Video & Transcript Research : 'Legacy Amendment'

Page 16 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Mar 18th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Constitutional amendment and bill.
  • , the amendment...
  • Several amendments to that original provision.
  • The 10th Amendment is clear.
  • The ability to have that amended.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Aug 26th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I do have a floor amendment.
  • I will withdraw those two amendments and support your amendment to that.
  • The following amendment, Secretary will read the amendment.
  • I move adoption. the adoption of the amendment? Hearing none, the amendment is adopted.
  • There is an amendment. The following amendment. Secretary, read the amendment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Aug 19th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • sex increases risks of violence and liability under the Prison Rape Elimination Act and the Eighth Amendment
  • I'm sick to my stomach to know that that the author refused amendments from violence shelters.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part I) Apr 28th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • The city of McAllen recently had a charter amendment that cost over $180,000.
  • Criminal immunity through a charter amendment.
  • And the result was the charter amendment passed by how much? 4555, 45.
  • So obviously this charter amendment was for pretty limited circumstances.
  • This amendment doesn't provide damages.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Natural Resources May 27th, 2026

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chairman and members, yes, it's just a technical amendment.
  • Yeah, it's just a technical amendment.
  • I make the motion to amend to approve Amendment 4490. Is there any objection?
  • McLeod, Amendment 4424?
  • And that's what the amendment does. Do I have any objections for me amending with 4424?
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/25/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Then we have to move the amendment, and then we’ll move the oral amendment on top of the existing amendment
  • Then we have to move the amendment, and then we’ll move the oral amendment on top of the existing amendment
  • It doesn’t matter either way whether there’s an amendment to your amendment.
  • We throw them amendments after amendments, corrections to amendments.
  • At least 15 different amendments. Weeks. At least 15 different amendments.
Summary: The committee first heard a lengthy presentation and discussion focused on Arizona State University’s foreign research ties, especially collaborations and funding connected to China and Chinese military-affiliated institutions. The presenter argued that ASU and the Arizona Board of Regents had not been transparent about foreign gifts, contracts, and research partnerships, citing federal reporting forms, the Wolf Amendment, export-control concerns, and alleged links to dual-use technologies such as quantum systems, AI, robotics, microelectronics, and biosecurity. A witness from American Global Strategies testified in support, saying the bill would help protect U.S. research security and national security by imposing state-level guardrails on sensitive collaborations. After questions, the committee considered a strike-everything amendment to SB 1060 that would bar public universities from entering into or continuing certain loans, gifts, contracts, research partnerships, or sponsored projects involving the PRC, the CCP, and listed Chinese military-linked universities, require ABOR review and approval, and impose reporting and budget penalties. The amendment was withdrawn, and the committee instead took up SB 1327, which directs ABOR to require university research security policies and to report annually on those policies and on foreign contributions over $250,000; SB 1327 received a 4-2 do-pass recommendation, with Del Santos, Hernandez, and Márquez voting no and Kolodin, Powell, Keshel, and Gillette voting yes. The committee then heard SB 1803, a veterans bill regulating unrecognized persons who assist with VA disability claims. The sponsor and industry witnesses said the bill would protect veterans from bad actors by requiring disclosures, capping fees, banning certain practices, and filing service agreements with the Attorney General, while opponents argued it could restrict consumer choice, resemble a price ceiling, and still allow non-attorneys to engage in the unauthorized practice of law. After extensive debate over contingent fees, legal ethics, and whether the bill was too favorable to one company, the committee continued the hearing with additional testimony and questions.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Commerce and Small Business Committee Feb 18th, 2026

Commerce and Small Business

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, this is an amendment that was just submitted to me, but it's a friendly amendment. >> I'm giving
  • The bill applies only to new or amended requirements, not to existing ones.
  • The bill applies only to new or amended requirements, not to existing ones.
  • So, that's the amendment that you have before you. >> Chairman, the amendment replaces lines 82 and 83
  • All in favor of this amendment say I. >> All post amendment is adopted. >> All post amendment is adopted
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • ominous designation as a potential future reservoir site, well, that's not where I'm going to build my legacy
  • Explore every option they have available before it takes legacy property.
  • And so I think we just have to be very careful and sensitive with the amendments that we make to our
  • And so I think we just have to be very careful and sensitive with the amendments that we make to our
Summary: The Committee on Natural Resources heard House Bill 2109, which would remove certain long-proposed reservoir projects from the state water plan after 50 years without progress. Chairman Van Deaver and many landowners, local officials, timber interests, and conservation advocates testified in support, arguing that the Marvin Nichols Reservoir has burdened Northeast Texas landowners for decades with the threat of eminent domain, depressed property values, and uncertainty over homes, farms, ranches, schools, churches, and cemeteries. Supporters also said the project would flood tens of thousands of acres, require extensive mitigation, harm timber and agriculture, and that Texas now has better alternatives such as conservation, reuse, aquifer storage and recovery, and desalination. Several members expressed sympathy for the affected families and questioned whether a project could remain in the plan indefinitely without progress. Opposition came from North Texas water interests, including the North Texas Commission, Tarrant Regional Water District, and the Texas Water Association, who argued that the bill would interfere with the state’s long-term water planning process and remove needed future supply options for a fast-growing region. They said Region C faces major projected shortages by 2070, that conservation and reuse have already delayed the need for new supplies, and that reservoirs remain one tool in the state’s water-planning toolbox. TWDB staff explained the existing inter-regional conflict process and noted that the substitute would affect several unique reservoir sites, not just Marvin Nichols. After testimony, Chairman Van Deaver closed by urging passage of the bill, but the committee withdrew the substitute and left HB 2109 pending. The committee then took up House Bill 5188, a brackish groundwater bill. The author said the bill would reduce permitting burdens for wells in designated brackish groundwater production zones, and the committee substitute added requirements on monitoring, groundwater-rights ownership, and allocation of pumpage limits while removing some exclusions and export-fee provisions. Texas Wildlife Association testified against the bill, warning that the exemptions could weaken groundwater conservation districts’ ability to protect freshwater resources and surface-owner rights. San Antonio Water System testified in favor, saying brackish groundwater is a key future supply and that the substitute would help speed development of desalination and brackish projects. The Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts testified neutrally but raised concerns about reduced district oversight, especially around injection-well exclusions and the loss of export fees, and said discussions on the bill were ongoing.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • ominous designation as a potential future reservoir site, that's not where I'm going to build my legacy
  • Before it takes legacy property, I think Dallas has put the region through enough.
  • And so I think we just have to be very careful and sensitive with the amendment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Apr 23rd, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • While the county is going through the process of amending the desired future conditions, the DFC, for
  • on behalf of SE Legacy testifying for the bill, is that correct? That's correct. Please proceed.
  • So House Bill 3525 seeks to amend the Enabling Act for North Texas Groundwater Conservation District.
  • the use of groundwater. for those purposes, nor does it automatically deny any permits or permit amendments
  • It's not it's not specifically defined in in this amendment.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Energy Resources Apr 14th, 2025

Energy Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • You bring some of that forward as maybe an amendment, potentially.
  • House Bill 5103, as you said, just amends Section 75 of the Texas Property Code, and it's woefully overdue
  • Why do we need to amend Section 72 if it's settled law?" Well, it...
  • And this also really isn't a very good argument because Section 75 has been amended from time to time
  • Now hold on, because you said... right, which we know the lease can amend how you pay and what says because
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate County and Municipal Government Committee Apr 2nd, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Is there a second to adopt the amendment? So moved. Is there any discussion on the amendment?
  • Okay, the first Hatcher amendment is adopted. Here there... The amendment is adopted.
  • Any objection using the previous roll on the amendment? Okay, we've adopted the second amendment.
  • Any questions on the bill as amended? Yes, Al.
  • Senator, would you be willing to accept a friendly amendment because... ...a friendly amendment because
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Ways & Means Mar 31st, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • It amends Tax Code Section 151.462B, repealing the requirement to include UPC in the RTP.
  • HB 2481 proposes to amend the existing sales tax holiday in Texas by increasing the price threshold for
  • This is an overwhelmingly approved proposition to amend the state constitution to enable this property
  • HB 3684 seeks to amend Sections 170 and 171.1011 of the Texas Tax Code to exclude certain securities
  • comptroller be... ...directed to amend the tax rate calculation worksheet form 80-56.