Transcript Highlights:

• <00:26:19.760> Again,<00:26:20.159> we integrity of our operations.
• Again, we integrity of our operations.
• In April of 2025, our board of directors was chosen and I was voted president. Blount.
• It allows for the dissolution of single-family HOAs with no common elements by a 67% vote of owners.
• <00:48:07.920> this<00:48:08.160> offering to vote on set assessment. this offering

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee took up Senate File 1750, an HOA/common interest community reform bill, and first adopted the DE9 amendment after the chair moved it to put the bill in the form the author wanted. The bill was described by supporters as a consumer and homeowner protection measure intended to add transparency, dispute-resolution rights, conflict-of-interest rules, and limits on fees and late charges in Minnesota HOAs, which supporters said have grown rapidly and are not adequately covered by current law. Supporters, including legal aid, the Minnesota Home Ownership Center, and Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity, said the bill responds to longstanding complaints about HOA abuse, lack of transparency, escalating attorney fees, foreclosure-related problems, and management-company conflicts of interest. They argued the revised bill reflects extensive stakeholder work and would help homeowners resolve disputes without costly escalation while improving fairness and accountability. Opponents, including attorneys and representatives of HOA management interests, argued the bill is too rigid and one-size-fits-all, would raise costs for all homeowners, and could make associations harder to govern. They said fee caps, contract restrictions, procurement mandates, and dispute procedures would increase assessments, reduce flexibility, discourage board service, and create more legal and administrative burden, especially for smaller or financially strained communities. No final vote on the bill itself was taken in the portion provided; the bill was laid over for possible inclusion.

Transcript Highlights:

• I'll be voting.
• I would not have voted for him.
• Why didn't use vote for Scott the enter and you know, do you have an explanation related to that vote
• And if you give us the names of those who would like to vote on individually, our we will vote as a bloc
• Hell, yes. >> And by your vote, Mr.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Votes of the bill are reported favorably.
• The votes of the bill are reported favorably.
• The votes of the bill are reported favorably.
• Voting is hard. I go to these annual meetings.
• This bill provides for electronic voting and for those electronic votes to count as part of their core

Transcript Highlights:

• [music] >> Senator Jasinski. >> Senator Hley votes I. >> Senator Hley votes I.
• Senator Hley votes I. >> Senator Hley votes I. >> Senator Jazinski.
• Senator Hley votes<00:13:25.519> I. votes I. votes I.
• a All members having voted who desires a vote<00:13:36.240> the<00:13:36.399> secretary
• All members having voted who desires a vote, the secretary will close the roll.

Keywords: 918, senate, all

Summary: The Senate came to order, a quorum was established, and the chamber proceeded through routine business on the February 19, 2026 agenda. Several newly introduced Senate files were given first reading and referred to committees, including SF 3658 to Health and Human Services, SF 3665 to Judiciary and Public Safety, and SF 3687 to Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development. Senate resolutions 54 through 57 were referred to Rules and Administration. The body then adopted several resolutions. Senate Resolution 58, which updates the mileage resolution to add the chamber’s three newest members, passed 60-2. Senate Resolution 59, the annual postage resolution setting each member’s postal budget at $1,170 and additional amounts for the majority and minority leaders, was adopted 56-8. Senate Concurrent Resolution 6, setting session deadlines for March 27 and April 17, was also adopted after Senator Howe questioned why the first two deadlines were on the same date and Majority Leader Murphy said the schedule matched recent sessions to expedite work. The Senate also adopted a resolution honoring Helen Marjorie Spade Levy on her 104th birthday and recognizing her World War II service as a Rosie the Riveter and her long community involvement. The chamber then moved into tributes for the late Senator Bruce Anderson, with multiple senators describing his military service, faith, veteran advocacy, committee work, and personal kindness. Senators Lucero, Grunhagen, Howe, Pappas, Lang, Putnam, and others shared memories of his leadership and character, and the presiding officer noted that members could later sing in his honor after the remarks concluded.

Transcript Highlights:

• Vote for this amendment.
• Please vote yes on this amendment.
• If you cast your vote just a moment, you are voting for the most aggressive immigration package ever
• Clerk will unlock the Machine and members will proceed to vote. Have all members voted?
• Have all members voted? The clerk will lock the machine and announce the vote. 82 Yea, 32 Nay, Mr.

Transcript Highlights:

• Oh, are we ready to vote? I don't Okay. Oh, are we ready to vote?
• really vote for an interim study. really vote for an interim study.
• So I cannot vote for the amendment. going to vote for the amendment, but I'm going to vote for the amendment
• So I cannot vote for the amendment. So I cannot vote for the amendment.
• am really proud uh to vote for this. am really proud uh to vote for this.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Members, we will first vote on Committee Substitute 1191, followed by 1786.
• Members, now we will vote on...”
• “Members, now we will vote on Committee Substitute Senate Bill 1786.
• Before voting it out of committee.
• I vote aye; show the chair voting aye on Senate Bill 60.

Summary: The committee continued hearing testimony on Senate Bill 2252, which would expand early literacy and numeracy screening, parent notification, intervention supports, and teacher training, including math academies and early childhood supports. Supporters from Texas 2036, Good Reason Houston, Texas Business Leadership Council, and several parents argued that early identification of skill gaps, clearer data for families, and stronger teacher preparation would improve student outcomes, workforce readiness, and long-term earnings. They cited low math proficiency statewide, the importance of early intervention, and examples of districts using screeners and data dashboards to guide instruction and resource allocation. One witness also highlighted home visiting as a family-support model, while another urged more funding for pre-K partnerships and stronger support for parents with reading materials and guidance. A district special education administrator testified neutrally, saying the bill reflects practices already used in her district but expressing concern that it could reduce local control and teacher discretion by standardizing screening and tying it to funding. A Texas Classroom Teachers Association representative supported the intent but warned that mandatory math academies and intervention academies could burden teachers if implemented like prior reading academies, and a substitute teacher/teacher-of-the-year witness asked for clearer protections around special education information and pay for alternative certification candidates. After public testimony closed, SB 2252 was left pending. The committee then took up Senate Bill 2253, as substituted, which would phase out routine hiring of uncertified teachers over time, require parent notification when a teacher is uncertified, and expand high-quality preparation pathways such as university programs, residencies, improved alternative certification, and grow-your-own programs. Senator Creighton said the bill responds to the rise in uncertified teachers and aims to strengthen the teacher pipeline with more structured preparation, mentorship, and oversight by SBEC. Invited testimony strongly supported the measure: a Texas Tech researcher said uncertified teachers and fast-track programs are associated with significant learning losses, while year-long residencies and mentored pathways produce stronger outcomes and higher earnings for students. Leaders from Dallas College and Sam Houston State University described successful residency and grow-your-own models, high completion and retention rates, and the need for paid residencies and stipends so candidates can afford to enter the profession. Committee members asked about the difference between mentorship and residency, the cost-effectiveness of paid residencies, retention incentives, and how to scale the model statewide. The committee also adopted the substitute for SB 2253 and later paused to vote out several other bills, including SB 1191, SB 1786, SB 226, SB 326, SB 570, SB 870, SB 991, SB 60, SB 365, SB 1401, and SB 1067, all of which were reported favorably, many with unanimous votes and some placed on the local and uncontested calendar.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senate Bill 62 deals with voting and teaching children about the voting process and taking them in the
• We love the integrity of it.
• Vote no on Senate Bill 3 and support Smoot's bill.
• Voting in support of SB 3 will also mean voting to cost the state of Texas seven hundred and sixty four
• I urge you to vote no on SB 3.

Bills: SB3, SB810, SB965, SB1073, SB1119, SB1505, SB 3

Keywords: Texas Education Code, public schools, school district, open-enrollment charter school, teacher speech, employee speech, biological sex, pronouns, gender identity, retaliation, discipline, workplace protections, school personnel, education policy, LGBTQ, transgender, charter schools, SB 965, religious speech, prayer

Transcript Highlights:

• Any no votes? No votes? No. Sorry. No. No for reprice or any other no votes.
• Any no votes? No no vote for Rep. Alcos. Any other no votes? Recommendations adopted.
• Any no votes? No no vote for Rep. Alcos. Any other no votes? Recommendations adopted.
• Any no votes? No votes. No. No, Alcos. Any other no votes? Recommendations adopted. Okay.
• Any no votes? Gideon and Alcos. No votes. Any other no votes?

Bills: HCR93, HCR14, HR85

Keywords: image-based sexual abuse, working group, gender-based violence, Hawaii Commission on the Status of Women, prevention efforts, survivor protections, new technologies, legal reform, HCR14, House Concurrent Resolution, perpetual easement, non-exclusive easement, state submerged lands, submerged lands, shoreline easement, drainage outfall, stormwater outfall, lagoon outfall, pipelines, Kahala Hotel & Resort

Transcript Highlights:

• on the integrity of the poles? They do, yes.
• increase the loading on the pole, and the pole loading. is typically a factor in the structural integrity
• We're typically assessing the structural integrity of the pole. shipping away at it.
• If you see something bad, just carve a little bit out like a cancer. and weaken the structural integrity
• Do we have your vote? Permission to correct you have my permission.

Bills: HB 13, HB143, HB144, HB145, HB366, HB470, HB805, HB912, HB13, HB143, HB144, HB145

Keywords: emergency communication, infrastructure, first responders, grant program, interoperability, Texas Interoperability Council, local governments, HB 143, Texas Railroad Commission, Public Utility Commission of Texas, Natural Resources Code, oil and gas, well site, surface facility, electrical power line, National Electrical Code, NEC, electrical safety, utility disconnect, service disconnection

Transcript Highlights:

• chart that can also integrate with the DOD?
• I hate not being able to vote for that bill, but I voted against it because we promised out of this committee
• that we would fix it before it got a vote on the floor.
• We don't vote on ideas; we vote on words on paper. And those cost money. So yes, I'll stand up.
• in the House and a supermajority vote in the Senate.

Transcript Highlights:

• You notice I didn't vote against your bill, okay?
• I noticed you didn't vote against my bill a few minutes ago.
• And all I can say is I got one vote, give me two, give me two.
• I got one vote, got one vote, give me two. Got two votes. Come on, got two votes.
• Give me two votes. Give me three, give me three. Give me three. Got three votes over here.

Bills: HB316, HB549, HB646, HB752, HB824, HB873, HB1129, HB1157, HB1170

Keywords: literacy, adolescent, teacher education, high-dosage tutoring, reading intervention, workforce development, training programs, Bayou Growth Opportunity, funding, employment, skills gap, qualified employer, credential recognition, government growth limit, recurring revenue, state finance, Louisiana Income Tax Elimination Fund, fiscal responsibility, legislative sessions, regular sessions

Summary: The House Appropriations Committee met on April 22 and took up several bills, beginning with House Bill 646 and its companion House Bill 824 by Chairman Beaulieu. HB 646 proposed a constitutional amendment limiting the amount of State General Fund recurring money that may be appropriated in a fiscal year, and HB 824 set the growth limit formula based on CPI, medical CPI, and population change. Amendments were adopted on both bills, including creation of a Louisiana Income Tax Elimination Fund, and both bills were reported favorably as amended. The committee also advanced House Bill 1157, which creates the Louisiana State Infrastructure Fund to support infrastructure-related projects through a bank-like financing structure. After a technical amendment, the bill was reported favorably as amended. House Bill 316 on student literacy was presented as a continuation of prior literacy reforms, with the Department of Education stating it would not require new funding; it was reported favorably. House Bill 549 created the Bayou Growth Opportunity Workforce Program to help employers train and upskill workers, with supporters from business groups saying it would be industry-supported and modeled on a successful Michigan program; it was also reported favorably as amended. House Bill 1129, dealing with the sale of state-owned surplus movable property, drew support from Louisiana auctioneers who argued local firms should be allowed to bid on the state’s auction contract instead of relying on an out-of-state vendor. Members questioned whether the state could receive more revenue and expressed support for giving Louisiana companies a chance to compete. The bill was reported favorably. House Bill 873, which would add a $2 fee on driver’s license renewals to fund pursuit intervention technology and training for law enforcement, generated substantial concern about adding fees and whether the money should instead come from existing budgets. After discussion of the bill’s purpose, the technology involved, and the need for a sunset, the committee deferred the bill to work on revisions. Finally, House Bill 752, which would allow the timing and duration of regular legislative sessions to be set by joint rule, was reported without action after members noted the revised fiscal note showed a decrease in state general fund expenditures.

Transcript Highlights:

• Pretty good agenda today of four bills and then we're also be at the end of our agenda voting out a couple
• war vote.
• I got more votes. than Donald Trump on the ballot. 1,863,000 votes in the state of Texas.
• of the foreign Affairs Committee to vote for it.
• No nays, and none present on voting. The motion prevails.

Bills: HB39, HB227, HB930, HB 1078, HB39, HB227

Keywords: highway designation, veteran recognition, commemorative, transportation, Brazoria County, Texas National Guard, combat duty, military activation, state requirements, emergency response, active combat duty, military service, Congressional action, Governor responsibilities, Congressional declaration, state law, conflict, armed forces, congressional approval, war declaration

Transcript Highlights:

• All right, members, as we wait for more of the committee members to get here, we are going to vote on
• think the permitting requirement in House Bill 2608 aims to encourage greater coordination and integration
• effort, House Bill 2608 seeks to align with these priorities by facilitating the development of integrated
• utility’s ability to recover necessary costs while maintaining service quality and infrastructure integrity
• so, whatever that life cycle might be, it needs to be updated on a regular basis to make sure the integrity

Bills: HB29, HB685, HB1633, HB1689, HB1690, HB1918, HB2010, HB2500, HB2608, HB2626, HB29

Keywords: water audit, water loss, water loss mitigation plan, municipally owned utility, municipal utility, water conservation, Texas Water Development Board, TCEQ, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, water leakage, leak detection, billing data accuracy, utility validation, water audit validation, water scarcity, water management, infrastructure, public utility, conservation plan, administrative penalty

Transcript Highlights:

• >> Allen votes yes. >> Allen votes yes.
• for a no vote on this. for a no vote on this.
• Chair, I would ask for a no vote. Chair, I would ask for a no vote.
• ask folks to vote no. ask folks to vote no.
• the vote or just state it? the vote or just state it?

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee took up House File 4252 and first heard a walkthrough of a DE2 amendment that largely incorporated Office of Higher Education technical and statutory cleanup items, including reporting consolidations, updates to postsecondary registration and licensing statutes, and an anti-fraud provision. New provisions in the DE2 would require public postsecondary institutions to explain developmental courses before enrollment and obtain a written acknowledgement, revise the state grant tuition cap, add a $1.5 million ongoing appropriation in FY 2027 for an identity verification system to combat enrollment fraud, and provide $5,000 one-time funding for reforestation at Bemidji State University. Fiscal staff also noted additional special revenue fund revenue and expenditures tied to licensing and registration litigation response. The main debate centered on the A8 amendment offered by Representative Rarick, which would require the governor to appoint University of Minnesota regents only from candidates recommended by the joint legislative committee if the legislature fails to elect regents. Rarick argued the amendment was needed to address what he described as conflicts of interest and pay-to-play concerns in recent gubernatorial appointments. Several members questioned whether the language was constitutional, whether it actually addressed conflicts of interest, and whether it should instead refer to ARCAC-screened or ARCAC-recommended candidates. Nonpartisan staff said the governor’s appointment power is addressed in the university charter, not directly in the constitution, but could not definitively assess constitutionality if challenged. Members were divided: some supported the goal of cleaner governance but said the amendment was not ready or did not match the problem being described; others argued the legislature had failed to complete its own regent appointments and that the amendment was a response to that failure. No vote on the A8 amendment or the bill was reached in the portion provided, though a roll call was requested on the amendment and the chair indicated the bill would continue through amendment consideration before final discussion and vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senators, CS for Senate Bill 1694 requires technology-integrated post-secondary general education core
• And by your vote, CS for SB 1694 is reported favorably.
• You've heard each appointee, and we'll be taking an entire group vote, block vote, on this unless you
• Is there any senator who would like to be recorded on voting on...
• Is there any senator who would like to be recorded on voting on?

Bills: S1694

Keywords: technology education, digital literacy, artificial intelligence, computer science, high school graduation

Summary: The Appropriations Committee on Higher Education met with a quorum present and first took up CS for SB 1694, which would require technology-integrated postsecondary general education core courses to include digital literacy and competency instruction, including use of artificial intelligence tools, and encourage high school computer science courses with AI content to teach how AI systems use data, their benefits and limitations, and responsible use in academic and personal contexts. The bill drew support from several speakers who emphasized the need for students to understand AI’s capabilities, limitations, ethics, and risks, while one speaker raised concerns about overreliance on AI and the loss of skills. Senator Davis said the bill was a good step toward preparing the future workforce and suggested earlier instruction might be worth considering later. The bill was reported favorably, and Senator Leek asked to be recorded in the affirmative. The committee then heard a long series of confirmation presentations for trustees at multiple Florida colleges and universities, including Tallahassee State College, USF, UNF, Palm Beach State College, the College of the Florida Keys, Hillsborough College, Miami-Dade College, Florida A&M University, Florida Gulf Coast University, Florida International University, New College of Florida, Florida Polytechnic University, and the University of Florida. The appointees generally emphasized student success, workforce alignment, fiscal responsibility, access and affordability, and institutional growth; several members and senators offered supportive comments, with some asking about specific issues such as Tallahassee State’s NCLEX passage rates and the need for continued improvement. One appointee’s attendance was delayed or skipped for later consideration, but the committee ultimately took a block vote and reported the confirmations favorably to the Ethics and Elections Committee. Finally, Chair Harrell gave a brief overview of the higher education budget, describing a total of $11.9 billion and highlighting increases for workforce education, Florida College System operating funds, workforce development capitalization, the Rural Incentive for Professional Educators program, the USF Center for Nursing, preeminent research universities, UCF’s community school grant program, UF’s Lassinger Center on Learning, the Florida Center for Autism and Neurodevelopment, and campus security through a postsecondary guardian program. Senator Davis asked about a transfer related to the workforce development capitalization and incentive grant fund, and the chair explained it was a transfer of an existing program with new funds being added. There was no public comment on the budget, and the meeting adjourned after Senator Leek requested to be recorded in the affirmative on SB 1694.

Transcript Highlights:

• I thank you very much for your time, and I urge you to vote no.
• So unfortunately, I am a no vote today. Representative Franson. Thank you, Madam Chair.
• Can we proceed with the voice vote, or should we go to a roll call? Voice vote is fine. I'm sorry.
• Voice vote is fine unless people want a roll call. We can roll it.
• Just do a voice vote. Okay, I will proceed to the voice vote. All those in favor say aye. Aye.

Transcript Highlights:

• Votes will be taken in the following order. favoring a vote by the ys and nays will favoring a vote by
• The first electronic vote will be conducted as a 15-minute vote.
• A recorded vote is requested. Those favoring a recorded vote will rise.
• Have all members voted? Does any member wish to change their vote?
• Recorded vote.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Tuesday, March 25, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Come back to be able to vote before the committee happens very often at the end as you roll call vote
• We urge you to vote YES. Yes on AB 65 today. Thank you. Thank you.
• Chair for the amendments and we respectfully ask for the aye vote. Thank you.
• We ask for your aye vote.
• Alvarez 7-0 Okay, we will hold it up until 3.50 to add on any more votes.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The clerk votes >> Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The clerk votes I. I. I.
• Chairman, by a vote of 13 in the affirmative, zero in the negative, three not voting, House Bill 1485
• count on that on that vote? count on that on that vote?
• The clerk votes >> Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The clerk votes I. I. I.
• <02:27:08.000> I three not voting. Hold on a second. I three not voting.

Keywords: 1189, house, all