Video & Transcript Research : 'fiscal note'

Page 12 of 500
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - Senate Public Safety

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • Will the Secretary please call the roll, or note the roll? Just note it.
  • Chairman, Chief, my last question is this: was this, this last fiscal year, the first fiscal year that
  • He noted that the county covers 6,300 square miles with only 99 sworn officers.
  • A number of what the last fiscal year expenditures were for this activity? Mr.
  • So there's one thing I think that we need to note in pension reform.
Summary: The committee first approved its February 4 minutes and announced several bills would be held, including SB 1317, SB 1416, SB 1419, SB 1490, and SB 1493. It then heard SB 1579, which would appropriate about $4.7 million from the state general fund to expand a law enforcement data-sharing pilot through the Department of Administration, with funds for DPS, county sheriffs, university police, and city/town police departments. Testimony from the sponsor, Flagstaff’s mayor, Eloy’s police chief, and Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office staff emphasized faster records access, better coordination, and officer safety; an amendment added $125,900 for the Scottsdale Police Department after it had been omitted. The committee adopted the amendment and gave SB 1579 a do pass recommendation by a 6-0 vote with one not voting. The committee next considered SB 1581, which appropriates about $1.4 million from the Peace Officer Training Equipment Fund for pepperball equipment and about $1.316 million for public safety training simulators, with an amendment increasing the Nogales Police Department’s pepperball allocation and expanding simulator funding so Yavapai County could buy two simulators with a three-year warranty. Supporters from Navajo County, Phoenix, Glendale, Flagstaff, and Cochise County described pepperball as a de-escalation tool and simulators as important for crisis-response and use-of-force training. The committee adopted the amendment and passed SB 1581 as amended on a 7-0 vote. SB 1673 was heard next and would appropriate $8.2 million from the general fund to the Law Enforcement Crime Victim Notification Fund, exempting the appropriation from lapsing. The sponsor and law enforcement witnesses said the automated notification system has improved victim communication, reduced workload, and sent millions of updates; committee members asked about funding sources and why a bill is needed for a constitutionally mandated program. The committee approved SB 1673 without amendment on a 7-0 vote. The committee also heard SB 1544, which would make adult probation records public on request, while requiring redaction or withholding of sensitive information such as victim data, minors’ information, medical or counseling records, active investigations, and confidential informants, and creating a process for written denials and court appeals. The sponsor said the bill is intended to increase transparency and data access, while witnesses raised concerns about risk-assessment language and confidential information; the sponsor said amendments would be brought later to clarify those provisions. The committee passed SB 1544 on a 4-3 vote. Finally, SB 1376, creating a civic leadership development special plate and fund for a youth mentoring nonprofit, passed unanimously, and SB 1550, a three-year Queen Creek pilot program to prevent runaway youth exploitation and improve investigations, also passed after testimony from Queen Creek officials and police; one senator voted no, citing concerns about how runaway youth are treated in other legislation. The committee then began hearing SB 1504, a pension bill modifying retirement dates and COLA timing for Tier 2 and Tier 3 public safety personnel, with supporters arguing it would improve recruitment and retention and opponents warning it would create significant unfunded liabilities, but the transcript cuts off before final action on that bill.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Appropriations and Finance Feb 9th, 2026 at 06:36 pm

House Appropriations & Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • On a personal note, I grew up here in Santa Fe and was fortunate...
  • On a personal note, I grew up here in Santa Fe and was fortunate enough to attend some of the programs
  • And so our questions are much more fiscal in nature, particularly in the amendments that we’ll see are
  • going to be, for the most part, fiscal in nature.
  • Our amendments will be focused on the fiscal side of it. Excellent, thank you. Great question.
Bills: HB63, HB64, HB184, HB200, HB47, HB48, HB2, HB9
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Apr 30th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • So as you noted in your comments, um, we have the last few years we have had challenges, especially taking
  • So strictly Ecot perspective, we look at from the transmission side, most of the congestion noted is
  • I would also, uh, note that the federal authorities have considered this as well.
  • It is important to note that this bill only exempts residential addresses from disclosure.
  • Uh, I note that this has a great, this bill also has a fantastic provision in it.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 30th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • As noted in your comments, we have had challenges in the last few years, especially regarding outages
  • I would also note that the federal authorities have considered this as well, when FERC ordered 19-20,
  • It is important to note that this bill only exempts residential addresses from disclosure.
  • I note that this bill also has a fantastic provision in it, because other states have tried this on other
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Ways & Means Apr 14th, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • They even highlighted its sensible policy design and minimal state fiscal impact.
  • On a fiscal note, it seems very out of whack. You're not giving them vehicles.
  • I would be surprised if this fiscal note is accurate.
  • I'll note there's no one who has registered to testify.
  • I express my strong support for House Bill 2370, fiscal responsibility.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Local Government (Part II) Mar 24th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • On a personal note, I am one of those small business owners as well.
  • On a personal note, I am one of those small business owners as well. Texas economy.
  • On a personal note, I am one of those small business owners as well.
  • Let me leave you with this final thought for those taxing units that like to claim fiscal responsibility
  • akin to owning a house and having a $2,000-a-month mortgage, and the mortgage company says they're fiscally
Summary: The Senate Local Government Committee heard several bills by Senator Bettencourt focused on property tax and local government accountability. SB 32 would provide about $700 million in business tax relief by raising the business personal property exemption from $2,500 to $25,000 and continuing a 20% franchise tax credit for inventory taxes paid. Witnesses from NFIB, the Texas Retailers Association, and Texas Realtors supported the bill, saying business personal property and inventory taxes are burdensome and especially hard on small businesses. After no opposition testimony, SB 32 was left pending. The committee also heard SB 1453, which would change how interest and sinking tax rates are calculated by using only the minimum debt service required under bond schedules, while still allowing a higher rate with a 60% governing body vote and a public explanation. A witness from the Texas Taxpayers and Research Association supported the bill as a way to keep debt rates from rising as property values increase and to preserve tax relief. The bill was left pending after testimony. SB 1883 would tighten rules on local impact fees by requiring 60 days of public availability for capital improvement plans and land use assumptions, raising the approval threshold for adopting impact fees from a simple majority to two-thirds, limiting how often fees can be increased, and expanding notice requirements. Builders and developers testified in support, arguing that impact fees are often poorly reviewed, lack accountability, and are passed on to homebuyers, worsening housing affordability. Committee members discussed adding audit provisions and questioned the lack of city testimony. The bill was left pending with subcommittee action. SB 1452 would require a voter election to decide whether a municipal management district continues to exist, with dissolution if voters reject it; supporters said it would add accountability, while others noted some districts provide essential services and infrastructure. The committee heard testimony from district representatives and builders, then left SB 1452 pending before recessing.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Local Government (Part I) Mar 24th, 2025

Local Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's important to note that moratoriums are rather draconious measures, and when you stop the development
  • Just as a note, in 2019 this election cost us about $9460 whereas in 2022 the cost went up to $81,500
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Mariah basically runs the fiscal division for the statehouse. And also, as a bonus, he is the.
  • And I guess, she also ran the fiscal division while she was here too.
  • will pass and so I know you are one of those like me who's very concerned about taxpayer dollars and fiscal
  • I know that we're not appropriating funds right now, but in the fiscal analysis on the bill summary,
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • I would like to note that with these amendments, NDE would be able to remove their fiscal note entirely
  • No fiscal note is always a good thing.
  • DCFS fiscal note, that liability has been increasing.
  • bill, has removed its fiscal note.
  • Regarding the fiscal impact, there was a fiscal note from the Division of Public and Behavioral Health
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation Education Committee Mar 4th, 2026

Finance and Taxation Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • What is the fiscal note on this?" "1.5 million? If I'm not mistaken, Senator..."
  • Its cost is 1.9 million and thereafter for a full fiscal year is 2.6 million.
  • year is 2.6 thereafter for a full fiscal year is 2.6 million.<00:24:44.480> If<00:24:44.640><
  • I want to ask what is the fiscal note on this? >> Yes, sir.
  • I want to ask what is the fiscal note on this? >> Yes, sir.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Chamber Meeting Jan 30th, 2026 at 12:05 pm

New Mexico House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • So just something to note. Thank you. Thank you, gentlelady.
  • year 27, increasing to $76 million by fiscal year 30.
  • state is about as fiscally irresponsible as we could possibly...
  • Out of that $1.5 billion, how long is that note?
  • Members, take note. Gentlelady from Bernalillo. Mr.
Bills: HM3, HM11, HM14, HM15, HM21, HM25, HB9, SB2, SB19
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • And so, I don't see how this doesn't have a fiscal impact and That's the nature of my question.
  • I'm looking really quickly to see what the fiscal impact will be.
  • So they feel like that that is already in place, and there as there's no fiscal impact.
  • What's the anticipated fiscal impact on this? Thank you for the question, Madam Elect.
  • There is no anticipated fiscal impact.
OK
OK