Transcript Highlights:

• Test, test, test. This next is going to be a test. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Yeah.
• One more thing: we provided 1.5 million to an emergency fund to test for avian flu in case that decides
• Half of which goes to testing workers in the supply chain as we work through to eventually getting those

Transcript Highlights:

• Extending the required age for booster use and implementing straightforward testing can significantly
• Endorsed by the Strategic Highway Safety Plan Occupant Protection Committee, the five-step test was designed
• to continue to sit in the rear seat in a child passenger safety seat unless they meet the five-step test
• ; and to require children starting at the age of 13 to meet the five-step test before being allowed to
• Starting at the age of 13, children must meet the five-step test before being allowed to sit in the front

Summary: The Assembly Appropriations Committee met on May 7, 2025, considering a large number of bills, with several measures heard in detail before the committee moved through consent and suspense items. Early in the hearing, AB 876 by Assemblymember Flora was heard on CRNA scope of practice and anesthesia access. Supporters said it would clarify that certified registered nurse anesthetists may provide anesthesia services independently, while opponents from physician and medical groups argued that anesthesiologists and CRNAs are not interchangeable and that physician-led care is needed for patient safety. The bill was ultimately voted out, with a later vote change recorded for Mr. Tangipa from not voting to aye. The committee also heard AB 379, a major human trafficking and child exploitation bill, which would expand penalties for solicitation of a minor, create a misdemeanor for loitering with intent to purchase commercial sex, increase fines on businesses that fail to post trafficking notices or knowingly allow trafficking, create a survivor support grant program, and establish a vertical prosecution grant program. The bill drew strong support from the author and some members who emphasized tougher enforcement and victim services, but also significant opposition from sex worker and civil liberties advocates who argued the bill would worsen criminalization, disproportionately harm Black and Brown communities, and fail to address housing and other root causes. After extensive discussion, the committee voted the bill out, with one member later changing from not voting to aye. Other bills heard included AB 435 on child passenger safety, which would adopt a five-step test and update booster-seat and front-seat rules; AB 1415, which would give the Office of Health Care Affordability more access to information from health systems and private equity-related entities; AB 539, the Timely Care Act, which would extend the duration of approved prior authorizations for treatment; AB 1466, relating to groundwater adjudication and sustainability disputes; AB 127, which would tie the cap-and-trade price ceiling to the social cost of carbon; and AB 672, which would require public employers to notify PERB of certain court actions and allow intervention to protect labor rights. The committee also approved a large consent calendar and then deemed the suspense calendar approved, sending many bills onward. The hearing concluded with several bills reported out, some on call, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's just that their blight test is more land-use oriented.
• land use their blight test is more land use oriented.<00:04:50.560> Um oriented.
• Nord. test. test.
• <00:34:31.720> And how meaningful the but for test is.
• And how meaningful the but for test is.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• of whether or not to devolve the authority to review or change that test back to the Public Utilities
• back to the public change that test back to the public utilities<00:22:11.520> commission<00:
• , which the department agrees with, where there is in that test it's a dollar-for-dollar—you have for
• But, um, so yes, on the Grant C test, that's the dollar-for-dollar requirement.
• But, um, so yes, on the Granite State test, that's the dollar-for-dollar requirement.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• They've taken an IQ test. We can go ahead and say this is what this person might be.
• Test. Not conjecture. That data that's IoT this later time.
• On fentanyl testing by Senator Polsky there.
• year in testing.
• aligns with their standards resources as opposed to the type of follow-up testing.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, just wanted to put out on the public record that having initial license requirements for testing
• requirements for testing to earn an<00:44:20.640> initial<00:44:21.040> license<00:44:
• <00:44:56.560> is more time to pass those tests is more time to pass those tests is appreciated
• It may be passing that K-Perry test that was mentioned earlier, and so with the Cox Campus training,
• It may be passing that K-Perry test that was mentioned earlier, and so with the Cox Campus training,

Bills: HB0023, HB0024, HB0025

Keywords: extracurricular activities, public school participation, enrollment, Wyoming, student access, charter schools, application process, authorizers, public hearing, community support, scholarship, education, eligibility, continuous enrollment, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• In fact, internal testing—you see that there's about 67,000 internal tests that are done.
• In fact, internal testing—you see that there's about 67,000 internal tests that are done.
• In fact, internal testing—you see that there's about 67,000 internal tests that are done.
• In fact, internal testing—you see that there's about 67,000 internal tests that are done.
• And that actually took about 67,000 individual little tests, another 2,500 tests making sure things are

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• educational material costs college educational material costs college application<00:32:57.080> test
• test costs educational therapies<00:32:59.440> for<00:32:59.679> students<00:33:00.080
• <00:43:50.040> prep connectivity or or uh uh SAT test prep connectivity or or uh uh SAT test
• When it's, when they're from, uh, wealthier families, they have high test scores.
• show um results in schools you know test show um results in schools you know test scores<03:58:25.479

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee opened a public hearing on HB 402, a bill dealing with whether Education Freedom Account (EFA) payments should be described in state law as not constituting taxable income. The bill sponsor argued that the current statute is misleading because New Hampshire should not imply a federal tax result, and said the bill would remove that language and could also be amended to clarify that families should consult tax advisors. He emphasized that the measure was not intended to impose a state tax on EFAs, but to avoid giving inaccurate advice about possible federal tax liability. Testimony was divided. A retired representative and a tax preparer both opposed the bill, saying EFA payments are already treated consistently with IRS rules and that the bill would create confusion, administrative burden, and possible tax consequences for low- and moderate-income families. They argued the bill is a solution in search of a problem and warned that requiring 1099s could add costs for the scholarship organization and recipients. A tax attorney supported the bill’s repeal of the state language, saying New Hampshire should not put tax advice into statute and that the current wording is inaccurate because federal law, not state law, controls taxability. He cited IRS Section 117 and Publication 970, explaining that only some scholarship-like payments are tax-free and that many EFA-eligible expenses may not qualify for federal exemption. Members asked questions about what would be misleading, whether the bill was trying to tax EFAs, and the cost of issuing 1099s. The sponsor and witnesses repeatedly said the bill was not a state tax on voucher payments, but a clarification about federal tax treatment. No vote or final committee action was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• And now the Governor is proposing to fully reinstate the asset test limit to where it was prior to 2022
• And now the Governor is proposing to fully reinstate the asset test limit to where it was prior to 2022
• to fully estimate the number of individuals who will lose access to IHSS as a result of the asset test
• We strongly oppose the reduction of the asset test, and as a point of personal privilege, this proposal
• CBHA opposes the proposal to reinstate the Medi-Cal asset test limit.

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Human Services held a hearing on the Governor’s May Revision, with no votes taken. The first major topic was child care and early education, where the Department of Social Services and Department of Finance outlined proposed changes to absorb federal Child Care and Development Fund and Proposition 64 revenue reductions, shift some funding between child care programs, end funding for prospective pay implementation now that the federal requirement has been rescinded, adjust the alternative payment administration structure, and fund child care infrastructure grants and a Low-Income Investment Fund contract closeout. The Legislative Analyst’s Office said the budget makes progress on the structural deficit but recommended maintaining the administration’s solution level, making reserve deposits, and avoiding new ongoing commitments; it also raised concerns about shifting reductions to the California Alternative Payment Program and about the proposed administrative-rate change. Committee members strongly criticized the proposed loss of child care slots and said they would oppose eliminating those slots, while also expressing support for child care as essential infrastructure. The committee then reviewed California State Preschool Program proposals. Finance and CDE described reductions to the preschool COLA from 2.41% to 2.01%, removal of prospective pay funding, and increases for the QRIS block grant, audit support, and rate reform implementation. Trailer bill language would codify age-based rate categories, inclusion-rate documentation, family fee collection rules, portability, and excused absences. CDE supported the QRIS increase and some attendance and family-fee changes, but warned that aligning three- and four-year-old rates could reduce support for three-year-olds and that the budget does not fully cover enrollment growth. Members also questioned whether the preschool and child care slot reductions should be reallocated rather than terminated, and the administration said the reductions were intended to reflect current utilization and avoid harm to currently enrolled families. The hearing then moved to CalFresh and nutrition programs. CDSS said the May Revision includes a one-time CalFood augmentation, funding to cover federal SNAP administrative cost-share pressures, and additional staffing and technical assistance to implement HR 1 changes, including the able-bodied adults without dependents time limit and new non-citizen eligibility rules. The department estimated HR 1 could cut CalFresh funding by $2.3 billion to $3.7 billion annually and affect about 500,000 people, with roughly 806,000 adults potentially subject to the time limit and about 34,000 non-citizens expected to lose eligibility once fully implemented. Members pressed for stronger harm mitigation, including a $98 million backfill to protect families from losing food benefits, and raised concerns about county workload and the “chilling effect” on immigrant participation. The final portion of the transcript began the IHSS presentation, noting a revised budget of $33.7 billion total funds and $12.8 billion General Fund, with proposed reductions tied to Medi-Cal asset-limit changes and other federal conformity items.

Transcript Highlights:

• Her test scores are now up.
• Her test scores are now up.
• There is no testing for admissions.
• Louisiana can compare apples to apples without forcing one test on every school.
• Without forcing one test on every school. And it's been fascinating.

Summary: The committee met for public testimony on the Finance budget, with the main discussion focused first on funding for disability services and then on the LA GATOR scholarship program. Several individuals testified in support of fully funding Families Helping Families and Louisiana Rehabilitation Services (LRS), describing how advocacy, transition services, and direct support workers help people with disabilities access education, employment, and independent living. Witnesses urged the committee to preserve or increase state general funds to draw down federal matching dollars, and provider groups said current reimbursement rates and staffing shortages are leaving agencies in deficit, creating waitlists, overtime costs, and difficulty retaining workers. Committee members thanked the speakers and noted that the testimony would be used to compare the governor’s, House, and remaining budget requests. The committee then heard extensive testimony in support of increasing funding for the LA GATOR scholarship program. Supporters included policy groups, school leaders, parents, and students who argued that the program expands educational choice, helps low-income and special-needs students find schools that fit their needs, and should be fully funded at the level of demonstrated demand. Speakers from Catholic and Christian schools said GATOR funding had helped students thrive academically and spiritually, but that shortfalls left many eligible students without awards, hurt kindergarten enrollment, and forced schools to raise private donations to cover gaps. Several witnesses emphasized that the program is not a zero-sum attack on public schools, but a way to let education dollars follow students. A few committee questions focused on the fiscal impact and on whether choice programs improve outcomes without harming public schools. Testimony cited enrollment growth, parent demand, and data from other states to argue that school choice can improve student and parent outcomes and may also strengthen traditional public schools through competition. No votes or formal actions were taken during the public testimony portion of the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• So it's just giving and publishing the testing and what it is.
• It requires the school systems to post. on the testing the school system.
• of what the testing is doing.
• So it's just giving it and publishing the testing and what it is.
• Provides relative to blood pressure testing in schools, requiring testing in accordance with the American

Bills: HR244, HR245, HR246, HR247, HR248, HR249, HR250, HR251, HCR101, HCR102, HR223, HR224, HR225, HR226, HR227, HR229, HR230, HR231, HR232, HR234, HR235, HR236, HR237, HR238, HR239, HR240, HR241, HR242, HR243, HCR94, HCR95, HCR96, HCR97, HCR98, HCR99, HCR100, SCR31, SCR33, SCR35, SCR37, SCR56, SCR57, SB171, SB251, SB252, SB353, SB367, SB433, SB461, HR170, HR191, HR206, HR207, HR208, HR217, HCR11, HCR53, HCR60, HCR66, HCR68, HB66, HB153, HB165, HB326, HB387, HB454, HB455, HB484, HB513, HB603, HB660, HB719, HB762, HB766, HB793, HB802, HB816, HB833, HB940, HB947, HB950, HB975, HB1028, HB1039, HB1051, HB1053, HB1080, HB1201, HB1215, HB1228, HB1251, HB1252, SCR2, SB26, SB28, SB29, SB30, SB41, SB44, SB64, SB84, SB87, SB93, SB98, SB107, SB118, SB142, SB192, SB195, SB199, SB219, SB222, SB234, SB241, SB255, SB275, SB277, SB292, SB294, SB306, SB314, SB482, SB233, SB326, HR171, HCR49, HCR65, HCR72, HR37, HCR64, SCR19, SCR3, SCR6, SCR18, SCR11, SCR22, HB64, HB68, HB92, HB130, HB258, HB633, HB801, HB89, HB341, HB451, HB456, HB579, HB595, HB621, HB818, HB841, HB1064, HB1101, HB1191, SB47, SB82, SB106, SB206, SB210, SB248, SB305, SB376, SB397, SB441, SB2, SB19, SB24, SB50, SB70, SB96, SB101, SB103, SB104, SB114, SB122, SB159, SB160, SB173, SB180, SB182, SB260, SB412, SB418, SB424, SB442, SB460, SB476, SB1, SB23, SB32, SB42, SB43, SB46, SB51, SB110, SB113, SB150, SB154, SB161, SB218, SB220, SB221, SB253, SB289, SB310, SB351, SB399, SB404, SB502, HCR32, HB955, HB284, HB617, HB730, HB926, HB1125, HB1194, HB1203, HB798, HB998, HB1084, HB1223, HB646, HB824, HB901, HB79, HR20, HR74, HB59, HB306, HB366, HB393, HB458, HB577, HB582, HB605, HB614, HB682, HB733, HB752, HB773, HB911, HB996, HB1035, HB1069, HB1113, HB1140, HB1180, HB1234, HB1240, SB89, SB68, SB149

Keywords: disclosure, local law, public notice, legislative transparency, Artists at the Capitol Day, art education, Louisiana Art Education Association, recognition, community engagement, House Resolution 247, HR247, Laura Lewis, birthday commendation, 104th birthday, centenarian, longevity, St. James Parish, Louisiana House of Representatives, Mount Calvary Baptist Church, ceremonial resolution

Transcript Highlights:

• We actually, it is totally untreated, although we pass it through all the tests and systems, but we've
• It's not tested. Um, it's put in stations, stores that, you know, my 14 year old kid can go get.
• There's no testing. There's no regulation, and there's no overs.
• My question is about the testing labs, those are essential to the whole process.
• He set up these testing labs. Um, so now we're having a better vetting process.

Transcript Highlights:

• They have more test...
• They have more test...
• parents have to pay for genetic testing parents have to pay for genetic testing or<01:15:49.159>
• Could the high school league use these tests when evaluating a girl's eligibility?
• They would be subject to a test of some kind.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• $175 per meter per annual uh testing $175 per meter per annual uh testing that's<00:01:46.799>
• We are currently already testing through our agents.
• fact we are currently already testing fact we are currently already testing through<00:07:08.639
• <00:07:12.400> ourselves Staffing to do all the testing ourselves Staffing to do all the testing
• and New York who are doing testing and New York who are doing testing currently<00:10:15.000>

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It also included language that allowed three screening tests for newborns, which you'll hear about later
• This bill, SB87, started out with those three newborn screening tests included, but two of them were
• Blood spots, pulse oximetry, hearing checks—simple tests a rookie nurse could do.
• However, all further medical evaluation and care for the infant, including urinalysis, blood glucose testing
• child does not give their consent, parents do not have access to their medical records, including test

Bills: SB87, HB491, SB43, SB101

Keywords: midwifery, licensed midwives, State Board of Midwifery, licensure fees, professional liability insurance, complaints investigation, emergency care plan, out-of-hospital care, HB491, public schools, K-12, school nutrition, school lunch, cafeteria, artificial dyes, food additives, food coloring, synthetic dyes, Red Dye No. 3, Red Dye No. 40

Transcript Highlights:

• My test IC test ike test check one too Chairman's I test one too Est ing testing Rules committee will
• Public schools have testing requirements, so is that an accurate gauge of whether or not we're seeing
• Would you support eliminating those testing requirements in public schools?

Bills: HB1675, HB3242, HB1739, HB3320, HB3047, HB4434, HJR1089, HB4432, HB3718, HB3705

Keywords: emergency management, severe weather, youth camp, summer camp, overnight camp, day camp, outdoor education, adventure camp, wilderness program, campground safety, tornado preparedness, flooding, flash flood, high winds, hail, lightning, extreme heat, extreme cold, wildfire smoke, evacuation plan

Transcript Highlights:

• Now, if you went through the AB 5 test, you wouldn't probably qualify as an independent contractor by
• that test.
• Now, if you went through the AB5 test, you wouldn't probably qualify.
• Now, if you went through the AB5 test, you wouldn't probably qualify as an independent contractor by
• that test.

Summary: The Assembly Insurance Committee met as a subcommittee and heard several bills focused on insurance transparency, wildfire mitigation, market access, and workforce issues. AB 75 would require insurers to give homeowners 30 days’ notice before collecting aerial images of their property and allow homeowners to review those images; supporters said it would improve privacy and prevent inaccurate non-renewals, while consumer and industry groups both sought amendments. AB 234 would add the Assembly Speaker and Senate President pro Tem, or designees, as non-voting members on the California FAIR Plan governing committee; the Department of Insurance supported it as an oversight measure, while Consumer Federation of California said it was only a small first step toward broader transparency reforms. AB 428 would let water corporations join joint powers authorities for pooled insurance, with supporters citing rising insurance costs for small water systems and no remaining opposition after amendments. AB 943 would streamline producer pre-licensing education by removing the 20-hour per-line requirement while keeping ethics training; industry sponsors said it would reduce barriers to entry, while consumer advocates warned it could lower professional standards. AB 1209 would create a pathway for cannabis employers to secure workers’ compensation coverage and related services through a state-coordinated network; supporters said it would help bring the industry into compliance, while one member raised concerns about creating a special carveout for a federally restricted industry. AB 1 would require periodic review of the state’s Safer from Wildfire regulations every five years, and it drew broad support from the department, insurers, local governments, and industry groups as a way to keep wildfire mitigation incentives current. The committee also took up a consent calendar including AB 69, AB 487, and AB 570, all of which were sent to Appropriations. The committee approved AB 75 to Privacy and Consumer Protection, AB 234 to the Assembly Floor, AB 428 to Local Government, AB 943 to Appropriations, AB 1209 to Business and Professions, and AB 1 to Appropriations. Most measures passed on strong or unanimous votes after members added coauthor requests and expressed support for the bills’ consumer protection, transparency, or wildfire-related goals.

Transcript Highlights:

• Scope hasn't moved forward, but education, training, and testing have.
• The National Board of Examiners in Optometry has had injectables on their test requirements since 2013
• And what I heard about the training here is you said something about that injectables are on a test.
• So graduates coming from optometry school for the last 11 years Have been trained and tested as they
• long time, but when we have had it in the past, The board has stipulated additional training and testing

Transcript Highlights:

• Chairman, the consensus revenue forecast and our consultants do a lot of work in terms of stress testing
• Chairman, this is, as I mentioned, the stress testing that we do.
• Chairman, and thank you to all three of you on the stress test.
• I want to ask you about the stress test. We've obviously entered a new administration. We are the.
• First, has that been factored into our stress testing? Yeah. Mr.

Transcript Highlights:

• So under this bill, only new animal testing is impacted.
• Testing cosmetics on animals is inhumane and also unnecessary.
• There is strong public support to end cosmetic animal testing.
• A 2019 poll showed 79% of Americans support a law to ban such testing.
• So far, 12 states have banned animal testing.

Keywords: 1182, all