Video & Transcript Research : 'fiscal analysis'

Page 14 of 500
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

GVO DEFER, GVO Public Hearings 02-05-2026

Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, we have next up, City and County of Honolulu, Budget and Fiscal Services. They are opposed.
  • Uh, we have next up, City and County of Honolulu, Budget and Fiscal Services. They are opposed.
Summary: The committee met for decision-making on measures heard earlier in the week and took up a series of government operations, procurement, public records, public meetings, and related bills. Several measures were deferred one week to February 12, 2026, including bills on state construction projects, government accountability, gubernatorial appointments, the legislature, public procurement, and a bill on Hawaiian lei sales, largely so the committee could compare similar measures, address concerns, or integrate related reports. The committee also deferred SB 2449 on public meetings for the year, citing concerns that the proposed business-day definition was overly prescriptive and unnecessary. The committee passed several bills with amendments. These included measures clarifying UIPA applicability to records created or maintained by agencies, with amendments changing “government function” to “agency function” and committee report language noting Attorney General concerns and exempting ERS for now; SB 2811 on state building projects with technical amendments and a delayed effective date; SB 2809 on budget-related reports; SB 2336 on trees, with a Senate draft and removal of “political subdivision”; SB 2308 on small purchase vendor compliance, setting the threshold at $5,000 and adding a delayed effective date; SB 2601 on procurement, reorganizing misdemeanor language and leaving funding/FTE issues to Ways and Means; SB 2219 on a capital visitor center working group; and SB 2849 on public meetings, with technical amendments and a delayed effective date. Bills on neighborhood board concerns and public notice were also adopted, with SB 2929 drawing testimony both for and against. Testimony was generally supportive on procurement and small business measures, especially SB 2928 establishing permanent small business procurement coordinator positions, which drew strong support from the State Procurement Office, DBEDT, the Chamber of Commerce, DOT, the Ethics Commission, and others. On public notice, the County of Maui supported allowing website posting, while another witness raised concerns about accessibility, centralized notice locations, and impacts on kūpuna and people with disabilities. On search and rescue, the committee heard support for creating a statewide coordination structure, along with discussion of where such an office should reside; the Attorney General raised constitutional and placement concerns, while witnesses suggested law enforcement, DLNR, or DoD as possible homes. The committee also heard support for a bill protecting home addresses of covered public servants and candidates, though the Public First Law Center urged broader coverage and a better fit with existing law.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

GVO Public Hearing 02-03-2026

Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • more um analysis on on our<00:18:29.840> part<00:18:30.160> but<00:18:30.400> I
  • <00:25:15.840> on preferences as well as an analysis on preferences as well as an analysis
  • <00:25:31.520> especially<00:25:31.840> when<00:25:32.480> the analysis especially
  • when the analysis especially when the governmental<00:25:33.600> uh<00:25:33.760> agency
  • <00:31:21.520> 2% analysis 2% analysis 2% four<00:31:23.520> six<00:31:23.919> eight
Summary: The committee heard several government operations measures, beginning with SB 2064 on state construction projects, which would create an office of the state architect within DAGS to oversee design review and approvals for state construction. DAGS said it stood on its written testimony, DECAB supported the bill, DOT supported it, and HGA opposed it. No audience testimony or member questions were taken, and the chair moved on. The committee then took up SB 2312 on government contracts, which would make records held by private contractors performing government functions subject to UIPA. The State Procurement Office, Attorney General, OIP, ERS, DHS, and HGA offered comments or opposition, while the League of Women Voters, Public First Law Center, All Hawaii News, Grassroots, and several individuals supported the bill. Public First Law Center argued the bill closes a loophole and does not expand or reduce existing exemptions, while OIP and others raised concerns about privacy, confidential information, and the need for clearer procedures. Members discussed possible clarifying amendments, including changing “government function” to “agency,” and the bill was left for further consideration. Other measures discussed included SB 2662 on government accountability, which would require justification and caps for external consultants; ERS and DOT opposed it, while the American Council of Engineering Companies of Hawaii and Airlines Committee of Hawaii argued consultants are often more efficient and necessary for major projects. The committee also heard SB 2744 on due process, for which no testimony was received; SB 2809 on budget-related reports, with comments from B&F and the Tax Foundation; SB 2862 on gubernatorial appointments, opposed by the Governor’s Office and the Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission and supported by one individual; a bill on continuous legislative sessions, with comments from B&F, LRB, and Hope for Hawaii; SB 2336 on tree management standards, supported by an individual and the Outdoor Circle; and SB 2075 on public procurement local preferences, which drew broad support with comments from SPO and the Attorney General and discussion of simplifying the preference structure. No votes were taken in the excerpt, and the chair repeatedly moved measures along after testimony and questions.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Mar 18th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I mean, that's, like I said, every transaction we work on has a public benefit analysis that compares
  • So it really just kind of depends on the public benefit analysis itself.
  • So before my testimony today, we were. kind of running some sample analysis in terms of the abatement
  • They'll tell you this is about fiscal responsibility. That is a lie. This is about control.
  • Although there is currently no fiscal note attached to this bill, members should raise. consideration
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Mar 10th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • There is no fiscal impact to this. This is simply adding that section.
  • So the fiscal impact may continue to grow as the program becomes more popular, but it's.
  • But we're still working on the fiscal impact.
  • Because if you read the fiscal note, we are still trying to get with.
  • So that fiscal note you see may not be the actual appropriated amount necessary for this year.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Mar 10th, 2026 at 09:00 am

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Apr 14th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • No revenue has been collected from the fees since fiscal year 2019.
  • It's a hard copy of just one of that analysis.
  • The fiscal notes on this bill state there are no fiscal impacts to local governmental entities.
  • So as a result, I would need to hire an additional staff member. which would impose an additional fiscal
  • Additionally, we'd be looking at substantial fiscal impact depending on the size of my investment portfolio
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • How long does it take to complete one of these audits after the fiscal year ends?
  • I looked specifically at where it says the fiscal impact that would be anticipated.
  • I would suggest that local governments will have significant implications. see fiscal implications up
  • So the fiscal impact... to our community would be absolutely devastating. Thank you.
  • I read the bill analysis; I did not...