal street gangs and foreign organizations fail to abide by the rule of law and consistently change
  • Identification as a member of a criminal street gang (CSG) or foreign terrorist organization (FTO) by
  • It's not uncommon for criminal street gangs and foreign terrorist organizations to claim what is deemed
  • These transnational groups as foreign terrorist organizations.
  • We're concerned that this language is vague and gives law enforcement too much discretion that could
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Border Security (Part II) Apr 10th, 2025

Border Security

Transcript Highlights:
  • Secondly, SB 2201 removes conflicting language from Chapter 67 regarding the suspension of validation
  • organizations, when an individual is asked directly, “Are you a member of a criminal street gang, foreign
  • the portion that says “or is located at a previously documented area of a criminal street gang or foreign
  • Or it’s not uncommon for criminal street gangs, foreign terrorist organizations, to claim what is deemed
  • no criteria for how self-admission may be implied or demonstrated, and we’re concerned that this language
Summary: The Senate Committee on Border Security heard several bills related to border security, law enforcement databases, DPS aviation maintenance, and transportation motor fuels. SB 2199, after brief invited testimony from the Texas Trucking Association and DPS, was left pending at first and later reported favorably to the full Senate on a 4-1 vote. SB 2332, relating to aircraft owned and operated by the Department of Public Safety, was laid out by Senator Parker, with DPS and TechSOT witnesses explaining that it would centralize DPS aircraft maintenance under DPS, align state law with FAA responsibility rules, and potentially reduce costs and downtime; it was later reported favorably on a 5-0 vote and placed on the local and uncontested calendar. SB 2949, relating to the regulation of transportation motor fuels, was also adopted as a committee substitute and reported favorably on a 4-1 vote, with a member noting continued interest in refining port-of-entry transloading issues. The committee spent the most time on SB 2201, which would revise Texas intelligence database criteria for criminal street gangs and foreign terrorist organizations. Senator Birdwell described the bill as adding safeguards such as requiring officer identification on submissions, setting retention and validation rules, and updating criteria to reflect technology and social media use. Invited witnesses from the district attorney’s office, DPS, and the Texas Anti-Gang Center generally supported the bill and said it would improve reliability and accountability. Public testimony included support from the Texas Public Policy Foundation and opposition from the Texas Civil Rights Project and the ACLU of Texas, which argued the bill’s language on implied or demonstrated self-admission and other criteria was vague, overly broad, and could lead to erroneous inclusion in the database and downstream consequences. After debate, SB 2201 was reported favorably to the full Senate on a 4-1 vote, with Senator Eckhardt voting no. During questioning on SB 2201, members discussed how gang-database entries are used in investigations and prosecutions, the meaning of “family member,” the scope of self-admission, and how “previously documented areas” would be identified in practice. Opponents raised concerns about due process, First and Fourth Amendment issues, racial profiling, and possible federal consequences if state database information is shared. Supporters emphasized that the database is a law-enforcement tool for identifying organized criminal activity and that the committee substitute adds training, audits, and accountability measures. The committee then completed its business and recessed subject to the call of the chair.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We will update the current bill language to ensure that it aligns with the legislative counsel draft.
  • That language has been in the tax code for many, many years.
  • This is a subject that Texas must be clear on as the global landscape shifts and foreign powers look
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session 04-07-2026 11:30am

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Durant earned her Bachelor of Arts in Sociology and Spanish Language and Literature from Brandeis University
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill, however, focuses on speech-language pathologists and audiologists.
  • Senate Bill 905 streamlines regulations for speech-language pathologists and audiologists, generally
  • by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, the Texas Association, the American Speech-Language
  • I do have some recommendations for some changes for the language under the current bill.
  • The language is limited to legal cases.