Video & Transcript Research : 'electronic filing'

Page 142 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Transportation Apr 22nd, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Are you okay with us electronically? Okay, so you are registered on the bill, okay? Yes, sir.
  • Is it okay electronically? If we can move you over to be opposed to the bill. Can I do...
  • Current Texas law does not establish regulations for the storage and management of electronic records
  • File HB3331 mirrors the agreed upon language from SB1383 from the 85th Legislature relating to the vehicles
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Municipal and County Government (02/27/2025)

Municipal and County Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 200 was filed upon the request of a number of our constituents across the state.
  • <00:11:52.240> upon committee House Bill 200 was filed upon committee House Bill 200 was filed
  • reference in the bill that was filed to reference in the bill that was filed to 194c<00:17:44.000>
  • Representative Majority, I'm a... originally filed Bill and and adds uh originally filed Bill and and
  • It is true once a zoning amendment is filed by petition, that's due very early as well.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Ways and Means (04/15/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • This was via electronic means.
  • betting on horse racing via electronic betting on horse racing via electronic means<00:15:46.560
  • This was via electronic means. location. This was via electronic means.
  • Um, but it was based on my belief of the marketplace in the northeast. bill was filed.
  • So, it's it's a few bill was filed. So, it's it's a few months<02:21:31.520> old.
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The committee held a public hearing on SB 60, which would expressly authorize advanced deposit wagering for horse racing in New Hampshire and set the online tax rate at 1.25%, matching the existing rate for in-person horse betting at Seabrook and Belmont. Senator Tim Lang said the bill is intended to clarify that online horse betting is permitted, regulate the activity, and create a revenue stream while keeping the tax rate consistent with brick-and-mortar wagering. Members asked about the rate compared with other states, whether the bill was really about casino front money, and whether geofencing would apply; Lang and later witnesses said the bill is narrowly limited to parimutuel horse racing and would use geofencing to keep wagering within New Hampshire. Peter Bragdon, speaking for Churchill Downs, supported the bill and described advanced deposit wagering as remote betting on horse races under the Interstate Horse Racing Act of 1978. He said Churchill Downs and other operators have long been active in New Hampshire, but the state’s lack of a specific statute has created a gray area. Bragdon said Churchill Downs stopped its own New Hampshire online operations in 2022 after discussions with the Lottery Commission and attorney general, while competitors continued operating, and he framed the bill as a fairness and consumer-protection measure that would clarify the law going forward. He also said the bill would not affect historic horse racing machines and would not create cannibalization of charitable gaming. Lottery Director Charlie McIntyre said the Lottery Commission and attorney general had identified the issue as similar to the earlier fantasy sports situation, where legislation was used to regulate an activity rather than pursue enforcement. He said the commission requested the bill, would serve as the regulator, and would address violations through rulemaking and penalties. McIntyre said operators would maintain customer and transaction records, with the commission reviewing them as needed, and he noted that three operators are currently active in the state and not paying the proposed 1.25% rate. No vote was taken during the hearing.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

FL House Floor Session - 2026-03-04 (10:00AM Session)

Florida House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Just late file. Without objection, showed the late-filed amendment introduced.
  • Just late file. Without objection, showed the late-filed amendment introduced.
  • filed to a judge.
  • That's why I filed the bill.
  • Late-filed substitute amendment.
Summary: The Senate opened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, introductions, and a moment of silence honoring service members killed in the conflict in Iran, including Florida native Captain Cody Cork. The chamber then moved through a special order calendar, taking up several bills on education, public safety, insurance, health, and local government policy. Many measures were accompanied by sponsor explanations and supportive remarks from members, often emphasizing constituent impacts, public safety, and administrative efficiency. The first major bill, SB 1062 on speech and debate education, was expanded through a delete-all amendment and passed 37-0 after extensive floor debate praising debate programs as a civic and educational tool. SB 1072 created an anti-Semitism task force in the Attorney General’s Office; an amendment clarified that criticism of Israel is not prohibited, and the bill passed 37-0. SB 1230/HB 1019 addressed PFAS “forever chemicals,” especially in firefighting foam, with phase-outs, testing, enforcement, and exceptions for certain federal, military, and emergency uses; it also passed 37-0 and was dedicated in memory of former firefighter Joe Casello. SB 1706 expanded the My Safe Florida Condominium Pilot Program with tighter eligibility rules, and SB 186 required broader seizure-response training and seizure action plans in schools; both passed unanimously. The Senate also approved SB 598 updating funeral and cemetery regulation, SB 990 authorizing protected cell captive insurance companies, SB 554 modernizing nonprofit corporation law, SB 560 streamlining foster care medication and oversight procedures, SB 684 easing electronic signature requirements for total-loss vehicle and vessel titles, and SB 778 revising forensic client services for certain defendants with intellectual disabilities or autism. Several bills were temporarily postponed, including SB 432, SB 928, and SB 620. Most of these measures passed by votes of 36-0 or 37-0 after brief debate or no debate. The most contentious item was SB 1134 on official actions of local governments related to DEI. The sponsor argued the bill would stop taxpayer funding and promotion of discriminatory or indoctrinating DEI practices, citing examples from several counties and cities. Multiple amendments sought to narrow penalties, protect good-faith officials, and preserve local proclamations and observances, including LGBTQ Pride Month and other cultural events, but those amendments were rejected. Debate centered on vagueness, local discretion, and whether the bill would chill legitimate government activity. The transcript cuts off during questioning on the underlying bill, before final disposition is shown.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • section two, or I think it's section—yeah—it requires things to be made available in printed and electronic
  • <03:36:49.200> in<03:36:49.320> printed<03:36:49.760> and<03:36:49.920> electronic
  • available in printed and electronic available in printed and electronic formats.<03:36:50.840>
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee Jan 21st, 2026

Public Safety and Homeland Security

Transcript Highlights:
  • The sub that we brought originally with House Bill 33 that I filed, I had filed to repeal that entire
  • identification card for an additional fee of $15, which may be displayed through an Aaliyah-approved mobile electronic
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part I) Sep 3rd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And then once a complaint is filed, they have 15 more days to cure that.
  • In fact, a lawsuit was filed alleging that a man drugged his girlfriend.
  • Every session, 10, 20, 30 more anti-abortion bills get filed.
  • In fact, a bill was filed in the House.
  • So, a lawsuit was filed to require that these protections be reinstated. The U.S.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II) Sep 3rd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • So I went down the last week; nobody had filed. And I asked the city secretary...
  • Early, somebody's filed. She said nobody's filed. I said, "Well, what happens if nobody files?"
  • I said, "No, really, what happens if nobody files?" She said, "See that door over there?"
  • We had 29 co-authors in the Senate before I filed, but I wouldn't file until we had it in the Senate
  • We filed them, and we passed that thing.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Municipal and County Government (01/13/2025)

Municipal and County Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:41:56.520> cabinet<00:41:56.920> draw assigned a file cabinet draw assigned a file
  • When it came time for the election filings, we had two individuals file for one of the districts, District
  • <04:03:28.239> for filings we had two individuals file for filings we had two individuals
  • <04:22:29.479> that one representative that um filed that one representative that um filed
  • <04:22:34.159> against War II the gentleman that filed against War II the gentleman that filed
Keywords: 1189, house, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session 4/29/25 - Part 2

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate File 3045 and House File numbers 1837, 2098, 1290, and 2130.
  • Senate file number bill.
  • filed his claim. filed his claim.
  • of House File 2444. of House File 2444.
  • House File 2403.
Keywords: 1183, house
WA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Electronic table games will be regulated in a highly regulated manner to protect the integrity of the
  • And what is electronic gaming? What does that look like? What is that? So there's...
  • So that, like, there's an electronic box that deals the cards?
  • Some of the casinos that are operating electronic table games, just a few, are close relatives there:
  • And the last thing I will say is the electronic table games cannot Be a play against the machine.
Summary: The State Government and Tribal Relations Committee held a public hearing on July 10 at 8:30 a.m. on a proposed amendment to the Lummi Nation’s tribal-state gaming compact. Washington State Gambling Commission Director Tina Griffin and Tribal Relations Advisor Johnny Bray outlined the compact process under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and explained that the amendment had reached tentative agreement after negotiations with the Lummi Nation. Lummi Vice Chair Terence Adams and Councilperson Vindeen Washington described the amendment as the tribe’s sixth compact amendment and said it would expand gaming opportunities while supporting tribal governmental services, infrastructure, and jobs. The main changes discussed were authorization for electronic table games, extension of credit to customers, higher wagering limits, and the possibility of a second gaming facility. Committee members asked several questions about how credit limits would be set, how electronic table games work, whether online gaming was included, and how the systems would be tested and monitored. Witnesses said online gaming is not authorized by this amendment, that electronic table games must be certified by an independent lab and tested under state-tribal procedures, and that higher-limit tables could go up to $5,000 with no more than 25% of tables at those limits. Lummi representatives said credit policies would be developed responsibly after approval and that the tribe already uses strong internal controls. The Gambling Commission said seven tribes currently operate electronic table games and 13 tribes have adopted the limitations appendix related to credit and wager limits. The hearing was informational and part of the required public review before the commission’s later vote that morning on whether to forward the amendment to the governor or send it back for further negotiations. No vote was taken by the committee during this hearing, and the chair closed the meeting after thanking the presenters.
MD

Maryland 2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session, 4/8/2026 #2

Maryland Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • regarding the sale or transfer of a burial ground within 60 days of the case filing being served.
  • The second amendment conforms the bill to the House cross-file.
  • Here's the cross-file in memory of Melanie Diaz.
  • Excellent report on that cross-file.
  • . electronically. electronically.
Summary: The Senate reconvened with a quorum present and proceeded through a series of committee reports and floor actions, mostly on House bills. Several measures were advanced without opposition, often after brief floor explanations and unanimous adoption of committee amendments. Topics included behavioral health rate-setting modernization (HB 772), expedited Medicaid eligibility for relocated individuals with developmental disabilities (HB 1015), perinatal behavioral health screening and coverage (HB 1118), mammogram notices about breast arterial calcification (HB 1364), menopause provider training and coverage (HB 1365), cannabis licensing and training changes (HB 622), cemetery sale and transfer oversight (HB 892), travel services insurance requirements (HB 994), cash transaction rounding authorization (HB 1026), specie as legal tender (HB 1312), menstrual hygiene product ingredient labeling (HB 1357), health care quality reporting and a health centralization commission (HB 1372), special pediatric hospital transfer and review procedures (HB 1376), telehealth continuity of care for out-of-state counselors (HB 1483), and child placement protections for unlicensed settings and pediatric overstay patients (HB 1559). Most of these bills were ordered passed for third reading after the chamber adopted the committee amendments and favorable reports. The Senate also considered environmental and consumer-related measures. HB 146 would delay implementation dates for onsite wastewater system regulation and licensing requirements, while striking provisions on inspections and pumping for rental properties and sales. HB 254, a Department of Natural Resources bill, was described as facilitating community engagement in planning and development of departmental projects. HB 969 on retail electric vehicle fuel sales and charging equipment requirements was also taken up and reported favorably. In each of these cases, members noted no committee opposition and no fiscal impact, and the bills were advanced. Two bills were set aside rather than immediately acted on. HB 1037, concerning a Public Service Commission study on broadband and voice over internet protocol service, was special ordered until Friday at the request of a senator. HB 1312, the specie/legal tender bill, prompted questions about the definition of specie and was also special ordered for consideration the next morning. No roll-call votes were recorded in the excerpt; actions were taken by unanimous consent on amendments and committee reports, with multiple bills ordered to third reading.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Transportation - 02/19/25

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:00:58.079> 1361 bill Senate file 1361 bill Senate file 1361 which<00:01:00.199> we<
  • The filing fee is...
  • electronically now.
  • electronically now.
  • electronically now.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • We are on file item number seven, AB 998. Thank you. We are on file item number seven, AB 998.
  • Yeah, we go back to file item six. I'm going to go back to file item six.
  • File item 2, AB 362, File item 2, AB 362, due pass to Appropriations.
  • File item 6, AB 864. File item 6, AB 864, due pass to Appropriations. Bauer-Kahan, Castillo. Aye.
  • File Item No. 8, AB 1031, Bauer-Kahan. File Item No. 9, AB 1088, due pass. Kayhan.
Summary: The committee heard a series of environmental safety and toxic materials measures, with several bills moving forward on unanimous or near-unanimous votes to Appropriations. Early in the meeting, the consent calendar was approved, including AB 372, AB 455, AB 1096, AB 1102, and AB 754. AB 362 by Assembly Member Ramos, which would recognize tribal beneficial uses of water and strengthen consultation and protection for tribal water uses, drew strong support from tribes and environmental groups. Water agencies and local government representatives opposed unless amended, raising concerns about CEQA requirements, co-management language, and conflicts with existing water law. The bill advanced to Appropriations, with some members voting aye and others not voting or absent. AB 728 by Assembly Member Lee would require age verification for the sale of certain anti-aging skin care products to minors. The author and a youth witness described social media-driven use of adult skin products by children and alleged skin damage, while supporters argued age checks are a reasonable consumer protection. Dermatologists and retailers opposed the bill, saying it could restrict legitimate acne and other medical uses of over-the-counter products, create compliance problems, and lacked a clear scientific basis. The committee discussed possible ambiguity in the bill’s definition of anti-aging products, but the measure still passed to Appropriations. AB 532 on low-income water rate assistance, AB 773 on copper-based anti-fouling paint, AB 998 on household hazardous waste disposal of vape pens, AB 1031 on geothermal hazardous waste fees, and AB 864 on solar panel hazardous waste and recycling all received strong support and advanced to Appropriations. Supporters for AB 532 emphasized water affordability and local program authority; AB 773 supporters said conflicting state water and pesticide rules are creating confusion for harbors and cities; AB 998 was presented as a practical way to let schools and local facilities dispose of confiscated vape devices safely; AB 1031 was framed as reducing DTSC fee burdens on geothermal development in Imperial County; and AB 864 would ease recycling and reuse of end-of-life solar panels. The committee also began hearing AB 1264 on ultra-processed foods in school meals, with the author and supporters arguing it would phase out the most harmful ultra-processed foods from school meals by 2032, but the transcript cuts off before the full discussion and any action on that bill.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services (04/08/2025)

Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • are filing your claim.
  • <00:27:52.320> your wage uh for when you are filing your wage uh for when you are filing your
  • <00:31:16.159> comp for it, they're already filing comp for it, they're already filing comp
  • Uh, are using electronic time systems.
  • But, electronic bill, however it may be.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
MA
Transcript Highlights:
  • After acquiring the needed signatures and filing them with the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the measure
  • is filed with the Legislature.
  • Parties filed suit over Washington's top-two primary system.
  • We have thousands of bills that we file, which gives us, I believe, a better opportunity...
  • , I'll be honest, I don't take filing of bills to be a measure of efficacy.
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions held a public hearing on Initiative Petition 25-12, H.503, a proposal to implement all-party state primaries for Massachusetts state and federal elections. The committee opened with procedural remarks explaining Article 48 requirements and then heard first from two subject-matter experts. Professor Costas Panagopoulos of Northeastern University testified that top-two primary systems in other states have produced mixed results: they may modestly increase primary turnout in some cases, but the research does not show a reliable reduction in polarization, and such systems can weaken party gatekeeping, increase strategic behavior, raise campaign spending, and reduce general-election choice for voters whose preferred party is not on the ballot. Katie King of the National Conference of State Legislatures outlined the different primary models used nationwide, explained that Massachusetts currently uses an open-to-unaffiliated primary, and reviewed legal distinctions between blanket primaries and top-two systems; she noted that blanket primaries were struck down by the Supreme Court, while Washington’s top-two system was upheld because it narrows the field rather than nominating party candidates. She also said voter education and administrative preparation would be important if the system changed. The proponents’ panel, led by Danielle Allen of the Coalition for Healthy Democracy, argued that Massachusetts has chronically uncompetitive elections, low turnout, and too many uncontested races, and that all-party primaries would give every voter a meaningful choice in the first round and force candidates to appeal to a broader electorate. Allen said the proposal is designed specifically for Massachusetts and differs from other states by allowing party endorsements to appear on the ballot, which supporters said would preserve useful information while shifting control of the preliminary election from party insiders to voters. Jim Henderson, the coalition’s counsel, said the bill is narrowly tailored to state-level primaries and would amend Chapter 53 to put all voters on equal footing. Other supporters, including Kevin Johnson, Kate Kavanaugh, and Spencer Reynolds, emphasized that the reform could increase competition, reduce polarization, improve participation by independents and underrepresented voters, and create more accountability to the full electorate. Committee members pressed the witnesses on turnout, the practical effect of endorsements, whether the proposal would simply shift party influence to an earlier stage, and whether it could disadvantage minority-party or independent candidates. Senator Fattman repeatedly asked about evidence that turnout would materially increase, while Representative Peisch and others questioned whether requiring or seeking endorsements would create new barriers or pressure candidates to clear the field. Supporters responded that the system would modestly increase primary participation, that the general election would remain the decisive contest, and that endorsements would be optional and handled through party rules. No vote was taken at the hearing; the committee heard testimony and questions only.