Video & Transcript Research : 'fiscal analysis'

Page 13 of 500
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

EDU Public Hearing 03-18-2026

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • We did share with the board that we are committed to doing our enrollment analysis this fall, releasing
  • We started doing the<01:51:30.719> analysis<01:51:31.600> last<01:51:32.000> year
  • ><01:51:32.239> and<01:51:32.400> then<01:51:32.560> we the analysis last year and
  • then we the analysis last year and then we started<01:51:32.880> rolling<01:51:33.119> out
  • our enrollment analysis this fall, releasing<01:53:58.400> a<01:53:58.560> list<01:53:
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on County & Regional Government Apr 28th, 2025

S/C on County & Regional Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • It removes the annual audit mandate and requires audits at least every three years to provide fiscal
  • It's fiscal sense because it reduces litigation.
  • I'd like to ask for a detailed analysis on every single group's impact.
  • ESDs have the option to provide using existing revenues and have zero fiscal impact to the state.
  • This is really about being able to get better outcomes for the residents that are being served, more fiscal
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The committee's substitute eliminates the fiscal note for the bill.
  • staff have done a lot of work, and I'm pretty... ...appreciate all of that and working to reduce the fiscal
  • The original fiscal note was astronomical.
  • I know we all want enforcement, but we wanted that fiscal note down to zero, and I...
  • Again, we expect the fiscal note to be resolved, and I appreciate y'all's attention.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 8th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The fiscal note indicated that there would not be an impact to the state for this.
  • I do not show that we received any fiscal note for this.
  • Yeah, so the fiscal note is really—should be on the back, but I do have.
  • So for fiscal year 2026, you have $9,000, $26,204, for a total of $27,934.55.
  • We've passed bills that had fiscal notes in them.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations Revised Apr 22nd, 2026 at 03:30 pm

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair, what is the fiscal impact on this bill? Thank you for the question.
  • Currently, there's not a fiscal impact on this. The date originally was would have been.
  • So this way, it lines up with the federal fiscal year. So that that in itself would be key.
  • There is no fiscal impact to the state.
  • So there's no fiscal impact. All we're raising is the maximum credit for eligible caregivers.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative, to that same end, actuarial services are just one piece of the analysis, correct?
  • There is a medical impact, and then there's a cost analysis. Is that correct? That is correct.
  • So this is something we deal with every year with those fiscal reports.
  • I mean I've heard stories of fiscal impact even though I haven't experienced that myself.
  • You know, I say again, we deal With that on fiscal impacts coming from the agencies themselves, that
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Delivery of Government Efficiency Apr 16th, 2025

Delivery of Government Efficiency

Transcript Highlights:
  • I will note this is a zero fiscal note bill, so we are. actually creating something with no additional
  • I do a lot of reading, I do a lot of writing, I do a lot of analysis.
  • Is there a fiscal note on this, Representative? That I have in my.
  • the requester, so it's It almost says that something's wrong with the process because there is a. fiscal
  • And I think you make a good point about fiscal notes.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We are trying to work out the language and the fiscal note; there's some uncertainty about how it's going
  • , forensic science is an essential role in the criminal justice system, providing the scientific analysis
  • However, the profession faces a growing shortage of qualified professionals. forensic analysis, creating
  • Appropriations, taking money from the ESF, can be made from the fund during certain fiscal conditions
  • Senator Perry moves that the bill has a fiscal note. It can't go there. Okay. Senator Schwertner.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

GVO DEFER, GVO Public Hearings 02-05-2026

Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, we have next up, City and County of Honolulu, Budget and Fiscal Services. They are opposed.
  • Uh, we have next up, City and County of Honolulu, Budget and Fiscal Services. They are opposed.
Summary: The committee met for decision-making on measures heard earlier in the week and took up a series of government operations, procurement, public records, public meetings, and related bills. Several measures were deferred one week to February 12, 2026, including bills on state construction projects, government accountability, gubernatorial appointments, the legislature, public procurement, and a bill on Hawaiian lei sales, largely so the committee could compare similar measures, address concerns, or integrate related reports. The committee also deferred SB 2449 on public meetings for the year, citing concerns that the proposed business-day definition was overly prescriptive and unnecessary. The committee passed several bills with amendments. These included measures clarifying UIPA applicability to records created or maintained by agencies, with amendments changing “government function” to “agency function” and committee report language noting Attorney General concerns and exempting ERS for now; SB 2811 on state building projects with technical amendments and a delayed effective date; SB 2809 on budget-related reports; SB 2336 on trees, with a Senate draft and removal of “political subdivision”; SB 2308 on small purchase vendor compliance, setting the threshold at $5,000 and adding a delayed effective date; SB 2601 on procurement, reorganizing misdemeanor language and leaving funding/FTE issues to Ways and Means; SB 2219 on a capital visitor center working group; and SB 2849 on public meetings, with technical amendments and a delayed effective date. Bills on neighborhood board concerns and public notice were also adopted, with SB 2929 drawing testimony both for and against. Testimony was generally supportive on procurement and small business measures, especially SB 2928 establishing permanent small business procurement coordinator positions, which drew strong support from the State Procurement Office, DBEDT, the Chamber of Commerce, DOT, the Ethics Commission, and others. On public notice, the County of Maui supported allowing website posting, while another witness raised concerns about accessibility, centralized notice locations, and impacts on kūpuna and people with disabilities. On search and rescue, the committee heard support for creating a statewide coordination structure, along with discussion of where such an office should reside; the Attorney General raised constitutional and placement concerns, while witnesses suggested law enforcement, DLNR, or DoD as possible homes. The committee also heard support for a bill protecting home addresses of covered public servants and candidates, though the Public First Law Center urged broader coverage and a better fit with existing law.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

GVO Public Hearing 02-03-2026

Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • more um analysis on on our<00:18:29.840> part<00:18:30.160> but<00:18:30.400> I
  • <00:25:15.840> on preferences as well as an analysis on preferences as well as an analysis
  • <00:25:31.520> especially<00:25:31.840> when<00:25:32.480> the analysis especially
  • when the analysis especially when the governmental<00:25:33.600> uh<00:25:33.760> agency
  • <00:31:21.520> 2% analysis 2% analysis 2% four<00:31:23.520> six<00:31:23.919> eight
Summary: The committee heard several government operations measures, beginning with SB 2064 on state construction projects, which would create an office of the state architect within DAGS to oversee design review and approvals for state construction. DAGS said it stood on its written testimony, DECAB supported the bill, DOT supported it, and HGA opposed it. No audience testimony or member questions were taken, and the chair moved on. The committee then took up SB 2312 on government contracts, which would make records held by private contractors performing government functions subject to UIPA. The State Procurement Office, Attorney General, OIP, ERS, DHS, and HGA offered comments or opposition, while the League of Women Voters, Public First Law Center, All Hawaii News, Grassroots, and several individuals supported the bill. Public First Law Center argued the bill closes a loophole and does not expand or reduce existing exemptions, while OIP and others raised concerns about privacy, confidential information, and the need for clearer procedures. Members discussed possible clarifying amendments, including changing “government function” to “agency,” and the bill was left for further consideration. Other measures discussed included SB 2662 on government accountability, which would require justification and caps for external consultants; ERS and DOT opposed it, while the American Council of Engineering Companies of Hawaii and Airlines Committee of Hawaii argued consultants are often more efficient and necessary for major projects. The committee also heard SB 2744 on due process, for which no testimony was received; SB 2809 on budget-related reports, with comments from B&F and the Tax Foundation; SB 2862 on gubernatorial appointments, opposed by the Governor’s Office and the Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission and supported by one individual; a bill on continuous legislative sessions, with comments from B&F, LRB, and Hope for Hawaii; SB 2336 on tree management standards, supported by an individual and the Outdoor Circle; and SB 2075 on public procurement local preferences, which drew broad support with comments from SPO and the Attorney General and discussion of simplifying the preference structure. No votes were taken in the excerpt, and the chair repeatedly moved measures along after testimony and questions.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Mar 18th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • I mean, that's, like I said, every transaction we work on has a public benefit analysis that compares
  • So it really just kind of depends on the public benefit analysis itself.
  • So before my testimony today, we were. kind of running some sample analysis in terms of the abatement
  • They'll tell you this is about fiscal responsibility. That is a lie. This is about control.
  • Although there is currently no fiscal note attached to this bill, members should raise. consideration