Video & Transcript Research : 'school lunch program'

Page 153 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Health Finance and Policy Committee 3/23/26

Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So program or another community program.
  • Um, I think it's modeling the school-linked mental health grants program and sort of aligning for that
  • school bas school linked uh mental health<00:33:19.039> grants<00:33:19.760> program<00
  • He said the University of Minnesota is one of the few schools in the country that has a four-year program
  • He said the University of Minnesota is one of the few schools in the country that has a four-year program
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Ways and Means Education Committee Feb 18th, 2026

Ways and Means Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • 04:13.680> Finance Alabama Charter School Finance Alabama Charter School Finance Authority,<00
  • I think we understand the the program. I think we understand the the program.
  • The program would be that every program.
  • from the School of Healthcare Sciences. from the School of Healthcare Sciences.
  • any health programs in their high schools, and this would be accelerated from any other health program
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Cap Committee Meeting - 2025-04-24

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • Northern Lights is a collaborative, and we serve 12 school districts.
  • Among our most critical programs is the Northern Lights Academy, which is a setting for school and serves
  • This gap puts a huge strain on families and schools. Parents feel helpless.
  • The school board that runs them consists of the superintendents of all the school districts, and as money
  • We created the Magnus Veterans Foundation using this proven program.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 4/24/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, among our most critical programs is the Northern Lights Academy, which is a setting for school, and
  • It doesn't belong to a school district. It works for all the other school districts.
  • The school board that runs them are the superintendent of all the school districts.
  • The school board that runs them are the superintendent of all the school districts.
  • The school board that runs them are the superintendent of all the school districts.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • opportunity to present Senate Bill 2776, which supports the expansion of the credible. messengers program
  • The Credible Messengers program is a promising initiative that invites these individuals who've successfully
  • That legal barrier is preventing the program from reaching its full potential. potential.
  • guess, Senator Hall, in your presentation you talk about an issue dealing with Rockwell Independent School
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Capital Investment Committee 3/27/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • and establishing new programs.
  • He's not skipping school today.
  • He's not skipping school today.
  • School buses can get stuck.
  • <00:51:14.079> School Emergency vehicles get stuck. School Emergency vehicles get stuck.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • go through months, if not years, of talk therapy before they actually get placed on this hormone program
  • of trade-off where the only way that they will keep a roof over their head or be allowed to go to school
  • And this is not different for young folks who tell me what their experience is in high school.
  • Some of you may have heard from Amy, Emily Schmidt, who's talked about her experience in schools and
  • In high school, my Uncle Louie came back from Vietnam and killed himself.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Mar 26th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Historically designated by the Texas Historical Commission Preservation Program, there are 2,300 sites
  • Would it be taking three years in college or, you know, high school language courses?
  • As expressed, there is the Office of Court Administration's free TCRIS program, it's the Texas Court
  • Remote Interpreter Service program that judges can schedule ahead of time for 30 minutes or less for
  • I think we could expand that program, and I'm sure in every other place, but they keep track of how many
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Mar 24th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • This program is in addition to... to the Pediatric Teleconnectivity Resource Program for rural Texas
  • of those four grant programs from the information required for all the grant programs.
  • No first days of school.
  • There isn't funding for these programs.
  • And cessation education in schools.
ND

North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session

Budget Section Leadership Division Jun 24th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • in 2023, and there was a $2.5 million transfer from SIF for that program.
  • from SIF for that program.
  • Another area that has been discussed is a free meal program.
  • The last item on here is just an update on the school construction loan program.
  • loan program.
Summary: The Budget Section Leadership Division met with a quorum and approved the March 18 minutes before hearing a series of informational updates. The Petroleum Council reported that North Dakota oil production is expected to remain relatively flat at just under 1.2 million barrels per day, with activity shifting northward in the Bakken as technology improves and three- and four-mile laterals boost well performance. The presentation also discussed oil and gas prices, gas taxation, flaring concerns, the importance of pipelines and other linear infrastructure, and enhanced oil recovery pilot projects supported by state and federal funding. Members asked questions about gas production taxes, natural gas liquids, and the outlook for drilling rigs and future production. The Office of State Tax Commissioner then reviewed the federal “big beautiful bill” and its estimated effect on North Dakota individual and business income tax collections. Staff explained that most of the individual income tax impact comes from the permanent increase in the standard deduction, while temporary provisions such as senior deductions, tip and overtime exclusions, and auto loan interest deductions have smaller or limited-term effects. They also noted that business tax changes, especially depreciation and expensing provisions, create a larger near-term cash impact, and that some FY25 collections likely reflected one-time oil field transactions that may have inflated the baseline used in earlier estimates. OMB provided updates on major capital projects and facility funding. For Capitol grounds improvements, officials described plans for 18th-floor renovations, wayfinding upgrades, public seating, lighting, tree management, and possible restroom and lobby reconfiguration, while also noting the governor’s residence security project and the discovery of human remains on the Capitol grounds. OMB and its consultants also reported on the state facility maintenance fund, including window replacement, boiler work, roof and foundation repairs, and a new facility conditions assessment covering more state buildings. Updates were also given on the new state hospital in Jamestown, the Minot state office building, and the use of federal state fiscal recovery funds, including possible future reallocations to the Department of Corrections. Finally, Legislative Council staff summarized the interim compliance report on legislative intent and trust fund activity, highlighting the status of lines of credit, Bank of North Dakota profit transfers, the statewide litigation pool, the new Office of Guardianship and Conservatorship, corrections planning, HHS program updates, and a likely future general fund request for the unemployment insurance modernization project. No formal votes were taken beyond approval of the minutes; the meeting was primarily informational, with members asking clarifying questions throughout.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

06/12/2026 - Senate Floor Session

Arizona Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • School Safety Center and programs, the following report to committee recommends the bill be passed, signed
  • Okay, so this is a school safety program bill, and for that part, it makes changes to the school safety
  • program, including fingerprinting. ...changes to the school safety program, including fingerprinting
  • And yet, this bill says only school districts must do this, not charter schools, not private schools,
  • voucher program because people should not be spending school voucher money on lingerie or ski trips.
Keywords: 1182, all
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • at Do High Dover cosmetology program at Do High School.
  • It’s school scheduling. It’s the distance between the sending school and the CTE program.
  • <02:22:56.720> into<02:22:57.120> a program or high school program into a program or
  • high school program into a post-secary<02:22:58.160> program.
  • between a high school CT program and a between a high school CT program and a beauty<02:30:51.760
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The committee opened a hearing on Senate Bill 185, which would add timelines to Office of Professional Licensure and Certification (OPLC) investigations. Senator Howard Pearl said the bill was prompted by concerns from the New Hampshire Association of Realtors about delays at the Real Estate Commission, and he explained that the proposal would require OPLC staff to make an initial determination within 30 days and, if misconduct is found, complete an investigation within 60 days. He said the goal is to improve transparency and give consumers and licensees more timely information, while preserving the board’s adjudicatory role. He also noted that the bill had been amended to delay implementation to give OPLC time to work through its backlog. Committee members questioned how the bill would work when an investigation is incomplete and whether the board could send a case back to OPLC without a firm deadline. Pearl said the board would have discretion to continue the investigation or make a final determination, and that the bill was intended to streamline OPLC’s process rather than impose a hard cap on complex cases. OPLC Executive Director Deanna Durus and General Counsel Nicholas Fry then testified that the agency has already changed its procedures under prior legislation, including a facial review of complaints and monthly board review of dismissal memos. They said the bill would substantially alter the current structure, could conflict with existing limitation periods and board duties, and would be difficult to implement without additional staff and funding. Durus said the agency’s backlog is large, that new complaints are being triaged and prioritized, and that some urgent matters are moved ahead based on risk and statutory deadlines. She said OPLC had completed a review of about 500 backlog cases that would now be dismissed under current screening standards, and that those cases are being turned into memos for board review. Board of Medicine public member Nina Gardner testified in favor of the bill but said the backlog is significant and that the agency needs more resources to make the process work effectively. She said the board is seeing progress, but not fast enough, and suggested the bill may not go far enough without additional staffing and funding. No vote was taken during the hearing.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Ways and Means (02/12/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • like our school voucher program.
  • like our school voucher program.
  • like our school voucher program.
  • like our school voucher program.
  • like our school voucher program.
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The committee opened a public hearing on HB 402, a bill dealing with whether Education Freedom Account (EFA) payments should be described in state law as not constituting taxable income. The bill sponsor argued that the current statute is misleading because New Hampshire should not imply a federal tax result, and said the bill would remove that language and could also be amended to clarify that families should consult tax advisors. He emphasized that the measure was not intended to impose a state tax on EFAs, but to avoid giving inaccurate advice about possible federal tax liability. Testimony was divided. A retired representative and a tax preparer both opposed the bill, saying EFA payments are already treated consistently with IRS rules and that the bill would create confusion, administrative burden, and possible tax consequences for low- and moderate-income families. They argued the bill is a solution in search of a problem and warned that requiring 1099s could add costs for the scholarship organization and recipients. A tax attorney supported the bill’s repeal of the state language, saying New Hampshire should not put tax advice into statute and that the current wording is inaccurate because federal law, not state law, controls taxability. He cited IRS Section 117 and Publication 970, explaining that only some scholarship-like payments are tax-free and that many EFA-eligible expenses may not qualify for federal exemption. Members asked questions about what would be misleading, whether the bill was trying to tax EFAs, and the cost of issuing 1099s. The sponsor and witnesses repeatedly said the bill was not a state tax on voucher payments, but a clarification about federal tax treatment. No vote or final committee action was taken in the portion provided.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Transportation (01/13/2026)

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • ,<00:59:00.079> stopping a nice day, driving to lunch, stopping a nice day, driving to lunch
  • <00:59:12.720> You're stop for a lunch on the way. You're stop for a lunch on the way.
  • <03:09:25.439> If mandatory program. This is an opt-in. If mandatory program.
  • supports the program alto together. supports the program alto together.
  • licensed driver to school. licensed driver to school. >> Thank<04:24:15.840> you.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Sustainable Fashion Program at Cups. Sustainable Fashion Program at House.
  • Sustainable Fashion Program at California State University, Northridge.
  • We are trying to stand up the nation's most aggressive EPR program for textiles.
  • And then, Most aggressive EPR program for textiles. And we did that in good faith.
  • , school lunches.
Summary: The committee heard several environmental and consumer-safety bills. AB 405, the Fashion Act, would require fashion companies to disclose and manage toxic chemicals in their supply chains; supporters said it would reduce worker and consumer exposure and align with existing industry frameworks, while retailers and business groups argued it would duplicate existing laws and raise costs. After questions about DTSC workload, international standards, and affordability, the bill was moved on a due-pass-as-amended motion to Natural Resources and held on call with three votes. AB 762 would ban the sale and distribution of disposable vape devices; supporters emphasized battery-fire risks, recycling contamination, and waste impacts, while cannabis and convenience-store interests warned it would push consumers to illicit markets and harm legal businesses. The bill passed on a due-pass motion to Business and Professions with three votes and was held on call. The committee also adopted the consent calendar with six votes. AB 794 would direct California to keep in place the federal PFAS drinking-water standard if federal protections are weakened, with supporters citing health risks and the need for certainty, and water agencies opposing the emergency-rulemaking authority and potential costs. Members debated whether the bill was too broad and whether federal funds would cover implementation; the bill passed on a due-pass-as-amended motion to Appropriations with four votes and was held open. AB 1148, the Safer Food Packaging Act, would restrict certain chemicals in food packaging; supporters cited cancer and reproductive-health concerns, while chemical, beverage, and manufacturing groups argued the bill should go through existing regulatory processes and that some chemicals lacked feasible alternatives. The author said she would remove antimony trioxide later in the process after hearing opposition concerns; the bill passed on a due-pass motion to Judiciary with four votes and was held open. Finally, AB 1338 would allow local air districts to recover costs for implementing fence-line air monitoring at metal shredding facilities, building on prior legislation and local air district efforts in AB 617 communities. The author said the bill would preserve local control and improve efficiency, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District testified in support. The transcript ends as the district witness begins testimony, with no vote yet taken on AB 1338.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • My name is Kim Lewis, and this morning I'm speaking on behalf of school board members, school administrators
  • , and school business officials across Minnesota.
  • without sufficient cost the UI program without sufficient cost analysis<00:14:33.639> risks<00
  • itself furthermore as deed program itself furthermore as deed shared<00:14:37.920> earlier<00
  • hospitals grocery stores to our schools hospitals grocery stores nursing<00:30:22.799> homes<
Keywords: 1183, house
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Ways and Means (02/12/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • like our school voucher program.
  • like our school voucher program.
  • like our school voucher program.
  • like our school voucher program.
  • like our school voucher program.
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The committee held a public hearing on HB 402, a bill to repeal a provision in RSA 194-F:2 stating that Education Freedom Account (EFA) funds “shall not constitute taxable income” to the parent or student. The bill sponsor argued the current language is misleading because the state cannot determine federal tax liability, and said the bill would simply remove inaccurate tax advice from state law. He cited IRS guidance and prior federal legislation, including a Ted Cruz proposal, to suggest some EFA uses may be taxable under federal law, while others may not, and said the bill could be amended if needed to avoid confusion. Testimony was sharply divided. Py Campbell opposed the bill, arguing it would unfairly single out EFA students and could amount to a tax on education funds, including for self-employed families, and recommended it be voted inexpedient to legislate. Stephen Matthew French, a tax preparer, also opposed the bill, saying IRS Publication 970 already makes clear that scholarship-type payments used for tuition and related expenses are not taxable, and that the bill addresses a problem that does not exist. He warned that adding tax reporting requirements could create administrative costs for families and the program administrator. Bill Ardinger, a tax attorney, supported the repeal of the statutory language, saying the state should not place potentially incorrect tax advice into law. He explained that under federal tax law, only certain scholarship-like uses are exempt, while many EFA-eligible expenses may not be, especially for families using the program for homeschooling or other nontraditional expenses. He said the current statute could mislead families into thinking all EFA payments are tax-free and could expose the state to future legal problems. The hearing ended after questions from committee members; no vote or final action was taken in the transcript.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:25:09.919> Um of pool mur management programs. Um of pool mur management programs.
  • management programs are not insurers? management programs are not insurers?
  • > is<00:36:54.800> no management programs, there is no management programs, there is no
  • So, school care is not work on.
  • beneficial for the towns and schools beneficial for the towns and schools because<01:53:01.440><
Keywords: 1189, house, all
Summary: The subcommittee took up the pooled risk management program bill and reviewed a new amendment drafted with input from the Insurance Department and Legislative Services. Department witnesses explained that the proposal would move oversight of pooled risk management programs from the Secretary of State’s office to the Insurance Department, add a licensure requirement, preserve the programs’ non-insurer status, and exempt them from third-party administrator licensure. They also described a series of solvency tools in the draft, including financial reporting, risk-based capital standards, minimum capitalization, investment limits, commissioner examination and enforcement authority, rulemaking authority, merger and affiliate-transaction review, confidentiality protections, and a separability clause. A major theme of the discussion was that pooled risk management programs differ from commercial insurers because the risk remains with the member local governments rather than being backed by a state guarantee fund. Witnesses said the bill is designed to emphasize solvency over return of premium and to give the Insurance Department a regulatory “toolbox” to prevent insolvency, including a proposed $5 million excess or stop-loss coverage benchmark, optional accessible policies, and a requirement that boards vote on dividends or premium returns when capital exceeds 600% of risk-based capital. Members questioned how this approach differed from the original Secretary of State bill and whether assessments on towns would still be possible; the department responded that the new framework would allow more flexible oversight and alternatives to immediate court action. The committee also discussed why the statute should continue to say the programs are not insurers, with the department explaining that this preserves their autonomy and avoids applying unrelated insurance laws and premium taxes. Members asked about the department’s workload and were told the department believed it could absorb the new duties without additional funding. No vote or final committee action was taken in the portion provided.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

04/28/2026 - Joint Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • The first thing that jumps to mind is the school safety program. Sounds like that would be gone.
  • safety grant program.
  • for the Promise Program.
  • safety program is cut.
  • would be the Arizona LEAP Program, the Community College Promise Program, the Arizona Promise Program
Summary: The joint appropriations committee met on April 28 to review the FY 2027 budget package, including the general appropriations feed bills (HB 4138 and SB 1831) and related budget reconciliation measures. Staff described the budget as including about $17.96 billion in general fund appropriations, a one-time transfer of state monies to increase revenues, a 5% lump-sum reduction to most agencies’ discretionary general fund budgets, and several one-time restorations or continuations for items such as school facilities, child care, child safety, corrections stipends, and public safety operating costs. Members spent much of the meeting debating how the across-the-board cuts would be implemented, which programs might be affected, and how fund sweeps from prior-year appropriations and special funds would work, including questions about universities, public safety, rural hospitals, transportation grants, the Corporation Commission, and health insurance costs for state employees and troopers. A major point of discussion was the impact on universities and higher education. Arizona Board of Regents representatives said the proposed reductions and fund sweeps would affect already obligated dollars, research, staffing, and student aid programs, and could force difficult decisions about programs such as the Promise Program, Teachers Academy, and other pass-through funds. Committee members also raised concerns about whether the cuts could lead to tuition increases or reductions in services, while majority members emphasized that agencies and the executive branch should decide how to absorb the reductions. Another major topic was health care and the state employee health plan: staff explained that the budget includes a $228 million general fund infusion to stabilize the plan, while a separate reconciliation bill would raise employee premiums over three years. Members also discussed whether the budget’s changes to AHCCCS/Access and hospital eligibility rules could increase costs for hospitals and reduce coverage. Public testimony largely opposed the budget. Speakers from Opportunity Arizona, the Arizona Board of Regents, and local governments argued that the proposal would shift costs onto working families, reduce support for education, housing, SNAP, health care, and rural infrastructure, and protect tax benefits for data centers and higher-income taxpayers. A mayor from Globe asked for state help after severe flooding damaged roads, water lines, and homes, while a motorcycle safety advocate asked the committee to review a DPS motorcycle safety fund appropriation. Committee members and staff repeatedly clarified that some items discussed were one-time appropriations not continued into FY 2027, that some fund sweeps were from unspent or unencumbered balances, and that the committee planned to take a mass roll-call vote on the budget bills at the end of the meeting.